İnovasyon Çiftustalığının Öncülleri ve Pratikteki Formülü

Bu çalışmanın amacı, örgütsel destek algısı ve örgütsel çevikliğin (moderatör) inovasyon çiftustalığı üzerindeki etkisi ile birlikte etki derecesinin açığa çıkartılmaktır. Araştırma, inovasyon çiftustalığını ve tetikleyici faktörlerini, hem genel hem de özellikle son günlerde içinden geçilen göç ve koronavirüs gibi küresel krizlerin etkisiyle daralan piyasa şartlarında işletmelerin ayakta kalması ve organizasyonların varlıklarını geleceğe taşıyabilmesi adına bir formül olarak düşünüldüğü için yapılmıştır. Araştırmanın evreni Malatya ilinde faaliyet gösteren BİM Marketler Zinciri çalışanları ve şirketin Malatya yönetimini oluşturan idari birim çalışanlarından oluşmaktadır. Toplamda 63 ürün grubundan (farklı markalar halinde) ve her ürün grubunun altında onlarca üretim ile binlerce parekende satışı olan ürün ile başta pazarlama ve dağıtım olmak üzere birçok inovasyon çeşidine uygun olduğu için seçilmiştir. Nicel analiz yöntemleriyle, zaman gecikmeli ve yüz yüze anket uygulanarak yapılan araştırmaya 285 denekten toplanan birincil veriler dahil edilmiştir. Öncelikle, çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizi için varsayım kontrolleri sağlanmıştır. Sonrasında ise çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizi uygulanmıştır. Araştırmanın saha çalışmaları 4,5 ay sürmüştür. Araştırma sonucunda, örgütsel destek ve örgütsel çevikliğin inovasyon çiftustalık üzerinde pozitif yönlü etkileri açığa çıkmıştır. Ayrıca, örgütsel desteğin inovasyon çifftustalığı üzerindeki etkisinde örgütsel çevikliğin aracı etkisi de açığa çıkartılmıştır. Hem literatüre katkı olması nedeniyle hem, her ölçekten işletmeler için her türden piyasa /pazar şartlarında genel geçerli olan inovasyon çitustalığı modeli ön plana çıkartılmıştır.

Pioneers of Innovation Ambidexterity and Its Practical Formula

The purpose of this study to reveal the impact level of organizational support. (O.S.) perception and organizational agility (O. A.) together with the effect of Innovation Ambidexterity. The research was conducted because innovation ambidexterity and triggering factors are considered as a formula for the survival of businesses and the required ability of organizations to carry their assets into the future in the market conditions that are shrinking due to the impact of general and recent global crises such as migration and Covid-19. The universe of the research consists of the employees of the BİM Grocery Chain operating in Malatya and the employees of the administrative unit that make up the Malatya management of the company. It was chosen because it is suitable for many types of innovation, especially marketing and distribution, with a total of 63 product groups (in different brands) and tens of products under each product group with thousands of retail sales. Hierarchical regression, which is a type of multiple linear regression analysis, with quantitative methods was used for research data. Previously, controls were provided for the assumptions of the multiple linear regression test. Primary data collected from 285 subjects were included in the study conducted with quantitative analysis methods, time-delayed and face-to-face questionnaires. Afterwards, multiple linear regression analysis was applied. The fieldwork of the research lasted 4.5 months. As a outycome of the research, the affirmative influence of O.S. and O.A. on innovation ambidexterity have been revealed. Also, as an outcome of the research, the moderator effect was revealed because O.S. indirectly affects the innovation ambidexterity through O.A. Both its contribution to the literature and the innovation model, which is generally valid for businesses of all sizes in all market conditions, has been brought to the fore.

