Türkiye’de Macera Turisti Tipolojisi

Türkiye’deki yüksek riskli aktivitelere katılan macera turistlerini keşfetmek için yola çıkılan bu çalışmada, Türkiye’de en çok tercih edilen macera aktiviteleri olan yamaç paraşütü, tüplü dalış, sörf, rafting, kano, kamp, kayak/snowboard, kaya tırmanışı, trekking ve tur bisikleti aktivitelerine katılan macera turistleri incelenmiştir. Çalışmada, macera turistlerinin demografik özellikleri, rekreasyonel davranışları, kişilik özellikleri ve tercih ettikleri aktiviteler değerlendirilerek, macera turisti tipolojisinin oluşturulması amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla, turist kişilik özelliklerini ortaya koymak için geliştirilen dışadönüklük kişilik ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Bu ölçekle birlikte, macera turistlerinin rekreasyonel davranışları ile demografik özelliklerine yönelik ifadelerin de yer aldığı anket soru formu oluşturulmuştur. Araştırma kapsamında veriler, nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden anket tekniği kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Belirlenen 10 macera aktivitesine katılan macera turistleri, kolayda örnekleme yöntemi kullanılarak seçilmiş ve bu turistlerden toplam 1246 veri elde edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda, macera turistlerinin kişilik tipleri ortaya konmuş ve macera turistlerinin tercih ettikleri aktivite türlerine göre kişilik tipleri, rekreasyonel davranışları ile demografik özellikleri belirlenmiştir.

Adventure Tourist Typology in Turkey

The study was starting to discover the adventure tourists who participate in high-risk activities in Turkey. Research was conducted for adventure tourists participating the most preferred adventure activities which are paragliding, scuba diving, surfing, rafting, canoeing, camping, skiing/snowboarding, rock climbing, trekking and tour biking. It was aimed to create adventure tourist typology by evaluating the demographic characteristics, recreational behavior, personality characteristics and the activities adventure tourists prefer. For this purpose, the allocentric personality scale -which is developed to reveal the tourist personality- was used. Along with this scale, a questionnaire form containing variables on recreational behavior and demographic characteristics of adventure tourists has been created. Within the scope of the research, the data were collected using the survey technique, which is one of the quantitative research methods. Adventure tourists participating in the 10 determined adventure activities were selected using the convenience sampling method and a total of 1246 data were obtained from these tourists. As a result of the research, personality typology of adventure tourists were determined and personality types, recreational behaviors and demographic characteristics were determined according to the adventure activities preferred by adventure tourists.

