Türkiye’deki Yenilenebilir Enerji Kaynaklarının Entropi-TOPSIS Yöntemiyle Değerlendirilmesi

Hızlı büyüyen nüfus ve ekonomiye sahip ülkelerde enerjiye olan talep önemli ölçüde arttığından, yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarının önemi de her geçen gün artmaktadır. Artan önemle birlikte bu kaynakların seçimi de oldukça karmaşık bir hal almaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’deki yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarının ekonomiklik, verimlilik, istihdam, sosyal kabul edilebilirlik ve ekonomik ömür gibi kriterler açısından değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Bu kapsamda geniş bir literatür araştırması ve uzman görüşü sonucunda belirlenen ve önem düzeyi ağırlıkları Entropi yöntemi ile hesaplanan 9 adet kriter, Türkiye’de bulunan hidroelektrik, rüzgâr, güneş, biyokütle ve jeotermal enerji kaynakları TOPSIS yöntemi ile sıralanmış ve kaynaklar değerlendirilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular; Türkiye açısından ihtiyaç duyulan yenilenebilir enerji santralleri arasında ilk üç sırayı biyokütle, jeotermal ve hidroelektrik enerji santrallerinin aldığını, bunları sırasıyla güneş ve rüzgâr enerjisi santrallerinin takip ettiğini ortaya koymuştur.

The Evaluation of Renewable Energy Resources in Turkey Using Entropy-TOPSIS Method

The importance of renewable energy sources is increasing day by day as the demand for energy increases significantly in countries with fast-growing populations and economies. With this increasing importance, the selection of energy sources is also becoming very complex. This study aimed to evaluate the renewable energy sources in Turkey in terms of criteria such as economy, efficiency, employment, social acceptability, and economic life. In this context, 9 criteria were determined as a result of wide literature research and expert opinion and whose significance weights were calculated with the Entropy method; and the hydroelectric, wind, solar, biomass, and geothermal energy resources in Turkey have been listed with the TOPSIS method and the resources have been evaluated. The findings revealed that biomass, geothermal and hydroelectric energies take the first three places among the most suitable renewable energy sources for Turkey, followed by solar and wind energies, respectively.

