Katı Atık Hizmetlerinde Özelleştirme: Taşeron İşçilerin Kadroya Geçişi Bir Fırsat mıdır Tehdit mi ?

Türkiye’de de katı atık hizmetleri 1980’li yıllardan itibaren özelleştirilmeye başlanmıştır. Tüm katı atık süreçleri içinde özelleştirmeye en fazla açılan alan katı atıkların toplanmasını içeren ilk aşaması olmuştur. Özellikle yüksek işçi ücretleri kaynaklı maliyetleri azaltabilmek adına hizmet alanı piyasaya açılmıştır. Toplama hizmetlerinde özelleştirme, belediye bütçeleri için bu hizmetin giderek ağırlaşan bir yük getirmesi ve hizmetlerin belediye eliyle gereği gibi yürütülememesi gerekçelerine dayandırılmaktadır. Ancak 2017 yılı sonunda çıkarılan bir Kanun Hükmünde Kararname (KHK) ile belediyelerin Kamu İhale Kanunu hükümlerine göre personel çalıştırılmasına dayalı ihalelerle piyasa firmaları aracılığıyla temin ettikleri temizlik işçileri, sürekli işçi kadrosu verilerek belediye şirketlerine alınmıştır. Başka bir ifadeyle, yaklaşık 30 yıldan fazla bir süre boyunca artan bir şekilde özelleştirilen hizmet alanının en azından personelle ilgili kısmı tekrar kamusallaştırılmıştır. Bu durum özelde katı atık yönetimleri için, genelde ise tüm belediye bütçeleri anlamında mali sonuçlar doğuran bir gelişme olmuştur. Bu çalışma esas olarak, KHK ile oluşturulan yeni düzenin mali anlamda olumlu sonuçları kadar, olumsuz sonuçları da olacağını göstermek yanında, personelin kamusallaştırılmasının sürdürülebilir koşulları oluşturulduğu takdirde yeniden bir özelleştirme dalgasının ortaya çıkmayabileceğini iddia etmektedir.

Privatization of Solid Waste Management: Is There An Opportunity or Threat To Recruitment Subcontracted Workers

In Turkey, solid waste services began to be privatized in the 1980s. The area most opened to privatization among all solid waste processes became the first stage that entailed the collection of solid wastes. The area of service was opened to the market to reduce costs originating from high wages. Privatization in collection services is based on the justification of the gradually worsening burdening of these services for municipal budgets and the inability to conduct services as required through the municipality. However, with a decree issued at the end of 2017, the cleaning services that municipalities procure through market firms with tenders based on the employment of personnel according to the provisions of the Public Tender Law have been acquired by municipal companies by providing a continuous cadre of workers. In other words, a portion of the privatized field of service, at least relating to personnel, was socialization again in a manner that has increased throughout a period of more than 30 years. This situation was a development that produced financial results for solid waste management specifically and in the sense of all municipal budgets in general. This study mainly shows that the new order established by the Decree Law will have negative as well as financially positive results and claims that a new wave of privatization may not be emerged if sustainable conditions of taking of personnel are established.

