205101

ARKETİPSEL LİDERLİK EĞİTİM MODELİ (ALEM): KARMA GÖMÜLÜ DENEYSEL ÇALIŞMA

Bu araştırmada, Arketipsel Liderlik Eğitim Programının (ALEP) etkililiğini belirlemek, Türkiye kültürüne özgü liderlik arketiplerini ortaya çıkarmak ve Arketipsel Liderlik Eğitim Modelini geliştirmek amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda Karma Gömülü Deneysel Desen kullanılmıştır. Öncelikle Arketipsel Liderlik Eğitim Programı (ALEP) oluşturulmuştur. Nicel araştırma aşamasında "ön test - son test” kontrol gruplu deneysel desen kullanılmıştır. 14-haftalık eğitimden elde edilen nicel ve nitel veriler eş zamanlı olarak toplanmış ve analiz edilmiştir. Nicel veriler “Myers Briggs Kişilik Tip Envanteri (MBTI)” ve “Liderlik Uygulamaları Envanteri (LPI)” ile toplanmıştır. Deney ve kontrol gruplarından ön test ve son testlerde elde edilen puanlar arasında anlamlı bir farklılık olup olmadığının belirlemek ve grupların kendi içlerindeki gelişimlerini tespit etmek amacıyla Eşleştirilmiş Örneklem t-Testi ve tek yönlü kovaryans analizi (ANCOVA) yapılmıştır. Nitel veriler yapılandırmacı gömülü teori aşamaları dikkate alınarak toplanmış ve analiz edilmiştir. Nitel aşamada derinlemesine bireysel ve odak grup görüşmeleri yapılmıştır. Araştırmada elde edilen nicel bulgularda, ALEP’in öğretmenlerin liderlik özelliklerini geliştirdiği ve dört harf ile ifade edilen kişilik özelliklerinde farklılaşmaya yol açtığı tespit edilmiştir. Araştırmanın nitel bulgularına göre Türkiye kültürüne özgü 12 adet (Araştırmacı, Odaklanmış Pratik, Bilgili Uzman, Yenilikçi, Girişimci Takım, İletişimci, Koç, Sabırlı, Saygılı, Merhametli, Adil, İnançlı Otoriter) liderlik arketipi tespit edilmiş ve iki çekirdek kategoriye (Bilge ve Erdem) ulaşılmıştır. Araştırma sürecinde elde edilen nicel ve nitel veriler Kendall’s tau-b korelasyon analizi sonuçları bağlamında değerlendirilerek Arketipsel Liderlik Eğitim Modeli (ALEM) oluşturulmuştur.

ARCHETYPAL LEADERSHIP EDUCATION MODEL (ALEM): MIXED EMBEDDED EXPERIMENTAL STUDY

In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Archetypal Leadership Education Program (ALEP) and to create the Archetypal Leadership Education Model by revealing the original leadership archetypes in Turkish culture, through mixed embedded experimental model. Initially, the Archetypal Leadership Education Program (ALEP) was developed. In the quantitative research stage experimental design with "pre test – post test" control group was used. During the 14-week application, quantitative and qualitative data from the study were collected and analyzed simultaneously. The quantitative data were collected by Myers Briggs Personality Type Inventory (MBTI) and Leadership Practices Inventory (LPI). In order to determine whether there was a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test measurements of the experimental - control groups and the development of the groups within themselves, the Paired Sample t-Test, one-way covariance analysis (ANCOVA) was applied. In-depth individual and focus group interviews were conducted at the qualitative stage. In the quantitative findings obtained from the results of the study, it was determined that ALEP improved the leadership characteristics of the teachers and caused differentiation in the personality traits expressed in four letters. As mentioned in the research model, the findings obtained from the qualitative data collection tools applied before, during, and after, 12 leadership archetypes (Researcher, Focused Practical, Knowledgeable Expert, Innovative, Entrepreneurial Team, Communicator, Coach, Patient, Respectful, Merciful, Fair, Faithful Authoritarian) were identified and 2 core categories (Wise & Virtue) were obtained. Findings obtained from quantitative data and qualitative data obtained in the research process were evaluated in the context of Kendall's tau-b correlation analysis results and by combining the data in the pattern stage, Archetypal Leadership Education Model (ALEM) was created.

