Endüstri 4.0 Farkındalığı ve Teknolojiye Yönelik Tutumun Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli ile Analizi

Eğitim sisteminde kişilerin yeniliklere uyum sağlaması ve günlük yaşamdaki teknolojik gelişmeleri pratik olarak kullanılması gerekmektedir. Bu sistemin son basamaklarından biri olan üniversitelerde çağın gerektirdiği teknolojik yeterliliklere sahip genç bireylerin yetiştirilmesi son derece önemlidir. Çalışmanın amacı, bir devlet üniversitesinde öğrenim gören öğrencilerin Endüstri 4.0 Farkındalığı ve Teknolojiye Yönelik Tutumlarını incelemektir. Verilerin analizi için IBM SPSS Statistics 25 programı kullanılarak tanımlayıcı istatistikler, korelasyon analizi ve açıklayıcı faktör analizi ve AMOS 23 Graphics programı kullanılmış ve kurulan hipotezlerin testi için de yapısal eşitlik model analizi uygulanmıştır. Analiz sonuçlarına göre, üniversite öğrencilerinin endüstri 4.0 algılanan fayda düzeyinin endüstri 4.0 kullanıma yönelik niyeti üzerindeki etkisi; üniversite öğrencilerinin endüstri 4.0 algılanan kullanım kolaylık düzeyinin endüstri 4.0 kullanıma yönelik niyeti üzerindeki etkisi; Üniversite öğrencilerinin endüstri 4.0 algılanan fayda düzeyinin endüstri 4.0 kullanım davranışı üzerindeki etkisi; üniversite öğrencilerinin endüstri 4.0 algılanan kullanım kolaylık düzeyinin endüstri 4.0 kullanım davranışı üzerindeki etkisi anlamlı olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Analysis of Industry 4.0 Awareness and Attitude towards Technology with Structural Equation Model

In the education system, it is necessary for people to adapt to innovations and to use the technological developments in daily life practically. It is extremely important to raise young individuals with the technological competencies required by the age in universities, which is one of the last steps of this system. The aim of the study is to examine the Industry 4.0 Awareness and Attitudes towards Technology of students studying at a state university. Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis and explanatory factor analysis were used using IBM SPSS Statistics 25 program for data analysis, and structural equation model analysis was applied for testing hypotheses using AMOS 23 Graphics program. According to the results of the analysis, the industry 4.0 perceived benefit level of university students is industry 4.0. its effect on intention to use; industry 4.0 of university students. industry 4.0 of perceived ease of use. its effect on intention to use; Industry 4.0 of university students. industry 4.0 of the perceived benefit level. its effect on usage behavior; industry 4.0 of university students. It has been concluded that the effect of perceived ease of use on industry 4.0 usage behavior is significant.

