Orta öğretim öğrencilerinin kimyada problem çözme basamaklarının kullanımı ile ilgili düşünceleri

Problem Çözme, zaman zaman oldukça güç bir süreç olmasına rağmen, problem çözme basamaklarının kullanılması, problemlerin daha kolay çözülmesini sağlayabilir. Bu çalışmada, Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin kimya derslerinde problem çözerken kullandıkları problem çözme basamakları ve problem çözme sırasında karşılaştıkları güçlükler incelenmiştir. Bu amaçla, Balıkesir ilinde yer alan 5 farklı Ortaöğretim kurumundan, 10. ve 11. Sınıf öğrencilerine (N=184) bir anket hazırlanarak uygulanmıştır. Çalışmada, öğrencilerin problem çözme sırasında, problemi anlama ve doğruluğunu kontrol etme basamaklarını kullanmadıkları sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

High school students' thought about the use of the stages of problem solving in chemistry

Although Problem solving can be a very difficult process; when problem solving stages are used, the problems can be solved much more easily. In this study, high school students’ problem solving stages used in solving problems in chemistry courses and their problem solving difficulties faced have been examined. For this purpose, a questionnaire was prepared and applied to 10th and 11th grades high school students (N=184) from 5 high schools in Balıkesir. It was concluded that students do not use understanding problem and controlling stages during the problem solving.

PDF

___

Gorodetsky, M., “Misconceptualiation of the chemical equilibrium concept as revealed by different evaluation methods”, Eur. J. Sci. Educ., (1986), 8, 427.
Nakhleh, M.B., “Are our students conceptual thinkers or algorithmic to problem solvers? Identifying conceptual students in general chemistry”, Journal of Chemical Education, (1993), 70, 52.
Sawrey, B.S., “Concept learning versus problem solving: revisited”, Journal of Chemical Education, (1990), 67, 253.
Pickering, M., “Further studies on concept learning versus problem solving”, Journal of Chemical Education,, (1990), 67, 254.
Lythcott, J., “Problem solving and requisite knowledge of chemistry”, Journal of Chemical Education, (1990), 67, 248.
Nurrenbern, S.C., Pickering, M., “Concept learning versus problem solving: Is there a difference?”, Journal of Chemical Education, (1987), 64, 508.
Nakhleh, M.B., Mitchell, R.C., “Concept learning versus problem solving. There is a difference”, Journal of Chemical Education, (1993), 70, 190.
Middlecamp, C. and Kean, E., “Generic and harder problems: teaching problem solving”, Journal of Chemical Education, (1987), 64, 516.
Frank, D.V., Baker, A., Herron, D., “Should students always use algorithms to solve problems?”, Journal of Chemical Education, (1987), 64, 514.
Herron, J.D., Greenbowe, T.J., “ What can we do about Sue: A case study of competence”, Journal of Chemical Education, (1986), 63, 528.
Wellington, J., Secondary science: Contemporary issues and practical approaches, Routledge, London, (1994), p.218.
12. http://www.math.utah.edu/~alfeld/math/polya.html
Bodner, G.M. ve McMillen, T.L.B., “Cognitive restructuring as an early stage in problem solving”, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, (1986), 23, 727.
Arenofsky, J., “Developing your problem-solving skills”, Career World, (2001), 29, 18.
Harren, J.D., The chemistry classroom, New York, (1996), p.63.
Nakiboğlu, C; Kalın, Ş. Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin kimya derslerinde problem çözme güçlükleri-I: Deneyimli Kimya Öğretmenlerine Göre, Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 11 (2), 305-316, 2003.