Enformasyon Toplumunun Ekonomi Politiği

II. Dünya Savaşı’ndan sonra, yeni iletişim ve enformasyon teknolojileri ile bunlarabağlı olarak enformasyon üretiminde önemli bir artış olmuştur. Daniel Bell, David Harveyve Manuel Castells gibi toplumbilimciler, 1970’lerden itibaren bilgiye dayalı yeni birenformasyon toplumunun bu gelişmeler sonucunda ortaya çıktığını iddia etmişlerdir.Bu bağlamda bu makalede, eleştirel ekonomi politik yaklaşımla enformasyon toplumukavramsallaştırması nitel/tarihsel bir yaklaşımla incelenmiştir. Buna göre, enformasyonteknolojileri ve bunların içerikleri özel sektör tarafından onun ihtiyaçları ve amaçlarıdoğrultusunda gerçekleştirilmiştir. Teknoloji ve içeriğin mülkiyet yapısı özel sektöründenetimindedir ve bunlar, toplumun bilgi ihtiyacını karşılamak amacıyla değil, kapitalistpazar mekanizması çerçevesinde emtia formunda üretilir. Kullanıcıların bunlara erişimive kullanımı da yine onların gelir düzeyine bağlıdır. Mevcut dünya sistemi bağlamındaenformasyon teknolojileri ve bunların içerikleri gelişmiş ülkelerle az gelişmiş ülkelerarasındaki ekonomik ve kültürel bağımlılığı ve dijital bölünmeyi daha da artırmıştır. Yenienformasyon teknolojileri ve bunların içerikleri hem sistemin enformasyonel altyapısı hemde bu alanda üretilen yeni emtialar açısından küresel kapitalizmin temel bileşenlerindendir.

The Political Economy of Information Society

After World War II, there has been a significant increase in information production due to new communication and information technologies and their contents. Sociologists such as Daniel Bell, David Harvey and Manuel Castells have argued that since the 1970’s a new “information society”, based on knowledge has emerged as a result of these developments. In this context, in this article, the conceptualization of the information society has been examined with a qualitative/historical approach using critical political economy. Accordingly, the information technologies (hardwares) and their contents (softwares) have been carried out by the private sector in accordance with their needs and objectives. The ownership structure of technology and the content are under the supervision of the private sector and they are produced in the form of commodities within the framework of the capitalist market mechanism, not to meet the needs of information of the society. Users’ access to information technologies and their contents also depends on their level of income. In the context of the present World system, information technologies and their contents have further increased economic and cultural dependency and the digital divide between developed and less developed countries. New information technologies and their contents are main components of global capitalism in terms of both the information infrastructure of the system end the new commodities which are produced in this area.

