DİJİTAL DÖNÜŞÜMÜN İŞGÜCÜ PİYASALARINA ETKİLERİ: TÜRKİYE İŞGÜCÜ PİYASASI İÇİN SOSYAL POLİTİKA ÖNERİLERİ

Dördüncü Sanayi Devrimini başlatan teknolojik gelişmeler sonucundamakineler ve nesneler arasında gerçek zamanlı veri akışının kesintisiz olaraksağlanabilmesi ve yapay zekâ teknolojisinin bilişsel süreçlerde insan gücünü ikameedebilecek şekilde kullanımı endüstrilerde insan gücü yerine otonom üretimsistemlerinin giderek daha yoğun olarak kullanılmasına imkân vermektedir.Otomasyona dayalı sistemlerin artması ise yenilikçi ve fark yaratabilen yüksekseviyede becerilere sahip çalışanlara olan talebi arttırırken rutin faaliyetleriyerine getirmeye dayalı mesleklere sahip çalışanların işlerini dijital sistemlerebırakmasına neden olmaktadır. Bu açıdan, bazı meslekler geçerliliklerini yitirirkenileri teknoloji ile bağlantılı yeni işlerin ve yeni mesleklerin ortaya çıkmaktaolduğu gözlenmektedir. Makro seviyede küresel işgücü piyasalarının dinamikleriyeniden oluşurken, mikro seviyede işgücü piyasasını oluşturan çalışanların sahipolmaları gereken iş becerilerinin kapsam ve içeriği radikal şekilde değişmektedir.İşgücü piyasalarındaki bu değişimlerin ekonomik ve sosyal açılardan bir takımetkileri olması kaçınılmazdır. Bu açılardan, dijital dönüşüm süreçlerinin Türkiyeişgücü piyasası üzerindeki mevcut ve muhtemel etkilerinin iyi anlaşılması, hemistihdam politikalarının oluşturulabilmesi, hem de işgücü yetkinliklerinin ve buyetkinliklerin kazandırılması için gereken mesleki ve örgün eğitim stratejilerinintespiti açılarından önem arz etmektedir.

EFFECTS OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION ON LABOR MARKETS: SOCIAL POLICY RECOMMENDATION FOR TURKEY’S LABOR MARKET

As a result of the technological developments leading to the Fourth Industrial Revolution, applicability of continuous real-time data flow between machines and objects along with the usage of artificial intelligence technology that substitutes manpower in cognitive processes have allowed more intensive usage of autonomous production systems. The boost in automation-based systems have been raising the demand for innovative and highly skilled employees, at the same time less skilled employees working on routine activities feel stuck to leave their jobs to digital systems. In this respect, while some professions are losing their validity, some new jobs and professions associated with advanced technologies are emerging. At the macro level global labor markets are reshaping along with the changes in the scope and content of the skills that employees need to have at micro level. It is inevitable that these changes in labor markets to have effects on economic and social dynamics. That is why, it is important to analyze the potential impact of digital transformation processes on Turkey’s labor market so that social policies including vocational and formal education strategies as well as effective employment policies could be developed to form Turkey’s effective future workforce