___

  • Akgül, A., Akbaş, H. E., & Gümüş, A. T. (2018). A Survey of students’ perceptions on Industry 4.0 in a Large Public University in Turkey. IJOPEC Publication Limited, Londra, 237-247.
  • Agolla, J. E. (2018). Human Capital in the smart manufacturing and Industry 4.0 Revolution. Digital Transformation in Smart Manufacturing, 41–58. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.7 3575.
  • Bentler, P. M. (1988). Causal modeling via structural equation systems. In Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 317-335). Springer, Boston, MA.
  • Bilotta, E., Bertacchini, F., Gabriele, L., Giglio, S., Pantano, P. S., & Romita, T. (2021). Industry 4.0 technologies in tourism education: Nurturing students to think with technology. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 29, 100275.
  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: WILEY.
  • Buer, S. V., Strandhagen, J. O., & Chan, F. T. S. (2018). The link between Industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing: mapping current research and establishing a research agenda. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2924–2940. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.20 18.1442945.
  • Butt, J. (2020). Exploring the interrelationship between additive manufacturing and Industry 4.0. Designs, 4(2), 13.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2020). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (28. Baskı). Pegem Akademi.
  • Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS : basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, N.J. : L. Erlbaum Associates.
  • Chalmeta, R., & Santos-deLeón, N. J. (2020). Sustainable supply chain in the era of Industry 4.0 and big data: A systematic analysis of literature and research. Sustainability, 12(10), 4108.
  • Çelik, H. & Yılmaz, V. (2013). LISREL 9 .1 ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi, Ankara, Anı Yayıncılık Doğan, O., & Baloğlu, N. (2020). Endüstri 4.0 kavramsal farkındalık ölçeği. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 22(38), 58-81.
  • Eryılmaz, S. (2018). Öğrencilerin bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri yeterliliklerinin belirlenmesi: Gazi Üniversitesi, Turizm Fakültesi örneği. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17(65), 37-49.
  • Fidell, S., Tabachnick, B., Mestre, V., & Fidell, L. (2013). Aircraft noise-induced awakenings are more reasonably predicted from relative than from absolute sound exposure levels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(5), 3645-3653.
  • Fragapane, G., Ivanov, D., Peron, M., Sgarbossa, F., & Strandhagen, J. O. (2020). Increasing flexibility and productivity in Industry 4.0 production networks with autonomous mobile robots and smart intralogistics. Annals of Operations Research, 1-19.
  • Frank, A. G., Mendes, G. H., Ayala, N. F., & Ghezzi, A. (2019). Servitization and Industry 4.0 convergence in the digital transformation of product firms: A business model innovation perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 341-351.
  • Galati, F., & Bigliardi, B. (2019). Industry 4.0: Emerging themes and future research avenues using a text mining approach. Computers in Industry, 109, 100-113.
  • Gleason, N. W. (2018). Higher Education in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Singapure: Singapore Pte Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981- 13-0194-0.
  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008, September). Evaluating model fit: a synthesis of the structural equation modelling literature. In 7th European Conference on research methodology for business and management studies (pp. 195-200)
  • Janíková, M., & Kowaliková, P. (2017). Technical education in the context of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Open Online Journal for Research and Education Special, 65–73.
  • Kazimirov, A. N. (2018). Education at university and industry 4.0. In 2018 Global Smart Industry Conference (GloSIC) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
  • Kusiak, A. (2018). Smart manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1-2), 508-517. Liao, Y., Deschamps, F., Loures, E. de F. R., & Ramos, L. F. P. (2017). Past, present and future of Industry 4.0 - a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. International Journal of Production Research, 55(12), 3609–3629. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.20 17.1308576
  • Liao, Y., Loures, E. R., Deschamps, F., Brezinski, G., & Venâncio, A. (2018). The Impact of the FOURTH Industrial Revolution. a CrossCountry/Region Comparison. Production, 28, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103- 6513.20180061
  • Magruk, A. (2016). Uncertainty in the sphere of the Industry 4.0 – potential areas to research. Business, Management and Education, 14(2), 275–291.
  • Makris, S., Tsarouchi, P., Matthaiakis, A. S., Athanasatos, A., Chatzigeorgiou, X., Stefos, M., & Aivaliotis, S. (2017). Dual arm robot in cooperation with humans for flexible assembly. CIRP Annals, 66(1), 13-16.
  • Motyl, B., Baronio, G., Uberti, S., Speranza, D., & Filippi, S. (2017). How will Change the Future Engineers’ Skills in the Industry 4.0 Framework? A Questionnaire Survey. Procedia Manufacturing, 11(June), 1501–1509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.201
  • Morrar, R., Arman, H., & Mousa, S. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution (Industry 4.0): A Social Innovation Perspective. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(11), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1 117. Masoni, R., Ferrise, F., Bordegoni, M., Gattullo, M., Uva, A. E., Fiorentino, M., & Di Donato, M. (2017). Supporting remote maintenance in industry 4.0 through augmented reality. Procedia manufacturing, 11, 1296-1302.
  • Muhammad, Y. (2018). Era Industri 4.0. Tantangan dan Peluang Perkembangan Pendidikan Kejuruan Indonesia.
  • Oke, A., & Fernandes, F. A. P. (2020). Innovations in teaching and learning: Exploring the perceptions of the education sector on the 4th İndustrial Revolution (4IR). Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(2), 31
  • Raykow, T., & Marcoulıdes, G. A. (2006). A first Course in Structural Equation Modeling. London: Lavrance Erlbaum Associates. Publishers.
  • Roy, S., & Edan, Y. (2020). Investigating joint-action in short-cycle repetitive handover tasks: The role of giver versus receiver and its implications for human-robot collaborative system design. International Journal of Social Robotics, 12(5), 973-988.
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
  • Smit, J., Kreutzer, S., Moeller, C. & Carlberg, M. (2016). Industry 4.0. policy department a: economic and scientific policy. European Parliament. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/570007/IPOL_STU(2016 )570007_EN.pdf Someshwar, R., & Edan, Y. (2017). Givers & Receivers perceive handover tasks differently: Implications for Human-Robot collaborative system design. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.06207.
  • Strozzi, F., Colicchia, C., Creazza, A., & Noè, C. (2017). Literature review on the ‘Smart Factory’concept using bibliometric tools. International Journal of Production Research, 55(22), 6572-6591.
  • Temel, K. (2019). Endüstri 4.0 Farkındalığının belirlenmesi: çanakkale onsekiz mart üniversitesi örneği. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 14(1), 31-44.
  • Torun, N. K., & Cengiz, E. (2019). Endüstri 4.0 Bakiş açisinin öğrenciler gözünden teknoloji kabul modeli (TKM) ile ölçümü. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, (22), 235-250.
  • Tsarouchi, P., Michalos, G., Makris, S., Athanasatos, T., Dimoulas, K., & Chryssolouris, G. (2017). On a human–robot workplace design and task allocation system. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 30(12), 1272-1279.
  • Xing, B., & Marwala, T. (2017). Implications of the Fourth Industrial Age on Higher Education. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.09643
  • Ujakpa, M. M., Osakwe, J. O., Iyawa, G. E., Hashiyana, V., & Mutalya, A. N. (2020, May). Industry 4.0: University Students’ Perception, Awareness and Preparedness-A Case of Namibia. In 2020 IST-Africa Conference (IST-Africa) (pp. 1-10). IEEE.
  • Villani, V., Pini, F., Leali, F., & Secchi, C. (2018). Survey on human–robot collaboration in industrial settings: Safety, intuitive interfaces and applications. Mechatronics, 55, 248-266.
  • Weyer, S., Schmitt, M., Ohmer, M., & Gorecky, D. (2015), “Towards Industry 4.0 - standardization as the crucial challenge for highly modular, multi-vendor production systems”, IFACPapersOnLine, Vol. 48 No. 3, pp. 579-584, doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.143.
  • Yıldız, S. C., & Fırat, S. Ü. (2020). Türkiye’deki üniversite öğrencilerinin endüstri 4.0 bilgi düzeylerinin belirlenmesi. Endüstri Mühendisliği, 31, 1-16
  • Yılmaz, V., & Çelik, H. (2009). LISREL ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi-I. Ankara,Pegem Akademi. Yurdugül, H., & Aşkar, P. (2008). Öğrencilerin teknolojiye yönelik tutum ölçeği faktör yapılarının incelenmesi: Türkiye örneği. İlköğretim online, 7(2), 288-309.