___

• Akçay, V. (2012). Pozitif Psikolojik Sermayenin İş Tatmini ile İlişkisi, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(1), 123- 140.
• Akın, M. (2008). Örgütsel Destek, Sosyal Destek ve Aile Çatışmalarının Yaşam Tatmini Üzerindeki Etkileri, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 25(2), 141-170.
• Aselage, J. ve Eisenberger, R. (2003). Perceived Organizational Support and Psychological Contracts: A Theoretical Integration, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 491-509
• Avey, J. B., Luthans, F. ve Jensen, S. M. (2009). Psychological Capital: A Positive Resource for Combating Employee Stress and Turnover, Human Resource Management, 48(5), 677- 693.
• Avey, J.B., Luthans, F., Smith, R. M. ve Palmer, N.F. (2010). Impact of Positive Psychological Capital on Employee Well-Being over Time, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15(1), 17-28.
• Avey, J.B., Reichard, R.J., Luthans, F., ve Mhatre, K.H. (2011). Meta-­-analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22(2), 127-152. Baron, R. M., ve Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
• Bhattacharya, C. B., Rao, H., ve Glynn, M. A. (1995). Understanding the bond of identification: An investigation of its correlates among art museum members. The Journal of Marketing, 59 (4), 46-57.
• Bülbül, H., ve Demirer, Ö. (2008). Hizmet kalitesi ölçüm modelleri SERVQUAL ve SERPERF'in karşılaştırmalı analizi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20, 181-198.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2006). Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Analizi El Kitabı, Ankara, Pegem A Yayıncılık.
• Caprara, G.V. ve Cervone, D. (2003). A Conception of Personality for a Psychology of Human Strengths: Personality as an Agentic, Self Regulating System, Içinde: L. G. Aspinwall ve U. M. Staudinger, (Ed), A Psychology of Human Strenghts: Fundamental Questions and Future Directions for a Positive Psychology. Washington: DC American Psychological Association, 2003, ss.61-74.
• Carmeli, A., Gilat, G. ve Waldman, D. A. (2007). The role of perceived organizational performance in organizational identification, adjustment and job performance. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), 972-992.
• Cheung, M. F. Y. ve Law M. C. C. (2008). "Relationships of Organizational Justice and Organizational Identification:The Mediating Effects of Perceived Organizational Support in Hong Kong", Asia Pacific Business Review, 14 (2): 213-231.
• Çetin, F. ve Basım, H. (2010). İzlenim Yönetimi Taktiklerinde Öz Yeterlilik Algısının Rolü. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, (35), 255- 269.
• Çetin, F., ve Basım, H. N. (2012). Örgütsel psikolojik sermaye: Bir ölçek uyarlama çalışması. Amme İdare Dergisi, 45(1), 121-137.
• Çetin, F. Hazır, K., ve Basım, H. N. (2013). Destekleyici Örgüt Kültürü İle Örgütsel Psikolojik Sermaye Etkileşimi: Kontrol Odağının Aracılık Rolü. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(1), 31-52. DPT (2014). Kamu Personeli
• İstatistikleri, Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı Erişim:
• http://www.dpb.gov.tr/tr-tr/istatistikler/kamu-personeli-istatistikleri, 29.01.2015.
• Efraty, D., ve Wolfe, D. M. (1988). The effect of organizational identification on employee affective and performance responses. Journal of Business and Psychology, 3(1), 105-112.
• Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., ve Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived Supervisor Support, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500-507.
• Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., ve Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived Organizational Support and Employee Diligence, Commitment, and Innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 51-59.
• Einsenberger, R., Cummings, J., Armeli, S., ve Lynch, P. (1997). Perceived Organizational Support, Discretionary Treatment, and Job Satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(5), 812-820.
• Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of applied psychology, 86(1), 42-51.
• Eren, E. (2012). Örgütsel Davranış ve Yönetim Psikolojisi. 13. Baskı, Beta Basım Yayım, İstanbul
• Eroğlu, A. (2010). Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Tekniklerin Varsayımları, (Ed.) Ş. Kalaycı, SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri, Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım Ltd.Şti.
