Türkiye Bölgelerinde Çeşitlenmiş Uzmanlaşmanın İncelenmesi

Kentsel ve bölgesel dinamikler içinde etkili olan güçler gerek yerelleşme ekonomilerini gerekse kentleşme ekonomilerini farklı koşullarda önemli hale getirmiştir. Çeşitli araştırmacılar, çeşitliliğin ve uzmanlaşmanın kesin karşıtlık olmadığını vurgulamıştır; buna göre bir bölge hem çok sayıda sektör çeşitliliğine sahip olabilir hem de belirli sektörlerde uzmanlaşabilir. Sektörel çeşitlilik gösteren kent/bölgeler birden fazla uzmanlaşmış küme içerebilir ve sektörler arası ilişki nedeniyle sağlıklı bir yapı ortaya çıkarırlar. Önceki çalışmalar ağırlıklı olarak sektörel uzmanlaşma/çeşitlilik ile istihdam artışı ve verimlilik arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektedir. Bu bağlamda, çeşitlenmiş uzmanlaşma kavramı son zamanlarda sektörler arasındaki ilişkiler ve ekonomik şoklara karşı önemli bir yaklaşım olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Ayrıca, karar vericiler genellikle bir veya birkaç uzmanlaşmış sektörden çok çeşitlenmiş uzmanlığı tercih etmektedirler. Bu makalenin amacı, 2009-2014 yılları arasında Türkiye’nin 26 İBBS düzey 2 bölgesinin imalat faaliyetlerindeki uzmanlaşma, çeşitlilik ve çeşitlenmiş uzmanlaşma durumlarını keşfetmektir. Sektörel uzmanlaşma ve çeşitlilik ile bu sektörlerin teknoloji düzeyleri, bölgelerin ekonomik yapısına ilişkin bilgiyi sunarken farklı tipolojileri de ortaya çıkarmaktadır. Ayrıca bölgelerin çeşitlenmiş uzmanlaşma yapısı ile bölgelerin sahip olduğu avantajlar arasında ilişki olup olmadığı dinamik değişim-pay analizi ile incelenmektedir.

Looking for Diversified Specialization in the Regions of Turkey

Different forces within the urban and regional dynamics made significant either localization economies or urbanization economies indifferent circumstances. Several researchers highlighted that diversity and specialization are not exact opposites; a region can be both diversified and specialized. Diversified cities might include several specialized clusters, as diversity might be having a healthy mix of sectoralemployment. Studies mainly look at the relationship between the sectorial specialization/diversification and employment growth andproductivity. From all that, the concept of diversified specialization has recently occurred related to the outcome of relationships betweenthe sectors and against the economic shocks. Furthermore, decision makers generally prefer a diverse specialization rather than just oneor a few. The aim of this paper is to explore the specialization, diversification due to the manufacturing activities and furthermore diversified-specialization pattern of the 26 NUTS 2 regions of Turkey between 2009 and 2014. How the regions specialize and indicate diversification of related industries, and if they point out different patterns regarding technology levels of the industries are the main researchquestions. Moreover, the performance of regions is explored by dynamic shift-share analysis whether there is a relationship between thespecialization/diversification pattern of regions and their advantages.

