Sürücülerin emniyet kemeri kullanımındakirasyonelliği: Ankara ili örneği

Karayollarındaki trafk kazalarında her yıl milyonlarca insan hayatnıkaybetmektedir. Emniyet kemerinin kullanılmaması da meydana gelenölümlerde önemli bir etken olarak kabul edilmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı,Ankarada araç kullanan sürücülerin rasyonel hareket edip etmediklerinisaptamaktr. Çalışmada kullanılan veriler yaklaşık bir yıl süren anketaraştrması sonucunda elde edilmiştr. Örnekleme dahil edilecek kişiler, olasılıkdışı örnekleme metotlarından biri olan uygun örnekleme metodu ile tespitedilmişlerdir. Günlük olarak daha uzun süre araç kullanan, eğitm seviyesidaha düşük olan ve polisin uygulamalarını yeterli görmeyen sürücülerin,emniyet kemerini daha az kullandıkları tespit edilmiştr.

The rationality of drivers in seat belt use: Ankara provinceexample

Trafc accidents on roads cost millions of lives each year. Failure touse seat belt is considered to be an important factor for this death toll. Thisstudy is about the ratonality of drivers in Ankara. The data for this study wascollected through administratng survey. Convenient sampling method wasused in identying samples. The result indicates that those who drive morehours daily, who has lesser educaton and who thinks that police controls onseat belt use is not enough prefer not use it.

PDF

___

Engel, J., Kollat, D. ve Blackwell, R. (1968). Consumer Behaviour, Himsdale, IL: The Dryden Press.
Cohen, A. ve Einav, L. (2003). The Efects of Mandatory Seat Belt Laws on Driving Behavior and Trafc Fatalites, The Review of Economics and Statstcs, 85(4), ss. 828-843.
Colgan, F., Gospel, A., Petrie, J., Adams, J., Heywood, P., White, M. (2004). Does rear selt belt use vary according to socioeconomic status?, J. Epidemiol Community Health, 58, ss. 929-930.
Elvik, R., Vaa, T. (2004). The Handbook of Road Safety Measures. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Etzioni, A. (1987). How Ratonal We, Sociological Forum, 2(1), pp.1-20.
Focklar, S. K. F. and Cooper, P. J. (1990). Situatonal Characteristcs of safety Belt Use, Accident Analysis and Preventon, 22, pp.109-118.
Hansen, F., (1972). Consumer Choice Behavior: A Cognitve Theory. New York: Free Press. Engel, J., Kollat, D., Blackwell, R. (1968). Consumer Behavior. New York: Holt, R., Winston.
H., J. David, Richardson, E. Lilliard (2006). Reducing trafc fatalites in the American States by upgrading seat belt use laws to primary enforcement, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25(3), ss. 645-659.
Hunter, W. W., Stuts, J.C., Stewart, J. R., Rodgman, E. A. (1988). Overrepresentaton of Seat Belt non-users in in Trafc Crashes. HSRC-TR74. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Caroline Highway Safety Research Center.
Katona, G., Mueller, E. (1954). A Study of purchase decisions, In L. Clark (Ed.), Consumer Behavior, New York: New York University Press.
Milne, P. W. (1985). Fitng and Wearing of Seat Belts in Australia: The History of a Successful Countermeasure, Department of Transport, Second Editon, ss. 1-31.
Preusser, F. D., Williams, F. A., Lund, K. Adrian (1990). Characteristcs of Belted and Unbelted Drivers, Accident, Analysis and Preventon, 23(6), ss. 475-482.
Sen, A. Mizzen B. (2007). Estmatng the Impact of Seat Belt Use on Trafc Fatalites, Canadian Public Policy, 33(3), ss. 315-335.
Şimşekoğlu, Ö., Lajunen, T. (2008). Why Turks Do Not Use Seat Belts? An Interview Study, Accident, Analysis and Preventon, 40, ss. 470-478.
Türkçe Sözlük (2005), Türk Dil Kurumu, Ankara.
WHO (World Health Organizaton), 2004. World Report on Road Trafc Injury Preventon: Summary. Geneva.