Balkanlardaki Geçiş Ekonomilerinde Dış Ticarete Açıklık ve Massetme Kapasitesi İlişkisi

Bir ülkenin ihracat ve ithalat değerlerinin, o ülkenin Gayrisafi Yurtiçi Hâsılası’na oranı olarak ifade edilen dış ticarete açıklık ölçüsü aynı zamanda küreselleşme göstergesi olarak da kabul edilmektedir. Massetme kapasitesi ise ülkelerin yabancı kaynaklı finansal akımlardan ne ölçüde faydalanabileceğini ifade eden, o ülkedeki kurumsal ve altyapısal kaliteyi de içeren bir gelişmişlik seviyesi göstergesi olarak kabul edilmektedir. Bu çalışmada massetme kapasitesinin, dış ticarete açıklık göstergesi üzerindeki etkileri incelenmektedir. Yöntem – Küreselleşmenin doğal bir sonucu olarak, dış ticarete açıklık birçok ülkede artış gösterme eğilimindedir. Geçiş Ekonomileri olarak tanımlanan eski Sovyet Blok’u ülkeleri de bu konuda istisna değildirler. Güney-Doğu Avrupa’da bulunan Balkan Geçiş Ekonomileri, Rusya hinterlandından uzak olmaları ve henüz Avrupa Birliği üyeliği süreçlerini tamamlamamış olmaları bakımından diğer eski Sovyet ülkelerinden ayrışmakta ve bu yönleriyle bu çalışmaya konu olmaktadırlar. Çalışmaya konu olan model panel veri analizi ile ele alınmış olup, regresyon analizi uygulanmıştır. Bulgular –Analiz sonuçlarına göre massetme kapasitelerinin o ülkelerde dış ticarete açıklığı olumlu anlamda etkilediği ekonometrik olarak ortaya konulmuştur. Ayrıca, uygulanan diğer çeşitli ekonometrik testler ile verilerin ve modelin güvenilirliği test edilerek onaylanmıştır. Tartışma – Böylelikle, henüz geçiş süreçlerini tamamlamamış Balkan Geçiş Ekonomileri için massetme kapasitelerinin önemi ortaya çıkmış ve massetme kapasitesi artırıcı politikalar izlemenin gereği vurgulanmıştır.

The Relationship Between Openness to Foreign Trade and Absorptive Capacities in Transition Economies in The Balkans

Purpose –The openness to foreign trade measure that is expressed as the ratio of sum of a country’s exports and imports to its Gross Domestic Product is considered as an indicator of globalization at the same time. The absorptive capacity on the other hand, shows to what extend countries could benefit from foreign financial flows and is considered as an indicator of development, which also denotes institutional quality along with infrastructural quality. In this study, the effects of absorptive capacity on the openness to foreign trade are investigated. Design/methodology/approach – As a natural outcome of globalization, openness to foreign trade has shown tendency to grow in many countries. Ex-Soviet Bloc countries defined as the Transition Economies are no exception in this matter. Balkan Transition Economies located in South-East Europe are distinguished from other ex-Soviet countries and are subject to this study in that being far from the Russian hinterland and not being European Union members as of yet. The model used in the study is handled through panel data analysis and regressed. Findings – It is econometrically revealed that absorptive capacities in countries in question positively affected openness to foreign trade in those countries. Moreover, applied other various econometric tests also confirm the integrity and reliability of the data and model. Discussion – In this way, the importance of absorptive capacities in Transition Economies in the Balkans who did not yet completed their transition, emerges and the necessity of pursuing absorptive capacity enhancing policies is emphasized.

___

  • Adams, S. (2009). Can Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Help to Promote Growth in Africa?African Journal of Business Management, 3(5), 178-183.
  • Alfaro, L., Chanda, A., Kalemli-Ozcan, S. and Sayek, S. (2004). FDI and Economic Growth: The Role of Local Financial Markets, Journal of International Economics, 64(1), 89-112.
  • Alfaro, L., Chanda, A., Kalemli-Ozcan, S. and Sayek, S. (2006). How Does Foreign Direct Investment Promote Economic Growth? Exploring the Effects of Financial Markets on Linkages, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper, No. 12522.
  • Baltagi, B., and Li, Q. (1991). A Joint Test for Serial Correlation and Random Individual Effects, Statistics & Probability Letters, 11 (3), 277-280.
  • Blomstrom, M., Lipsey, R. E., and Zejan, M. (1994). What Explains the Growth of Developing Countries? In Baumol, Nelson, and Wolff, (Ed.), Convergence of Productivity: Cross-National Studies and Historical Evidence. Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press, 243-259.
  • Borensztein, E., Gregorio, J. D., & Lee, J. W. (1998). How Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth? Journal of International Economics, 45 (1), 115-135.
  • Cohen, W. M., Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D. Economic Journal, 99 (397), 569-596.
  • Cohen, W. M., Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1), 128-152.
  • Durham, J. B. (2004). Absorptive Capacity and the Effects of Foreign Direct Investment and Equity Foreign Portfolio Investment of Economic Growth. European Economic Review, 48 (2), 285-306.
  • Gujarati, D. N. (2003). Basic Econometrics, 4th Edition. New York, McGraw-Hill.
  • Gujarati, D. N., ve Porter, D. C. (2012). Temel ekonometri, (Çev. Ü. Şenesen ve G. G. Şenesen). İstanbul, Literatür Yayıncılık.
  • Görgülü, M.E. (2015a). The Effects of Foreign Direct Investments on Transition Economies: The Balkans Case. Journal of Economic and Social Studies, 5(2), 23-39.
  • Görgülü, M.E. (2015b). Görgülü, M.E. (2015a). Foreign Direct Investments: In Pursuit of Happiness. Northern State University 22nd Annual Conference on International Business and Contemporary Issues in BusinessConference Proceedings, (23-38), Rapid City, SD, USA.
  • Görgülü, M.E.,and Akcay, S. (2015). The Effects of Foreign Direct Investments on Developing Countries. Eurasian Studies, Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry Turkish Cooperation and Coordination Agency, 47(1), 7-36.
  • Hermes, N., and Lensink, R. (2003). Foreign Direct Investment, Financial Development and Economic Growth. Journal of Development Studies, 40 (1), 142-63.
  • Igberaese, F.I., and Diania, E.N.(2012). Trade Openness (Globalization) and Economic Growth Question in Nigeria: An Empirical Evaluation. The Business & Management Review, 3(1), 138-144.
  • Krogstrup, S., and Matar, L. (2005). Foreign Direct Investment, Absorptive Capacity and the Arab World, HEI Working Paper No: 02/2005.
  • Li, X., and Liu, X. (2005). Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth: An Increasingly Endogenous Relationship. World Development, 33 (3), 393-407.
  • Nguyen, H., Duysters G., Patterson, J.H., and Sandler, H. (2009). Foreign Direct Investment Absorptive Capacity Theory, GLOBELICS, 7th International Conference, Dakar, Senegal. Rettman, A. (2013)Kosovo: EU meeting is 'de facto recognition' by Serbia, https://euobserver.com/foreign/118965 (Erişim Tarihi: 02.12.2018).
  • The World Bank.(2010).Kosovo – Country Brief 2010, http://web.worldbank.org/archive/website01352/WEB/0__CONTE.HTM (Erişim Tarihi: 21.11.2018).
  • The World Bank. (2018). World Development Indicators 2017. Washington, DC, The World Bank. UNDP. (2018). Human Development Index, Human Development Report, http://hdr.undp.org/en/data(Erişim Tarihi: 18.12.2018).
  • UN. (2014).World Economic Situation and Prospects 2014. New York, United Nations.