Mehmet YETKİN, Yasin ÇAKIREL

3620

AİLE İŞLETMELERİNİN KUŞAKLARARASI DEVRİ: VÂRİSLER ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

         Aile işletmeleri, özel sektör bağlamında ciddi bir paya sahip olup Dünya’da olduğu gibi Türkiye’de de ülke ekonomisi için büyük bir önem arz etmektedir. Büyümeleri ve hayatlarını devam ettirebilmeleri adına uzun soluklu politikalar belirleyerek yapılarını buna göre düzenlemeleri gerekmektedir. Söz konusu işletmeler ekonomik, kültürel veya sosyal nedenlerden dolayı uzun ömürlü olamamaktadır. Bu noktada devir süreci bir aile işletmesinin geleceği için kritik bir rol oynamaktadır. Ancak, sonraki kuşağın konuya olan bakış açısı pek bilinmemekle birlikte kurucuların yaklaşımları ön plana çıkabilmektedir. Konunun daha bütüncül bir şekilde ele alınması hem kurucuların hem de varislerin görüşlerinin birlikte değerlendirilmesi sağlıklı bir devir süreci için önem arz etmektedir. Nitel araştırma yönteminin benimsendiği bu çalışmada, kuşaklar bağlamında devir sürecinin incelenmesi suretiyle sürdürülebilirliğe engel teşkil edebilecek etmenlerin neler olduğunun açıklanması ve bunlara getirilebilecek çözüm önerilerinin sunulması amaçlanmaktadır. Kırklareli’nde faaliyet gösteren aile işletmelerinin sahipleriyle mülakatlar gerçekleştirilerek konu hakkındaki görüşleri alınmıştır. Elde edilen bulgulara göre, kurucu ve vârislerin mensubu oldukları kuşağın özellikleri, davranış biçimlerini etkilemekte ve işletmenin sürdürülebilirliği noktasında belirleyici rol oynamaktadır.
Anahtar Kelimeler:

Aile İşletmeleri, Kuşaklararası İletişim, Devir, Sürdürülebilirlik

TRANSGENERATIONAL SUCCESSION OF FAMILY FIRMS: A RESEARCH REGARDING SUCCESSORS

          Family businesses have a significant share in terms of private sector and they have an essential place not only in Turkey’s economy but also in the whole world. In order to grow and sustain their lives, they need to apply long term-policies and organize their structures accordingly. These businesses cannot survive due to social reasons such as economic, cultural or individual behavioral differences. At this stage, the notion of succession plays a fundamental role for the future of a family business. However, the next generation’s point of view about the subject is not known and the founders’ approaches can be more dominant. Hence, a holistic approach to the aforementioned topic is much appreciated by reflecting both founders’ and successors’ views for a robust process. In this study, where qualitative research method is adopted, it is aimed to explain what are the factors that can prevent sustainability by examining the succession process in the context of generations and to be able to offer solutions. Interviews were performed with the owners of family businesses in Kirklareli, and their opinions were received on the subject. According to the findings obtained the characteristics of the generation that the founder and successors belong to affect their behavioral attitudes and play a determining role in regard of the sustainability of the business.
Keywords:

