Rekreatif Amaçlı Seyahat Eden Motosiklet Kullanıcılarının Sosyal Kimlikleri Üzerine Bir Ölçek Geliştirme Çalışması

İnsanlar hayatları boyunca birçok gruba girmekte ve üye olmaktadır. Gönüllü olarak üye olunan bu gruplar kişinin sosyal kimliğini etkileyerek yeni bir sosyal kimliğin ortaya çıkmasını sağlamaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı ise serbest zamanlarında motosiklet ile seyahat eden ve bir motosiklet grubuna üye olan motosiklet kullanıcılarının sosyal kimliklerini ortaya çıkarmaktır. Aynı zamanda bu çalışmada motosiklet kullanıcılarına özgü sosyal kimlik ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Araştırmada nitel ve nicel yöntemler kullanılarak dört aşamada veri toplanmıştır. Nitel yöntemler olarak 27 kişi ile yarı yapılandırılmış soru formu, 33 kişi ile tam yapılandırılmış soru formu ile mülakatlar yapılmış ve üç adet odak grup çalışması gerçekleştirilmiştir. Daha sonra 486 adet anket toplanmış ve açıklayıcı faktör analizi yapılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonucunda, motosiklet gruplarına üye olan bireylerin sosyal kimlik belirleyicilerinin duygusal bağ, güvenlik, özgürlük hissi ve motosiklet ile seyahat etme ve gruba üye olması sonuncunda elde ettiği kazanımlar olarak ortaya çıkmıştır.

A Scale Development Study on the Social Identity of Motorcycle Users Traveling for Recreational Purposes

People are members of many groups throughout their lives. These groups, in which people voluntarily become members, affect the social identity of the person and enable the emergence of a new social identity. The purpose of this study is to reveal the social identity of a motorcycle user who the members of motorcycle groups and travel with a motorcycle in their leisure time. Also, the aim of this study is to develop a social identity scale of motorcycle users. Data were collected in four stages using both qualitative and quantitative research methods. As qualitative methods, 27 motorcycle users were interviewed with semi-structured questionnaires, 33 motorcycle users were interviewed with structured questionnaires and three focus group studies were conducted. Then, 486 questionnaires were collected and explanatory factor analysis was conducted. Results conclude that the social identity determinants of motorcycle users have emerged a strong emotional bond, feelings of safety, freedom, travelling by motorcycle and membership of the group