PDF

___

Açıkgöz, A. (2015). Innovation Ambidexterity: A Study of Scale Adaptation, Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 4(2), 1-26. http://doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.2947.3363
Abbas S. T., Blome, C., Papadopoulos, T. (2019). Impact of IT Ambidexterity on New Product Development Speed: Theory and Empirical Evidence. Decision Sciences. 51(3), 655 – 690. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12399
Abbas S. T., Blome, C., Papadopoulos, T. (2020) Resolving Paradoxes in IT Success Through IT Ambidexterity. Information & Management Journal, 57(6), 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020. 103345
Akkaya, B., Tabak, A. (2018). Adaptation to Turkish of Organizational Agility Questionnaire: Reliability/ Validity Study, The Journal of Human and Work, 5(2), 185-206. https://doi.org/10.18394/iid.439184
Alamro, M.Q., Hosseini, S.B., Farooq, A. (2019) Organizational Agility and HRM Practices: Framework and Perspectives, Restaurant Business, 118(12), 177-194. http://ir.amu.ac.in/13571/1/T10872.pdf
Al-Hakim, L.A.Y., Thabit, T.H., Al-Nasrawi, H.A. (2017) The Complementary Relationship Between Organizational Architecture and Organizational Agility. International Journal of Social Science & Educational Studies, 3(3), 19-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.23918 / ijsses.v3i3p19
Anafarta, N., (2015), Algılanan Örgütsel Destek ve İşten Ayrılma Niyeti İlişkisi: İş Tatmininin Aracılık Rolü, İstanbul Üni. İşletme Fakültesi İşletme İktisadı Enstitüsü Yönetim Dergisi, 26(79), 112-130. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/iuiieyd/issue/25357/267681
Andriopoulos, C. and Lewis, M.W. (2009) Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696 – 717. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0406
Ardito, L., Messeni, P., Antonio, D., Luca C. S. (2020). The Influence of Inbound Open Innovation on Ambidexterity Performance: Does It Pay to Source Knowledge from Supply Chain Stakeholders? Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, 119(3), 321-329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016 / j.jbusres.2018.12.043
Ardito, L., Peruffo, E., Natalicchio, A. (2019). The Relationships Between the Internationalization of Alliance Portfolio Diversity, Individual Incentives and Innovation Ambidexterity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, 148(3), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119714
Armeli, S., Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., Lynch, P. (1998). Perceived O.S. and Police Performance: The Moderating Influence of Socio Emotional Needs, Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 288-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037 / 0021-9010.83.2.288
Aubry, M., Lièvre, P. (2010). Ambidexterity as a competence of project leaders: A case study from two polar expeditions. Project Management Journal 41, 32-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20183
Basri, S., Zorlu, K., (2020), Örgüt Kültürü Algısının Örgütsel Çeviklik Üzerindeki Etkisiin İncelenmesi, Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 20(39), 147-164. https://doi.org/10.30976/susead.705821
Behmer, F., Jochem, R., Hanke, H. (2016). Planning and Reorganizing Quality Management Organizations–An Empirical Analysis of Current Practice. Journal of Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 27, 963 – 978. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2016.1202754
Benner, M.J. and Thusman, M.L. (2003). Exploitation, Exploration and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28, 238 – 256. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.9416096
Blindenbach-Driessen, F. and Van Den Ende, J. (2014) The Locus of Innovation: The Effect of A Separate Innovation Unit on Exploration, Exploitation and Ambidexterity In Manufacturing and Service Firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(5), 1089 – 1105. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12146
Bodwell, W., Chermack, T. J. (2010). Organizational Ambidexterity: Integrating Deliberate and Emergent Strategy with Scenario Pl, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 77. 193- 202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.07.004
Bozkurt, V., Baştürk, Ş. (2009). Kobi Girişimcilerinde Risk Ve Belirsizlik Algıları: Bursa Örneği. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 64(02), 43-74. https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000002103
Burns, T., Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. Oxford University Press.
Cantarello, S., Martini, A., Nosella, A. 2012. A Multi‐Level Model for Organizational Ambidexterity in the Search Phase of the Innovation Process. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(1), 28-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111 / j.1467-8691.2012.00624.x
Chandrasekarana, A., Lindermanb, K. and Schroeder, R. (2012). Antecedents to ambidexterity competency in high technology organizations. Journal of Operations Management, 30(1), 134-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2011.10.002
Cicerali, E. E. (2019). Çevikliği Destekleyen Örgütsel Kültür Özellikleri, OPUS–Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(18), 2422-2432. http://dx.doi.org/10.26466/opus.525842
Cobb, S. (1976). Social Support as a Moderator of Life Stress, Psychosomatic Medicine, 38(5), 300- 314. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-197609000-00003
Cohen, Sheldon., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, Social Support and the Buffering Hypothesis, Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310-357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037 / 0033-2909.98.2.310
Çiftçi, G. E., Çankaya, M., (2019), İşkoliklik ve Benlik Saygısı Arasındaki İlişkide Örgütsel Desteğin Aracılık Rolü, Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi, 14(1), 499-536. https://doi.org/10.17550/akademikincelemeler.464116
Duncan, R.B. (1976). The Ambidextrous Organization: Designing Dual Structures for Innovation, The Management of Organization.