PDF

___

Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı. (2003). Türkiye Çevre Atlası. Ankara: ÇED ve Planlama Genel Müdürlüğü Çevre Envanteri Dairesi Başkanlığı Yay.
Ayres, D. W. (1975). Municipal Interfaces in the Third Sector: A Negative View. Public Administration Review, 35(5), 459-463.
Bel, G., & Miralles, A. (2003). Factors Influencing the Privatization of Urban Solid Waste Collection in Spain. Urban Studies, 40(7), 1323-1334.
Blackstone, E., & Hakim, S. (1997). Private Ayes. American City and Country, 112, 4-9.
Boyne, G. A. (1998). The Determinants of Variations in Local Service Contracting: Garbage In, Garbage Out. Urban Affairs Review, 34(1), 150-163.
Clark, C. (1998). How Privatization Helped Raise The Bar in The Solid Waste Field. American City&County, 113.
Cointreau, S. J. (1982). Environmental Management of Urban Solid Wastes in Developing Countries, Urban Development Technical Paper (Number 5). Washington DC.: World Bank.
Cointreau-Levine, S. J. (1994). Private Sector Participation in Municipal Solid Waste Services in Developing Countries (Volume.1 The Formal Sector), Urban Management Programme Discussion Paper No.13. Washington DC.: World Bank.
Cubbin, J., Domberger, S., & Meadowcroft, S. (1987). Competitive Tendering and Refuse Collection: Identifying the Sources of Efficiency Gains. Fiscal Studies, 8(3), 49-58.
Dilger, R. J., Randolph, R. M., & Struyk, L. (1997). Privatization of Municipal Services in America's Largest Cities. Public Administration Review, 57(1), 21-26.
Dohrman, J., & Aiello, J. (1999). Public‐private partnerships for waste management: Challenges for policies and procedures. Development Southern Africa, 16(4), 691-705.
Emek, U. (2003). Posta Hizmetlerinin Serbestleştirilmesi -Özelleştirme, Rekabet, Regülasyon-. Ankara: DPT (Yayın No: 2672).
Ersöz, H. Y. (2001). Yerel Yönetimlerde Özelleştirme Uygulamaları ve Yaygınlık Derecesi. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler Dergisi, 10(2), 31-50.
Ferris, J. M. (1986). The Decision to Contract Out: An Empirical Analysis. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 22(2), 289-311.
Florestano, P. S., & Gordon, S. B. (1980). Public vs. Private: Small Government Contracting with the Private Sector. Public Administration Review, 40(1), 29-34.
Florestano, P. S., & Gordon, S. B. (1980). Public vs. Private: Small Government Contracting with the Private Sector. Public Administration Review, 40(1), 29-34.
Grierson, J., & Brown, A. (1999). Small Enterprise Opportunities in Municipal Solid Waste Management. Development in Practice, 9(1-2), 193-198.
IETC/UNEP. (1996). Solid Waste Generation Handling Treatment and Disposal International Source Book on Environmentally Sound Technologies for Municipal Solid Waste Management. International Environmental Technology Centre of the United Nations Environment Programme.
Keleş, R. (2000). Yerinden Yönetim ve Siyaset. İstanbul: Cem Yayınevi (4. B).
Kodrzycki, Y. (1998). Fiscal Pressures and the Privatization of Local Services. New England Economic Review, January-February, 39-50.
Mansoor, A. (1997). Integration of the Official and Private Informal Practices in Solid Waste Management. PhD THesis Loughborough University Department of Civil and Building Engineering. UK.
Massoud, M., & El-Fadel, M. (2002). Public–Private Partnerships for Solid Waste Management Services. Environmental Management, 30(5).
McDavid, J. C. (1985). The Canadian Experience with Privatizing Residential Solid Waste Collection Services. Public Administration Review, 45(5), 602-608.
Medina, M. (2002, 11 12). Municipal Solid Waste Management in Third World Cities: Lessons Learned and a Proposal for Improvemen. https://www.eolss.net/Sample-Chapters/C14/E1-18- 06-06.pdf adresinden alındı
Moe, R. C. (1987). Exploring the Limits of Privatization. Public Administration Review, 47(6), 453-460.
Morgan, D. R. (1992). The Pitfalls of Privatization: Contracting Without Competition. American Review of Public Administration, 22(4), 251-269.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government. Addison-Wesley Pub.
Post, J., Broekema, J., & Obirih-Opareh, N. (2003). Trial and Error in Privatisation: Experiences in Urban Solid Waste Collection in Accra (Ghana) and Hyderabad (India). Urban Studies, 40(4).
Reeves, E., & Barrow, M. (2000). The Impact of Contracting Out on the Costs of Refuse Collection Services: The Case of Ireland. The Economic and Social Review, 31(2), 129-150.
Resmi Gazete. (2017, 12 24). http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2017/12/20171224-22.htm adresinden alındı
Rosner, D. (1996). Topics for Our Times: Don't Inhale— Reflections on Garbage! American Journal of Public Health, 86(2), 159-161.
Savas, E. S. (1977). An Empirical Study of Competition in Municipal Service Delivery. Public Administration Review, 37(6), 717-724.
Savas, E. S. (1979). Public v. Private Refuse Collection: A Critical Review of the Evidence. Journal of Urban Analysis, 6, 1-13.
Savas, E. S. (1981). Intracity Competition Between Public and Private Service Delivery. Public Administration Review, 41(1), 46-52.
Savas, E. S. (2003). Daha İyi Devlet Yönetiminin Anahtarı Özelleştirme. Ankara: Milli Prodüktivite Merkezi Yay. (No.517), 3.B.
Sullivan, H. J. (1987). Privatization of Public Services: A Growing Threat to Constitutional Rights. Public Administration Review, 47(November-December), 461-471.
Szymanski, S., & Wilkins, S. (1993). Cheap Rubbish? Competitive Tendering and Contracting Out in Refuse Collection - 1981-88. Fiscal Studies, 14(3), 109-130.
Teel, G. (1993). Privatization Backers Criticize The High Cost Of Public Garbage Pickup. Western Report, 20(8), 18-19.
Torunoğlu, E. (1997). Çöp Dağları Yaşamı Tehdit Ediyor. Ada Kentliyim Dergisi(8).
Warner, M., & Hefetz, A. (2002). THe Uneven Distribution of Market Solutions For Public Goods. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24(4), 445-459.
Werlin, H. H. (1995). Comperative Solid Waste Management. Journal of Asian & African Studies, 30(3-4), 121-145.
World Bank. (1999). What a Waste: Solid Waste Management in Asia. Washington.
YYAEM. (2001). Çöp Hizmetleri Yönetimi. (B. A. Güler, Dü.) Ankara: TODAİE (Türkiye ve Orta Doğu Amme İdaresi Enstitüsü Yerel Yönetimler Araştırma ve Eğitim Merkezi).