PDF

___

Akdemir, B. & Özer, E. (2018). Psikodinamik yaklaşım temelinde liderlik. SSSjournal (ISSN:2587– 1587), 4(13): 39 -50
Bass, B. M. & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Psychology Press.
Bass, B. M. & Stogdill, R. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill's handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. Simon and Schuster.
Bennis, W. G. & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: The strategies for taking charge. New York: Harper ve Row.
Bolden, R. (2004). What is leadership? Leadership south west research report. Centre for Leadership Studies, Exeter, UK.
Brown, F. W. & Reilly, M. D. (2009). The Myers-Briggs type indicator and transformational leadership. Journal of Management Development, 28(10), 916–932.
Bryman, A. (1992). Charisma and leadership in organizations. London: SAGE.
Bryman, A., Collinson, D., Grint, K., Jackson, G., & Uhl-Bien, M. (Eds.). (2011). The SAGE handbook of leadership. London: SAGE.
Burns, J.M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
Capt, (2018). Lifelong type development. Center for applications of psychological type. Retrieved from https://www.myersbriggs.org/my-mbti-personality-type/understanding-mbti-type- dynamics/lifelong-type-development.htm?bhcp=1
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
Charmaz, K. (2008). Grounded theory as an emergent method. In S. Nagy Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), In Handbook of emergent methods (s. 155–172). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2015). Karma yöntem araştırmaları: Tasarımı ve yürütülmesi. Ankara: Anı.
Cutcliffe, J. (2000). Methodological issues in grounded theory. Journal o f Advanced Nursing 31, 1476– 1484.
Czander, W. M. (1993). The psychodynamics of work and organizations: Theory and application. Guilford Press.
Çelik, H. & Ekşi, H. (2015). Nitel desenler: gömülü teori. İstanbul: EDAM Yayınları.
Çelik, V. (2000). Eğitimsel liderlik. Ankara: Pegem.
Day, D. V. & Antonakis, J. (Eds.), (2012). The nature of leadership (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
DeBoard, R. (1978). The psychoanalysis of organisations. London, Routledge. Demirel, Ö. (2012). Eğitimde program geliştirme içinde (19. baskı). Ankara: Pegem,
Demirel, H. G., & Kişman, Z. A. (2014). Kültürler Arası Liderlik. Electronic Turkish Studies, 9(5). Retrieved from http://www.turkishstudies.net/Makaleler/633513920_38DemirelHaticeG%C3%B6k%C 3%A7e-vd-sos-689-705.pdf
Duygulu, S. (2007). Servis sorumlu hemşirelerine yönelik hazırlanan transformasyonel liderlik eğitim programının liderlik uygulamaları üzerine etkisi. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
Edizler, G. (2010). Karizmatik liderlikte duygusal zekâ boyutuyla cinsiyet faktörüne ilişkin literatürsel bir çalışma. Selçuk Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Akademik Dergisi, 6(2), 137–150.
Eisold, K. (2010). What you don't know you know. Other Press, LLC.
Felfe, J., & Schyns, B. (2006). Personality and the perception of transformational leadership: The impact of extraversion, neuroticism, personal need for structure, and occupational self‐ efficacy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(3), 708–739.
Freud, S. (1900). The ınterpretation of dreams (First Part). In J. Strachey (translator and editor) (1953). The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Volume IV. London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-analysis.
Gabriel, Y. (1999). Organizations in Depth. London: Sage.
Gardner, J. W. (1990). On leadership. New York: Free Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Advances in the methodology of grounded theory: Theoretical sensitivity. University of California
Goulding, C. (2002). Grounded theory a practical guide for management, business and market researchers. London: Sage.
Grant, W. H., Thompson, M., & Clarke, T. E. (1983). From image to likeness: A Jungien path in the gospel journey. Paulist Press.
Greenberg, L. W., Goldberg, R. M., & Foley, R. P. (1996). Learning preference and personality type: their association in paediatric residents. Medical education, 30(4), 307–311.
Harris, A. (2002). Improving schools through teacher leadership. Education Journal(59), 22–23.
Hautala, T. M. (2005). Personality and transformational leadership: Perspectives of subordinates and leaders. Vaasan yliopisto.
Hautala, T. M. (2006). The relationship between personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Management Development, 25(8), 777–794.
Hickman, G. R. (Ed.). (2009). Leading organizations: Perspectives for a new era (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hirschhorn, L. (1988). The Workplace Within: Psychodynamics of Organizational Life. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Hoerr, T. R. (2005). The Art of School Leadership. Alexandria, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Jazzar, M. & Algozzine, B. (2006). Critical Issues in Educational Leadership. Toronto: Pearson.
Judge, T. A. & Bono, J. E. (2000). Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of applied psychology, 85(5), 751.
