Gökhan GÖKULU, ŞEREF ULUOCAK, Olgun BİLİR

KADINA YÖNELİK ŞİDDETİN YAYGINLIĞI VE RİSK FAKTÖRLERİ: ÇANAKKALE, TÜRKİYE’DE BİR SAHA ARAŞTIRMASI

Bu çalışma, Çanakkale, il merkezinde Toplum Merkezlerine başvuran gönüllü 400 kadın katılımcının kadına yönelik şiddete maruz kalma durumunu ölçmektedir. Çalışma kadına yönelik fiziksel, ekonomik, sözel- psikolojik ve cinsel şiddet türlerinin ne oranda yaşandığını incelemektedir. Çalışma 43 kişiye pilot çalışma uygulanarak, anket sorularına son şekli verilmiştir. Uygulama süreci boyunca, katılımcıların hayatlarına dair deneyimleri ile ilgili her türlü bilginin korunmasında gizlilik ilkesine göre hareket edilmiş, anketler uygulanmadan ve görüşmeler yapılmadan önce katılımcılara gerekli bilgilendirmeler yapılmıştır. Çalışma sorularına verimli cevaplar alabilmek için Toplum Merkezleri'nde görevli 6 kadın personel, anket uygulaması ile ilgili eğitimden geçirilmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda yaşamının herhangi bir döneminde fiziksel şiddete maruz kaldığını söyleyen kadınların oranı %54,6 bulunurken, ekonomik şiddet % 51,2 sözel psikolojik şiddet % 55,7 cinsel şiddet ise % 50,8 bulunmuştur. Çalışma kadına yönelik farklı şiddet türlerinin gerçekleşme düzeylerini inceledikten sonra kadına yönelik fiziksel şiddetin risk faktörlerini belirlemek amacıyla ikili lojistik regresyon modeli oluşturmaktadır. Yapılan analiz sonucunda aylık hane halkı gelir düzeyinin 1500 TL (700 $) altında olması (OR =1,98 95% CI: 0,279-0,915) kadının eğitim düzeyinin lise altı olması (OR =1,91 95% CI: 0,273-0,997) giyim tarzına müdahale edilmesi (OR =3,81 95% CI: 0,115-0,586) aile reisini ihtiyaç yoktur demesi (OR =2,13 95% CI: 0,256-0,857) ve çocuklukta şiddet görmesi (OR =2,63 95% CI: 0,014-0,100) kadına yönelik fiziksel şiddet açısından önemli risk faktörleri arasında bulunmuştur

THE PREVALANCE AND RISK FACTORS FOR VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN: A FIELD STUDY IN ÇANAKKALE, TURKEY

This study examines the violence against women with 400 voluntary female participants who applied to Community Centers in the city center of Canakkale. The study measures the rates of women who experienced physical, economic, verbal-psychological and sexual violence types. At the first stage, a 43-person trial run was completed. After the trial run, the survey was given its final form. Before interviews, participants were informed about the aim of the study, confidential policy, how data would be evaluated and stored, and written and verbal consents were obtained. A team of six female interviewers was composed in Community Centers for surveying. According to the results of the study, the rate of the women who stated that they were subjected to physical violence in their lifetime is found as %54.6, economic violence as %51.2, verbal-psychological violence as %55.7, and sexual violence as %50.8. After examining the perpetration level of various violence types against women, the study formed a binary logistic regression model in order to determine the risk factors of physical violence against women. As a result of the analysis, several significant risk factors have been determined in relation to physical violence against women, which are as follows: Household income accounting below 1500TL ($700) (OR =%1.9895 CI: 0,279-0,915), woman’s education below high school level (OR =1,9195% CI: 0,273-0,997), intervention to the dressing style (OR =%3.8195 CI: 0,115-0,586), refusing the need for a head for the family (OR =%2.1395 CI: 0,2560,857), and being subject to violence at childhood (OR =%2.6395 CI: 0,014-0,100)