___

  • Acemoglu, D. (2002) “Technical change, inequality, and the labor market”, Journal of Economic Literature, 40(1):7-72.
  • Akgüngör, S. (2006) “Geographic concentrations in Turkey’s manufacturing industry: identifying regional highpoint clusters”, European Planning Studies, 14 (2):169-197.
  • Akgüngör, S., Kumral, N., Lenger, A. (2003) “National industry clusters and regional specializations in Turkey”, European Planning Studies, 11 (6):647-669.
  • Amiti, M. (1996) “International trade in the manufacturing sectors of industrialised countries: Theory and Evidence”. Dissertation in Economics, LSE, Chapter 3.
  • Arrow, K.J. (1962) “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing”. Review of Economic Studies 29:155–172.
  • Asheim, B., Boschma, R., Cooke, P. (2011) “Constructing regional advantage: platforms policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases”, Regional Studies, 45(7):893-904.
  • Barff, R. A., Prentice III, L. K. (1988) “Dynamic shift‐share analysis”. Growth and Change, 19(2):1-10.
  • Beer, A., Clower, T. (2009) “Specialisation and growth: evidence from Australia’s regional cities”, Urban Studies, 46(2):369- 389.
  • Boschma, R. (2013) “Constructing regional advantage and smart specialization: comparison of two European policy concepts”, Papers in Evolutionary Economşc Geography, 13.12, Utrecht University.
  • Boschma, R., Giannelle, C. (2014) “Regional branching and smart specialisation policy”, S3 Policy Brief Series No. 06/2014.
  • Boschma, R., Minondo, A., Navarro, M. (2012) “Related variety and regional growth in Spain”, Papers in Regional Science, 91(2):241-256.
  • Ceapraz, I. L. (2008) “The concepts of specialisation and spatial concentration and the process of economic integration: theoretical relevance and statistical measures. The case of Romania’s regions”. Romanian Journal of Regional Science, 2(1):68-93.
  • Brülhart, M. (2001) “Growing alike or growing apart? Industrial specialization of EU countries”. In: Wyplosz, (ed). The impact of EMU on europe and the developing countries. Oxford University Press.
  • Cortright, J. (2006) “Making sense of clusters: regional compet itiveness and economic development, metropolitan policy program”, Discussion Paper, The Brookings Institution.
  • Davies, A., Tonts, M. A. (2010) “Economic diversity and regional socioeconomic performance: an empirical analysis of the Western Australian grainbelt”, Geographical Research, 48(3):223-234.
  • deVor, F., deGroot, H. (2010) “Agglomeration externalities and localized employment growth: the performance of industrial sites in Amsterdam”, The Annals of Regional Science, 44(3)409-431.
  • Dewhurst, J. H., McCann, P. (2007) “Specialization and regional size”. In:Fingleton B, (ed) New Directions in Economic Geography (pp. 204-229). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Dewhurst, J.H., McCann, P. (2002) “A comparison of measures of industrial specialization for travel-to-work areas in Great Britain, 1981-1997”, Regional Studies, 36(5):541-551.
  • Dinç, M. (2002) “Regional and local economic analysis tools”, The World Bank, Washington DC.
  • Dinc, M., Haynes, K. E., Tarimcilar, M. (2003) “Integrating models for regional development decisions: A policy perspective”, The Annals of Regional Science, 37(1):31-53.
  • Dissart JC (2003) “Regional economic diversity and regional economic stability: research results and agenda”, International Regional Science Review 26(4):423.
  • Dunn, E. S. (1960) “A statistical and analytical technique for regional analysis”, Papers in Regional Science, 6(1):97-112.
  • Duranton, G., Puga, D. (2000) “Diversity and specialisation in cities: why, where and when does it matter?”, Urban Studies, 37 (3):533-555.
  • Duranton, G., Puga, D. (2001) “Nursery cities: urban diversity, process innovation, and the life cycle of products”, American Economic Review, 91.5, 1454-1477.
  • Eser, U., Köse, S. (2005) “Endüstriyel Yerelleşme ve Yoğunlaşma Açısından Türkiye Sanayii: İl İmalat Sanayiilerinin Analizi. Ankara Üniversitesi”, SBF Dergisi, 60(2)(in Turkish).
  • Falcıoğlu, P. (2008) “Spatial determinants of regional productivity in Turkish manufacturing industry: an analysis for the regions of Turkey”, Regional Studies Association International Conference, May 20-22. Prague.
  • Falcıoğlu, P. (2011) “The relation between geographical place and innovativeness: the case of Turkey”, International Journal of Emerging and Transition Economies, 4(1-2):75-95.
  • Falcıoğlu, P., Akgüngör, S. (2008) “Regional specialization and industrial concentration patterns in the Turkish manufacturing industry: an assessment for the 1980-2000 period”, European Planning Studies, 16(2):303-323.
  • Farhauer, O., Kröll, A. (2012) “Diversified specialisation—going one step beyond regional economics’ specialization-diversification concept”, Jahrbuch Für Regionalwissenschaft, 32(1):63-84.
  • Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., Verburg, T. (2007) “Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth”, Regional studies, 41(5):685-697.
  • Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., Verburg, T., Boschma, R. (2004) “Variety and regional economic growth in the Netherlands”, Report to the Ministry of Economic Affairs.