Family Firms,

PDF

___

  • Alcorn, P. (1982). Success and Survival in the Family-Owned Firm. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Allen, I., ve Langowitz , N. (2003). Women In Family Owned Businesses. Babson Park: Center for Women's Leadership at Babson College.
  • Altıntuğ, N. (2012). “Kuşaktan Kuşağa Tüketim Olgusu ve Geleceğin Tüketici Profili”, Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, C. 4, S. 1, ss. 203-212.
  • Anderson, R. ve Reeb, D. (2003). “Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500”, Journal of Finance, C. 58, S. 3, ss. 1301-1328.
  • Arksey, H. ve Knight, P. (1999). Interviewing for Social Scientists. London : Sage Publications.
  • Aronoff, C. (2004). “Self‐Perpetuation Family Organization Built on Values: Necessary Condition for Long‐Term Family Business Survival”, Family Business Review, C. 17, S. 1, ss. 55-59.
  • Astrachan, J., Klein, S., ve Smyrnios, K. (2002). “The F-PEC scale of family influence: A proposal for solving the family business definition problem”, Family Business Review, C. 15, S. 1, ss. 45-58.
  • Ayhün Erden, S. (2013). “Kuşaklararasındaki Farklılıklar ve Örgütsel Yansımaları”, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, C. 2, S. 1, ss. 93- 112.
  • Ballal, J. ve Bapat, V. (2019). “How Does Family Succession Impact Family Firms' Innovation?”, Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy, C. 8, S. 2, ss. 302-324
  • Baltacı, A. (2017). “Nitel Veri Analizinde Miles-Huberman Modeli”, Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, C. 3, S. 1, ss. 1- 15.
  • Becker, H. (1958). “Problems of Inference and Proof in Participant Observation”, American Sociological Review, C. 23, S. 6, ss. 652- 660.
  • Beckhard, R. ve Burke, W. (1983). “Preface”, Organizational Dynamics, C. 12, S. 12.
  • Berg, K., ve Latin, R. (2008). Essentials of Research Methods in Health, Physical Education, Exercise Science and Recreation (3rd ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
  • Bjuggren, P. ve Sund, L. (2001). “Strategic Decision Making in Intergenerational Successions of Small- and Medium-Size FamilyOwned Businesses”, Family Business Review, C. 14, S. 1, ss. 11-24.
  • Blaikie, N. (2009). Designing Social Research (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1996). “On the Family as a Realized Category”, Theory, Culture & Society, C. 13, S. 3, ss. 19-26.
  • Brockhaus, R. (2004). “Family Business Succession: Suggestions for Future Research”, Family Business Review, C. 17, S. 2, ss. 165-177.
  • Buchholz, B., Crane, M. ve Nager, R. (2000). 101 Toughest Questions About Family Business. Paramus, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Press.
  • Burkart, M., Panunzi, F. ve Shleife, A. (2003). “Family Firms”, Journal of Finance, C. 58, S. 5, ss. 2167-2201.
  • Chua, J., Chirsman, J. ve Bergiel, E. (2009). “An Agency Theoretic Analyisis of the Professionalized Family Firm”, Entrepreneurship, Theory & Practice, C. 33, S. 2, ss. 355-372.
  • Chua, J., Chrisman, J. ve Sharma, P. (1999). “Defining the Family Business by Behaviour”, Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, C. 23, S. 4, ss. 19-40.
  • Church, R., Fishlow, A., Fligstein, N., Hughes, T., Kocka, J., Morikawa, H. ve Scherer, F. M. (1990). “Review: "Scale and Scope": A Review Colloquium”, The Business History Review, C. 64, S. 4,ss. 690-735.
  • Corbin, J. ve Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of Qualitative Reserach: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (4th ed.).Thousand Oaks: Sage .
  • Coşkun, R., Altunışık, R. ve Yıldırım, E. (2017). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri SPSS Uygulamalı. İstanbul: Sakarya Yayıncılık.
  • Çelik, A., Soysal, A. ve Alıcı, S. (2004). “Aile İşletmelerinde Kuşak Çatışmasından Kaynaklanan Yönetim Sorunları: K. Maraş Örneği”. 1.Aile İşletmeleri Kongresi (17-18 Nisan 2004) Kongre Kitabı. İstanbul: İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2004, ss. 189-201.
  • D'Allura, G., Colli, A. ve Goel, S. (2019). Family Firms and Institutional Contexts: Business Models, Innovation and Competitive Advantage. Glos: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
  • Dascher, P. ve Jens, W. (1999). “Executive Briefing: Family Business Succession Planning”, Business Horizons , C. 42, S. 5, ss. 2-4.
  • DeAngelo, H. ve DeAngelo, L. (2000). “Controlling Stockholders and The Disciplinary Role of Corporate Payout Policy: A Study of The Times Mirror Company”, Journal of Financial Economics, C. 56, ss. 153- 207.
  • Demsetz, H. ve Lehn, K. (1985). “The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences”, Journal of Political Economy, C. 93, S. 6, ss. 1155-1177.
  • Dimock, M. (2019). “Fact Tank: News In the Numbers”, http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/where-millennialsend-and-generation-z-begins/, (Erişim: 11.09.2019).
  • Donnelly, R. (1964). “The Family Business”, Harvard Business Review, C. 42, S. 4, ss. 93-105.
  • Dyck, B., Mauws, M., Starke, F. A. Ve Mischke, G. A. (2002). “Passing the Baton: The Importance of Sequence,Timing, Technique and Communication in Executive Succession”, Journal of Business Venturing, C. 17, S. 2, ss. 143-162.
  • Dyer, W. ve Handler, W. (1994). “Entrepreneurship and Family Business: Exploring the Connection”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, C. 19, S. 1, ss. 71-83.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). “Building Theories from Case Study Research”, The Academy of Management Review, C. 14, S. 4, ss. 532-550.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). “Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review”, The Academy of Management Review, C. 14, S. 1, ss. 57-74.
