The Role of Category Labeling in Categorization and Evaluation of New Products

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to analyze how consumers react to new products that do not fit into any existing product categories in their minds and how the category label provided for the new product helps them understand and categorize it. It intends to discover how consumers' attitudes, purchase intentions, and expected benefits from a new product are shaped when they can categorize the product versus when they cannot. The drink "cider" is chosen as the new product subject to the study. Although the imaginary cider brand in the study contains three percent alcohol, it is labeled either as a soft drink or an alcoholic drink. Another aim of the study is to test whether consumers' categorization decisions are affected by the labels and cues provided in the advertisements although more suitable categorizations are possible. Design/methodology/approach – (2 x 2) ANOVA is run on 350 participants. Category label is manipulated with a 2 (soft drink schema ad with no label indicated- alcoholic drink schema ad with no label indicated) x 2 (soft drink schema ad with soft drink label indicated- alcoholic drink schema ad with alcoholic drink label indicated) between-groups design. Findings – When faced with a new product, consumers categorize the product in the direction of the label provided in the advertisement and away from other more likely categorizations. Although the cider brand contains three percent alcohol, when it is labeled as a soft drink, it is categorized as a soft drink. Consumers who are uncertain about cider's product category showed lower attitude towards the product and purchase intention scores than consumers who are more confident about their category decisions. Discussion – When a new product is introduced into the market, the product's marketing communications should clearly define the product, its product category, its benefits, and usage situations. The label and cues given in the advertisements will help consumers to place the product into a category indicated by advertisements. Providing a label also helps consumers to have a positive attitude towards the product and increases its chance of trial.

___

Alba, J. W., and Chattopadhyay, A. (1985). Effects of context and part-category cues on recall of competing brands. Journal of Marketing Research, 22(3), 340-349.

Alba, J. W., and Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 411-454.

Arboleda, A. M., and Arce-Lopera, C. (2015). Quantitative analysis of product categorization in soft drinks using bottle silhouettes. Food Quality and Preference, 45, 1-10.

Barsalou, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition, 11(3), 211-227.

Bruner, J. D., Goodnow, J. J., and Austin, G. A. (1972). Categories and cognition. Culture and Cognition, 168- 190.

Cider Definition (2020), www.dictionary.cambridge.org, (Erişim tarihi: 20 Ocak 2020).

Cider Statistics (2019), https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/cider-market , (Erişim tarihi: 5 Aralık 2019).

Cohen, J. B., and Basu, K. (1987). Alternative models of categorization: Toward a contingent processing framework. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 455-472.

Dovidio, J. F., Love, A., Schellhaas, F. M., and Hewstone, M. (2017). Reducing intergroup bias through intergroup contact: Twenty years of progress and future directions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(5), 606-620.

Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155-170.

Gentner, D. (1989). Analogical learning. Similarity and analogical reasoning, 199.

Gentner, D., and Markman, A. B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52(1), 45.

Gregan-Paxton, J., and John, D. R. (1997). Consumer learning by analogy: A model of internal knowledge transfer. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(3), 266-284.

Gregan‐Paxton, J., Hibbard, J. D., Brunel, F. F., and Azar, P. (2002). "So that's what that is": Examining the impact of analogy on consumers' knowledge development for really new products. Psychology & Marketing, 19(6), 533-550.

Gutman, J. (1982). A means-end chain model based on consumer categorization processes. Journal of Marketing, 46(2), 60-72.

Iyengar, S. S., and Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995.

Lingle, J. H., Altom, M. W., and Medin, D. L. (1984). Of cabbages and kings: Assessing the extendibility of natural object concept models to social things.

Loken, B., and Ward, J. (1990). Alternative approaches to understanding the determinants of typicality. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 111-126.

MacKenzie, S. B., Lutz, R. J., and Belch, G. E. (1986). The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(2), 130- 143.

Medin, D. L., Wattenmaker, W. D., and Hampson, S. E. (1987). Family resemblance, conceptual cohesiveness, and category construction. Cognitive Psychology, 19(2), 242-279.

Mela, C. F., and Lehmann, D. R. (1995). Using fuzzy set-theoretic techniques to identify preference rules from interactions in the linear model: an empirical study. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 71(2), 165-181.