___

  • Adventure Travel Trade Association (2015). Adventure Tourism Development İndex Report. [Online] http://www.adventuretravel.biz [Erişim Tarihi: 12.02.2019].
  • Akgündüz, Y. ve Kızılcalıoğlu, G. (2016). Likya Yolu’nu Yürüyen Turistlerin Seyahat Motivasyonları ve Memnuniyet Düzeyleri. Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(3): 817-836.
  • Arslan Ayazlar, R. (2015). Akış Deneyiminin Yamaç Paraşütü Deneyim Doyumu ve Yaşam Doyumuna Etkileri, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi.
  • Aytaç, S. (2000.) İnsanı Anlama Çabası. Bursa: Ezgi Kitabevi.
  • Boorstin, D. J. (1961/1964). The Image: A Guide to Pseudo-events in America. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Buckley, R. (2012). Rush as a Key Motivation in Skilled Adventure Tourism: Resolving The Risk Recreation Paradox. Tourism Management, 33(4): 961-970.
  • Celsi, R. L., Rose, L. R. and Leigh, T. W. (1993). An Exploration of High-Risk Leisure Consumption Through Skydiving. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(1): 1-23.
  • Chen, S. L., Ou, S. J., and Lin, L. Z. (2001). Application in Recreation and Leisure. Taipei City, Taiwan: Shin Hsin University.
  • Cohen, E. (1979). A Phenomenology of Tourist Experience. The Journal of the British Sociological Association 13(1): 179-201.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper Perennial.
  • Cüceloğlu, D. (2018). İnsan ve Davranışı-psikolojinin Temel Kavramları (36. Basım). İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
  • Donnelly, P. and Young, K. (1988). The Construction and Confirmation of Identity in Sport Subcultures. Sociology of Sport Journal, 5(3): 223-40.
  • Ewert, A. W. (1985). Why People Climb: The Relationship of Participant Motives and Experience Level to Mountaineering. Journal of Leisure Research, 17(3): 241-50.
  • Ewert, A. W. (1989a). Outdoor Adventure Pursuits: Foundations, Models and Theories. Columbus, OH: Publishing Horizons.
  • Ewert, A. W. and Hollenhurst, S. (1989b). Testing the Adventure Model: Empirical Support for a Model of Risk Recreation Participation. Journal of Leisure Research, 21(2): 124-139.
  • Ewert, A., Gilbertson, K., Luo, Y. C. and Voight, A. (2013). Beyond “Because It’s There”: Motivations for Pursuing Adventure Recreational Activities. Journal of Leisure Research, 45(1): 91-111
  • Eysenck, H. and Eysenck, S. (1970). The Eysenck Personality Inventory. San Diego: Edits.
  • Gilbertson, K. and Ewert, A. (2015). Stability of Motivations and Risk Attractiveness: The Adventure Recreation Experience. Risk Management, 17(4): 276-297.
  • Graburn, N. (1983). The Anthropology of Tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 10(1): 9-33.
  • Green, D. C. and Chalip, L. (1988). Sport Tourism as the Celebration of Subculture. Annals of Tourism Research, 25(2): 275-291.
  • Hsieh, T. C. (2007). Recreational Motivation, Sensation Seeking and Recreational Involvement of Taiwan's Adventure Recreation Participants, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, University of the Incarnate Word.
  • Kay, J. and Laberge, S. (2002a). The “New” Corporate Habitus in Adventure Racing. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 37(1): 17-36.
  • Kay, J. and Laberge, S. (2002b). Mapping the field of “AR”: Adventure Racing and Bourdieu’s Concept of Field. Sociology of Sport Journal, 19(1): 25-46.
  • Lipscombe, N. (1999). The Relevance of the Peak Experience to Continued Skydiving Participation: A Qualitative Approach to Assessing Motivations. Leisure Studies, 18: 267-288.
  • Litvin, S. (2008). Sensation Seeking and Its Measurement for Tourism Research. Journal of Travel Research, 46(4): 440-445
  • Lynch, P. and Dibben, M. (2016). Exploring Motivations for Adventure Recreation Events: A New Zealand Study. Annals of Leisure Research, 19(1): 80-97.
  • Jackson, M., White, G. and White, M. (2001). Developing a Tourist Personality Typology. Proceedings of National Research Conference, Australia, 177-184.
  • Jackson, M. (2006). Development of a Tourist Personality Inventory to Evaluate Parameters Associated with Tourist Crime Victımization, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, RMIT University.
  • Jung, C. G. (1910). The Association Method. American Journal of Psychology, 21(2): 219-269.
  • MacCannell, D. (1976/1999). The Tourist: A New Theory in the Leisure Class. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Martin, P. and S. Priest (1986). Understanding Adventure Experience. Adventure Education, 3(1): 18-21.
  • Mason, M., Gos, L. and Moretti, A. (2017). Motivations, Perceived Risk and Behavioural Intentions in Hard Adventure Tourism. A Natural Park Case Study. Sinergie Italian Journal of Management, 34: 181-199.
  • Meier, J. F., Morash, T. W. and Welton, G. E. (1980). High-adventure Outdoor Pursuits: Organisation and Leadership. Columbus, OH: Publishing Horizons.
  • Meyersohn, R. (1981) Tourism as a Socio-cultural Phenomenon: Research Perspectives. Waterloo: Otium Publications.
  • Pizam, A., Jeong, G. H., Reichel, A., Boemmel, H., Lusson, J. M., Steynberg, L., Mason, M. and Montmany, N. (2004). The Relationship Between Risk-Taking, Sensation-Seeking and the Tourist Behavior of Young Adults: A Cross-Cultural Study. Journal of Travel Research, 42(3): 251-260.
  • Plog, S. (1972). Why Destination Areas Rise and Fall in Popularity? Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Quarterly, 14(4): 55-58.
  • Plog, S. (1987). Understanding Psychographics in Tourism Research. Travel, Tourism and Hospitality Research. New York: Wiley.
  • Plog, S. (1991). Leisure Travel: Making it a Growth Market. Again. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Plog, S. (2001). Why Destinastions Areas Rise and Fall in Popularity, an Update of Cornel Quarterly Classic. Cornel Hotel and Administrastion Quarterly, 42(3): 13-24.
  • Priest, S. (1992). Factor Exploration and Confirmation for the Dimensions of an Adventure Experience. Journal of Leisure Research, 24(2): 127-139.
  • Przeclawski, K. (1985). The Role of Tourism in Contemporary Culture. The Tourist Review, 40(1): 2-6.
  • Selwyn, T. (ed.) (1996). The Tourist Image: Myths and Myth Making in Tourism. Chichester: Wiley.
  • Sung, H. H. (2004). Classification of Adventure Travelers: Behavior, Decision Making and Target Markets. Journal of Travel Research, 42(4): 343-356.
  • Swarbrooke, J., Beard, S, C., Leckie., S. and Pomfret, G. (2003) Adventure Tourism: The New Frontier. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
  • Warburton, N. (2015). Felsefenin Kısa Tarihi. (Çeviren, Ateşoğlu, G.) İstanbul: Alfa Felsefe.
  • Wheaton, B. (2000). “Just Do It”: Consumption, Commitment, and Identity in The Windsurfing Subculture. Sociology of Sport Journal, 17(3): 254-74.
  • Tanrisevdi, A. (2009). Türk Özel İlgi Gezginleri Sansasyon Arama Özelliği Sergilemekte Midir? Ege Academic Review, 9(4): 1313-1340.
  • Tucker, H. (2003). Living with Tourism: Negotiating Identities in a Turkish Village. London: Routledge.
  • Urry, J. (1990). The Tourist Gaze: Leisure and Travel in Contemporary Societies. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Zuckerman, M. (1979). Sensation Seeking (Psychology Revivals): Beyond the Optimal Level of Arousal. Psychology Press.