İş Grubu Üyeliği ve Firma Performansı: Türkiye’den Kanıtlar

Amaç – Bu çalışmanın amacı, iş grubu üyeliğinin firma performansı üzerindeki etkisini dinamik panel veri analizi ile araştırmaktır. Yöntem – 2013-2017 dönemini kapsayan çalışmada Türkiye’de faaliyette bulunan 271 firma verisinden ve Dinamik panel veri analizinden faydalanılmıştır. Bulgular – Çalışmanın ampirik bulguları, grup üyeliği ile hem muhasebe temelli hem de piyasa temelli firma performans ölçüleri arasında pozitif yönlü ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca bulgularımız grup üyeliği-firma performansı ilişkisinin firma büyüklüğü ve finansal kaldıraç gibi firma düzeyindeki değişkenlerden önemli ölçüde etkilendiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Tartışma – Her ekonomide önemli roller oynayan iş gruplarının üye firmalar açısından sağladığı avantajlar literatürde tartışılmaya devam etmektedir. Çalışmanın bulgularına göre genel olarak iş grupları üye firmalar için fayda sağlamaktadır. Ancak, grup üyeliğinin firma performansı üzerindeki pozitif etkisi firmalar büyüdükçe azalmaktadır. Ayrıca, kaldıraç oranı düşük olan firmalar, grup üyeliğinden özellikle fayda sağlamaktadır.

Business Group Affiliation and Firm Performance: Evidence from Turkey

Purpose – The aim of this study is to examine the influence of business group affiliation on firm performance. Design/methodology/approach – In this study, dynamic panel data regression analysis is used to determine the association between group membership and firm performance. The estimates are based on yearly data of 271 firms for the period 2013-2017. Findings – Empirical findings of the study indicate that group membership increases a firm's accounting (ROA)and stock market performance (Tobin’s Q) measures. Our findings also imply that firm specific factors such as firm size and financial leverage effectively moderates the group affiliation-performance relationship for ROA model. Discussion – The advantages of business groups that play important roles in every economy for member firms continue to be discussed in the literature. According to the findings of the study, business groups are generally beneficial for member firms. However, the positive impact of group membership on firm performance decreases as firms grow. In addition, firms with low leverage benefit from group membership.