Jung, C. G. (1970). The Collected Works of C.G. Jung. 20 vols. Bollingen Series XX, translated by R.F.C. Hull, edited by H. Read, M. Fordham, G. Adler, and Wm. McGuire. Princeton University Press.
Kaya, F. (2017). Kutadgu Bilig'e Göre Liderde Bulunması Gereken Temel Vasıflar. Electronic Turkish Studies, 12(33). DOI Number: http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies. 12769
Kets de Vries, M. F. R. (1989). Leaders who self-destruct: The causes and cures. Organizational Dynamics, 17(4), 5–17.
Kets de Vries, M. F. R. (2009). Reflections on leadership and character. London: Wiley.
Kets de Vries, M. F. R. & Cheak, A. (2014). Psychodynamic approach. INSEAD.
Kets de Vries, M. F. R. & Miller, D. (1984). The Neurotic Organization. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
Komives, S. R., Lucas, N. & McMahon, T. R. (2007). Exploring leadership: For college students who want to make a difference Calif.: Jossey-Bass
Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (1987). The leadership challenge: How to get extraordinary things done in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2002). The Leadership Practices Inventory: Theory and evidence behind the five practices of examplary leaders. http://media.wiley.com/assets/61/06/lc_jb_appendix.pdf. [20.10.2016]
Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2003). The Jossey-Bass academic administrator's guide to exemplary leadership (1st ed.). San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass.
Krantz, J. (2010). The Myth that Binds. Psychoanalytic Perspectives on a Turbulent World. London: Karnac.
Law, S. & Glover, D. (2003). Educational Leadership and Learning: Practice, Policy and Research. Buckingham, Open University Press.
Levinson, H. (1962). Men, Management, and Mental Health. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Macalinao, R. C. (2004). A study of the leadership attributes of pastors in large churches in urban metro Manila and the implications to designing a pastoral leadership development program. Basılmamış Doktora Tezi. Asia Graduate School of Theology, Quezon City, Philippines.
Memişoğlu, S. P., & Çakır, M. (2015). Öğretmenlerin Liderlik Stilleri İle Sınıf İçi Öğretmen Davranışları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. Electronic Turkish Studies, 10(15). DOI Number: http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.8806
Miles, M, B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded Sourcebook. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Moutafi, J., Furnham, A. & Crump, J. (2007). Is managerial level related to personality?. British Journal of Management, 18(3), 272–280.
Mumford, M. D. (2006). Pathways to outstanding leadership: A comparative analysis of charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leaders. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Murphy, J. T. (2000). The Unheroic Side of Leadership. Michael Fullan (Ed.) Educational Leadership içinde (ss.114–126) . San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass Press.
Myers, I. B. (1998). Introduction to Type: A Guide to Understanding Your Results on the MBTI Instrument (6th ed.). Inc. Cpp.
Myers, I. B., McCaulley, M. H., & Most, R. (1985). Manual, a guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs type indicator. Consulting Psychologists Press.
Neumann, J. E. & Hirschhorn, L. (1999). The Challenge of Integrating Psychodynamic and Organizational Theory. Human Relations 52(6).
Northouse, P. G. (2016). Leadership: Theory and practice (Seventh Edition). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Inc.
Obholzer, A. & Zagier Roberts, V. (Eds). (1994). The Unconscious at Work. London: Routledge.
Papadopoulos, R. K. (2006). The handbook of Jungien psychology: Theory, practice and applications. London: Routledge.
Pearson, C., & Marr, H. K. (2002). Introduction to archetypes: The guide to interpreting results from the Pearson-Marr Archetype Indicator Instrument. Gainesville Fla. Center for Applications of Psychological Type.
Rezler, A. G., & French, R. M. (1975). Personality types and learning preferences of students in six allied health professions. Journal of Allied Health.
Rost, J. C. (1991). Leadership for the twenty-first century. New York: Praeger.
Schyns, B. & Sanders, K. (2007). In the eyes of the beholder: Personality and the perception of leadership. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(10), 2345–2363.
Somers, R. H. (1962). A new asymmetric measure of association for ordinal variables. American sociological review, 799–811.
Stevens, A. (2013). Archetype: A natural history of the self. Routledge.
Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. New York: The Free Press.
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Tuzcuoğlu, S. (1996). Myers Briggs Psikolojik Tip Belirleyicisinin Dilsel Eşdeğerlilik Güvenirlik ve Geçerlilik Çalışması. Basılmamış Doktora Tezi, Marmara Universitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
VandenBos, G. R. (2015). APA dictionary of psychology (Second Edition). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Zaleznik, A. (1966). Human Dilemmas of Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
Zaleznik, A. & Kets de Vries, M. F. R. (1975). Power and the corporate mind. Oxford: Houghton Mifflin.