Restoranları Deneyimleyen Misafirlerin Neofobi ve Neofili Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi: Kapadokya Örneği

İnsanların yiyeceğe karşı besledikleri psikolojik yaklaşım yiyecekleri tüketip tüketmemelerinde etkili olmaktadır. Neofobi ve neofili, insanların yemek deneyimi gerçekleştirmelerinde etkili olan önemli bir unsurdur. Yemek neofobisi veya neofilisi yemek deneyimi esnasında veya öncesinde oluşabilmektedir. Bu çalışmada Kapadokya bölgesindeki restoranları deneyimleyen misafirlerin neofobi (gıdaya karşı duyulan korku) ve neofili (gıdaya karşı duyulan heyecan-merak) düzeylerinin sahip olunan özellikler (cinsiyet, medeni durum, yaş, eğitim düzeyi, gelir düzeyi) açısından belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda nicel veri toplama yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Veriler Kapadokya bölgesini ziyaret eden ve restoranlarda yeme deneyimi yaşayan misafirlerden elde edilmiştir. Ankette “Gıda Neofobisi” ve “Gıda Neofili” ölçeği olmak üzere toplam 13 ifade kullanılmıştır. Ölçeklerin yanı sıra katılımcıların bireysel özelliklerini ölçen 5 ifade yer almaktadır. Bireylerin neofobi ve neofili düzeylerini belirlemek için bağımsız T-Testi ve ANOVA testleri kullanılmıştır. Yapılan analizlerden elde edilen sonuçlarda, Kapadokya bölgesindeki restoranları deneyimleyen misafirlerin cinsiyet ve medeni durumları ile neofobi ve neofili arasında anlamlı farklılığın olmadığı, yaş ve gelir seviyeleri ile neofobi ve neofilileri arasında anlamlı farklılık olduğu, eğitim durumu ile yalnızca neofili arasında anlamlı bir farklılığın olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

The Specification of the Neophobia and Neophilia Levels of the Guests Experiencing Restaurants: Cappadocia Sample

The psychological attitudes people (sex, marital status, education, age, monetary income) embed towards food become effective in terms of whether they consume the food or not. Neophobia and neophilia are two significant elements with regard to people’s experiences of eating, and they can be formed during the experience of eating or before that period. In this study, the neophobia and nephilia levels of the guests experiencing the restaurants in Cappadocia Region were aimed to be specified in terms of the features they exhibit. With respect to this purpose, quantitative data method was implemented. The data to be analyzed were collected from the guests in Cappadocia who experienced eating the food in the restaurants located in this region. In the questionnaire applied to the participants, 13 expressions comprised of the “Food Neophobia” and “Food Neophilia” scales took place were used. Besides the scales, there existed 5 expressions that measured the participants’ individual features. In order to define the neophobia and neophilia levels of the individuals, independent T-test and ANOVA tests were made use of. As a result of the outcomes of the analyses carried out, it was found out that the gender and the marital status of the guests experiencing the Cappadocia Region restaurants and their levels of neophobia and neophilia were not significantly correlated. However, the results of these anaylses indicated that the age and income levels of the guests and their neophobia and neophilias exhibited meaningful differences, also showing the existence of a significant difference between the education status and solely neophilia.