  • Eisner, E. (1991). The Enlightened Eye: Qualitative Inquiry and The Enhancement of Educational Practice. New York: MacMillan Publishing.
  • European Commission DG Enterprise and Industry (2009). “Owerview of Family Business Relevant Isssues: Research, Networks, Policy Measures and Existing Studies”. European Commission DG Enterprise and Industry. Viyana.
  • Fama, E. ve Jensen, M. (1983). “Seperation of Ownership and Control”, The Journal of Law and Economics, C. 26, S. 2, ss. 301-325.
  • Gagné, M., Marwick, C., Brun de Pontet, S. ve Wrosch, C. (2019). “FamilyBusiness Succession: What‟s Motivation Got to Do With It?”, Family Business Review, Online First , ss. 1-14.
  • Garcia-Alvarez, E., Sintas, J. ve Gonzalvo, P. (2002). “Socialization Patterns of Successors in First to Second Generation Family Businesses”, Family Business Review, C. 15, S. 3, ss. 189-203.
  • Gephart, R. (2004). “What Is Qualitative Research and Why Is It Important? The Academy of Management Journal, C. 47, S. 4, ss. 454-462.
  • Gersick, K. E., Davis, J., Hampton, M. ve Lansberg, I (1997). Generation to Generation: Life Cycles of the Family Business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Gioia, D., Corley, K. ve Hamilton, A. (2013). “Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology, Organizational Research Methods, C. 16, S. 1, ss. 15-31.
  • Glaser, B. ve Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
  • Glaser, B. ve Strauss, A. (2006). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction.
  • Golafshani, N. (2003). “Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research”, The Qualitative Report, C. 8, S. 4, ss. 597-607.
  • Goldberg, S. ve Wooldridge, B. (1993). “Self-Confidence and Managerial Autonomy: Successor Characteristics Critical to Succession in Family Firms, Family Business Review, C. 7, S. 1, ss. 55-73.
  • Gomez-Mejia, L., Nuñez-Nickel, M. ve Gutierrez, I. (2001). “The Role of Family Ties in Agency Contracts”, The Academy of Management Journal, S. 44, S. 1, ss. 81-95.
  • Grote, J. (2003). “Conflicting Generations: A New Theory of Family Business Rivalry”, Family Business Review, C. 16, S. 2, ss. 113-124.
  • Handler, W. (1990). “Succession in Family Firms: A Mutual Role Adjustment Between the Entrepreneur and Next Generation Family Members”, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, C. 15, S. 1, ss. 37-51.
  • Handler, W. (1992). “The Succession Experience of The Next Generation”, Family Business Review, C. 5, S. 3, ss. 283-307.
  • Handler, W. (1994). “Succession in Family Business: A Review of the Research”, Family Business Review, C. 7, S. 2, ss. 133-157.
  • Haugh, H. ve McKee, L. (2003). “It‟s Just Like A Family Shared Values in the Family Firm”, Community, Work & Family, C. 6, S. 2, ss. 141- 158.
  • Hürriyet Ekonomi, (2017). “Türkiye'deki İşletmelerin Yüzde 95'i Aile Şirketi”, https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/ekonomi/turkiyedekiisletmelerin- yuzde-95i-aile-sirketi-40599291, (Erişim: 23.03.2020)
  • Jensen, M. ve Meckling, W. (1976). “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior Agency Costs and Ownership Structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, C. 3, S. 4, ss. 305-360.
  • Kaplan, A. (1964). The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodolgy for Behavioral Science. San Francisco: Chandler.
  • Kudlats, J., McDowell, W. ve Mahto, R. (2019). “Unrelated but together: Trust and Intergroup Relations in Multi-Family Businesses”, Journal of Business Research, S. 101, ss. 750-756.
  • Kraus, M. (2017). “Comparing Generation X and Generation Y on Their Preferred Emotional Leadership Style”, Journal of AppliedLeadership and Management, S. 5, ss. 62-75.
  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to ItsMethodolgy (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Lambrecht, J. ve Donckels, R. (2006). Towards A Business Family Dynasty: A Lifelong, Continuing Process. Poutziouris, P. Smyrnios, ve Klein, S., içinde, Handbook of Research on Family Business. Glos: Edward Elgar.
  • Lambrecht, J. ve Lievens, J. (2008). “Pruning the Family Tree: An Unexplored Path to Family Business Continuity and Family Harmony”, Family Business Review, C. 21, S. 4, ss. 295-313.
  • Lansberg, I. (1988). “The Succession Conspiracy”, Family Business Review, C. 1, S. 2, ss. 25-36.
  • Lappalainen, M. (2019). Role of Family Governance in Bringing the Next Generation Close to the Family Business, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Aalto University School of Business, Aalto.
  • La Pelle, N. (2004). “Simplifying Qualitative Data Analysis Using General Purpose Software Tools”, Field Methods, C. 16, S. 1, ss. 85-108.
  • Leedy, P. ve Ormrod, J. (2015). Practical Research: Planning and Design (11th ed.). Harlow: Pearson.
  • Lee, J. (2006). “Family Firm Performance: Further Evidence”, Family Business Review, C.19, S. 2, ss. 103-114.
  • Lincoln, Y. ve Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.
  • Lune, H. ve Berg, B. (2017). Qualitative Research Methods for The Social Sciences. Harlow: Pearson.
  • Magretta, J. (1998). “Governing the Family-Owned Enterprise: An Interview with Finland‟s KristerAhlström”https://hbr.org/1998/01/governingthe-family-owned-enterprise-an-interview-with-finlands-kristerahlstrom, (Erişim: 30.10.2019).
  • Miles, J. (2016). Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kuramları, çev.Mustafa Polat, Korhan Arun. Ankara: Nobel.
