Sosyal Girişimcilik Öncülleri Ölçeğinin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Hockerts (2015) tarafından geliştirilmiş olan, sosyal girişimcilik öncülleri ölçeğini Türkçeye uyarlamaktır. Çalışma, üniversite öğrencilerinden oluşan birbirinden farklı 4 çalışma grubuyla gerçekleştirilmiştir.Çalışmanının verileri 20Eylül-15 Aralık 2019 tarihleri arasında toplanmıştır.30 öğrenciden oluşan birinci çalışma grubuyla dil eşdeğerliği test edilmiştir ve ölçeğin orijinal dili olan İngilizce formu ile Türkçe formunun birbirine eş değer olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır (r= .83; p˂ .05). Altmış öğrenciden oluşan ikinci çalışma grubuyla ölçeğin Türkçe formunun pilot uygulaması gerçekleştirilmiş ve her bir maddeye ait madde toplam korelasyon değerleri ile Cronbach Alfa değerleri incelenmiştir. Bu aşamada orjinal ölçekte yer alan bir maddenin ölçekten çıkarılmasına karar verilmiştir. Geriye kalan maddelerin birbirleriyle ve ölçeğin geneli ile uyumlu olduğu görülmüştür. 305 öğrenciden oluşan üçüncü çalışma grubuyla 17 madde ve 4 boyuttan oluşan ölçeğin mevcut yapısının geçerliği test etmek amacıyla DFA yapılmış ve DFA sonucunda ölçeğin model uyumuna sahip olduğu görülmüştür (χ²/sd= 248.29/111= 2.34; p < .05, CFI = .92; TLI= .91; GFI = .91; SRMR = .076; RMSEA = .064). Bununla birlikte ölçeği oluşturan maddelerin faktör yüklerinin .33 ile .88 arasında değiştiği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Ölçeğin güvenirliği incelenmesinde test-tekrar test analizi ve iç tutarlık katsayısı kullanılmıştır. Ölçeğin alt boyutlarına ilişkin Cronbach Alfa ve test-tekrar test değerleri sırayla şu şekildedir; empati (.70; .80), ahlaki yükümlülük (.83; .79), öz yeterlik (.72; .71) ve sosyal destek (.81; .88). Yapılan geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizlerine göre ölçeğin Türkçe formunun geçerli ve güvenilir olduğu ifade edilebilir.

Turkish Adaptation of the Social Entrepreneurial Antecedents Scale (SEAS): Validity and Reliability Studies

The aim of the study is to adapt the social entrepreneurial antecedents scale, developed by Hockerts (2015) into Turkish. The study was conducted with four different study groups, composed of university students. The data of the study were collected between September 20 and December 15, 2019.The first study group consisting 30 students was tested on language equivalence. It was concluded that the form in English, the original language of the scale and the form in Turkish were equivalent (r = .83; p˂ .05). The pilot scheme of Turkish form was conducted with the second study group consisting 60 students, and the total correlation values of each item and Cronbach Alpha values were analyzed. It was decided in this phase that the fourth item be removed from the scale. It was observed that remaining items were compatible with each other and the scale in general. In order to test the validity of the scale having 17 items and 4 dimensions in its current shape, CFA was conducted with the third study group, consisting 305 students. CFA results revealed that the scale had model compatibility (χ² / sd = 248.29 / 111 = 2.34; p