• Erkmen, T., ve Esen, E. (2012). Psikolojik Sermaye Konusunda 2003-2011 Yıllarında Yapılan Çalışmaların Kategorik Olarak İncelenmesi. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(19), 89-103.
• Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., ve Barron, K. E. (2004). Testing Moderator and Mediator Effects in Counseling Psychology Research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(1), 115-134.
• Fuller, J. B., Marler, L., Hester, K., Frey, L., ve Relyea, C. (2006). Construed External Image and Organizational Identification: A Test of the Moderating Influence of Need for Self-esteem. The Journal of Social Psychology, 146(6), 701-716.
• George, J. M., Reed, T. F., Ballard, K. A., Colin, J., ve Fielding, J. (1993). Contact with AIDS Patients as a Source of Work-Related Distress: Effects of Organizational and Social Support. Academy of Management Journal, 36(1), 157-171.
• Gillet, N., Colombat, P., Michinov, E., Pronost, A.M., ve Fouquereau, E. (2013). Procedural Justice, Supervisor Autonomy Support, Work Satisfaction, Organizational Identification and Job Performance: The Mediating Role of Need Satisfaction and Perceived Organizational Support. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(11), 2560-2571.
• Güriş, S. ve Çağlayan, E. (2005). Ekonometri, İstanbul: Der Yayınları.
• He, H., ve Brown, A. D. (2013). Organizational Identity and Organizational Identification: A Review of the Literature and Suggestions for Future Research. Group & Organization Management, 38 (1), 3-35.
• Keleş, H. N. (2011). Pozitif Psikolojik Sermaye: Tanımı, Bileşenleri ve Örgüt Yönetimine Etkileri, Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(2), 343-350.
• Hogg, M. A., ve Terry, D. I. (2000). Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25 (1), 121-140.
• Hu, L., Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit, Içinde: R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 76-99.
• Johnson, R. A. ve Wichern, D. W. (2002). Applied Multivaried Statistical Analysis, 5th Ed. USA: Pearson Education Int.
• Kenny D. A., Kashy, D. ve Bolger, N. (1998). Data Analysis in Socialpsychology, (Ed) D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, ve G. Lindzey, The Handbook of Social Psychology (ss.203- 227). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
• Levinson, H. (1965). Reciprocation: The Relationship Between Man And Organization, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 9, 370-390
• Loi, R.; Chan, K. W. ve Lam, L. W. (2013). Leader-Member Exchange, Organizational Identification, and Job Satisfaction: A Social Identity Perspective. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 42-61.
• Luthans, F. ve Youssef, C. M. (2004). Human, Social and Now Positive Psychological Capital Management: Investing in People for Competitive Advantage, Organizational Dynamics, 33(2), 143-160.
• Luthans, F., ve Youssef, C. M. (2007). Emerging Positive Organizational Behavior, Journal of Management, 33, 321-349
• Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B. ve Norman, S. M. (2007). Psychological Capital: Measurement And Relationship With Performance And Satisfaction, Personnel Psychology, 60, 541-572.
• Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. ve Peterson, S. (2010). The Development and Resulting Performance Impact of Positive Psychological Capital, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 21(1), 41-67.
• Mael, F. ve Ashforth, B. (1992). "Alumni and Their Alma Mater: a Partial Test of the ReformulatedModel of Organizational Identification", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2):103-123.
• Marsh, H. W. and Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher-order factor models and their invariance across groups, Psychological Bulletin, 97, 562-582.
• Meydan, C. H. ve Şeşen H. (2011). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi Amos Uygulamaları, Detay, Ankara.
• Miller, V. D., Allen, M., Casey M. K. ve Johnson, J. R. (2000). "Reconsidering the Organizational Identification Questionnaire", Management Communication Quarterly, 13(4): 626-658.
• Norman, S. M, Avey, J. B., Nimnicht, J. L. ve Graber, P. N. (2010). The Interactive Effects of Psychological Capital and Organizational Identity on Employee Organizational Citizenship and Deviance Behaviors. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 17(4), 380-391.