Mervis, C. B., and Rosch, E. (1981). Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 32(1), 89- 115.

Meyers-Levy, J., and Tybout, A. M. (1989). Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(1), 39-54.

Moreau, C. P., Lehmann, D. R., and Markman, A. (2001). Entrenched category structures and resistance to really new products. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(1), 14-29.

Moreau, C. P., Markman, A. B., and Lehmann, D. R. (2001). "What is it?" Categorization flexibility and consumers' responses to really new products. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 489-498.

Murphy, G. L., and Ross, B. H. (1994). Predictions from uncertain categorizations. Cognitive Psychology, 27(2), 148-193.

Rosch, E. (1999). Principles of categorization. Concepts: core readings, 189.

Shiv, B., and Fedorikhin, A. (1999). Heart and mind in conflict: The interplay of affect and cognition in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(3), 278-292.

Sujan, M. (1985). Consumer knowledge: Effects on evaluation strategies mediating consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(1), 31-46.

Sujan, M., and Dekleva, C. (1987). Product categorization and inference making: Some implications for comparative advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 372-378.

Thomas, R. D. (1998). Learning correlations in categorization tasks using large, ill-defined categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(1), 119.

Urban, G. L., Hulland, J. S., and Weinberg, B. D. (1993). Premarket forecasting for new consumer durable goods: Modeling categorization, elimination, and consideration phenomena. Journal of Marketing, 57(2), 47-63.

Viswanathan, M., and Childers, T. L. (1999). Understanding how product attributes influence product categorization: development and validation of fuzzy set-based measures of gradedness in product categories. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(1), 75-94.

Weiss, L., & Johar, G. V. (2013). Egocentric categorization and product judgment: Seeing your traits in what you own (and their opposite in what you don't). Journal of Consumer Research, 40(1), 185-201.

Ziamou, P., and Gregan-Paxton, J. (1999). Learning of new products: moving ahead by holding back. Advances in Consumer Research 26, 365-367.
İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1309-0712
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2009
  • Yayıncı: Melih Topaloğlu
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Borsa İstanbul’ da 2013-2018 Yılları Arasında İlk Kez Halka Arz Edilen Payların Kısa Dönem Fiyat Performanslarının İncelenmesi

Göksenin YAŞAR, Burak TERİM, Cevdet A. KAYALI

Zaman ve Ürün Miktarı Kısıtlılığı Koşullarındaki Tepkisel Satın Alma Davranışlarının Psikolojik Reaksiyon Kuramı Bağlamında İncelenmesi

Fatma İrem KONYALIOĞLU, Ahmet ŞEKERKAYA

The Relationship Between Burnout Syndrome and Organizational Commitment Perception of Employees in Fast Moving Consumer Goods Industry

M. Çağrı PEHLİVANOĞLU, Ertuğrul KÖSE

Sigortacılık Sektörünün Güncel Sorunlarına Yönelik İlişkisel Pazarlama Uygulamaları Ekseninde Çözüm Önerileri

DAVUT KARAMAN, Hacer YUMURTACI AYDOĞMUŞ

A Bibliometric Analysis of Academic Articles about Innovation in the Perspective of Tourism Sector

Ahmet GÜMÜŞ

Coğrafi İşaretli Ürünleri Satın Almaya Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği; Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Alpaslan YÜCE, Nazan KORUCUK

Sürekli Denetim Uygulamalarının Temel Amaçları ve Sürekli Denetimin Uygulanma Koşulları: İSO 500 Büyük Sanayi Kuruluşu’nda Bir Araştırma

Seda AĞGÜL, Turan ÖNDEŞ

İşletmelerde Stratejik Yönlülük Boyutları ile Hizmet Yenilik Yeteneği ve Pazar Performansı Arasındaki İlişki: Bir Araştırma

Nurhan PAPATYA, Gürcan PAPATYA, AHMET BUĞRA HAMŞIOĞLU

The Effect of Organisational Culture on Employees’ Life and Job Satisfaction

Erdinç BALLI, Ayşe İpek KOCA BALLI

Banka Tercihini Belirleyen Kriterlerin ENTROPİ Yöntemi İle Ağırlıklandırılması: Giresun İli Örneği

Alper KARAVARDAR, Arif ÇİLEK