PDF

___

ABRAMSKY, T., WATTS, C. H., GARCİA-MORENO, C., DEVRIES, K., KISS, L., ELLSBERG, M., JANSEN, H. A., HEİSE, L. (2011). What factors are associated with recent intimate partner violence? findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence. BMC Public Health, 11(1), 109.
AKAR, T., AKSAKAL, F. N., DEMİREL, B., DURUKAN, E., & ÖZKAN, S. (2010). The prevalence of domestic violence against women among a group woman: Ankara, Turkey. Journal of family violence, 25(5), 449-460.
ALTINAY, A, G, ARAT, Y., (2009) Violence Against Women in Turkey A Nationwide Survey, Punto, İstanbul.
ANTAİ, D. (2011). Controlling behavior, power relations within intimate relationships and intimate partner physical and sexual violence against women in Nigeria. BMC public health, 11(1), 511.
ARSLANTAŞ, H., ADANA, F., ERGİN, F., GEY, N., BİÇER, N., & KIRANŞAL, N. (2012). Domestic Violence During Pregnancy in an Eastern City of Turkey A Field Study. Journal of interpersonal violence, 27(7), 1293-1313.
BROWNRİDGE, D.A. S.S. HALLİ. (2002). Understanding Male Partner Violence Against Cohabiting and Married Women: An Empirical Investigation With a Synthesized Model. Journal of Family Violence 17:341-61.
DEVRİES, K., WATTS, C., YOSHİHAMA, M., KİSS, L., SCHRAİBER, L. B., DEYESSA, N., TEAM, W. H. O. M. S. (2011). Violence against women is strongly associated with suicide attempts: Evidence from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women. Social Science & Medicine, 73(1), 79-86.
EFE, Ş. Y. AYAZ, S. (2010). Kadına yönelik aile içi şiddet ve kadınların aile içi şiddete bakışı. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 11, 23-29.
ELLSBERG, M., JANSEN, H., HEİKE, L., WATTS, C., GARCİA-MORENO, C.(2008). Intimate partner violence and women’s physical and mental health in the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence: an observational study.Lancet, 371, 1165–1172.
ERDEM, M. (2007) Aile İçi Şiddet Ve 4320 Sayılı Ailenin Korunmasına Dair Kanun, Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi, sayı;73, s:46-77.
FLİNCK, A., PAAVİLAİNEN, E., & ASTEDT-KURKİ, P. (2005). Survival of intimate partner violence as experienced by women. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 384(14), 383-393.
GENÇOĞLU, C. KUMCAĞIZ, H. ERSANLI, K. (2014). “Ergenlerin Şiddet Eğilimine Etki Eden Ailevi Faktörler/Family Factors Affecting Violent Tendency In Adolescents” TURKISH STUDIES -International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic-, ISSN: 1308-2140, Volume 9/2, Winter 2014, www.turkishstudies.net, DOI Number: http://dx.doi.org/ 10,7827/TurkishStudies.6208, p. 639-652.
GÖKULU, G. (2005) Terör Eylemlerinin Medyaya Yansıması (15-20 Kasım 2003 İstanbul Saldırıları Örneği), Polis Akademisi Güvenlik Bilimleri Enstitüsü Suç Araştırmaları Anabilim Dalı. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
GÖKULU, G. FURAT, M. (2013). “Türkiye'de Kadınla İlgili Kalkınma Politikalarının ve Projelerinin Eleştirel Bir Değerlendirmesi /A Critical Evaluation of Gender Related Development Policy and Projects in Turkey ”, TURKISH STUDIES -International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic-, ISSN: 1308- 2140, Volume 8/8, Summer 2013, www.turkishstudies.net, DOI Number : http://dx.doi.org/ 10.7827/TurkishStudies.5355, p. 1895-1913.
HEİSE, L., MOORE, K., & TOUBİA, N. (1995). Sexual coercion and reproductive health: A focus on research. New York: Population Council.
İÇLİ, T. G., PEKKAYA, M., SEVER, H. (2014). The Evaluation of Domestic Violence: The Case of Zonguldak. Advances in Applied Sociology, 4, 5-14
KAPTANOĞLU, İ, TÜRKYILMAZ, A. (2012). What Puts Women at Risk of Violence From Their Husbands? Findings From a Large, Nationally Representative Survey in Turkey, J Interpers Violence vol. 27 no.14 p. 2743-2769
KARAÇAM, Z., ÇALIŞIR, H., DÜNDAR, E., ALTUNTAŞ, F., & Avcı, H. C. (2006). Evli kadınların aile içi şiddet görmelerini etkileyen faktörler ve kadınların şiddete ilişkin bazı özellikleri. Ege Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksek Okulu Dergisi, 22, 71-88.
KARAL, D., AYDEMİR, E., (2012), Türkiye’de Kadına Yönelik Şiddet, Usak Yayınları, Ankara.
KARAOGLU, L., CELBİS, O., ERCAN, C., ILGAR, M., PEHLİVAN, E., GUNES, G., ... & EGRİ, M. (2006). Physical, emotional and sexual violence during pregnancy in Malatya, Turkey. The European Journal of Public Health, 16(2), 149-156.