PDF

___

Akar, H. & Aydın, S. (2015). Öğretmen adaylarinin kişilik özelliklerinin sosyal girişimcilik özelliklerini yordama düzeyi. The Journal Of Academic Social Science,3(12), 425-436. http://dx.doi.org/10.16992/ASOS.647
Akar, H., & Dogan, Y. B. (2018). The role of personal values in social entrepreneurship. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(1), 83-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060107
Akar, H., & Üstüner, M. (2017). Mediation role of self-efficacy perceptions in the relationship between emotional intelligence levels and social entrepreneurship traits of pre-service teachers. Journal of Education and Future, (12), 95-115.
Alvord, S. H., Brown, L. D., & Letts, C. W. (2004). Social entrepreneurship and societal transformation: An exploratory study. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40(3), 260-282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886304266847
Anheier, H., & Themudo, N. (2002). Organisational forms of global civil society: implications of going global. Global Civil Society, 2(1), 42-47.
Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00107.x
Aydogmus, M. (2019). Investigation of the effect of social entrepreneurship on professional attitude and self-efficacy perception: a research on prospective teachers. Studies in Higher Education, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1673719
Ayob, N., Yap, C. S., Sapuan, D. A., & Rashidd, Z. A. (2013). Social entrepreneurial intention among business undergraduates: an emerging economy perspective. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.5453
Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 25(3), 285-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092- 6566(91)90021-H
Bornstein, D. (1998). Changing the world on a shoestring. Atlantic Monthly, 281(1), 34-38.
Borzaga, C. & Depedri, S. (2013). When social enterprises do it better: efficiency and efficacy of work integration in Italian social cooperatives, in S. Denny & F. Simmon (Eds.) Social Enterprises. Accountability and Evaluation around the World. London: Routledge, pp. 85- 101.
Boyd, N. G., & Vozikis, G. S. (1994). The influence of self-efficacy on the development of entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(4), 63- 77. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879401800404
Brislin, R.W., Lonner, W. J. & Thorndike, R. M. (1973). Cross cultural research method. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için veri analiz el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akedemi Yayıncılık. https://doi.org/10.14527/9789756802748
Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. (2.Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. https://doi.org/10.14527/9789756802335
Decety, J. & Jackson, P. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(2), 71-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582304267187
Dees, J. G. (2001). The meaning of “social entrepreneurship”. Comments and suggestions contributed from the Social Entrepreneurship Founders Working Group. Durham: Center for the Advancement of Social Entrepreneurship, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University. Erişim: http://www.caseatduke.org/documents /dees_sedef.pdf https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351278560-5
Dees, J. G. (2012). A tale of two cultures: Charity, problem solving, and the future of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 321-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1412-5
Dökmen, Ü. (2013). İletişim çatışmaları ve empati. Istanbul, Türkiye: Remzi Yayınevi.
Drayton, W. (2002). The citizen sector: Becoming as entrepreneurial and competitive as business. California Management Review, 44(3), 120-132. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166136
Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101(1), 91-119. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.91
Erkuş, A. (2012). Psikolojide ölçme ve ölçek geliştirme. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları. https://doi.org/10.14527/9786052416594
Fitzsimmons, J. R., & Douglas, E. J. (2011). Interaction between feasibility and desirability in the formation of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 431-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.01.001
Forster, F., & Grichnik, D. (2013). Social entrepreneurial intention formation of corporate volunteers. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 4(2), 153-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2013.777358
Haugh, H. (2007). Community–led social venture creation. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 31(2), 161-182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00168.x
Henton, D., Melville, J., & Walesh, K. (1997). The age of the civic entrepreneur: restoring civil society and building economic community. National Civic Review, 86(2), 149-156. https://doi.org/10.1002/ncr.4100860208
Hockerts, K. (2010). Social entrepreneurship between market and mission. International Review of Entrepreneurship, 8 (2), 177-198.
Hockerts, K. (2015). The social entrepreneurial antecedents scale (SEAS): A validation study. Social Enterprise Journal, 11(3), 260-280. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-05-2014-0026
Hockerts, K. (2017). Determinants of social entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 105-130. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12171
Ip, C. Y., Liang, C., Wu, S. C., Law, K. M. Y., & Liu, H. C. (2018). Enhancing social entrepreneurial intentions through entrepreneurial creativity: A comparative study between Taiwan and Hong Kong. Creativity Research Journal, 30(2), 132-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1446744