___

  • Alley, R. and Potter, K. (2011). Food Neophobia and Sensation Seeking. V. R. Preedy ve diğerleri (Yay. haz.) Handbook of Behavior Food and Nutrition. 707-724.
  • Asperin, A. E. Phillips, W. M. J. and Wolfe K. (2011). Exploring food neophobia and perceptions of ethnic foods: The case of Chinese and Thai cuisines. International CHRIE Conference, USA. Erişim: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/refereed/ICHRIE_2011/Friday/4
  • Assanand, S. Pinel, J. P. J. and Lehman, D. R. (1998) Personal theories of hunger and eating. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(11): 998-1015.
  • Berbel-Pineda, J. M. Palacios-Florencio, B. and Ramirez-Hurtado, J. M. (2019). Gastronomic experience as a factor of motivation in the tourist movements. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 18: 2-10.
  • Ball, I.L. Farnhill, D. and Wangeman, J.F. (1984). Sex and age differences in sensation seeking: Some national comparisons. British Journal of Psychology, 75: 257–265.
  • Briedehann, J. and Wickens, E. (2004). Tourism routes as a tool for the economic development of rural areas-vibrabt hope or impossible dream Tourism Management, 25: 71-79.
  • Canizares, S. S. and Guzman, T. (2012). Gastronomy as a tourism resource: Profile of the culinary tourist. Current Issues in Tourism, 15(3): 229-245.
  • Chang, R. Kivela, J. and Mak, A. (2011). Attrinutes that influence the evaluation of travel dining experience: When east meets West. Tourism Management, 32(2): 307-316.
  • Fischler, C. (1988). Food, self and identify. Antropology of Food, 27(2): 275-292.
  • Flight, I. Leppard, P. and David N. (2003). Food neophobia and associations with cultural diversity and socio-economic status amongst rural and urban Australian adolescents. Appetite 41(1): 51-59.
  • Fortis, M. and Sartori, A. (2016). Food and Wine: Quality, Tradition and Innovation. Fortis M. (Ed.) The Pillars of the Italian Economy. Springer (s. 283-317) Erişim adresi: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-40186-7_6
  • Gyimothy, S. Rassing, C. R. and Wanhill, S. (2000). Marketing works: a study of the retaurants on Bornholm, Denmark. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 12(6): 371-379.
  • Horng, J. and Tsai, C. (2012). Exploring marketing strategies for culinary tourism in Hong Kong and Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 17(3): 277-300.
  • Imada, S. and Terasaki, M. (1988). Sensation seeking and food preferences. Pergamon Journals, 9(1): 87-93.
  • Joppe, M. Martin, D. W. and Waalen, J. (2001). Toronto’s image as a destination: A comparative ımportance-satisfaction analysis by origin of visitor. Journal of Travel Research, 39: 252-260.
  • Karim, S. and Chi, C.G. (2010). Culinary tourism as a destination attraction: An empirical examination of destinations food image. Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management, 19(6): 531-555.
  • Kastenholz, E. Davis, D. and Paul, G. (1999). Segmenting tourism in rural areas: The case of north and central Portugal. Journal of Travel Research, 37(4): 353-363.
  • Lepp, A. and Gibson H. (2006). Sensation seeking and tourism: Tourist role, perception of risk and destination choice. Tourism Management, 29(4). 740-750.
  • Latimer, L. A. Pope, L and Wansink B. (2015). Food neophiles: Profiling the adventurous eater. Obesity A Research Journal. 23(8): 1577-1581.
  • Luncahprasith, T. (2017). Gastronomic experience as a community development driver: the study of Amphawa Floating Market as community-based culinary tourism destination. Asian Journal of Tourism Research, 2(2): 84-116.
  • MacLaurin, T.L. (2001). Food safety in travel and tourism. Journal of Travel Research, 39(3): 332- 333.
  • Martin, Y. Pelchat, M. L. and Pliner P. (1997). Try it; it’s good and it’s good for you’: Effects of Taste and Nutrition Information on Willingness to Try Novel Foods. Appetite, 28(2): 89-102.
  • Murgado, E. M. (2013). Turning food into a gastronomic experience: Olive oil tourism. Options Méditerranéennes, 106: 97-109.
  • Pliner, P. and Hobden K. (1992). Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans. Appetite, 19(2): 105-120.
  • Richards, G. (2011). Creativity and Tourism the State of the Art. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(4): 1225-1253.
  • Ridgeway, D. and Russell, J. A. (1980). Reliability and validity of the Sensation-Seeking Scale: Psychometric problems in Form V. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48(5): 662-664.
  • Rigal, N. Frelutt, M-L. Monneuse, M-O. Hladik, C-M. Simmen, B. and Pasquet, P. (2006). Food neophobia in the context of a varied diet induced by a weight reduction program in massively obese adolescents. Appetite 46(2): 207–214.
  • Rozin, P. and Fallon A. (1988). Body image, attitudes to weight, and misperceptions of figure preferences of the opposite sex: A comparison of men and women in two generations. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97(3): 342-345.
  • Sivrikaya, K. (2019). Gıda neofobisi ve heyecan arama kişilik özelliklerinin yabancı turistlerin geleneksel Türk yemeklerini satın alma niyetine etkisi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi) Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Konya.
  • Tong, X. F. Tong, D. and Tam, W. (2016). Food tourism: The Melaka gastronomic experience. Journal of Emerging Trends in Marketing and Management, 1(1): 236-246.
  • Tuorila. H. Lähteenmäki, L. Pohjalainen, L. and Lotti, L. (2001). Food neophobia among the Finns and related responses to familiar and unfamiliar foods. Food Quality and Preference 12(1): 29-37.
  • Quan, S. and Wang, N. (2004). Towards a structural model of the tourist experience: an illustration from food experiences in tourism. Tourism Management, 25(3): 297-305.
  • Van Trijp, H. C. and Van Kleef, E. (2008). Newness, value and new product performance. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 19(11): 562-573.
  • Verbeke, W. and Poquiviqui, G. (2005). Ethnic food attitudes and behavior among Belgians ve Hispanics living in Belgium. British Food Journal, 107(11): 823-840
  • Yiğit, S. (2019). Etnik mutfak ürünlerinin tercihinde neofobinin etkisi (karşılaştırmalı bir uygulama). (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Balıkesir Üniversitesi. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Balıkesir.
  • Wolf, E. (2006). Culinary tourism. The Hidden Harvest, Abd-Lowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
  • Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph Supplement, 9(2): 1-27.