Implementation of Innovation Management Systems in Large Companies of Different Typologies

Purpose – While established companies try to renew themselves and upgrade to innovation organizations through the implementation of innovation management systems, academic literature is scarce regarding how they actually do it and if different approaches are required in different firm typologies. The purpose of this paper is to fill this research gap by presenting a 10- step innovation management system that is proposed by the InoSuit project, and compare the actual implementation processes of this roadmap in large and mature organizations of different typologies. Design/methodology/approach – This paper employs an inductive action research approach which uses qualitative methods of data collection to produce a form of grounded theory that does not test formal research hypotheses but guides subsequent interventions in the organizations. Authors of this paper, as mentors and researchers, spent at least half a day every week for eleven months between October, 2017 and September 2018 in the focal companies, and did several individual interviews and groups meetings in an iterative process of planning, acting and observing of the processes and consequences of establishing an appropriate innovation management system in two large organizations. Findings – The results demonstrate that while the IMS roadmap proposed by the InoSuit project is a useful starting point, how it is actually being implemented is driven by company typology where bureaucrats run this system in a slow, cautious and centralized manner where action steps are planned in advance, incremental ideas are selected, and innovation projects are funded and implemented internally. Dynamic movers, on the other hand, implement the system much faster and in a decentralized way where employees at every level are empowered to make decisions in an iterative manner. Radical ideas are welcomed as well as incremental ideas and external cooperation is searched for both in funding and implementing the innovation projects. Discussion – Implementing an IMS is a complex task with company specific requirements. It was observed that different approaches were required in different companies. The paper discusses the observed implementation methods, associated enablers and challenges in a comparative manner and suggests direction for future research.

PDF

___

Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. 1988. Innovation in large and small firms: an empirical analysis. The American Economic Review, 678-690.

Ahmed, P. K. 1998. Culture and climate for innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 1(1), 30-43.

Albors-Garrisos, J., Ignacio, J. & Peiro, A. 2018. Innovation management techniques and tools: Its impact on firm innovation performance, International Journal of Innovation Management, 22(6):1-31

Argyris, C., & Schon, D. 1991. Participatory action research and action science compared, in W.F. Whyte (ed.), Participatory Action Research, pp. 85-96., Sage-London.

Bear, D. J. 2006. The quest for innovation: a global study of innovation management, 2006-2016. American Management Association.

Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G., & Mol, M. J. 2008. Management innovation. Academy of Management Review, 33(4): 825-845.

Bower, J. L., & Christensen, C. M. 1995. Disruptive technologies: catching the wave. Harvard Business Review 73(1): 43–53.

Cassell, C., Watkins, K. 1999. Action research: Explaining the diversity, Human Relations, 59 (6): 783-814.

CEN 2013. CEN/TC 389 Innovation Management, Part 1: Innovation Management System. Technical Specification (TS) of the European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Nr. CEN/TS, 16555-1:2013.

Chao, R. O., & Kavadias, S. 2008. A theoretical framework for managing the new product development portfolio: When and how to use strategic buckets. Management Science, 54(5): 907-921.

Christensen, C. M. 2013. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Reprint Edition. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Review Press.

Conforto, E. C., Salum, F., Amaral, D. C., da Silva, S. L., & de Almeida, L. F. M. 2014. Can agile project management be adopted by industries other than software development? Project Management Journal, 45(3): 21-34.

Cooper R. G. 1990. Stage-gate systems: a new tool for managing new products. Business Horizons, 33(3): 44-54.

Cooper, R. G. 2008. Perspective: The stage‐gate® idea‐to‐launch process—update, what's new, and nexgen systems. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(3): 213-232.

Cooper, R. G. 2011. “Perspective: The innovation dilemma: how to innovate when the market is mature” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(1): 2-27.

Dickens, L., Watkins, K. 1999. Action research: Rethinking Lewin, Management Learning, 30(2): 127-140.

Eden, C., Huxman, C. 1996. “Action research for management research” British Journal of Management, 7:75-86.

Ekmekci, U., & Pasin, M. 2016. InoSuit Project. Report of the methodology workshop of InoSuit. İstanbul: TİM.

FTSE Russell 2017. Industry Classification Benchmark: Structural enhancements to the industry categorization framework. Gudmundson, D., Tower, C. B., & Hartman, E. A. 2003. Innovation in small businesses: Culture and ownership structure do matter. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 8(1): 1-17.

Gunasekaran, A. 1999. Agile manufacturing: a framework for research and development. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1-2): 87-105.

Hansen M. T., & Birkinshaw, J. 2007. The Innovation Value Chain. Harvard Business Review, 85(6): 121-130.

Humphrey, J., & Schmitz, H. 2002. How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters? Regional Studies, 36(9): 1017-1027.