PDF

___

Amiot, C. E. and Sansfaçon, S. (2011). Motivations to Identify with Social Groups: A Look at Their Positive and Negative Consequences, Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 15(2): 105- 127.
Arkonaç, S. A. (2008). Sosyal Psikolojide İnsanları Anlamak: Deneysel ve Eleştirel Yaklaşımlar, Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
Ashforth, B. E. and Mael, F. (1989). Social Identity Theory and the Organization, Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 20-39.
Austin, D. M. and Gagné, P. (2008). Community in a Mobile Subculture: The World of the Touring Motorcyclist, Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 30: 411-437.
Brewer, M. B. and Gardner, W. (1996). Who is This" We"? Levels of Collective Identity and Self Representations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1): 83-93.
Broughton P. and Walker L. (2009). Motorcycling and Leisure Understanding the Recreational PTW Rider. New York: CRC Press.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2005). Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Analizi El Kitabı: İstatistik, Araştırma Deseni, SPSS Uygulamaları ve Yorum, Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
Cattell, R. B. (1966). The Scree Test for The Number of Factors, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2): 245-276.
Comrey, A. L. and Lee, H. B. (1992). A First Course in Factor Analysis. (2. Edition), New Jersey: Psychology Press.
Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria, Qualitative Sociology, 13(1): 3-21.
Cruwys, T., Haslam, S. A., Dingle, G. A., Haslam, C. and Jetten, J. (2014). Depression and Social Identity: An integrative review, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(3): 215-238.
Deaux, K. (2002). Social Identity, (Editör) Worell, J.: Encyclopedia of Women and Gender Sex Similarities and Differences and the Impact of Society on Gender içinde (ss. 1059-1068). USA: Academic Press.
Demirtaş, H. A. (2003). Sosyal Kimlik Kuramı, Temel Kavram ve Varsayımlar, İletişim Araştırmaları, 1(1): 123-144.
Ellemers, N. (2012). The Group Self, Science, 336(6083): 848-852. Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P. and Ouwerkerk, J. W. (1999). Self-Categorization, Commitment to the Group and Social Self-Esteem as Related but Distinct Aspects of Social Identity, European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(2-3): 371-389.
Erkuş, A. (2012). Varolan Ölçek Geliştirme Yöntemleri ve Ölçme Kuramları Psikolojik Ölçek Geliştirmede Ne Kadar İşlevsel: Yeni bir Öneri, Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 3(2): 279-290.
Ertaş, M. ve Aktaş, G. (2017). Sosyal Kimlik Kuramı: Motosiklet Kullanıcılarının İncelenmesi. 4. Rekreasyon Araştırmaları Kongresi. 12 Kasım 2017. Kuşadası. ss: 239-247.
Fabrigar, L. R. and Wegener, D. T. (2012). Exploratory Factor Analysis Understanding Statistics, New York: Oxford University Press. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C. and Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Psychological Research, Psychological Methods, 4(3): 272-299.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G. and Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A Flexible Statistical Power Analysis Program for the Social, Behavioral, and Biomedical Sciences, Behavior Research Methods, 39(2): 175-191.
Green, B. C. and Jones, I. (2005). Serious Leisure, Social Identity and Sport Tourism, Sport in Society, 8(2): 164-181.
Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries, Educational Communication and Technology, 29(2): 75-91.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. and Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis. (17. Edition), Edinburg: Pearson.
Harris, K. J. (2016). The Fierce Commitment to 1% Motorcycle Clubs, Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 11(1): 73-83.
Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J., Postmes, T., and Haslam, C. (2009). Social Identity, Health and WellBeing: An Emerging Agenda for Applied Psychology, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 58(1): 1-23
Hogarty, K. Y., Hines, C. V., Kromrey, J. D., Ferron, J. M. and Mumford, K. R. (2005). The Quality of Factor Solutions in Exploratory Factor Analysis: The Influence of Sample Size, Communality, and Overdetermination, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(2): 202-226.
Hogg, M. A., Abrams, D. and Brewer, M. B. (2017). Social identity: The Role of Self in Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(5): 570-581.
Hogg, M. A., Abrams, D., Otten, S. and Hinkle, S. (2004). The Social Identity Perspective: Intergroup Relations, Self-Conception, and Small Groups, Small Group Research, 35(3): 246-276.
Hogg, M. A. and Abrams, D. (1998). Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes, London and New York: Routledge.
Hogg, M. A. and Vaughan, G. M. (2007). Sosyal Psikoloji. (1.Basım). (Çeviren, Gelmez, A. ve Yıldız, İ.) İstanbul: Ütopya Yayınevi.
Hogg, M. A. and Williams, K. D. (2000). From I to We: Social Identity and the Collective Self, Group dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4(1): 81-97.
Horn, J. L. 1965. A Rationale and Test for the Number of Factors in Factor Analysis, Psychometrica, 30(2): 179–185.
Hoyle, R. H. and Crawford, A. M. (1994). Use of Individual-Level Data to Investigate Group Phenomena Issues and Strategies, Small Group Research, 25(4): 464-485
Jetten, J., Haslam, C., Haslam, S. A., Dingle, G. and Jones, J. M. (2014). How Groups Affect Our Health and Well-Being: The Path from Theory to Policy, Social Issues and Policy Review, 8(1): 103- 130.