• Ökten, Ş. (2009). Toplumsal Cinsiyet ve İktidar: Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi'nin Toplumsal Cinsiyet Düzeni, Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2(8), 302- 312.
• Özdevecioğlu, M. (2003). Algılanan Örgütsel Destek ile Örgütsel Bağlılık Arasındaki İlişkilerin Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 18(2), 113-130.
• Qadeer, F. ve Jaffery, H. (2014). Mediation of Psychological Capital between Organizational Climate and Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 8 (2), 453- 470.
• Rhoades, L. ve Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived Organizational Support: A Review Of The Literature, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 698-714.
• Rousseau, D. M. (1998). Why workers still identify with organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 217-233.
• Ruiller, C. (2010). Le soutien social au travail: conceptualisation, mesure et influence sur l'épuisement professionnel et l'implication organisationnelle: l'étude d'un cas hospitalier, École Doctorale de Sciences Économiques et de Gestion. (Doctoral dissertation, Université Rennes 1).
• Schaufeli, W. B. ve Salanova, M. (2007). Work engagement: An Emerging Psychological Concept and its Implications for Organizations. Içinde: S. W. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner ve D. P. Skarlicki (Eds.), Research in social issues in management: Managing social and ethical issues in organizations, 5, 135-177.
• Schermelleh, E., Karin, M., ve Helfried M. H. (2003). Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures, Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
• Seligman. M. E. P. (1998). What is the "good life, American Psychological Association Monitor, 29(10), 1-3.
• Senge, P. (2006) Beşinci Disiplin: Öğrenen Organizasyon Sanatı ve Uygulaması, Çev.: Ayşegül İldeniz, Ahment Doğukan, Barış Pala, Yapı Kredi Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Shearman, M. S. (2013). American workers' organizational identification with a Japanese multinational manufacturer, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(10), 1968-1984.
• Shukia A. ve Singh S. (2013). Psychological Capital & Citizenship Behavior: Evidence from Telecom Sector in India, The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 49(1), 97-112.
• Stassen, M. ve Ursel, N. D. (2009). Perceived Organizational Support, Career Satisfaction, and The Retention of Older Workers, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 201-220.
• Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180.
• Stets, J. E. ve Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63 (3), 224-237.
• Suazo, M. and Turnley, W. (2010), Perceived Organizational Support as a Mediator of the Relations between Individual Differences and Psychological Contract Breach, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(6), 620-648.
• Sungur, O. (2010). Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Tekniklerin Varsayımları, Ş. Kalaycı (Ed.), SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri, Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım Ltd.Şti.
• Tajfel, H. ve Turner, J.C. (1979). An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. Içinde: W. G. Austin ve S. Worchel (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (ss. 33-48), Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
• Tatlıdil, H. (1996). Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistiksel Analiz, Ankara: Cem Web Ofset Ltd.Şti.
• Tavşancıl, E. (2002). Tutumların Ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile Veri Analizi, 1.Baskı, Ankara, Nobel Yayınları.
• Turunç, Ö. ve Çelik, M. (2010). Çalışanların Algıladıkları Örgütsel Destek ve İş Stresinin Örgütsel Özdeşleşme ve İş Performansına Etkisi, Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 17(2), 183-206.
• Tüzün, İ. K. (2006). Örgütsel Güven, Örgütsel Kimlik ve Örgütsel Özdeşleşme İlişkisi, Uygulamalı Bir Çalışma. Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İşletme Ana Bilim Dalı, Ankara.
• Ullman, J.B. (2001). Structural equation modeling, Içinde: B. G. Tabachnick ve L. S. Fidel (Eds.), Using Multivariate Statistics, (4th ed; s.:653- 771), Allyn&Bacon, Needham Heights, MA.
• Van Knippenberg, D. ve Van Schie, E.C.M. (2000). Foci and Correlates of Organizational Identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 137-147.
• Yazıcıoğlu, Y. ve Erdoğan, S. (2004). SPSS Uygulamalı Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
• Yüksel, İ. (2006), Örgütsel Destek Algısı ve Belirleyicilerinin İşten Ayrılma Eğilimi İle İlişkisi, İ.Ü. İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(1), 7-32.