İstismarcı Yönetimin Üretkenlik Karşıtı İş Davranışı Üzerindeki Etkisinde İşyerinde Dışlanmanın Düzenleyici Rolü

Bu araştırmanın amacı istismarcı yönetimin üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışı üzerindeki etkisinde işyerinde dışlanmanın düzenleyici (moderatör) rolünü incelemektir. Araştırmada veriler İstanbul’da bankacılık, turizm ve sağlık alanında faaliyet gösteren işletmelerde çalışan 274 kişiden anket tekniğiyle toplanmıştır. Araştırma hipotezlerinin test edilmesinde, korelasyon analizi ve hiyerarşik regresyon analizinden yararlanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda; istismarcı yönetimin üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışı üzerinde pozitif yönlü ve anlamlı bir etkisi olduğu görülürken, istismarcı yönetimin üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışı üzerindeki etkisinde işyerinde dışlanmanın düzenleyici rol oynadığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

The Moderating Role of Workplace Ostracism on the Effect of Abusive Supervision on Counterproductive Work Behavior

The purpose of this study is to examine the moderator role of workplace ostracism on the effect of abusive supervision on counterproductive work behavior. The data in the study were collected through a survey technique from 274 people working in businesses operating in the fields of banking, tourism and health in Istanbul. Correlation analysis and hierarchical regression analysis were used to test the research hypotheses. As a result of the research; abusive supervision has a positive and significant effect on counterproductive work behavior and it has been concluded that workplace ostracism plays a moderator role on the effect of abusive supervision on counterproductive work behavior.

