Savaşın Girdabından Kaçmak: Türkiye’nin İkinci Dünya Savaşı’ndaki Tarafsızlık Politikasının İki Yönlü Analizi

Türkiye İkinci Dünya Savaşı’nda tarafsız kalan az sayıda ülkeden bir tanesi olmuştur. Ankara hükümetinin dış politikadaki bu tercihi, tarafsız devletlerin haklarının çoğu kez göz ardı edildiği (daha ziyade küçük ölçekli devletlerin) ve onların muharipler tarafından “ahlaksız bedavacılar” ve “harp zenginleri” gibi benzetmeler ile itibarsızlaştırıldığı bir dönemde kendisi için büyük bir sınavdı. Bu makalede iddia edilen Türk yönetici sınıfının İkinci Dünya Savaşı’ndaki tarafsızlık tercihinin savaşan taraflarla ticaretten edinilecek kar benzeri günlük hesapların çok ötesinde, onların geçmiş deneyimlerinin de etkisiyle milli güvenlik algılarında şekil bulan anlayıştan kaynaklı bir ölüm kalım mücadelesi olduğudur. Çalışmada ilk olarak Türk yönetici sınıfının bilinçaltına nüfuz etmiş olan tarafsızlık politikasının arkasında yatan sebepler tartışılacaktır. İkinci olarak, Türkiye’nin tarafsızlık politikasını riske atıcı gelişmeler karşısında Türk yönetici sınıfının, ülkenin savaş dışı konumunu muhafaza etmek amacıyla uyguladığı diplomatik manevraların bir analizi yapılacaktır.

Escaping the Whirlpool of War: a Two-fold Analysis of Turkey’s Neutrality Policy in World War II

Turkey was one of the few countries that remained neutral during World War II. It was a big test for the government in Ankara since the rights of the wartime neutrals (particularly that of the small powers) were often ignored and they were labeled by the belligerents with such derogatory terms as “immoral free riders” or “war profiteers”. This article argues that, Turkish ruling elite’s choice of neutrality was not taken based on simple calculations of profiting from the trade with the belligerents, but it was their number one priority due to a national security psyche deeply ingrained in their past experiences. To this end, this article will firstly re-unfold the roots of Turkish neutrality philosophy. Secondly it will give a deeper analysis of the diplomatic methods undertaken by the Turkish ruling elite (balancing, bridging alignments, evasion, procrastination, downplaying countries strategic value, exhibiting pro-status quo tendencies, etc..) to counter the developments (i.e. changing perceptions/war aims of belligerents) that would lead to its belligerency.