___

  • Alampay, Ervin A. (2006). “Beyond Access to ICTS: Measuring Capabilities in the Information Society”, International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology. 2 (3), s. 4-13.
  • Atkinson, Robert (2004). “The New Knowledge Economy”, Issues in Science and Technology. 20 (3), s. 93-95.
  • Bagdikian, Ben H. (2000). The Media Monopoly, 6th Edition. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Barker, Chris (1999). Television, Globalization, and Cultural Identities, Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Bell, Daniel (1973). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society, New York: Basic Books.
  • Bettig, R. V. (1997). “The Enclosure of Cyberspace”, Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 14, s. 138-157.
  • Castells, Manuel (2001). The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Bussiness, and Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Castells, Manuel (1998). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Volume: III. End of Millennium, Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Castells, Manuel (1996). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture .Volume:I. The Rise of Network Society, Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Cate, Fred, H. (1997). Privacy in the Information Age, Washington D.C.: Brooking Institution Press.
  • Chandra, Rajesh (1992). Industrialization, and Development in the Third World, London: Routledge.
  • Chomsky, Noam (2001). Sömürgecilikten Küreselleşmeye, M. Erdem Sakınç (çev.), Ankara: Ütopya.
  • Crafton, Christine (2002). “Making a Difference Globally- How the Internet and Other Forms of Information Technology are Transforming Global Economics and Politics”, World and I, 17. (1), s. 38.
  • Curran, James (1999). “Kitle İletişimi Araştırmasında Yeni Revizyonizm: Bir Yeniden Değerlendirme Çabası”, Medya, İktidar, İdeoloji (içinde), Mehmet Küçük (der.), Ankara: Ark, s.397-435.
  • Dawson, Michael ve Foster, John Bellamy (1996). “Virtual Capitalism: The Political Economy of the Information Highway”, Monthly Review. 48 (3), s. 40-48.
  • Fagin, Barry S. (2002). “Intellectual Freedom and Social Responsibility: As We Grow More Dependent on the Internet, We Grow More Vulnerable”, World and I, 17(3), s.38.
  • Farmer, Brian (2007). “A World of Opportunity: Although Some World Economic Changes Have Negatively Affected American Workers, the United States is Uniquely Positioned to Thrive in the Global Economy”, The New American, 23(13),s.12-14.
  • Golding, Peter (1998).“Worldwide Wedge: Division and Contradiction in the Global Information Infrastructure”, D. Thussu (der.), Electronic Empires, London: Arnold. s. 135-148
  • Golding, Peter (1998a). “Global Village or Cultural Pillage? The Unequal Inheritance of the Communications Revolution”, R. W. McChesney, E. M. Wood and J. B. Foster (der.), Capitalism and the Information Age: The Political Economy of the Global Communications Revolution, New York: Monthly Review Press. s. 69-86.
  • Harvey, David (1989). The Condition of Postmodernity, New York: Basic Books.
  • Joel, Smith (1995). Understanding the Media: A Sociology of Mass Communication, New Jersey: Hampton Press Inc.
  • Lane, Neal (1999). “Understanding the Digital Economy”, Presidents & Prime Ministers. 8(3), s.34.
  • Langmia, Kehbuma (2006). “The Role of ICT in the Economic Development of Africa,: The Case of South Africa”, International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology. 2(4), s. 144-151.
  • Lerner, Daniel (1958). The Passing of Traditional Society, Illinois: Free Press.
  • Leye, Veva (2009). “Information and Communication Technologies for Development: A Critical Perspective”, Global Governance, 15(1), s.S29-32.
  • Marcuse, Peter (2001). “Küreselleşmenin Dili”, Ali Tartanoğlu (çev.), Mülkiye, XXV (229), s. 201-206.
  • McChesney, Robert W. (1999). Rich Democracy, Poor Democracy: Communication Politics in Dubious Times, Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
  • McChesney, Robert W. (1997). Corporate Media and the Threat to Democracy, New York: Seven Stories Press.
  • Mosco, Vincent (1996). The Political Economy of Communication: Rethinking and Renewal, London: Sage.
  • Murdock, Graham (1999). “İletişim, Modernlik ve İnsan Bilimleri”, Mehmet Küçük (der.), Medya, İktidar ve İdeoloji, Ankara: Ark, s. 437-455.
  • O’Rouke, Kevin (2008). “The Politics of Globalization: Lessons From History”, The International Economy, 22(3), s. 36-39.
  • O’Shaughnessy, Michael ve Stadler, Jane (2008). Media & Society, 4th Edition, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Shapiro, Andrew L. (1999). “The Internet”. Foreign Policy, Summer, s. 14-19.
  • Schiller, Dan (1999). Digital Capitalism: Networking the Global Market System, Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Schiller, Herbert I. (1996). Information Inequality, New York: Routledge.
  • Schiller, Herbert I. (1995). “Information and Advanced Capitalism”. Frank Webster (der.) Theories of the Information Society, London: Routledge, s. 74-100
  • Schiller, Herbert I. (1991). Culture Inc: The Corporate Takeover of Public Expression, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Schiller, Herbert I. (1981). Whose New International Economic and Information Order? Who Knows: Information in the Age of The Future 500, Norwood: Ablex.
  • Schiller, Herbert I. (1973). The Mind Managers, Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Seymour, Richard (2004). “Access All Areas: If Knowledge is Power the Internet Has Placed an Invaluable Too in Our Hands, However, Like All Forms of Power Its Use is Open to Abuse”, The Middle East, 348, s.46-47.
  • Sklair, L. (2002). Globalization: Capitalism and its Alternatives, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Underwood, William (2002). “Embracing Cyberspace - the Evolution of Japan’s Internet Culture”. World and I, 17(6), s. 265.
  • Valcanis, Tom (2011). “An iPhone in Every Hand: Media Ecology, Communication Structures and the Global Village”, A Review of General Semantics, 68(1), s.33-40.
  • Wade, Robert Hunter (2002).”Bridging the Digital Divide: New Route to Development or New Form of Dependency”. Global Governance. 8 (4), s.443-456.
  • Wasko, Janet (1989). “ What’s So ‘New’ About the ‘New’ Technologies in Hollywood? An Example of the Study of Political Economy of Communications”. Brenda Dervin. Lawrance Grossberg, Barbara J. O’Keefe, ve Ellen Wartella (der.), Rethinking Communication: Volume Exemplars. London: Sage Publications, s.474-485.
  • Webster, Frank (2002). Theories of the Information Society, 2nd Edition. London: Routledge.
  • Williams, Raymond (2001). “Teknoloji ve Toplum”, Doğu-Batı, 4(15). MayısHaziran-Temmuz, s. 227-238.