Asymmetric Effect of Globalization on the Interest Rates on External Debt: The Case of Turkey

This study empirically examines the short-run and long-run asymmetry between the series of globalization and the interest rate on external debt for the years from 1970 to 2015 for Turkey by employing the Nonlinear Auto-Regressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) model. Estimation results show that there is a statistically significant nonlinear relationship between globalization and the interest rate on external debt for the case of Turkey. We identified a long-run but not a short-run asymmetry between two series. According to the findings, when the degree of globalization in Turkey increases by 1%, then the interest rate on the external debt commitments drops by 3.43%. On the other hand, the interest rate on external debt commitments rises by 3.07% in the long-run when the degree of globalization drops by 1%. Diagnostic test results also reveal that our model does not contain any problems of autocorrelation, heteroscedasticity, misspecification, and non-normality.

Asymmetric Effect of Globalization on the Interest Rates on External Debt: The Case of Turkey

This study empirically examines the short-run and long-run asymmetry between the series of globalization and the interest rate on external debt for the years from 1970 to 2015 for Turkey by employing the Nonlinear Auto-Regressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) model. Estimation results show that there is a statistically significant nonlinear relationship between globalization and the interest rate on external debt for the case of Turkey. We identified a long-run but not a short-run asymmetry between two series. According to the findings, when the degree of globalization in Turkey increases by 1%, then the interest rate on the external debt commitments drops by 3.43%. On the other hand, the interest rate on external debt commitments rises by 3.07% in the long-run when the degree of globalization drops by 1%. Diagnostic test results also reveal that our model does not contain any problems of autocorrelation, heteroscedasticity, misspecification, and non-normality.

___

  • Bertaut, C., DeMarco, L. P., Kamin, S. and Tryon, R. (2012). ABS inflows to the United States and the global financial crisis. Journal of International Economics, 88(2), 219–34.
  • Carvalho, D. and Fidora, M. (2015). Capital inflows and euro area long-term interest rates. The European Central Bank (ECB) Working Paper Series No: 1798, Frankfurt, Germany: The European Central Bank (ECB). https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp1798.en.pdf?cce679c384cc11837abd7f125ddc5bed
  • Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., and Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326.
  • Shin, Y., Yu, B., Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in an ARDL framework. In: W.C. Horrace & R.C. Sickles (Eds.), Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt (pp. 281-314). New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Warnock, F.E. and Warnock, V.C. (2009). International capital flows and U.S. interest rates. Journal of International Money and Finance, 28(6), 903–19.