___

  • Ahmad, S., Tahar R. M. (2014). “Selection of renewable energy sources for sustainable development of electricity generation system using analytic hierarchy process: a case of Malaysia”. Renewable Energy, No: 63, pp. 458-466.
  • Alizadeh, R., Soltanisehat, L., Lund, P. D., Zamanisabzi, H. (2020). “Improving renewable energy policy planning and decision-making through a hybrid MCDM method”. Energy Policy. No: 137, pp.22-33.
  • Amer, M., Daim, T.U. (2011). “Selection of renewable energy technologies for a developing county: A case of Pakistan”. Energy Sustain Dev., Vol:15, No: 420, pp.27-35.
  • Apaydın, S., Tasdogan, C. (2019). “The long run effects of renewable and primary energy demand on growth in Turkey”. Third Sector Social Economic Review, Vol:54, No:1, pp. 431-445.
  • Atıcı, K.B., Ulucan, A. (2009). “Enerji projelerinin değerlendirilmesi sürecinde çok kriterli karar verme yaklaşımları ve Türkiye uygulamaları”. H.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. Vol: 27, No: 1, pp. 161-186.
  • Beccalı, M., Cellura, M., Mistretta, M. (1998). “Decision-making in energy planning: Application of the electre method at regional level for the diffusion of renewable energy technology”. Renewable Energy. No:28, pp. 2063-2087.
  • Chen,Y.C., Hung, M., Wang,Y. (2018). “The effect of mandatory CSR disclosure on firm profitability and social externalities: Evidence from China”. Journal of Account. Econ. Vol:65, No: 1, pp. 169- 190.
  • Derse, O., Yontar, E. (2020). “SWARA-TOPSIS yöntemi ile en uygun yenilenebilir enerji kaynağının belirlenmesi”. Journal of Industrial Engineering. Vol: 31, No:3, pp. 389-410.
  • Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas,G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). “Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method”, Computers & Operations Research. Vol:22, No: 7, pp. 763- 770.
  • Ertay, T., Kahraman, C., Kaya, I. (2013). “Evaluation of renewable energy alternatives using MACBETH and fuzzy AHP multicriteria methods: The case of Turkey”, Technological and Economic Development of Economy. Vol: 19, No: 1, pp. 38-62.
  • Freeman, J., Chen, T. (2015). “Green supplier selection using an AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS framework”. Supply Chain Management. Vol: 20, No: 3, pp. 327-340.
  • Garni, H.A., Kassem, A., Awasthi, A., Komljenovic, D., Al-Haddad, K. (2016). “A multicriteria decision-making approach for evaluating renewable power generation sources in Saudi Arabia”, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. No: 16. pp. 137-150.
  • Georgiou, D., Mohammed, E.S., Rozakis, S. (2015). “Multi-criteria decision-making on the energy supply configuration of autonomous desalination units”. Renewable Energy, No: 75, pp. 459-467.
  • Ghorabaee, M.K., Zavadskas, E.K., Olfat, L., Turskis, Z. (2015). “Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution”. Informatica. Vol: 26, No: 3, pp. 435-451.
  • Ghosh, S., Mandal, M.C., Ray, A. (2021). “Selection of environmental-conscious sourcing: an empirical investigation", Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-ofprint. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-08-2020-0416.
  • Gorgij, A. D., Wu, J., Moghadam, A. A. (2019). “Groundwater quality ranking using the improved Entropy TOPSIS method: A case study in Azarshahr Plain Aquifer, East Azerbaijan, Iran”. Human And Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal. Vol: 25, No: 1-2, pp. 176- 190.
  • Goumas M., Lygerou, V. (2000). “An extension of the PROMETHEE method for decision making in fuzzy environment: ranking of alternative energy exploitation projects”. Europen Journal of Operational Research. No: 123, pp. 606–613.
  • Govindan, K., Shankar, M., Kannan, D. (2018). “Supplier selection based on corporate social responsibility practices”. International Journal of Production Economics. No: 200, pp. 353-379.
  • Gök-Kısa, A.C., Çelı̇k, P., Peker, I. (2021). “Performance evaluation of privatized ports by entropy based TOPSIS and ARAS approach”. Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. ahead-ofprint No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2020-0554.
  • Haddad, B., Liazid, A., Ferreira, P. (2017). “A multi-criteria approach to rank renewables for the Algerian electricity system”, Renewable Energy, pp. 462-472.
  • Hamal, S., Sever, O., Vayvay, O. (2018). “Selection of optimal renewable energy ınvestment project via Fuzzy ANP”. Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting. Vol: 5, No: 2, pp. 224-233.
  • Horng, J.H., Hsu, H., Tsai, C.Y. (2018). “An assessment model of corporate social responsibility practice in the tourism industry”. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. Vol: 26, No: 7, pp. 1085-1104.
  • Kahraman C., Kaya, I. (2010). “A fuzzy multicriteria methodology for selection among energy alternatives.” Expert System with Applications. No: 37, pp. 6270–6281.
  • Karaca, C., Ulutaş, A. (2018). “Entropi ve Waspas yöntemleri kullanarak Türkiye için uygun yenilenebilir enerji kaynağının seçimi”, Ege Akademik Bakış. Vol: 18, No: 3, pp. 483-494.
  • Karami, A., Johansson, R. (2014). “Utilization of multi attribute decision making techniques to integrate automatic and manual ranking of options”, Journal of Information Science and Engineering, No: 30, pp. 519-534.
  • Khan, I. (2020). “Sustainability challenges for the south Asia growth quadrangle: A regional electricity generation sustainability assessment”. Journal of Clean Production. No: 243, pp. 118639.
