Piyasa Riskinin Ölçülmesi: Enerji Piyasası Üzerine Bir Uygulama

Bu çalışmanın amacı enerji piyasasında öngörülecek riske maruz değerler (VaR değerleri) için uygun dağılımın belirlenmesidir. Bu amaçla çalışmada Ocak 2003-Kasım 2013 dönemlerine ait Brent petrol, WTI petrol ve doğal gaza ilişkin günlük getiri serileri kullanılmıştır. VaR değerleri; normal, student-t ve GED dağılımına dayanan simetrik ve asimetrik GARCH modelli Varyans-Kovaryans yöntemi ile hesaplanmıştır. Analiz sonuçları, brent petrol serilerinde %99 ve %95 güven düzeyinde sırasıyla normal ve student-t dağılımının, WTI petrol ve doğal gaz serilerinde ise her üç dağılımın da doğru VaR öngörülerde bulunduğunu göstermiştir.

Measuring Market Risk: Evidence from Energy Market

The aim of this study is to determine an appropriate distribution for VaR in the energy market. Daily return data of Brent oil, WTI oil and natural gas are used for the period January 2003-November 2013. VaR is calculated by the Variance-Covariance method with the symmetric and asymmetric GARCH models based on normal, student-t and GED distributions. Analysis results suggest that at 99% and 95% confidence levels, the models based on normal and student-t distributions have more accurate predictions of VaR for Brent oil, while models based on each of the three distributions for WTI and natural gas have accurate predictions.