Jetten, J., O'Brien, A. and Trindall, N. (2002). Changing Identity: Predicting Adjustment to Organizational Restructure as a Function of Subgroup and Superordinate Identification, British Journal of Social Psychology, 41(2): 281-297.
Jones, I. (2000). A Model of Serious Leisure Identification: The Case of Football Fandom, Leisure Studies, 19(4): 283-298.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An Index of Factorial Simplicity, Psychometrika, 39(1): 31-36.
Karaman, H., Atar, B. ve Çobanoğlu-Aktan, D. (2017). Açımlayıcı Faktör Analizinde Kullanılan Faktör Çıkartma Yöntemlerinin Karşılaştırılması, GEFAD, 37(3): 1173-1193.
Karasawa, M. (1991). Toward an Assessment of Social Identity: The Structure of Group Identification and Its Effects on In-Group Evaluations, British Journal of Social Psychology, 30(4): 293-307.
Küçük, S., Yılmaz, R. M., Baydaş, Ö. ve Göktaş, Y. (2014). Okullarda Artırılmış Gerçeklik Uygulamaları Tutum Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması, Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(2014): 383-392.
Kümbetoğlu, B. (2015). Sosyolojide ve Antropolojide Niteliksel Yöntem ve Araştırma. (4. Basım), Ankara: Bağlam Yayıncılık.
Lincoln, Y. S. and Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Longhurst R. (2010). Semi- Structured Interviews and Focus Groups, (Editörler) Clifford, N.,
French, S. and Valentine, G.: Key Methods in Geography (2. Basım) içinde (ss. 103-115) London: Sage.
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S. and Hong, S. (1999). Sample Size in Factor Analysis, Psychological Methods, 4(1): 84-99
Malhotra, N. K. (2006). Questionnaire Design and Scale Development, (Editörler) Grover, R. and Vriens, M.: The Handbook of Marketing Research: Uses, Misuses, and Future Advances içinde (ss. 176- 202) USA: Sage Publication.
Mvududu, N. H. and Sink, C. A. (2013). Factor Analysis in Counseling Research and Practice, Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation, 4(2): 75-98.
Norman, G. R. and Streiner, D. L. (1998). Biostatistics - The Bare Essentials, Hamilton: B.C. Decker Inc.
Patton, M. Q. (2018). Nitel Araştırma ve Değerlendirme Yöntemleri (2. Basım). (3. Basımdan Çeviri) (Çeviren: Bütün, M ve Demir, S. B.) Ankara: Pegem Akademi . Packer, D. J. (2008). On Being Both with Us and Against Us: A Normative Conflict Model of Dissent in Social Groups, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(1): 50-72.
Punch, K. F. (2016). Sosyal Araştırmalara Giriş Nicel ve Nitel Yaklaşımlar (4. Basım). (2. Basımdan Çeviri) (Çeviren: Bayrak, D., Arslan, H. B. ve Akyüz, Z.) Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
Reicher, S., Spears, R. and Haslam, S. A. (2010). The Social Identity Approach in Social Psychology, (Editörler) Wetherell, M. and Mohanty, C. T.: The SAGE Handbook of Identities içinde (ss. 45-62) London: Sage Publications.
Shenton A. K. (2004). Strategies for Ensuring Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research Projects, Education for Information, 22(2): 63-75.
Sherif, M. (1967). Group Conflict and Co-Operation: Their Social Psychology, London: Psychology Press.
Swann, W. B., Jetten, J., Gómez, Á., Whitehouse, H. and Bastian, B. (2012). When Group Membership Gets Personal: A Theory of Identity Fusion, Psychological Review, 119(3): 441-456.
Swann, W. B. and Bosson, J. K. (2010). Self and Identity, (Editörler) Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T. and Lindzey, G.: Handbook of Social Psychology (5. Edition) içinde (ss. 589-628) New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidell, L. S. (2015). Çok Değişkenli İstatistiklerin Kullanımı. (6. Basımdan çeviri) (Çevirmen: Baloğlu, M.) Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Inter-Group Relations, London: Academic Press.
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Annual Review of Psychology, 33(1): 1- 39.
Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. C. (1979). An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict, (Editörler)
Austin, W. G. and Worchel, S.: The Social psychology of intergroup relations içinde (ss. 33-47) Monterey: Brooks/Cole.
Tinsley, H. E. and Tinsley, D. J. (1987). Uses of Factor Analysis in Counseling Psychology Research, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34(4): 414-424.
Trepte, S. and Loy, L. S. (2017). Social Identity Theory and Self-Categorization Theory, (Editör) Rössler, P.: The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects içinde (ss. 1-13) London: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a Cognitive Redefinition of the Social Group, (Editör) Tajfel, H.: Social Identity and Intergroup Relations içinde (ss. 15-40). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A. and McGarty, C. (1994). Self and Collective: Cognition and Social Context, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5): 454-463.
Turner, J. C., Reynolds, K. J., Haslam, S. A. and Veenstra, K. E. (2006). Reconceptualizing
Personality: Producing Individuality by Defining the Personal Self, (Editörler) Postmes, T. and Jetten, J.: Individuality and the Group Advances in Social Identity içinde (ss. 11-36) London: Sage Publications.
Van Knippenberg, D., Van Knippenberg, B., Monden, L. and De Lima, F. (2002). Organizational Identification After a Merger: A Social Identity Perspective, British Journal of Social Psychology, 41(2): 233-252.
Velicer, W.F. (1976). Determining the Number of Components from the Matrix of Partial Correlations, Psychometrika, 41(3): 321–327.
Velicer, W. F. and Fava, J. L. (1998). Affects of Variable and Subject Sampling on Factor Pattern Recovery, Psychological Methods, 3(2): 231-251.
Veno, A. (2009). The Brotherhoods Inside the Outlaw Motorcycle Clubs. (3. Edition), Australia: Allen&Unwin.