  • Klein S.J.W., Whalleyi S. (2015). “Comparing the sustainability of U.S. electricity options through multi-criteria decision analysis”. Energy Policy. No: 79, pp. 127–149.
  • Li, X., Zhou, S., Yin, K., Liu, H. (2021). “Measurement of the high-quality development level of China's marine economy”. Marine Economics and Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. aheadof- print. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAEM-10-2020-0004.
  • Liu, X.B., Zhang, Y.J, Cui, W.K, Wang, L.T., Zhu, J.M. (2021). “Development assessment of higher education system based on TOPSIS-Entropy, hopfield neural network, and cobweb model”, Hindawi Complexity. No: 5520030, pp. 1-11.
  • Marquez, L., Lontra, P., Wanke, P., Antunes, J.J.M. (2021). “Governance modes in supply chains and financial performance at buyer, supplier and dyadic levels: the positive impact of power balance”. Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-ofprint. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-03-2020-0114.
  • MFA (2020). “Türkiye'nin Enerji Profili ve Stratejisi”. https://www.mfa.gov.tr/turkeys-energystrategy. en.mfa .
  • OECD (2019) “OECD environmental performance reviews: Turkey 2019”. https://www.oecdilibrary. org/environment/oecd-environmental-performance-reviews-turkey- 2019_9789264309753-en.
  • Owusu, P.A., Asumadu-Sarkodie, S. (2016). “A review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation”. Cogent Engineering. Vol: 3, No: 1, pp. 1-14.
  • Özcan, E.C., Ünlüsoy, S., Eren, T. (2017). “ANP ve TOPSIS yöntemleriyle Türkiye'de yenilenebilir enerji yatırım alternatiflerinin değerlendirilmesi”, SUJEST. Vol: 5, No: 2, pp. 204-219.
  • Sharma, D., Vaish, R., Azad, S. (2015). “Selection of India’s energy resources: a fuzzy decision-making approach”. Energy Systems, No: 6, pp. 439–453.
  • Solangi, Y.A., Tan, Q., Mirjat, N.H., Valasai, G.D., Khan, M.W.A., Ikram, M. (2019). “An integrated Delphi-AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS approach toward ranking and selection of renewable energy resources in Pakistan”. Processes. Vol: 7, No: 2, pp. 118.
  • Şengül, Ü., Eren, M., Shiraz, S.E., Gezder, V., Şengül, A.B. (2015). “Fuzzy TOPSIS method for ranking renewable energy supply systems in Turkey”. Renewable Energy. No: 75, pp. 617-625.
  • Torkayesh, A.E., Fathipoir, F., Saidi-Mehrabd, M. (2019). “Entropy-based multi-criteria analysis of thermochemical conversions for energy recovery from municipal solid waste using fuzzy VIKOR and ELECTRE III: Case of Azerbaijan region”. Journal of Energy Management and Technology. Vol: 3, No: 1, pp. 17-29.
  • Troldborg, M., Heslop, S., Hough, R.L. (2014). “Assessing the sustainability of renewable energy technologies using multi-criteria analysis: Suitability of approach for national-scale assessments and associated uncertainties”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. No: 39, pp. 1173- 1184.
  • Vyas, V., Jain, P. (2020). “Prioritization of financial performance determinants in Indian SMEs”. Journal of Indian Business Research. Vol: 12, No: 2, pp. 169-190.
  • Wang, J. W., Cheng, C. H., Kun-Cheng, H. (2009). “Fuzzy hierarchical Topsis for supplier selection”, Applied Soft Computing, No:1, pp. 377-386.
  • Wang, T. C., Lee, H. D. (2009). “Developing a fuzzy Topsis approach based on subjective weights and objective weights”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol:36, No:5, pp. 8980-8985.
  • Wu, J., Sun, J., Liang, L., Zha, Y. (2011). “Determination of weights for ultimate cross efficiency using shannon Entropy”, Expert Systems with Applications. Vol:38, No: 5, pp. 5162-5165.
  • Yan, X., Gong, J., He, J., Zhang, H., Zhang, C., Liu, Z. (2020). “Integrated data mining and TOPSIS Entropy weight method to evaluate logistics supply and demand efficiency of a 3PL company”. Hindawi Mathematical Problems in Engineering. No: 7057143, pp. 1-12.
  • Yazdani, M., Torkayesh, A.E., Santibanez-Gonzalez, E., Otaghsara, S.K. (2020). “Evaluation of renewable energy resources using integrated Shannon Entropy—EDAS model”. Sustainable Operations and Computers. No: 1, pp. 35-42.
  • Yazdani, M., Chatterjee,P., Zavadskas,E.K., Streimikiene, D. (2018). “A novel integrated decisionmaking approach for the evaluation and selection of renewable energy Technologies”. Clean Technology. Environ. Policy. Vol: 20, No: 2, pp. 403-420.
  • Zhang, N., Lior, N., Jin, H. (2011). “The energy situation and its sustainable development strategy in China”. Energy. Vol: 36, No: 6, pp. 3639-3649.
  • Zhao, G., Ahmed, R., Ahmad, N., Yan, C., Usmani, M.S. (2021). “Prioritizing critical success factors for the sustainable energy sector in China: A DEMATEL approach”, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2021.100635. Retrieved from.
  • Zheng, G., Wang, X. (2020). “The comprehensive evaluation of renewable energy system schemes in tourist resorts based on VIKOR method”. Energy. No: 193, pp. 116676.
  • Zheng, H., Si, D., Wang, W., Wang, R. (2018). “Quantitative Entropy Weight TOPSIS Evaluation of Sustainable Chinese Wind Power Development”s. Hindawi Mathematical Problems in Engineering. No: 12, pp. 1-13.
  • Zolfani, S. H., Yazdani, M., Ebadi Torkayesh, A., Derakhti,A. (2020). “Application of a gray-based decision support framework for location selection of a temporary hospital during COVID-19 pandemic”. Symmetry. Vol: 12, No: 6, pp. 886.
Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-1237
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1941
  • Yayıncı: Türk Kooperatifçilik Kurumu
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Kendi Kendine Uygulanabilen Yaşlı İstismarı Şüphe Ölçeğinin Türk Yaşlı Örneğinde Geçerlik ve Güvenirliği