___

  • Akram, Z., Li, Y., & Akram, U. (2019). When employees are emotionally exhausted due to abusive supervision: a conversation of resources perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, 1-17.
  • An, F. & Wang, B. (2016). Abusive supervision and counterproductive work behavior: moderating effect of negative affectivity. Journal of Service Science and Management, 9, 66-73.
  • Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L. Y., & Debrah, Y. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 191-201.
  • Ashforth, B. (1994). Petty tyranny in organizations. Human Relations, 47, 755-778.
  • Bamberger, P. A. & Bacharach, S. B. (2006). Abusive supervision and subordinate problem drinking: Taking resistance, stress and subordinate personality into account, Human Relations, 59(6), 723- 752.
  • Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  • Blackhart, G. C., Nelson, B. C., Knowles, M. L., & Baumeister, R. F. (2009). Rejection elicits emotional reactions but neither causes immediate distress nor lowers self-esteem: A meta-analytic review of 192 studies on social exclusion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(4), 269-309.
  • Brees, J., Mackey, J., Martinko, M., & Harvey, P. (2014). The mediating role of perceptions of abusive supervision in the relationship between personality and aggression. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 21(4), 403-413.
  • Brown, M. E., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595–616.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E.K., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2018). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri, Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
  • Cacciatore, G. (2015). Petty tranny as a form of destructive leadership: Results of studies based on a french-canadian measure, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Quebec: University of Quebec.
  • Carlson, D. S., Ferguson, M., Perrewé, P. L., & Whitten, D. (2011). The fallout from abusive supervision: An examination of subordinates and their partners. Personnel Psychology, 64(4), 937-961.
  • Chen, Z. X., & Wang, H. Y. (2017). Abusive supervision and employees' job performance: A multiple mediation model. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 45(5), 845-858.
  • Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review, Journal of Management, 31, 874–900.
  • Eissa, G., Lester, S.W., & Gupta, R. (2020). Interpersonal deviance and abusive supervision: The mediating role of supervisor negative emotions and the moderating role of subordinate organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 166, 577–594.
  • Eschleman, K. J., Bowling, N. A., Michel, J. S., & Burns, G. N. (2014). Perceived intent of supervisor as a moderator of the relationships between abusive supervision and counterproductive work behaviours. Work ve Stress, 28(4), 362-375.
  • Estévez, A. M., & Serlin, J. (2013). Organizatinal ostracism as political game. Diversity Management and Identity in Organizations Convenors. Montreal, July, 1-26.
  • Ferris, D. L., Brown, D. J., Berry, J. W., & Lian, H. (2008). The development and validation of the workplace ostracism scale. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1348-1366.
  • Ferris, D. L., Lian, H., Brown, D. J., & Morrison, R. (2015). Ostracism, self-esteem, and job performance: When do we self-verify and when do we self-enhance? Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 279-297.
  • Fiset, J., Robinson, M., & Saffie-Robertson, M.C. (2019). Masking wrongs through brilliance: the moderating effect of vision on the relationship between abusive supervision and employee outcomes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28, 756-768.
  • Fox, S., Spector, P. E., & Miles, D. (2001). Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: Some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(3), 291-309.
  • Glad, B. (2002). Why tyrants go too far: Malignant narcissism and absolute power. Political Psychology, 23(1), 1–37.
  • Gürbüz, S. (2019). Aracı, Düzenleyici ve Durumsal Etki Analizleri, Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara. Haar, J. M., de Fluiter, A., & Brougham, D. (2016). Abusive supervision and turnover intentions: The mediating role of perceived organizational support. Journal of Management and Organization, 22(2), 139-153.
  • Hamid, R. A., Juhdi, N.H., Ismail, D., & Abdullah, N.H. (2016). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance as moderated by spiritual intelligence: An empirical study of Selangor employees. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 12(2), 191-202.
  • Harris, K. J., Kacmar, K. M., & Zivnuska, S. (2007). An investigation of abusive supervision as a predictor of performance and the meaning of work as a moderator of the relationship. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 252-263.
  • Harvey, P., Stoner, J., Hochwarter, W., & Kacmar, C. (2007). Coping with abusive supervision: The neutralizing effects of ingratiation and positive affect on negative employee outcome. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 264-280.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Perspective (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Hitlan, R. T., Kelly, K. M., Schepman, S., Schneider, K. T., & Zárate, M. A. (2006). Language exclusion and the consequences of perceived ostracism in the workplace. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 10(1), 56-70.
  • Howard, M. C., Cogswell, J. E., & Smith, M. B. (2020). The antecedents and outcomes of workplace ostracism: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(6), 577-596.
  • Jawahar, I.M., & Liu, Y. (2016). Proactive personality and citizenship performance: The mediating role of career satisfaction and the moderating role of political skill. Career Development International, 21(4), 378-401.
  • Jin, N. S., & Chen, X. (2016), The Research on the effects of abusive supervision on counterproductive work behavior: The moderating effects of emotional intelligence. Management Science and Engineering, Vol.10, No.2, 81-84.
  • Ju, D., Xu, M., Qin, X., & Spector, P. (2019). A multilevel study of abusive supervision, norms, and personal control on counterproductive work behavior: A theory of planned behavior approach. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 26(2), 163-178.
  • Kellerman, B. (2004). Bad Leadership: What It Is, How It Happens, Why It Matters. Harvard Business School Press, Boston: MA.
  • Kemper, S. (2016). Abusive supervision in the workplace: An examination of current research and a proposal for preventive measures. University Honors Theses. 303, 1-54.
  • Laila, U., Iqbal, S., & Rasheed, M. (2019).Abusive supervision and workplace deviance: The moderating role of power distance. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 13(2), 334-357.
  • Lin, W., Wang, L., & Chen, S. (2013). Abusive supervision and employee well being: The moderating effect of power distance orientation. Applied Psychology, 62(2), 308-329.
  • Lipman-Blumen, J. (2005). The allure of toxic leaders: Why we follow destructive bosses and corrupt politicians—and how we can survive them. UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Liu, J., Kwan, H. K., Lee, C., & Hui, C. (2013). Work to family spillover effects of workplace ostracism: The role of work home segmentation preferences. Human Resource Management, 52(1), 75-93.
  • Low, M.Y., Sambasivan, M., & Ho, J.A. (2021). Impact of abusive supervision on counterproductive work behaviors of nurses. Asia Pasific Journal of Human Resources, 59, 250-278.
  • Marcus, B., & Schuler, H. (2004). Antecedents of counterproductive behavior at work: A general perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 647-660.
  • Martinko, M. J., Harvey, P., Brees, J. R., & Mackey, J. (2013). A review of abusive supervision research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(1), 120-137.
  • Martinko, M. J., Sikora, D., & Harvey, P. (2012). The relationships between attribution styles, LMX, and perceptions of abusive supervision. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 19(4), 397-406.
  • Martinko, M. J., Harvey, P., Sikora, D., & Douglas, S. C. (2011). Perceptions of abusive supervision: The role of subordinates' attribution styles. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(4), 751-764.
  • Martinko, M. J., Gundlach, M. J., & Douglas, S. C. (2002). Toward an integrative theory of counterproductive workplace behavior: A causal reasoning perspective. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10(1-2), 36-50.
  • Mathieu, C., & Babiak, P. (2016). Corporate psychopathy and abusive supervision: Their influence on employees' job satisfaction and turnover intentions. Personality and Individual Differences, 91, 102-106.