Eisenberger, R.., Hutchison, S., Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived O.S., Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500-507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., Mastro D., (1990), Perceived O.S. and Employee Diligence Commitment and Innovation, Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 51-59, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037 / 0021-9010.75.1.51
Eisenberger, R., Rhodes, L. Cameron, J. (1999). Does Performance Increase or Decrease Perceived Self-Determination, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 71(5), 1026-1040. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1026
Ekmekçioğlu, E. B., Sökmen, A., (2016), Algılanan Örgütsel Desteğin İşten Ayrılma Niyetine Etkisinde Örgütsel Bağlılığın Aracı Rolü: Sınır Birimi Çalışanları Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, International Review of Economics and Management, 4(2), 32-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.18825/irem.23569
Farokhi, S. & Rajaeepour, S. (2016). The relationship between management factors and Sharifi- Zhang's agility components in Isfahan Bank Saderat, International Business Management 10(19), 4530-4539. http://dx.doi.org/10.36478 / ibm.2016.4530.4539
Felipe, C.M., J.L. Roldán and A.L. Leal-Rodríguez, (2016), An Explanatory and Predictive Model for O.A. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4624-4631. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016 / j.jbusres.2016.04.014
Fischer, M., (2001), Innovation, Knowledge Creation and System of Innovation, The Annals of Regional Science, 35(2), 199-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001680000034
Fundin, A., Bergquist, B., Eriksson, H., Gremy, I. (2018). Challenges and Propositions for Research in Quality Management. International Journal of Production Economics, 199, 125-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.02.020
Gakovic, A., Tetrick, L. E. (2003). Perceived O.S. and work status: A comparison of the employment relationships of part‐time and full‐time employees attending university classes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(5), 649-666. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.206
Ganguly, A., Nilchiani, R., Farr, J. V. (2009). Evaluating Agility in Corporate Enterprises. International Journal of Production Economics, 118, 410-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.12.009
Ghoshal, S., Bartlett, C.A. (1994). Linking organizational context and managerial action: The dimensions of quality of management. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 91-112. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250151007
Gibson, C.B., Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The Antecedents, Consequences and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, Volume 47(2), 209-222. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159573
Gregory, R., Keil, M., Muntermenn, J., Mähring., M. (2015). Paradoxes and The Nature of Ambidexterity in IT Transformation Programs. Information Systems Research, 26(1), 57-80. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2014.0554
Gunasekaran, A., Yusuf, Y.Y. (2002). Agile Manufacturing: A Taxonomy of Strategic and Technological Imperatives, International Journal of Production Research, 40(6), 357-385. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540110118370
Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 693-706. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083026
He, Z. L., Wong, P., K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15, 481-494. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078
Hughes, M., Martin, L.S., Morgan, R.E., Robson, M.J, (2010), Realizing Product-Market Advan. in High-Technology Int. New Ventures”, Journal of International Marketing, 18(4), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.18.4.1
Işık, M. (2019), Algılanan Aşırı Vasıflılık ve Bireysel Kariyer Planlaması İlişkisinde Algılanan Örgütsel Desteğin Düzenleyicilik Etkisi, Bingöl Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 9(18), 1015-1041. https://doi.org/10.29029/busbed.559814
Işık, M., Karma, A. (2018), Algılanan Örgütsel Desteğin İşgören Performansına Etkisinde İşe Adanmışlığın Aracı Etkisi, Anemon Muş Alparslan Üni. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(3), 395- 403. https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.338253
Jain, V., Benyoucef, L., Deshmukh, S.G. (2008). What’s the Buzz about Moving from “Lean” to “Agile” Integrated Supply Chains?”, International Journal of Production R., 46(23), 6649- 6677. https://doi.org/ 10.1080 / 00207540802230462
Jansen, J. J. P., Van D. B., F. A. J., Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52, 1661-1674. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576