Ionescu, M. A., & Bratosin, Ş. 2009. Desirable typologies of organizational culture in quality management implementation. Communicational findings. Management & Marketing, 4(3):77-84.

Jacobides, M. G., Knudsen, T., & Augier, M. 2006. Benefiting from innovation: Value creation, value appropriation and the role of industry architectures. Research Policy, 35(8): 1200-1221.

Johnson, S. 2010. Where Good Ideas Come From: The natural history of innovation. New York, NY: Riverhead Books.

Karlsson, M. 2013. Who needs a standard for innovation management? Towards a management system standard (MSS) for innovation. Helsinki, Germany: XXIV ISPIM (International Society for Professional Innovation Management) Conference.

Kearny A. T. 2017. Innovation – A.T. Kearney. The IMP³rove. European Innovation Management Academy.

Koen, P. A. 2007. The fuzzy front end for incremental, platform and breakthrough products. The PDMA Handbook of New Product Development, 2nd Edition, Chapter 6: 81-91. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.

Koshy, E., Koshy, V., Waterman, H. 2020. Action research in healthcare. Sage-London.

Kurt, O. E., Ucler, C., & Vayvay, O. 2017. From ideation towards innovation: pillars of front-end in new product development. Press Academia Procedia, 5: 71-79.

Lewin, 1946. Action research and minority problems, Journal of Social Issues, 143-153.

Mandić, V. 2014. Methodology for innovation management. WBCInno project, EU Tempus Programme. Kragujevac, Serbia: Inter Print, University of Kragujevac.

McDermott, CM & O’Connor, GC. 2002. Managing radical innovation: An overview of emergent strategy issues. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(6): 424-438.

Morris, L. 2011. The innovation master plan: the CEO’s guide to innovation. Walnut Creek, CA, USA: Innovation Academy.

Nieto, M. J., & Santamaría, L. 2010. Technological collaboration: Bridging the innovation gap between small and large firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(1): 44-69.

Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. 2000. SECI, Ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 33: 5-34.

Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. 2010. Business Model Generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons.

Phaal, R., Farrukh, C. J., & Probert, D. R. 2004. Technology road mapping—a planning framework for evolution and revolution. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71(1): 5-26.

Pieterse, A. N., Van Knippenberg, D., Schippers, M., & Stam, D. 2010. Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior: the moderating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4): 609-623.

Sawhney, M., Wolcott, R. C. & Arroniz, I. 2006. The 12 different ways for companies to innovate. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(3): 75.

Stamm, B. v. 2003. The innovation wave: meeting the corporate challenge. England: Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Teece, D. J. 1996. Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 31(2): 193-224.

Thomke, S., & Reinertsen, D. 1998. Agile product development: Managing development flexibility in uncertain environments. California Management Review, 41(1): 8-30.

TIM 2016. Türkiye İnovasyon Stratejisi 2023: İhracat Odaklı İnovasyon ile Rekabet Gücünü Arttırmak. İstanbul: TİM.

TIM 2017. InoSuit – Innovation Focused Mentoring Project. tim.org.tr/tr/inosuit-inosuit-inovasyon-odaklimentorluk- projesi.html.

Tsekouras G., Meier C., Sutkus A., & Wolf, A. 2014. The smE-MPOWER business innovation roadmap methodology: A methodological approach for establishing in a participative way a roadmap for business innovation in SMEs. Technical Results Paper, smE-MPOWER Project of the EU (ETIS-CT-2005- 023401).

Ucler, C. 2017. Intelligent assignment in clusters to enhance collaboration and innovation. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 28(5): 554-576.

Ucler, C., & Adiloglu-Yalcinkaya, L. 2018. Innovation management system: what is and how to establish it? A Critical Review of Social Sciences: Theory and Practice. ISBN 978-9-3810-4328-8.

UND 2018. TİM İnoSuit - İnovasyon Odaklı Mentorluk Programı. https://www.und.org.tr/tr/20905/tim-inosuit--- inovasyon-odakli-mentorluk-programi

ÜSİMP 2017. İnovasyon Karnesi. Üniversite Sanayi İşbirliği Merkezleri Platformu, çevrimci inovasyon değerlendirme anketi. https://usimpinovasyonkarnesi.com.tr/.

Vaccaro, IG, Jansen, JJ., Van Den Bosch and Volberda, HW. 2012. Management innovation and leadership: The moderating role of organizational size, Journal of Management Studies, 49(1): 28-51.

Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. 1998. Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1): 108-119.

White, M. A., & Bruton, G. D. 2010. The Management of Technology and Innovation: A Strategic Approach. 2nd Edition. Mason, OH, USA: Cengage Learning.