___

  • Afza, T., Slahudin, C., & Nazir, M. S. (2008). “Diversification and corporate performance: An evaluation of Pakistani firms”. South Asian Journal of Management, 15(3), 7-18.
  • Ahmad, I., Oláh, J., Popp, J., & Máté, D. (2018). “Does Business Group Affiliation Matter for Superior Performance? Evidence from Pakistan”. Sustainability, 10(9), 3060.
  • Arellano, M. & Bond, S. (1991). “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations”. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297.
  • Bae, K.H., J.K. Kang & J.M. Kim. (2002). “Tunneling or Value Added? Evidence From Mergers By Korean Business Groups”. The Journal of Finance, 62(6), 2695-2740.
  • Baltagi, B. H. (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. 3.Ed., John Wiley & Sons.
  • Blundell, R. & Bond, S. (1998). “Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models”. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143.
  • Cameron, C. A. & Trivedi, P. K. (2005).Microeconometrics: Methods and Application, Cambridge University Press.
  • Carney, M. (2008).“The Many Futures of Asian Business Groups”. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25, 595– 613.
  • Chakrabarti, A., K. Singh & I. Mahmood. (2007).” Diversifıcation and Performance: Evidence From East Asian Firms”. Strategic Management Journal, 28(2), 101–120.
  • Chang S.J. & U. Choi. (1988), "Strategy, Structure and Performance of Korean Business Groups: A Transactions Cost Approach". The Journal of Industrial Economics, 37(2), 141-158.
  • Chang, S.J. & J. Hong. (2000). “Economic Performance of Group-Affiliated Companies in Korea: Intragroup Resource Sharing and Internal Business Transactions”. The Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 429- 448.
  • Cheong, K.S., K. Choo & K. Lee. (2010). ” Understanding The Behavior of Business Groups: A Dynamic Model and Empirical Analysis”. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 76(2), 141-152.
  • Chung, C.N. (2001). “Markets, Culture And Instıtutıons: The Emergence of Large Busıness Groups In Taıwan, 1950s-1970s”. Journal of Management Studies, 38(5), 719-745.
  • Claessens, S., Fan, J. P., & Lang, L. H. (2006). “The benefits and costs of group affiliation: Evidence from East Asia”. Emerging Markets Review, 7(1), 1-26.
  • Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2006). ”Business Groups And Their Types”. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(4), 419–437.
  • Daud, W.M.N.W., N.B. Salamudin & I.B. Ahmad. (2009). “Corporate Diversification and Performance”. International Business Education Journal, 2(1), 1-18.
  • Ferris, S.P., K.A. Kim & P. Kitsabunnarat. (2003). “The Costs (and Benefits?) of Diversified Business Groups: The Case of Korean Chaebols”. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27(2), 251–273.
  • Fluck, Z. & A.W. Lynch. (1999). “Why Firms Merge and then Divest: A Theory of Financial Synergy. Journal of Business, 72(3), 319-346.
  • Ghemawat, P. & T. Khanna. (1998), “The Nature of Diversified Business Groups: A Research Design and Two Case”. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(1), 35-61.
  • Ghosh, S. (2010). “Affiliation and Firm Performance: Evidence From Indian Business Groups”. The Manchester School, 78(3), 183–200.
  • Gohar, R. & S. Karacaer, (2009). "Pakistani Business Groups: A comparison of group affiliated and unaffiliated firm performance". NUST Journal of Business and Economics, 2(2), 41-53.
  • Gönenç, H., Ö. B. Kan & E. C. Karadağlı. (2007). “Business Groups and Internal Capital Markets”. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 43(2), 63–81.
  • Granovetter, M. (1994). Business Groups, pp. 453-475. In: The Handbook of Economic Sociology (Eds.
  • Smelser, N.J., R. Swedberg.). Princeton: Princeton University Press, N.J; and New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Isik, O. (2017). “Does Family Business Group Affiliation In Real Sector Firms Really Affect Their Performance?”. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 4(15), 22-36.
  • Khanna, T. & K. Palepu. (2000). “Is Group Affiliation Profitable in Emerging Markets? An Analysis of Diversified Indian Business Groups”. The Journal of Finance,55(2), 867-891.
  • Khanna, T. & J.W. Rivkin. (2001). “Estımatıng The Performance Effects of Busıness Groups in Emerging Markets”. Strategic Management Journal, 22(1), 45–74.
  • Leff, N.H. (1978). “Industrial Organization and Entrepreneurship in the Developing Countries: The Economic Groups”. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 26(4), 661-675.
  • Lensink, R. & R. V. D. Molen. (2010). "Does Group Affiliation Increase Firm Value for Diversified Groups? New Evidence from Indian Companies". Journal of Empirical Finance, 17(3), 332-344.
  • Ma, X., Yao, X., & Xi, Y. (2006). “Business group affiliation and firm performance in a transition economy: A focus on ownership voids”. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(4), 467-483.
  • Ma, X., & Lu, J. W. (2017). “Business group affiliation as institutional linkages in China’s emerging economy: A focus on organizational traits and institutional conditions”. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34(3), 675-697.
  • Park, H.Y., G.C. Shin, S.H. Suh. (2008). "Advantages and Shortcomings of Korean Chaebols", International Business & Economics Research Journal, 7(1), 57-65.
  • Poczter, S. (2018). “Business Groups in Emerging Markets: A Survey and Analysis”. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 54(5), 1150-1182.
  • Roodman, D. (2009). “How to do Xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata”. The Stata Journal, 9, 86-136.
  • Shin, J.S. & H.J. Chang. (2003). Restructuring Korea Inc. New York: Routledge Curzon. Singh, D. A., & Gaur, A. S. (2009). “Business group affiliation, firm governance, and firm performance: Evidence from China and India”. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 411-425.
  • Windmeijer, F. (2005). “A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators”. Journal of Econometrics, 126(1), 25-51.
  • Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E., & Peng, M. (2005). “Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom”. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 1-33.
  • Yafeh, Y. (2003). “An International Perspective of Corporate Groups and Their Prospects”, pp.259-284. In: Structural Impediments to Growth in Japan (Eds. Blomström, M., J. Corbett, F. Hayashi & A. Kashyap). Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Yu, H., Van Ees, H., & Lensink, R. (2009). “Does group affiliation improve firm performance? The case of Chinese state-owned firms”. The Journal of Development Studies, 45(10), 1615-1632.
  • Zattoni, Z., T. Pedersen & V. Kumar. (2009). “The Performance of Group-affiliated Firms during Institutional Transition: A Longitudinal Study of Indian Firms”. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 510–523.
İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1309-0712
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2009
  • Yayıncı: Melih Topaloğlu