Jansen, J.J., Tempelaar, M.P., Van den Bosch, F.A., Volberdda, H.W. (2009). Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity, Organization Science, 20(4), 797-811. https://doi.org/ 10.1287 / orsc.1080.0415
Kim, D. Y., Kumar, V., Kumar, U. (2012). Relationship Between Quality Management Practices and Innovation. Journal of Operations Management 30(4), 295-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2012.02.003
Kortmann, S. (2014). The Mediating Role of Strategic Orientations on the Relationship between Ambidexterity‐Oriented Decisions and Innovative Ambidexterity. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(5), 666-684. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12151
Lin, C. T., Chiu, H., Chu, P. Y. (2006), Agility Index in the Supply Chain, International Journal of Production Economics, 100(2), 285-299. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.11.013
Lin, H. E., McDonough E. F. (2014). Cognitive frames, learning mechanisms and innovation ambidexterity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31, 170-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12199
Lin, H-E., McDonough E. F., Lin, S. J. and Lin, C. Y. (2013). Managing the exploitation/exploration paradox: The role of a learning capability and innovation ambidexterity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30, 262-278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00998.x
Malik, C. Sinha, S., Pereira, V., Rowley, C. (2019). Implementing Global-Local Strategies in A Post- GFC Era: Creating an Ambidextrous Context Through Strategic Choice and HRM. Journal of Business Research. Volume 103, 557-569. https://doi.org/ 10.1016 / j.jbusres.2017.09.052
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
McKinsey. (2006). Build a Nimble Organization: A Mckinsey Global Survey, McKinsey Comp.
Mohammadi, M., Nikpour, A. & Chamanifard, R. (2015). The Relationship between Organizational Agility and Employee, (Case Study: Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, Iran), JIEB, 3, 66-70. http://www.psp-ltd.com/JIEB_24_3_2015.pdf
Nafei, W.A., (2016), O.A.: The Key to Improve Organizational Performance, International Business Research, 9(3), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v9n3p97
Nickerson, J., Zenger, T. (2002). Being Efficiently Fickle: A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Choice. Organization Science, 13(5), 547-566. https://doi.org/ 10.1287 / orsc.13.5.547.7815
Niosi, J. (2000), National System of Innovation: In Search of a Workable Concept, System of Innovation, Charles Edquist, Maureen McKelvey.
O’Reilly III, C. A. and Tushman, M. L. (2004). Ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82, 71-81.
Olbert, S., Prodoehl, H. G., & Worley, C. G. (2017). Organizational Agility as a competitive factor: The “Agile Performer Index”. NEOMA Business School, Reims Cedex.
Özeroğlu, E., Koçyiğit, Y., (2020), O.A. Health Organizations: The Role of Visionary Leadership, Research Journal of Business and Management, 7(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/ 10.17261/Pressacademia.2020.1184
Palm, K., Lilja, J., Wiklund, H. (2016). The Challenge of Integrating Innovation and Quality Management Practice. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 27(1-2), 34-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2014.939841
Patel, P. C., Terjesen, S., Li, D. (2012). Enhancing Effects of Manufacturing Flexibility Through Operational Absorptive Capacity, Journal of Operations Management, 30, 201-220. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jom.2011.10.004
Porter, M. (1985). Competitive Advantage. The Free Press.
Prahalad, C. K., Hamel, G. (1990) The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68, 79-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30763-X_14
Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes and Moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375 – 409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316058
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived O.S.: A Review of the Literature, Journal of Applied Psychology, 8(4), 698–714. https://doi.org/ 10.1037 // 0021-9010.87.4.698
Sağır, M., Gönülölmez, A., (2019), Yapısal Sermaye ve İnsan Sermayesinin İşletme Performansına Etkileri, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 11(27), 58-77. https://doi.org/ 10.20875/makusobed.476375
Sağsan, M., & Fırtına, B. (2015). Bilgi Mesleğine Bağlılık ve Adanmışlık: Platonik Bir Ilişkinin Gelgitleri ve Profesyonellikle İmtihanı. Bilgi Dünyası, 16(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.15612/BD.2015.485
Satı, Z. E., (2013). İnovasyonu Yönetmede Kesitler, Nobel Yayıncılık.