KARATAŞ, E. (2013). “Türkiye’de Kadın Hareketleri ve Edebiyatımızda Kadın Sesleri /The Woman’s Movements In Turkey And The Woman’s Voices In Our Literary ”, TURKISH STUDIES -International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic-ISSN: 1308-2140, (Prof. Dr. Ahmet Buran Armağanı) Volume 4/8, Fall 2009, www.turkishstudies.net, DOI Number: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.7827/TurkishStudies.1014, p. 1652-1673.
KOCACIK, F, ÇAĞLAYANDERELİ, M. (2009) Ailede Kadına Yönelik Şiddet: Denizli Örneği, Uluslar arası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 6 (2): 24 - 43.
KOCACIK, F, DOGAN, O. (2006). Domestic violence against women in Sivas, Turkey: survey study. Croatian medical journal, 47(5), 742-749.
KOCACIK, F, KUTLAR, A, ERSELCAN, F. (2007). Domestic Violence against Women, A Field study in Turkey. Social Science Journal.; 44(4):698-720.
KSGM. (2009) Türkiye’de Kadına Yönelik Aile İçi Şiddet Araştırması, http://www.kadininstatusu.gov.tr/upload/mce/eski_site/tdvaw/doc/Ana_Rapor_Miz an_1.pdf accessed on 18.05.2013
KWAGALA, B., WANDERA, O, S., NDUGGA, P., KABAGENYİ, A. (2013). Empowerment, partner’s behaviours and intimate partner physical violence among married women in Uganda, BMC Public Health, 13:1112.
MACMİLLAN, R., GARTNER, R. (1999). When she brings home the bacon: Labor-force participation and the risk of spousal violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 947-958.
SAKALLI, N. (2001). Beliefs about wife beating among Turkish college students: The effects of patriarchy, sexism, and sex differences. Sex Roles, 44(9-10), 599-610.
SAKALLİ-UGURLU, N., BEYDOGAN, B. (2002). Turkish college students' attitudes toward women managers: The effects of patriarchy, sexism, and gender differences. The Journal of Psychology, 136(6), 647-656.
SUBAŞI, N, AKIN, A. (2003) Kadına Yönelik Şiddet; Nedenleri ve Sonuçları. Toplumsal Cinsiyet, Sağlık ve Kadın (Ed. Akın A), s.231-249. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Kadın Sorunları Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayınları, Ankara,
ŞAHİN, N. H., TİMUR, S., ERGİN, A. B., TAŞPİNAR, A., BALKAYA, N. A., & ÇUBUKÇU, S. (2010). Childhood trauma, type of marriage and self-esteem as correlates of domestic violence in married women in turkey. Journal of family violence, 25(7), 661-668.
TOKUÇ, B., EKUKLU, G., AVCİOĞLU, S. (2010). Domestic Violence against married women in Edirne. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(5), 832-847. United Nations, (2010). The World’s Women 2010: trends and statistics. New York: UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
VAKİLİ, M., NADRİAN, H., FATHİPOOR, M., BONİADİ, F., MOROWATİSHARİFABAD, M. A. (2010). Prevalence and determinants of intimate partner violence against women in Kazeroon, Islamic Republic of Iran. Violence and victims, 25(1), 116-127.
VATANDAŞ, C. (2003). Aile ve Şiddet: Türkiye’de Eşler Arası Şiddet.1.Baskı, Ankara, Uyum Ajans.
WATTS C, ZIMMERMAN C. (2002). Violence against women: global scope and magnitude. Lancet;359:1232–37.
WHALEY, Rachel Bridges, Steven F. MESSNER. (2002). Gender equality and gendered homicides. Homicide Studies 6:188–210
WHO (2005). WHO Multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence against women. Geneva: World Health Organization.
WHO (2013) Global and regional estimates of violence against women Prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence.http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/85239/1/9789241564625_eng.pd f accessed on 25.09.2013.
XIE, Min, Karen HEIMER, Janet L. LAURITSEN. (2012). Violence against women in US metropolitan areas: Changes in women's status and risk, 1980–2004. Criminology 50:105– 43.
YANIKKEREM, E. (2002). The investigation of the opinion of married women between age of 15- 49 on inner domestic violence and the circumstances they exposed to violence. Unpublished master’s thesis, Ege University, Institute of Health Sciences, İzmir, Turkey.
YILMAZ, D. V., ZEYNELOĞLU, S., KOCAÖZ, S., KISA, S., TAŞKIN, L., EROĞLU, K. (2009). Views on gender roles of university students. E-International Journal of Human Sciences. Retrieved from http://www.insanbilimleri.com accessed on 15.09.2013.
YODANIS, C. L. (2004). Gender Inequality, Violence Against Women, and Fear A Cross-National Test of the Feminist Theory of Violence Against Women.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(6), 655-675.