  • Fritsch, M., Slavtchev, V. (2007) “Industry Specialization, Diversity and Efficiency of Regional Innovation Systems”, Jena Economic Research Papers, 2007-018, www.jenacon.de.
  • Fujita, M., Krugman, P., Venables, A. J. (1999) “The spatial economy: cities, regions and international trade”, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
  • Glaeser, E., Kallal, H., Scheinkman, J., Schleifer, A. (1992) “Growth in cities”, Journal of Political Economy, 100(6):1126–1152.
  • Gönenc, R., Röhn, O., Koen, V., Saygılı, Ş. (2012) “Structural reforms to boost Turkey’s long-term growth”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 987, OECD.
  • Grossman, G. M., Helpman, E. (1992) “Protection for sale”, National Bureau of Economic Research, No. w4149.
  • Henderson, J. V. (1997) “Externalities and industrial development”, Journal of Urban Economics, 42(3):449–470.
  • Hoover, E. (1937) “Location theory and the shoe leather industry”, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
  • Imbs, J., Wacziarg, R. (2003) “Stages of diversification”, American Economic Review, Vol. 93, No. 1, pp. 63-86.
  • Jacobs, J. (1969) “The economy of cities”, NewYork: Random House.
  • Jenks, G. F. (1967) “The data model concept in statistical mapping”, International Yearbook of Cartography 7:186-190.
  • Kemeny, T., Storper, M. (2012) “The sources of urban development: wages, housing and amenity gaps across American cities”, Journal of Regional Science, 52(1).
  • Kıymalıoğlu, Ü., Ayoğlu, D. (2006) “Türk imalat sanayindeyığılma ekonomileri”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 7 (2), 198-209 (in Turkish).
  • Krugman, P. (1998) “What’s new about the new economic geography?” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14, 7-17.
  • Longhi, S., Nijkamp, P., Traistaru, I. (2005) “Is sectoral diversification a solution to unemployment? Evidence from EU regions”, Kyklos, 58(4):591-610.
  • Malizia, E.E., Ke, S. (1993) “The influence of economic diversity on unemployment and stability”, Journal of Regional Science, 33 (2):221-235.
  • Marelli, E. (2006) “Specialization and convergence of European regions”, The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 4(2):149-178.
  • Marshall, A. (1920) “Principles of economics”, London: Macmillan.
  • Mayor, M., Jesús López, A., Pérez, R. (2007) “Forecasting regional employment with shift–share and arima modeling”, Regional Studies, 41(4):543-551.
  • Merrifield, J. (1983). The role of shift-share in regional analysis. Regional Science Perspectives, 13(1):48-54.
  • Ministry of Economy (2014) http://www.ekonomi.gov.tr/index. cfm?sayfa=7173D4A4-D8D3-8566-452001910DD1747A. Accessed 1 June 2014.
  • Mitchell, W., Myers, J., Juniper, J. (2007) “Extending shift-share analysis to account for spatial effects: A study using Australian census data”. In Proceedings of the ARCRNSISS Methodology, Tools and Techniques and Spatial Theory Paradigm Forums Workshop, University of Newcastle, Australia, 15-17 June 2005 (p. 116). RMIT Publishing.
  • Nakamura, R., Paul, C.J. (2009) “Measuring agglomeration”. In: Capello R, Nijkamp P, (ed). Handbook of regional growth and development theories (pp. 305-328). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Neffke, F., Henning, M., Boschma, R. (2011) “How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions”, Economic Geography, 87:237-265.
  • O’Donoghue, D., Townshend, I. (2005) “Diversification, specialization, convergence and divergence of sectoral employment structures in the British urban system, 1991–2001”, Regional Studies, 39(5):585-601.
  • OECD (2003) “Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard”, OECD Publishing, Paris.
  • Paci, R., Usai, S. (2000) “The role of specialization and diversity externalities in the agglomeration of innovative activities”, Rivista Italiana Degli Economisti, 2, 237-268.
  • Peker, Z. (2012) “Specialization, diversity and region size”, Vizyoner Dergisi, 3(6), 1-25. (in Turkish).
  • Rodrik, D. (2013) “Structural Change, Fundamentals, and Growth: An Overview”, Institute for Advanced Study.
  • Romer, P.M. (1986) “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth”. Journal of Political Economy 94:1002–1037.
  • Rosenthal, S. S., Strange, W. C. (2006) “The micro-empirics of agglomeration economies”, A Companion to Urban Economics, 7-23.
  • Siegel, P. B., Johnson, T. G., Alwang, J. (1995) “Regional economic diversity and diversification”, Growth and Change, 26, 261- 284.
  • Suedekum, J. (2006) “Concentration and specialization trends in Germany since re-unification”. Regional Studies, 40(8):861- 873.
  • Stimson, R. J., Stough, R. R., Roberts, B. H (2006) “Regional economic development: analysis and planning strategy”, Springer, New York.
  • Traistaru, I., Nijkam, P., Longhi, S. (2002) “Regional specialization and concentration of industrial activity in accession countries”, ZEI Working Paper, No. B16-2002.
  • TurkStat (2014) http://www.tuik.gov.tr/VeriBilgi.do?alt_id=1079. Accessed 1 June 2014.
Megaron-Cover
  • ISSN: 1305-5798
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2006
  • Yayıncı: Kare Yayıncılık
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Peyzaj Mimarlığı Tasarım Stüdyosunda Kavramsal Yaklaşımlar ve Esin Kaynakları