Selamet, T., Alamsjah, F., Kosasih, W., Elidjen. (2020). Innovation Ambidexterity Through Ambidextrous Leadership, EurAsian Journal of Biosciences, 14,(2), 6857-6864. http://www.ejobios.org/article/innovation-ambidexterity-through-ambidextrous-leadership- an-empirical-research -on-firm-performance-8443
Shahaei, B. (2008). Paradigm of Agility, Definitions, Features. Tadbir Pub., 194, 14-18.
Sharifi, H., Zhang, Z. (2001). Agile Manufacturing in Practice-Application of A Methodology. International Journal of Operations & Production Management,21(5/6), 772-794. https://doi.org/ 10.1108 / 01443570110390462
Sharp, J. M., Irani, Z. Desai, S. (1999). Working towards Agile Manufacturing in the UK Industry, International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1/2), 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00228-X
Shore, L., McFarlane W., Sandy J. (1993). Commitment and Employee Behavior, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(5), 774-780. https://doi.org/10.1037 / 0021-9010.78.5.774
Soliman, K.S. (2020) Organizational Agility: Online Retailing at a Glance, International Business the 28th Information Management Association Conference, 573-576
Strode, E. D., Sid, L. H. Tretiakov, A. (2009). The Impact of Organizational Culture On Agile Method Use, 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 1-9. DOI: 10.1109 /HICSS.2009.436 · Source: DBLP
Şimşek, Z. (2009). Organizational Ambidexterity: Towards A Multilevel Understanding. Journal of Management Study, 46, 597-624. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00828.x
Tallon, P.P., Pinsonneault, A., (2011), Competing Perspectives on the Link between Strategic Information Technology Alignment and Organizational Agility, MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 463- 486. https://doi.org/10.2307 / 23044052
Teece, D., Petaraf, Leih, S. (2016), Dynamic Capabilities and Organization Agility: Risk, Uncertainly and Strategy in the Innovation Economy, California Management Review, 58(4), 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13
Teece, D., Pisano, G., Shuen A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097- 0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Tseng, Y., Lin, C. (2011). Enhancing Enterprise Agility by Deploying Agile Drivers, Capabilities and Providers. Information Sciences, 181(17), 3693–3708. https://doi.org/10.1016 / j.ins.2011.04.034
Tsourveloudis, N.C. Valavanis, K.P., (2002), On the Measurement of Enterprise Agility, Journal of Intelligent and Robotic System, 33(3), 329-342. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015096909316
Tushman, M.L., O'Reilly, C.A. (1996). The Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change. California Management Review. 38(4), 8-30. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165852
Yeganegi K., Azar, M., (2012), The Effect of IT on Organizational Agility. International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 537-544.
Yıldız, İ., Karaman, G. E., Karaman, E., (2017), Information System Success and Organizational Agility. Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(11), 421- 444. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gusbd/issue/31316/373782
Zaheer, A., Zaheer, S. (1997). Catching the Wave: Alertness, Responsiveness and the Market Influence in Global Electronic Networks. Management Science, 43(11), 1493-1509. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.11.1493
Zaina, M., Hamad, M., Yozgat, U., (2017), Does O.A. Affect Organizational Learning Capability? Evidence from Commercial Banking, Management Science Letters, 7(1), 407-422. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2017.5.001
Zhang, Z. (2011). Towards Theory Building in Agile Manufacturing Strategies-Case Studies of an Agility Taxonomy. International Journal of Production Economics, 131(1), 303-312. https://doi.org/10.1016 / j.ijpe.2010.08.010
Zhou, K. Z., Wu, F. (2010). Technological Capability, Strategic Flexibility and Product Innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 547-561. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2723

Turkish Studies - Economics, Finance, Politics-Cover

ISSN: 2667-5625
Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
Başlangıç: 2006
Yayıncı: ASOS Eğitim Bilişim Danışmanlık Otomasyon Yayıncılık Reklam Sanayi ve Ticaret LTD ŞTİ