  • Miles, M. ve Huberman, A. (1994). An Expanded Sourcebook: Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Miller, D. ve Le Breton-Miller, I. (2006). “Family Governance and Firm Performance: Agency, Stewardship and Capabilities”, FamilyBusiness Review, C. 19, S. 1, ss. 73-87.
  • Morris, M., Williams, R. ve Nel, D. (1996). “Factors Influencing Family Business Succession”, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, C. 2, S. 3, ss. 68-81.
  • Morris, M. H., Williams, R. O., Allen, J. A. Ve Avila, R. A. (1997). “Correlates of Success in Family Business Transitions”, Journal of Business Venturing, C. 12, S. 5, ss. 385-401.
  • Morse, J. ve Richards, L. (2002). Read Me First: For a User‟s Guide to Qualitative Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Neubauer, F. ve Lank, A. (1998). The Family Business: Its Governance for Sustainability. Houndmills: MacMillan Press Ltd.
  • Neuendorf, K. (2002). The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Özkaya, M. ve Şegül Muter, C. (2006). “Aile Şirketlerinde Kurumsallaşma ve İkinci Kuşağın Kurumsallaşma Konusuna Bakış Açısı”, Dokuz Eylü l Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, C. 21, S. 1, ss. 109-126.
  • Özmutaf, N., Kırbaç, Ş., Ustaoğlu, E. ve Aytaş, M. (2016). “Kobiler Kapsamında Yer Alan Aile İşletmelerinde Etkili İletişime Yönelik Faktörlerin Çalışan Performansına Etkisi”, İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi 7. Aile İşletmeleri Kongresi (14-15 Nisan 2016) Kongre Kitabı. İstanbul: İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi, 2016, ss. 260-274.
  • Pham, T., Bell, R. ve Newton, D. (2019). “The Father's Role in Supporting the Son's Business Knowledge Development Process in Vietnamese Family Businesses, Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, C. 11, S. 2, ss. 258-276.
  • Pratt, M. (2009). “For The Lack of A Boilerplate: Tips On Writting up (and Reviewing) Qualitative Research”, The Academy of Management Journal, C. 52, S. 5, ss. 856-862.
  • Pyromalis, V. D., Vozikis, G. S., Kalkanteras, T. A., Rogdaki, M. E. Ve Sigalas, G. P. V. (2006 ). An Integrated Framework for Testing The Success of The Family Business Succession Process According to Gender Specificity. Poutziouris P., Smyrnios K. ve Klein S. içinde, Handbook of Research on Family Business. Glos: Edward Elgar.
  • Rodoplu, D. (2003). “Örgütlerde Farklı İnsan Kaynakları Kuşaklarına Yönlendirilmiş Yönetim Yaklaşımları Geliştirme”. II. Ulusal Bilgi, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı. İzmit, 2011, ss. 464- 477.
  • Rogal, K. (1989). “Obligation or Opportunity: How Can Could-Be Heirs Assess Their Position?”, Family Business Review, C. 2, S. 3, ss. 237- 255.
  • Shane, S. ve Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226.
  • Sharma, P., and J. J. Chrisman. 1999. Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 23 (3): 11–27.
  • Scholes, L., Westhead, P. ve Burrows, A. (2008). “Family Firm Succession: the Management Buy-out and Buy-in Routes”, Journal of Small Business and Entreprise Development, C. 15, S. 1, ss. 8-30.
  • Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N.ve Buchholtz, A. K. . (2001). “Agency Relationships in Family Firms: Theory and Evidence ”, Organization Science, C. 12, S. 2, ss. 99-116.
  • Sharma, P., Chrisman, J. ve Chua, J. (2003 (b)). “Succession Planning As Planned Behavior: Some Emprical Results”, Family Business Review, C. 16, S. 1, ss. 1-15.
  • Sharma, P., Chrisman, J. ve Gersick, K. (2012). “25 Years of Family Business Review: Reflections on the Past and Perspectives for the Future”, Family Business Review, C. 25, S. 1, ss. 5-15.
  • Sievinen, H., Ikäheimonen, T., ve Pihkala, T. (2019). “Strategic Renewal in A Mature Family-Owned Company – A Resource Role of the Owners”, Long Range Planning, C. 53, S. 2, ss. 1-19.
  • Sirmon, D. ve Hitt, M. (2003). “Managing Resources: Linking Unique Resources, Management and Wealth Creation in Family Firms”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, C. 27, S. 4, ss. 339-358.
  • Smola, K. ve Sutton, C. (2002). “Generational Differences: Revisiting Generational Work Values for the New Millennium”, Journal of Organizational Behaviour, C. 23, S. 4, ss. 363-382.
  • Sönmez, Y. (2015). Aile Şirketlerinde Kurumsallaşma Stratejileri. İstanbul: Ares Yayıncılık.
  • Spector, J.M., Merrill, M.D., Merrinboer, J. Ve Driscoll, M.P. (2008). Handbook Of Research On Educational Communications and Technology Third Edition. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Stavrou, E. (1998). “A Four Factor Model: A Guide to Planning Next Generation Involvement in The Family Business”, Family Business Review, C. 11, S. 2, ss. 135-142.
  • Stenbacka, C. (2001). “Qualitative Research Requires Quality Concepts of its Own”, Management Decision, C. 39, S. 7, ss. 551-555.
  • Thyer, B. (2010). The Handbook of Social Work Research Methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Tosun, C. ve Keskin, F. (2017). “Çalışan-Dostu Kurumlarda İş-Yaşam Dengesi Politikaları, Kurumsal İletişim ve Verimlilik”, Verimlilik Dergisi, S. 4, ss. 7-27.
  • Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. İstanbul: Seçkin
  • Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Yukl, G. (1989). Managerial leadership: A review of theory and research. Journal of management, 15(2), 251-289
  • Zellweger, T. (2017). Managing the Family Business Theory and Practice. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar.
Akademik Hassasiyetler-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-5933
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2014
  • Yayıncı: A Kitap
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