Sema MUMCU, Tuğba DÜZENLİ

A Modular and Dynamic Evolutionary Algorithm For Architectural Design

Nizam Onur SÖNMEZ

Memluk Dönemi Hamam Yapıları: Antakya Beyseri Hamamı Özelinde Yapısal-Mekânsal-İşlevsel Çözümleme

Mert Nezih RİFAİOĞLU

Yapı Ürünlerinden Kaynaklanan Uçucu Organik Bileşiklerin Yapı Biyolojisi Açısından İrdelenmesi

Polat DARÇIN, Ayşe BALANLI

Conservation of the Land Walls Protection Area by Renewal (!): Evaluating the Spatial Effects of the Law No. 5366 Through “Zeytinburnu Culture Valley Project” of Istanbul

Elifnaz DURUSOY ÖZMEN, Mehmet cengiz CAN

Dikdörtgen Planlı Tünel Kalıp Kullanılan Betonarme Yapılarda Plan Boyutları ve Kat Adedinin Maliyete Etkileri

Zeynep Yeşim İLERİSOY, Mehmet Emin TUNA

Mark Augé’de Yok-Yer (Non-Lieu) Kavramı Üzerine Bir Epistemik Çözümleme

Rifat Gökhan KOÇYİĞİT

Türkiye Bölgelerinde Çeşitlenmiş Uzmanlaşmanın İncelenmesi

Ferhan GEZİCİ KORTEN, Zeynep ELBURZ

İngiltere Veliahtı Prens Edward (Kral VII. Edward)’ın 1862 ve 1867 Yıllarındaki İstanbul Ziyaretleri ve Gezdiği Yapılar Çerçevesinde Osmanlı Teşrifatındaki Değişimler

Sena BELVİRANLI, Nuran Kara PİLEHVARİAN

Kültürel Miras Alanları İçin Kullanıcı Odaklı Bir Kentsel Tasarım Rehberi Modeli: Bursa Hanlar Bölgesi Örneği

Sibel POLAT, Hikmet Özge TÜMER YILDIZ, TÜRKÜN Neslihan DOSTOĞLU