Mikail ÖZDEMİR, Pelin UYMAZ

Dindarlık ve Kamu Hizmeti Motivasyonu İlişkisi: Nevşehir İlinde İlkokul Öğretmenleri Üzerinde Ampirik Bir Araştırma

Mustafa ARSLAN, Dilek CERAN

E-7 Ülkelerinde Sağlık Harcamaları ile İnsani Gelişmişlik Endeksi Arasındaki İlişki: Fourier Yaklaşımı

Fatma KIZILKAYA, Mehmet DAĞ

The Examination of the Internet Usage Properties and Relationship Between Purposes of Internet Usage and Social Media Addiction Among University Students

Filiz AKAR

Kadına Yönelik Yakın Partner Şiddetinin Gerisindeki Sosyo-Ekonomik Faktörler: Yatay Kesit Veri Analizi

Hivdan YÜKSEL, Hakan ULUCAN

Türkiye’de Şehir Çiftleri Arasında Ulaşım Türü Tercihini Etkileyen Faktörleri Belirlemeye Yönelik Bir Alan Çalışması

Dilaver TENGİLİMOĞLU, İzay REYHANOĞLU

Örgüt İklimi ve Algılanan Örgütsel Desteğin Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışına Etkisi Üzerine Sağlık Sektöründe Bir Araştırma

Esra Burcu BULGURCU GÜREL, İlay TİLKİ

Sigortacılık Sektöründe Dijitalleşmenin Poliçe Bilinirliğine Etkisi ve Müşterilerin Satın Alma Tercihleri Ankara Ölçeğinde Değerlendirilmesi

Hatice KAYA, Abdurrahman OKUR

Türkiye’deki Uluslararası Birleşme ve Satın Almalarda Sahiplik Düzeyi: Sektör, Ülke Kökeni ve Deneyimin Etkileri

Ayşe KAYACI, Ömer DÜLEK

COVID-19 ve Küresel Cinsiyet Uçurumu: Cinsiyete Dayalı İşgücü Yansımaları

Gül EKİNCİ