  • Mitchell, M.S., & Ambrose, M.L. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1159-1168.
  • Molden, D. C., Lucas, G. M., Gardner, W. L., Dean, K., & Knowles, M. L. (2009). Motivations for prevention or promotion following social exclusion: being rejected versus being ignored. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(2), 415-431.
  • Nanshun, J., & Chen, X. (2016). The research on the effects of abusive supervision on counter- productive work behavior: The moderating effects of emotional intelligence. Management Science and Engineering, 10(2), 81-84.
  • Oaten, M., Williams, K. D., Jones, A., & Zadro, L. (2008). The effects of ostracism on self–regulation in the socially anxious. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27(5), 471-504.
  • O'Reilly, J., Robinson, S. L., Berdahl, J. L., & Banki, S. (2015). Is negative attention better than no attention? The comparative effects of ostracism and harassment at work. Organization Science, 26(3), 774-793.
  • Padilla, A., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2007). The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 176–194.
  • Pearson, C. M., Andersson, L. M., & Porath, C. L. (2005). “Workplace incivility”, In S. Fox ve P. E. Spector (Eds.), Counterproductive workplace behavior: Investigations of actors and targets (177–200). Washington, DC: APA.
  • Pradhan, S., & Jena, K. L. (2018). Abusive supervision and job outcomes: a moderated mediation study, Evidence-based HRM: a Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship. https:/doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-06-2017-0030
  • Samreen F, Rashid M. A., & Hussain G (2019). Effect of abusive supervision on subordinates’discretionary behaviors. Journal of Management and Organization, 1–16.
  • Scott, K. D. (2007). The development and test of an exchange-based model of interpersonal workplace exclusion. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, USA: University of Kentucky.
  • Scott, K. L., & Duffy, M. K. (2015). Antecedents of workplace ostracism: New directions in research and intervention. In Mistreatment in organizations. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Serdar, E., & Özsoy, E. (2019). İstismarcı yönetim: Bir literatür taraması. Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 2(1), 1-11.
  • Shoss, M. K., Eisenberger, R., Restubog, S. L. D., & Zagenczyk, T. J. (2013). Blaming the organization for abusive supervision: The roles of perceived organizational support and supervisor's organizational embodiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(1), 158-168.
  • Spector, P. E. (2011). The relationship of personality to counterproductive work behavior (CWB): An integration of perspectives. Human Resource Management Review, 21(4), 342-352.
  • Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2002). An emotion-centered model of voluntary work behavior: Some parallels between counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 12(2), 269-292.
  • Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2005). The Stressor-Emotion Model of Counterproductive Work Behavior. USA: American Psychological Association Publishing.
  • Spector, P. E., Bauer, J. A., & Fox, S. (2010). Measurement artifacts in the assessment of counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior: Do we know what we think we know? Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 781-790.
  • Spector, P. E., Fox, S., Penney, L. M., Bruursema, K., Goh, A., & Kessler, S. (2006). The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 446-460.
  • Sulea, C., Fine, S., Fischmann, G., Sava, F. A., & Dumitru, C. (2013). Abusive supervision and counterproductive work behaviors: The moderating effects of personality. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12(4), 196-200.
  • Tepper, B. J., Simon, L., & Park, H. M. (2017). Abusive supervision. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 123-152.
  • Tepper, B. J., Carr, J. C., Breaux, D. M., Geider, S., Hu, C., & Hua, W. (2009). Abusive supervision, intentions to quit, and employees’ workplace deviance: A power/dependence analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(2), 156-167.
  • Tepper, B. J., Henle, C. A., Lambert, L. S., Giacalone, R. A., & Duffy, M. K. (2008). Abusive supervision and subordinates' organization deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 721- 732.
  • Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33(3), 261-289.
  • Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., Henle, C. A., & Lambert, L. S. (2006). Procedural injustice, victim precipitation, and abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology, 59(1), 101-123.
  • Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178-190.
  • Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Stucke, T. S. (2001). If you can’t join them, beat them: Effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1058–1069
  • Turgut, E. ve Sökmen, A. (2018). Örgütsel etik değer algısının yenilikçi çalışma davranışına etkisinde öz yeterliliğin düzenleyici ve arabulucu rolü, İş Ahlakı Dergisi, 11 (1), 43-67.
  • Uzondu, C.N., Nwonyiand, S.K., & Ugwumgbor, E.T. (2017). Abusive supervision, work tension and overload aspredictorsof counterproductive work behavior. International Journal of Health and Psychology Research, 5(3), 37-48.
  • Valle, M., Kacmar, K.M., Zivnuska, S. & Harting, T. (2019). Abusive supervision, leader-member exchange, and moral disengagement: A moderated-mediationmodel of organizational deviance. The Journal of Social Psychology, 159(3), 299-312.
  • Walter, F., Lam, C. K., Van Der Vegt, G. S., Huang, X., & Miao, Q. (2015). Abusive supervision and subordinate performance: Instrumentality considerations in the emergence and consequences of abusive supervision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1056-1072.
  • Wang, C. C., Hsieh, H. H., & Wang, Y. D. (2020). Abusive supervision and employee engagement and satisfaction: The mediating role of employee silence. Personnel Review, 49(9), 1845-1858.
  • Wei, F., & Si, S. (2013). Tit for tat? Abusive supervision and counterproductive work behaviors: The moderating effects of locus of control and perceived mobility. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(1), 281–296.
  • Williams, K. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review Psychology, 58, 425-452.
  • Williams, K. D., & Sommer, K. L. (1997). Social ostracism by coworkers: Does rejection lead to loafing or compensation? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(7), 693-706.
  • Williams, K. D., & Zadro, L. (2001). Ostracism: On being ignored, excluded, and rejected. In M. R. Leary (Ed.), Interpersonal rejection (ss. 21–53). Oxford University Press.
  • Wu, C. H., Liu, J., Kwan, H. K., & Lee, C. (2016). Why and when workplace ostracism inhibits organizational citizenship behaviors: An organizational identification perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(3), 362-378.
  • Wu, L. Z., Yim, F. H. K., Kwan, H. K., & Zhang, X. (2012). Coping with workplace ostracism: The roles of ingratiation and political skill in employee psychological distress. Journal of Management Studies, 49(1), 178-199.
  • Xu, E., Huang, X., & Robinson, S. L. (2017). When self-view is at stake: Responses to ostracism through the lens of self-verification theory. Journal of Management, 43(7), 2281-2302.
  • Xu, E., Huang, X., Lam, C. K., & Miao, Q. (2012). Abusive supervision and work behaviors: The mediating role of LMX. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(4), 531-543.
  • Yagil, D. (2006). The relationship of abusive and supportive workplace supervision to employee burnout and upward influence tactics. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 6(1), 49-65.
  • Zellars, K. L., Tepper, B. J., & Duffy, M. K. (2002). Abusive supervision and subordinates' organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(6), 1068-1076.
  • Zhang, Y., & Bednall, T. C. (2016). Antecedents of abusive supervision: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(3), 455-471.
  • Zhao, H., Peng, Z., & Sheard, G. (2013). Workplace ostracism and hospitality employees’ counterproductive work behaviors: The joint moderating effects of proactive personality and political skill. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 33, 219-227.
  • Zheng, X., Yang, J., Ngo, H. Y., Liu, X. Y., & Jiao, W. (2016). Workplace ostracism and its negative outcomes. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 15, 143-151.
Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-1237
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1941
  • Yayıncı: Türk Kooperatifçilik Kurumu
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Marka Farkındalığının, Marka Tatmini ve Marka Sadakatine Etkisinde Marka Deneyiminin Aracı Rolü: Sağlık Sektöründe Bir Araştırma