___

  • Ahmed Elsheikh M. , A. ve Suliman, S. (2011). Modeling Stock Market Volatility Using Garch Models Evidence From Sudan. International Journal of Business and Social Science. 2 (23), 114-128.
  • Akan, B., Oktay, A. ve Tüzün, Y. (2003). Parametrik Riske Maruz Değer Yöntemi ve Türkiye Uygulaması. Bankacılar Dergisi. 14(45), 29-40.
  • Aksoy, G. ve Olgun, O. (2009). Optimal Hedge Oranı Tahminlemesi Üzerine Amprik Bir Çalış- ma: VOB Örmeği. İktisat, işletme ve Finans Dergisi. 24(274), 33-53.
  • Alexander, C. (2008). Market Risk Analysis Volume II: Practical Financial Econometrics. England: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Altay, E. (2009). Petrol Fiyatlarından Kaynaklanan Riskin Tahmin Edilmesi: Monte Carlo Simülasyonu Yöntemiyle RMD Yaklaşımı. İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası. 59(2), 61-84.
  • Asteriou, D. ve Hall, S. (2007). Applied Econometrics. 1st ed. NewYork: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Bacon, C. R. (2012). Practical Risk-Adjusted Performance Measurement. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics. 31, 307-327.
  • Bollerslev, T. (1987). A Conditional Heteroskedastic Time Series Model for Security Prices and Rates of Return Data. Review of Economics and Statistics. 69(3), 542-547.
  • Brooks, C. ve Persand, G. (2002). Model Choice and Value-At-Risk Performance. Financial Analysts Journal. 58 (5), 87-97.
  • Cabedo, J.D. ve Moya, I. (2003). Estimating Oil Price Value at Risk Using The Historical Simulation Approach. Energy Economics. 25, 527-539.
  • Cheng, W. H.ve Hung, J. C. (2011). Skewness and Leptokurtosis in GARCH-typed VaR Estimation of Petroleum and Metal Asset Returns. Journal of Empirical Finance. 18, 160-173.
  • Chiu, C.L., Lee, M.C. ve Hung, J.C. (2005). Estimation of Value-at-Risk under Jump Dynamics and Asymmetric Information. Applied Financial Economics. 15, 1095-1106.
  • Christoffersen, P.F. (1998). Evaluating Interval Forecasts. International Economic Review. 39, 841-862.
  • Culp, C. L., Mensink, R. ve Neves, A. M. (1998). Value at Risk for Asset. Derivatives Quarterly. 5(2), 21-33.
  • Enders, W. (2009). Applied Econometric Times Series. 3rd ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Engle, R.F., Lilien, D.M. ve Robins, R.P. (1987). Estimating Time Varying Risk Premia in the Term Structure: The Arch-M Model. Econometrica. 55(2), 391-407.
  • Fan, Y., Zhang, Y. J., Tsai, H. T. ve Wei, Y. M. (2008). Estimating Value at Risk of Crude Oil Price and its Spillover Effect Using The Ged-Garch Approach. Energy Economics. 30, 3156-3171.
  • Giot, P. ve Laurent, S. (2003). Market Risk in Commodity Markets: A VaR Approach. Energy Economics. 25, 435-457.
  • Giot, P. ve Laurent, S., (2003b). Value-at-Risk for Long and Short Trading Positions. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 18, 641-664.
  • Giot, P. ve Laurent, S., (2004). Modeling Daily Value-at-Risk Using Realized Volatility and Arch Type Models. Journal of Empirical Finance. 11, 379-398.
  • Glosten, L. R., Jaganathan, R. ve Runkle, D. E. (1993). On the Relation between the Expected Value and the Volatility of the Nominal Excess Return on Stocks. Journal of Finance. 48(5), 1779- 1801.
  • Güner, B., Mitov, I. ve Racheva-Yotova, B. (2013). Fat-Tailed Models for Risk Estimation. (Eds), Fabozzi, Frank J. Encyclopedia of Financial Models II. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Hartz, C., Mittnik, S. ve Paolella, M. (2006). Accurate Value-at-Risk Forecasting Based On The Normal-Garch Model. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis. 51, 2295-2312.
  • Hill, R. C., Griffiths, W. E. ve Lim, G. C. (2011). Principles of Econometrics. 4th ed. USA: John Wiley & Sons .
  • Huang, Y.C. ve Lin, B.J. (2004). Value-at-Risk Analysis for Taiwan Stock Index Futures: Fat Tails and Conditional Asymmetries in Return Innovations. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting. 22, 79-95.
  • Hung, J. C., Lee, M. C. ve Liu, H. C. (2008). Estimation of Value-at-Risk for Energy Commodities via Fat-Tailed Garch Model. Energy Economics. 30, 1173-1191.
  • International Energy Agency (2012), Key World Energy Statistics 2012, http://www.iea.org/.
  • Janabi, M. A. (2009). Commodity Price Risk Management Valuation of Large Trading Portfolios Under Adverse and Illiquid Market Settings. Journal of Derivatives & Hedge Funds. 15, 15-50.
  • Jorion, P. (2007). Value at Risk: A New Benchmark For Controlling Risk. 3rd ed. New York: Mc Graw Hill Inc.
  • Khindanova, I. ve Atakhanova, Z. (2002). Stable Modeling in Energy Risk Management. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research. 55, 225-245.
  • Kupiec, P. (1995). Techniques for Verifying The Accuracy of Risk Management Models. Journal of Derivatives. 3, 73-84.
  • Linsmeier, T. J. ve Pearson, N. D. (1996). Risk Measurement: An Introductin to Value at Risk. SSRN Working Paper No. 7875.
  • Mazıbaş, M. (2005). İMKB Piyasalarındaki Volatilitenin Modellenmesi ve Öngörülmesi: Asimetrik GARCH Modelleri ile Bir Uygulama. VII. Ekonometri ve İstatistik Sempozyumu. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Ekonometri Bölümü.
  • Nelson, D. B. (1991). Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach. Econometrica. 59, 347-70.
  • Sadeghi, M. ve Shavvalpour, S. (2006). Energy Risk Management and Value at Risk Modeling. Energy Policy. 34, 3367-3373.
  • Sadorsky, P. (2006). Modeling and Forecasting Petroleum Futures Volatility. Energy Economics. 28, 467-488.
  • Satchell, S. ve Knight, J. (2007). Forecasting Volatility in the Financial Markets. 3rd ed. Netherlands: Butterworth-Heinemann Pub.
  • Simons, K. (1996). Value-at-Risk New Approaches to Risk Management. New England Economic Review. September/October, 1-13.
  • Tan, K.H. ve Chan, I.L. (2003). Stress Testing Using VaR Approach - A Case for Asian Currencies. Journal of International Financial Markets. 13, 39-55.
  • Taş, O. ve İltüzer, Z. (2008). Monte Carlo Simulasyon Yöntemi ile Riske Maruz Değerin İMKB30 Endeksi ve DİBS Portföyü Üzerinde Bir Uygulaması. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve idari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 23(1), 67-87.
  • Wang, Y. ve Wu, C. (2012). Forecasting Energy Market Volatility Using Garch Models: Can Multivariate Models Beat Univariate Models? Energy Economics. 34(6), 2167-2181.
  • Zakoian, J.M. (1994). Threshold Heteroskedastic Models. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. 18, 931-55
TİSK Akademi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1306-6757
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2006
  • Yayıncı: Türkiye Isveren Sendikalari Konfederasyonu