PDF

___

Acemoglu, D., ve Autor, D.H. (2011), Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and
Earnings. In Handbook of Labor Economics, ed. D. Card ve O. Ashenfelter, 4, B, 1043–1171. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Akçomak: ve Gürcihan, B. (2013), Türkiye İşgücü Piyasasında Mesleklerin Önemi: Hizmetler Sektörü İstihdamı, İşgücü Ve Ücret Kutuplaşması”, Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Merkez Bankası Çalışma Tebliği 13/21.
Arntz, M. T. Gregory ve Zierahn, U. (2016), The risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries: a comparative analysis, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No 189.
Autor, D. H., (2015), Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), pp. 3-30.
Autor, D. H., ve Handel, M. J. (2013), Putting tasks to the test: Human capital, job tasks, and wages, Journal of Labor Economics, 31(2), pp. 59-96.
Autor, D. H., Katz, L.F. ve Kearney, M.S. (2006), The polarization of the U.S. labor market, American Economic Review, 96(2), 189-194.
Autor, D. H., Levy, F., ve Murnane, R. J. (2003), The skill content of recent technological change: An emprical explanation, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1279-1333.
Baruch, Y. (2003), Transforming careers: from linear to multidirectional career paths:organizational and individual perspectives, Career Development International, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 58-73.
Becker, B. E, ve Huselid, M. A. (2006), Strategic human resources management: Where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 32(6), 898– 925.
Beechler:, ve Woodward, I. (2009), The Global “War for Talent, Journal of International Management, 15, 273-285.
Berger, T., ve Frey, C. B. (2016), Did the computer revolution shift the fortunes of US cities? Technology shocks and the geography of new jobs, Regional Science and Urban Economics.
Berman, E., Bound, J. ve Machin: (1998), The implications of skill-biased technological change: International evidence, Quarterly Jounal of Economics, 113 (4), 1245-1279
Brynjolfsson, E., ve McAfee, A. (2014), The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Brynjolfsson, E., ve McAfee, A. (2011), Race against the machine: How the digital revolution is accelerating innovation, driving productivity, and irreversibly transforming employment and the economy. Lexington, Mass: Digital Frontier Press.
Cann, O., (2015), 3 things millennials want from work”, World Economic Forum Blog, October 25, 2015, https://agenda.weforum.org/2015/10/3-thingsmillennials- want-from-work.
Cappelli, P. (2008), Talent on demand: Managing talent in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
Carnevale, A., Smith, N., ve Melton, M. (2011), STEM Science, engineering, technology and mathematics. Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce, Washington, D.C., October 2011. http://cew.georgetown.edu/ STEM.
Chambers, E. G., Foulon, M., Handfield-Jones, M., Hankin: M., ve Michaels, E. G. (1998), The war for talent, The McKinsey Quarterly.
Cisco (2011), The internet of things: How the next evolution of the internet is changing everything, White Paper, Cisco Internet Business Solutions Group (IBSG), April 2011.
Collings, D., ve Mellahi, K. (2009), Strategic talent management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 304-313.
EPSC European Political Strategy Centre (2016), The Future of Work. Strategic Notes, Issue 13.
Firpo:, Fortin, N. ve Lemieux, T. (2009), Occupational tasks and changes in the wage structure, http://client.norc.org/jole/SOLEweb/fortin.pdf
Frey, C. B., ve Osborne, M. A. (2013), The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Oxford Martin School.
Goos, M. ve Manning, A. (2007), Lousy and lovely jobs: The rising polarization of work in Britain, Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(1), 118- 133.
Goos, M., Manning, A. ve Salomons, A. (2011), Explaining job polarization: The roles fo technology, offshoring and institutions.http://www.econ.kuleuven. be/public/n06022/ManuscriptExplainingJobPolarization.pdf
Grundke, R., M. Squicciarini: Jamet ve M. Kalamova (2017), Having the right mix: the role of skill bundles for comparative advantage and industry performance in GVCs, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Guthridge, M. Komm, A., ve Lawson, E. (2008), Making Talent a Strategic Priority, McKinsey Quarterly, 4.
Hill, Christopher. (2007), The Post-Scientific Society, Issues in Science and Technology Fall. http://www.issues.org/24.1/c_ hill.html.
Huselid, M.A., Beatty, R. W, ve Becker, B. E. (2005), “A players” or “A positions”? The strategic logic of workforce management. Harvard Business Review, 83(12), 110–17.
ILO (2015), World employment social outlook: The changing nature of jobs, 2015.
Khilji:, Tarique, I., ve Schuler, R. (2015), Incorporating the macro view in global talent management. Human Resource Management Review, 236-248.
Lepak, D. P., ve Snell: A. (1999), The human resource architecture: toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 31–48.
Linden, G., Kraemer, K. L., ve Dedrick, J. (2007). Who captures value in a global innovation system? The case of Apple’s iPod. Irvine, CA: Personal Computing Industry Center. http://pcic.merage.uci.edu/papers/2009/ InnovationAndJobCreation.pdf.
Marx, K. (1972). Das Kapital, Bd. 1. Berlin: Dietz.
ManpowerGroup (2018), Talent Shortage Survey, 2018.
McKinsey Global Institute (2017), A future that works: Automation, employment, and productivity, McKinsey & Company, January 2017.
OECD (2016a), Forum 2016 Issues: The Future of Education, http://www. oecd.org/forum/issues/forum-2016-issues-the-future-of-education.htm.
OECD (2016b), Getting skills right: Assessing and anticipating changing skill needs, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Piore, M. J. (2002). Thirty years later: internal labor markets, flexibility and the new economy, Journal of Manag. Gov, 6(4), 271–79.
Oxford Economics (2012), Global Talent 2012, How the new geography of talent will transform human resource strategies, https://www.oxfordeconomics. com/my-oxford/projects/128942.
PwC (2018), Will robots really steal our jobs? An international analysis of the potential long term impact of automation, PwC Economics, UK.
PwC (2015), People strategy for the digital age - A new take on talent, PwC 18th Annual Global CEO Survey, 2015.
Quintini, G. (2014), Skills at work: How skills and their use matter in the labour market, OECD social, employment and Migration working papers, No. 158, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Schumpeter, J. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper & Bros.
T.C. Kalkınma Bakanlığı (2014), İstihdam ve Çalışma Hayatı Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu 2023.
T.C. Çalışma Bakanlığı (2017), Ulusal İstihdam Stratejisi 2014- 2023.
Ulrich, D., ve Smallwood, N. (2012). What is talent? Leader to Leader, 63, 55–61.
World Economic Forum (2016a), The Future of Jobs Report, Cologny: Geneva, Switzerland.
World Economic Forum (2016b), Digital Transformation of Industries, Cologny: Geneva, Switzerland.