Alev SÖKMEN, Gökhan KENEK

Bulanık Entropi Tabanlı Bulanık MOORA Yöntemi ile Kurumsal Kaynak Planlaması Seçimi: Bir Rulman Şirketinde Örnek Olay Çalışması

Beyzanur DURMUŞ, Muhammet Enes AKPINAR

Online Yiyecek İçecek Markalarının Cinsiyet Özelliklerinin Marka Kullanım Niyeti ve Satın Alma Niyeti Üzerindeki Etkisi

Parisa ALİZADEHFANAELOO

Dostluk Değeri Üzerinde Sevgi ve Saygı Değerinin Yordayıcı Rolünün İncelenmesi

Ali GÖKALP

Yüksek Düzeyde Finansal Okuryazarlık Bristol ve İstanbul'daki Genç Yetişkinlerin Finansal Refahını Geliştirir mi?

Işık AKIN

Bankacılık Sektöründe Kârlılığı Belirleyici Faktörlerin İncelenmesi: Panel Veri Analizi

Feyza ERŞİN META

Ruhsal Liderlik: Literatür Taraması ve İçerik Analizi

Zülfi Umut ÖZKARA

E-S-QUAL Ölçeğinin Türkçe Formunun Geçerlilik Güvenilirlik Çalışması

Hasan TERZİ, Selma KARABAŞ, Rabiya GÖKÇE ARPA, Ebubekir IŞIK

Kurumsal İtibar, İş Tatmini, Duygusal Bağlılık ve İşten Ayrılma Niyeti Arasındaki İlişkilerin Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma

İrfan ÇAĞLAR, Coşkun AKÇA

İstismarcı Yönetimin Üretkenlik Karşıtı İş Davranışı Üzerindeki Etkisinde İşyerinde Dışlanmanın Düzenleyici Rolü

Erkan TAŞKIRAN, Nihal KARTALTEPE BEHRAM, Esra DİNÇ ELMALI, Gülşah GENÇER ÇELİK