Tekel eylemi haberlerinde çerçeveleme: Türk yazılı basını örneği

İletişim alanında haber üzerine yapılan araştırmalarda üzerinde en sık durulan konulardan biri, topumun büyük bir kısmını ilgilendiren ve toplumun büyük çoğunluğu tarafından yoğun biçimde takip edilen olayların yazılı ve görsel basında nasıl sunulduğudur. Haberlerin yazılı ve görsel basında nasıl sunulduğuna yönelik olarak son yıllarda kullanılan yöntemlerden biri ise çerçeveleme analizidir. Çerçeveleme analizi, temel olarak medyada sunulan haberlerin hangi çerçeveler içinde sunulduğunu ortaya çıkarmaya çalışan bir yöntemdir. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’nin gündeminde oldukça geniş bir şekilde yer alan Tekel çalışanlarının yaptığı eylemin, yazılı basında nasıl sunulduğu çerçeveleme yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir. Yapılan analiz sonucunda, gazetelerin kullandıkları haber çerçevelerinde benzerlik ve farklılıklara rastlanmıştır. Çalışmada haber çerçevelerindeki benzerliğin, haberlerin elde edildiği kaynakların benzer olmasına ve ticari kaygılara dayandığı; çerçevelerdeki farklılıkların ise gazetelerin farklı ideolojilere sahip olmalarından kaynakladığı saptanmıştır.

Framework in the news of Tekel movements: Example of Turkish newspapers

One of the matters frequently emphasized in research about communication is the presentation manner of the events concerning the majority of society and followed intensely by most people in visual and printed media. One of the methods used in recent years towards the presentation manner of news in visual and printed media is the framing analysis. Framing analysis is a method principally trying to reveal by which frames the news presented in media is introduced. However, in this study, the presentation manner of action largely appearing on the agenda of Turkey and realized by Tekel workers is analyzed by the framing method. As a result of this analysis, similarities and differences have been found in news frames of the newspapers. In this study, it is determined that similarities in news frames are based on commercial concerns and similarities of resources from which news is obtained; however, differences in frames stem from the different ideologies of the newspapers.