___

  • Allied Relations and Negotiations with Turkey, College Park Archives USA
  • ATAÖV Türkkaya (1965) Turkish Foreign Policy, 1939-1945, Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi.
  • Atatürk’ün Söylev ve Demeçleri I-III (1906-1938), Türk Inkilap Tarihi Enstitüsü, Ankara Vol. I. (1997) AYDEMIR Şevket Süreyya (1967) İkinci Adam: İsmet İnönü 1938-1950, Remzi Kitabevi, İstanbul, Volume II
  • BABA Gürol and ÖNSOY Murat (2016) “Between Capability and Foreign Policy: Comparing Turkey’s Small Power and Middle Power Status”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, Volume 13, No. 51, pp. 3-20.
  • BARLAS Dilek (1998) Etatism and Diplomacy in Turkey: Economic and Foreign Strategies in an Uncertain World, 1929-1939, E. J. Brill, Leiden and New York.
  • BUTLER James (1958), The History of the Second World War, United Kingdom Military Series, Grand Strategy, vol. II, September 1939-June 1941, London
  • CHURCHILL Winston (1951) The Second World War, vol. V, Closing the Ring, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
  • ÇALIŞ Şaban (1997) Pan‐Turkism and Europeanism: A note on Turkey's 'pro‐German neutrality'during the Second World War, Central Asian Survey.
  • DERİNGİL Selim (1982) “The Preservation of Turkey’s Neutrality During the Second World War 1940”, Middle Eastern Studies, 18:1.
  • DERİNGİL Selim (1989) Turkish Foreign Policy During the Second World War: An ‘active’ Neutrality, Cambridge University Press.
  • GORDON David L. and DANGERFIELD Royden (1947) The Hidden Weapon: The Story of Economic Warfare, New York, Harper & Brothers.
  • GROTIUS Hugo (2005) The Rights of War and Peace (2005 ed.) vol. 3 (Book III) [1625] The Rights of War and Peace (2005 ed.) vol. 3 (Book III) [1625]
  • GÜÇLÜ Yücel (2002) “The Uneasy Relationship: Turkey's Foreign Policy vis-a-vis the Soviet Union at the Outbreak of the Second World War, Mediterranean Quarterly.
  • Hague Convention V, ‘Convention Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in case of War on Land’, http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/hague05.asp,
  • HOWARD Michael (1972) The History of the Second World War, The United Kingdom Military Series, Grand Strategy, vol. IV, August 1942-September 1943, London.
  • J.C.S. Files (January 18, 1943) Memorandum by the British Joint Planning Staff, Casablanca. KARSH Efraim (1988) Neutrality and Small States, New York, Routledge.
  • LEITZ Christian (2001) Sympathy for the Devil: Neutral Europe and Nazi Germany in World War II, New York University Press, New York, 2001.
  • LEWIS Bernard (1961) The Emergence of Modern Turkey, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • MACHIAVELLI Nicolo (1966) The Prince, Nwy Work, Bantam Books, 1966. MCGHEE George C. (1954) 'Turkey Joins the West', Foreign Affairs, Vol. 32 (1954), pp. 626-9
  • OGLEY Roderick (1970) The Theory and Practice of Neutrality in the Twentieth Century, Barnes & Noble Inc, New York.
  • ÖYMEN Onur (Haziran 2002) Silahsız Savaş: Bir Mücadele Sanatı Olarak Diplomasi, Remzi Kitabevi.
  • “Preclusive Operations in the Neutral Countries in World War II," March 20, 1947. ÖNDEŞ Osman (1974) II. Dünya Savaşı:1939-1945, İstanbul, Altin Kitaplar Press.
  • ÖZDEN Haluk (2013) “The Diplomatic Maneuvers of Turkey in World War II”, Karadeniz Araştırmaları, Sayı 37 (Bahar 2013), s.91-110
  • Records of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff [JCS] | Memorandum by the British Joint Planning Staff, Casablanca, January 18, 1943
  • Records of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff [JCS] Memorandum by the United States Chiefs of Staff, Washington, 9 August 1943, Secret, Enclosure to C.C.S. 303, Strategic Concept for the Defeat of Axis in Europe
  • Roosevelt Papers: Telegram, Prime Minister Churchill to President Roosevelt, London, December 2, 1942.
  • ROZAKIS Christos (1987) The Turkish Straits, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht.
  • STEINBACH Udo (1994) The European Community, The United States, The Middle East, and Turkey, ‘Politics in the Third Turkish Republic, ed. Metin Heper, Westview Press, Boulder, Colo.
  • "Support Purchase Program in Turkey," May 28, 1945, RG 169, Office of the Administrator, Records Analysis Division, Historical Monographs Prepared Outside the Division, Box 5. Quoted in Allied relations and negotiations with Turkey, College Park Archives USA.
  • TAMKIN Nicholas (2009) Britain, Turkey an the Soviet Union, 1940-45, Palgrave, London.
  • The UK Prime Minister's Office files 3/445/6, Churchill to ˙Ismet ˙Inönü, 31 January 1941.
  • Turkey since 1940, Bulletin of International News, Royal Institute of International Affairs, Vol. 19, No. 18 (Sep. 5, 1942).
  • United States Department of State (1939), “Foreign Relations of the United States”, Vol. I.
  • United States Department of State (1940), “Foreign Relations of the United States”, Vol. I.
  • United States Department of State (1941), “Foreign Relations of the United States”, Vol. III.
  • United States Department of State (1942), “Foreign Relations of the United States”, Vol IV.
  • United States Department of State (1943), “Foreign Relations of the United States”, Vol IV.
  • U.S. State Department. “Allied Relations and Negotiations With Turkey.” www.state.gov/www/regions/eur/ rpt_9806_ng_turkey.pdf
  • US Department of State Bulletin, Vol. IX, December 11, 1943
  • US Department of State Executive Agreement Series No. 163
  • UZMAN Nasrullah (2018) II. Dünya Savaşı Sonrasında Sovyet Talepleri ve Türkiye’nin Tepkisi, Gazi Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Vol. 11, No. 22.
  • VANDERLIPPE John M. (2001) A Cautious Balance: The Question Of Turkey In World War II, Historian, Fall 2001, Vol. 64 Issue 1.
  • WEINBERG Gerhard L.(1994) A world at arms: a global history of World War II. Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • WALZER Michael (2006) Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations, 4th ed, Basic Books, New York:.
  • WEBER Frank G. (1979) The Evasive Neutral: Germany, Britain, and the Quest for a Turkish Alliance in the Second World War, University of Missouri Press, Columbia.
  • WEINBERG Gerhard L. (1994) A World At Arms: A Global History Of World War II. Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • WEISBAND Edward (1973) Turkish Foreign Policy 1943-1945: Small State Diplomacy and Great Power Politics, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
  • WOODWARD Lwelyn (1970) British Foreign Policy in the Second World War, Vol 1,HMSO, London.
  • WYLIE Neville (2002) Victims or actors? European neutrals and non-belligerents, 1939-1945, in, European Neutrals and Non Belligerents During the Second World War, Ed: Wylie, Neville, Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • ZÜRCHER Eric J. (1993) Turkey: A Modern History, I.B. Tauris, London.
Cumhuriyet Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1305-1458
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Atatürk İlkeleri ve İnkılap Tarihi Enstitüsü