Ip, C. Y., Wu, S. C., Liu, H. C., & Liang, C. (2017). Revisiting the antecedents of social entrepreneurial intentions in Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 6(3), 301-323. http://dx.doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2017.2835
Konaklı, T. (2015). Effects of self-efficacy on social entrepreneurship in education: a correlational research. Research in Education, 94(1), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.7227/RIE.0019
Konaklı, T., & Göğüş, N. (2013). Aday öğretmenlerin sosyal girişimcilik özellikleri ölçeği: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty (GUJGEF), 33(2).
Kümbül Güler, B. (2008). Sosyal girişimciliği etkileyen faktörlerin analizi, Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir.
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84-99. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84
Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of world business, 41(1), 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002
Mair, J., & Noboa, E. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: How intentions to create a social venture are formed. In Social entrepreneurship (pp. 121-135). Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625655_8
McDonald, N. M., & Messinger, D. S. (2010). The Development of Empathy: How, When, and Why. Department of Psychology, University of Miami: USA
Meydan, C.H. & Şeşen H. (2015). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi AMOS Uygulamaları. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
Miller, T. L., Grimes, M. G., McMullen, J. S., & Vogus, T. J. (2012). Venturing for others with heart and head: How compassion encourages social entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 616-640. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0456
Nga, J. K. H., & Shamuganathan, G. (2010). The influence of personality traits and demographic factors on social entrepreneurship start up intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(2), 259-282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0358-8
Pearce, J. (2003). Social Enterprise in Anytown, Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation, London.
Prabhu, G. N. (1999). Social entrepreneurial leadership. Career Development International, 4(3), 140-145. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620439910262796
Sassmannshausen, S. P., & Volkmann, C. (2013). A bibliometric based review on social entrepreneurship and its establishment as a field of research (No. 2013-003). Schumpeter Discussion Papers.
Savaşır, I. (1994). Ölçek uyarlamasındaki bazı sorunlar ve çözüm yolları. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 33 (9), 27-32.
Seçer, İ. (2015). Psikolojik test geliştirme ve uyarlama süreci: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
Sezen-Gultekin, G., & Gur-Erdogan, D. (2016). The relationship and effect between lifelong learning tendencies and social entrepreneurship characteristics of prospective teachers. The Anthropologist, 24(1), 113-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2016.11891996
Shaw, E., & Carter, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: Theoretical antecedents and empirical analysis of entrepreneurial processes and outcomes. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 14(3), 418-434. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000710773529
Sivathanu, B., & Bhise, P. V. (2013). Challenges for social entrepreneurship. International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management, (Special Issue), 1-9.
Snellman, L.(2016). Social entrepreneurship: making change in the world? Journal of Logistics, Informatics and Service Science, 3(1), 1-25
Tavşancıl, E. (2002). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi. Nobel Yayıncılık, Ankara.
Taylor, D. W., & Thorpe, R. (2004). Entrepreneurial learning: a process of co-participation. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 11(2), 203-211. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000410537146
Teise, H., & Urban, B. (2015). Antecedents to social entrepreneurship intentions: An empirical study in South Africa. Management Dynamics: Journal of the Southern African Institute for Management Scientists, 24(2), 36-52.
Thake, S., & Zadek, S. (1997). Practical people, noble causes: How to support community-based social entrepreneurs. Executive Summary. New Economics Foundation.
Tiwari, P., Bhat, A. K., & Tikoria, J. (2017). An empirical analysis of the factors affecting social entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 7(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40497-017-0067-1
Tyszka, T., Cieślik, J., Domurat, A., & Macko, A. (2011). Motivation, self-efficacy, and risk attitudes among entrepreneurs during transition to a market economy. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40(2), 124-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2011.01.011
Yazıcı, K., Uslu, S., & Arık, S. (2016). The investigation of the social entrepreneurship characteristics of social studies pre-service teachers. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1141455. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1141455
Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., & Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 519-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.007
Chinchilla, A., & Garcia, M. (2017). Social entrepreneurship intention: Mindfulness towards a duality of objectives. Humanistic Management Journal, 1(2), 205-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-016-0013-3

Turkish Studies - Educational Sciences-Cover

ISSN: 2667-5609
Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
Başlangıç: 2006
Yayıncı: ASOS Eğitim Bilişim Danışmanlık Otomasyon Yayıncılık Reklam Sanayi ve Ticaret LTD ŞTİ