The Importance of the Payment Methods on the Size of the Shadow Economy: Cross-Country Evidence

This study investigates the effect of debit and credit card ownership, checks, and electronic payments on the size of the shadow economy. Potential effects of holding a bank account or having an account in a financial institution on the size of the shadow economy is another aspect of the study. For this purpose, MIMIC model estimates of the size of the shadow economy as percentage of GDP are used as the shadow economy indicator. In addition, data on the percentages of debit card users, credit card users, checks and electronic payments used to make payments, and account ownership are utilized as the real or potential source of formal transactions. The estimation results indicate that debit, credit card, and account ownership have a strong negative effect on the size of the shadow economy. Checks and electronic payments that are realized in the past 12 months result in decrease in the size of the shadow economy as well. While tax revenue and corruption are in a positive relationship with the size of the shadow economy, coefficient of the labor force participation rate is not statistically significant.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Shadow economy, cross-section study, payment methods, account ownership, debit card ownership, credit card ownership

The Importance of the Payment Methods on the Size of the Shadow Economy: Cross-Country Evidence

Keywords:

Shadow economy, cross-section study, payment methods, account ownership, debit card ownership, credit card ownership,

PDF

___

Ahumada, H., Alvaredo, F., & Canavese, A. (2009). The Monetary Method to Measure the Size of the Shadow Economy. Revue économique, 60(5), 1069-1078.
Bajada, C., & Schneider, F. (2009). Unemployment and the Shadow Economy in the OECD. Revue économique, 60(5), 1033-1067.
Cebula, R. J. (1997). An empirical analysis of the impact of government tax and auditing policies on the size of the underground economy. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 56(2), 173-185.
Čihák, M., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Feyen, E., & Levine, R. (2012). Benchmarking Financial Systems Around the World. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 6175.
Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., Singer, D., Ansar, S., & Hess, J. (2018). The Global Findex Database 2017: Measuring Financial Inclusion and the Fintech Revolution. World Bank: Washington, DC.
Dreher, A., & Schneider, F. (2010). Corruption and the shadow economy: an empirical analysis. Public Choice, 144(1-2), 215-238.
Hassan, M., & Schneider, F. (2016). Size and development of the shadow economies of 157 countries worldwide: Updated and new measures from 1999 to 2013. IZA Discussion Paper No. 10281.
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank. (2014). Global Financial Development Report: Financial Inclusion, Washington DC.
Teobaldelli, D., & Schneider, F. (2013). The influence of direct democracy on the shadow economy. Public choice, 157(3-4), 543-567.
Torgler, B., & Schneider, F. (2006). Shadow Economy, Institutions, and Tax Morale. In National Tax Association Papers and Proceedings. Annual Conference on Taxation and Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the National Tax Association, 99, 204-210.
World Bank, 2017. Global Financial Development Database. Retrieved February 13, 2018, from http://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/gfdr/data/global-financial-development-database
World Bank, 2017. The Global Findex Database 2017. Retrieved January 2, 2019, from https://globalfindex.worldbank.org/#data_sec_focus
World Bank, 2017. World Development Indicators. Retrieved February 15, 2018, from http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=World-Development-Indicators
World Bank, 2015. Worldwide Governance Indicators Project. Retrieved February 15, 2018, from http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home