PDF

___

Atalık, A. (2009) TEKEL Alkollü İçkiler San. ve Tic. AŞ‘nin Özelleştirilmesi ve Sonrası, Sayı: 114, Mayıs-Temmuz 2009 http://www.sekeris.org.tr (Erişim: 10.05.2010).
Bateson, G. (1972) Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution and epistemology. Chicago, Chicago University Press.
Baysha, O. ve Hallahan, K. (2004) Media framing of the Ukrainian political crisis, 2000-2001, Journalism Studies, 5(2), s.233 -246.
Berinsky, A. J. ve Kinder, D.R. (2006) Making Sense of Issues Through Media Frames: Understanding the Kosovo Crisis, The Journal of Politics, 68 (3), s.640-656.
Brasted, M. (2005) Framing protest: The Chicago Tribune and the New York Times during the 1968 democratic convention, Atlantic Journal of Communication, 138(1), s.1-25.
Carreiro, J. L. (2005) Newspaper coaverage of U.S. labor movement: the case of anti-union frirngs, Labor Studies Journal, 30 (3), s.1-20.
Cooper, A. H. (2002) Media framing and social movement mobilization: German peace protest against INF missiles, the Gulf War, and NATO peace enforcement in Bosnia, European Journal of Political Research, 41 (1), s.37–80.
Dahinden, U. (2005) Framing a Decade of Research Experience, International Communication Association, 2005 Annual Meeting, New York.
Entman, R. M. (2007) Framing Bias: Media in the Distribution of Power, Journal of Communication, 57 (1), s.163-173.
Entman, R. M. ve Rojecki, A. (1993) Freezing Out the Public: Elite and Media Framing of the U.S. Anti-Nuclear Movement, Political Communication, 10(2) 155-173.
Entman, R. M. (1993) Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm, Journal of Communication, 43 (4) s.51-58.
Edy, J. A. ve Meirick, P. C. (2007) Wanted, Dead or Alive: Media Frames, Frame Adoption, and Support for the War in Afghanistan, Journal of Communication, 57(1): s.119–141.
Gamson, W. A., Croteau, David, Hoynes, William, Sasson, Theodore (1992) Media Images and the Social Construction of Reality, Annual Review of Sociology, 18 (1), s.373-393.
Gamson, W. ve Modigliani, A. (1989) Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: a constructionist approach, American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), s.1-37.
Gitlin, T. (1980) The whole world is watching. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Goffman, E. (1974) Frame Analysis. New York, Harper and Row.
Greenberg J. (2004) Tories, Teachers and the Media Politics of Education Reform: news discourse and the1997 Ontario teachers’ strike, Journalism Studies, 5(3), s.353–371.
Hallahan, K. (1999) Seven Models of Framing: Implications for Public Relations, Journal of Public Relations Research, 11(3), s.205-242.
Hürriyet (2008) Tekel ihalesini BAT kazandı, 22 Şubat, http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/ekonomi/8290881.asp?m=1 (Erişim: 15 Nisan 2010).
Knight, G. (2001) Prospective News: press pre-framing of the 1996 Ontario public service strike Journalism Studies, 2 (1), s.73–91.
Kumar, D. (2005) What’s Good for UPS is Good for America": Nation and Class in Network Television News Coverage of the UPS Strike, Television New Media,6 (2), s.131-152.
Martin, C. R. (2003) The 1997 United Parcel Service Strike: Framing the Story for Popular Consumption, Journal of Communication Inquiry,.27(2), s.190- 210.
McLeod, D. M., Kosicki, G. M. ve McLeod, J. M. (2002) Resurveying the Boundaries of Political Communications Effects, içinde Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research, Edt. Jennings Bryant, Mahwah, NJ, USA.
Noakes, John A. ve Wilkins, Karin Gwinn (2002) Shifting frames of the Palestinian movement in US news, Media, Culture & Society, 24 (5), s.649-671.
Pan, Z. ve Kosicki, G. M. (1993) Framing Analysis: An Approach to News Discourse, Political Communication, 10 (1), s.55-75.
Reese, S. D. (2007) The Framing Project: A Bridging Model for Media Research Revisited, Journal of Communication, 57(1), s.148–154.
Scheufele, D. A. ve Tewksbury, D. (2007) Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models, Journal of Communication, 57 (1), s.9-20.
Scheufele, D. (1999) Framing as theory of media effects, Journal of Communication vol. 49(1), s.103-122.
Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000) Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news, Journal of Communication, 50 (2), s.93–109.
Simon, A. ve Xenos, M. (2000) Media Framing and Effective Public Deliberation, Political Communication, 17 (4), s.363-376.
Tracy, J. (2006) Labor’s monkey wrench: newsweekly coverage of the 1962-63 New York newspaper strike, Canadian Journal of Communication, 31(3), s.541- 560.
Tracy, J. (2004) The News About the Newsworkers: press coverage of the 1965 American Newspaper Guild striice against The New York Times, Journalism Studies, 5 (4), s.451-467.
Valkenburg, P. M., Semetko H. A. ve de Vreese, C. H. (1999) The Effects of News Frames on Readers’ Thoughts and Recall, Communication Research, 26 (5), s.550-569.
Vliegenthart, R. ve Roggeband, C. (2007) Framing Immigration and Integration Relationships between Press and Parliament in the Netherlands, International Communication Gazette, 69 (3), s.295-319.
Vreese, C. H. (2005) News Framing: Theory and Typology Information Design Journal + Document Design, 13(1), s.51-62.
Wallis, P. ve Nerlich B. (2005) Disease metaphors in new epidemics: the UK media framing of the 2003 SARS epidemic, Social Science & Medicine, 60 (2), s.629–2639.
Weaver, D. A. Lively, E. ve Bimber, B. (2009) Searching for a Frame News Media Tell the Story of Technological Progress, Risk, and Regulation, Science Communication, 31 (2), s.139-166.
Weaver, D. H. (2007) Thoughts on Agenda Setting, Framing, and Priming, Journal of Communication, 57(1), s.142–147.