21. YÜZYILDA TARİHYAZIMI VE TARİHÇİLİK ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME

Hazal PAPUÇÇULAR

KIBRIS TÜRK BASININDA 1960 KIBRIS CUMHURİYETİ: BOZKURT GAZETESİ

Eren Ekin ERCAN

YANLIŞ YAPTIĞIMI BİLMİYORDUM: AKADEMİSYENLERDE ETİK KÖRLÜK ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Nuran ÖZTÜRK BAŞPINAR, Fulya MISIRDALI YANGİL

TİCARİ AÇIKLIĞIN MAKROEKONOMİK İSTİKRAR ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNİN ANALİZİ

Elmas DEMİRCİOĞLU KARABIYIK, Hakan ÇETİNOĞLU

İNANMA İRADESİ

Gülşen YAYLI, Çevirmen: Gülşen YAYLI

KIRILGAN BEŞLİDE GIDA FİYATLARININ ENFLASYONA GEÇİŞ ETKİSİ

Nimet VARLIK, Eda BALIKÇIOĞLU

YAŞLI SAĞLIĞI AÇISINDAN SOSYAL POLİTİKA İNCELEMESİ

Aydan Eda URVAYLIOĞLU, Esra GEDİK

TÜRK HAMAM KÜLTÜRÜNDE METAL OBJELER VE OBJELERİN FORM VE BEZEME ÖZELLİKLERİ

Hülya KALYONCU

ENGELLİ KADIN İSTİHDAMI: İŞKUR AKTİF İSTİHDAM POLİTİKALARI ÜZERİNE BİR ANALİZ

Hülya ÇAKIR

PEYAMİ SAFA, 27 MAYIS 1960 VE MİLLÎ BİRLİK KOMİTESİ: “ORGANİK AYDIN VE YASA-KOYUCU ENTELEKTÜEL OLARAK PEYAMİ SAFA’NIN HAVADİS YAZILARI (15 TEMMUZ 1960- 14 KASIM 1960)”

Ferit Salim SANLI