Vergi Uyuşmazlıklarının İdari Yolla Çözümünde Usul Adaletinin Gönüllü Vergi Uyumuna Etkisi

Bu araştırma vergi uyuşmazlıklarının idari aşamada çözüm yöntemlerinin gönüllü vergi uyumu üzerindeki etkisini usul adaleti bağlamında incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu doğrultuda Türkiye’de 1020 serbest muhasebeci mali müşavirden elde edilen anket verileri, çok değişkenli istatistiksel testler ve yapısal eşitlik modellemesi ile analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular vergi uyuşmazlıklarının idari aşamada çözüm yöntemlerinde usul adaletinin; vergi idaresine yönelik güven ile meşruiyet algısını ve ayrıca gönüllü vergi uyumunu anlamlı ve pozitif yönde etkilediğini göstermektedir. Ayrıca vergi uyuşmazlıklarının idari aşamada çözüm sürecine uyarlanan usul adaleti ile gönüllü vergi uyumu ilişkisinde hem idareye güvenin hem de meşruiyet algısının anlamlı aracı etkisi tespit edilmiştir.

The Effect of Procedural Fairness on Voluntary Tax Compliance in the Administrative Resolution of Tax Disputes

This research aims to examine the effect of resolution methods of tax disputes at the administrative stage on voluntary tax compliance in terms of procedural justice. In this direction, 1020 survey data obtained from certified public accountants in Turkey were analyzed by multivariate statistical tests and structural equation modeling. The findings show that procedural fairness in the resolution methods of tax disputes at the administrative stage affects significantly and positively the perception of trust and legitimacy towards the tax administration, as well as voluntary tax compliance. Besides, a significant mediating effect of both trust in the administration and the legitimacy perception in the relationship between procedural justice, which is adapted to the resolution process of tax disputes at the administrative stage, and voluntary tax compliance, has been determined.

___

  • Akdoğan, A. (2019), Vergi Hukuku ve Türk Vergi Sistemi (14.Bs.), Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
  • Alm, J. (2019), “What Motivates Tax Compliance?”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 33(2), 353-388.
  • Ayyıldız, Y. (2015), Türk Vergi Yargısı: İş Yükü ve Etkinliği, Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Barkworth, J.M. ve Murphy, K. (2015), “Procedural Justice Policing and Citizen Compliance Behaviour: The Importance of Emotion”, Psychology, Crime & Law, 21(3), 254-273.
  • Bayraklı, H.H. (2014), Vergi Yargılama Hukuku (2.Bs.), Trabzon: Celepler Matbaası.
  • Bornman, M. (2015), “The Determinants and Measurement of Trust in Tax Authorities as a Factor Influencing Tax Compliance Behaviour”, Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences, October, 8(3), 772-789.
  • Braithwaite, V. ve Reinhart, M. (2000), “The Taxpayers' Charter: Does the Australian Tax Office Comply and Who Benefits?”, Centre for Tax System Integrity Working Paper. No.1, The Australian National University, Canberra.
  • Bryne, B.M. (2016), Structural Equation Modeling with Amos (3th Edition), Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Bursal, M. (2019), SPSS ile Temel Veri Analizleri (2.Bs.), Ankara, Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Chau, G. ve Leung, P. (2009), “A Critical Review of Fischer’s Tax Compliance Model: A Research Synthesis”, Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 1(2), 34-40.
  • Civelek, M.E. (2018), Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi Metodolojisi, İstanbul: Beta.
  • Dijke, M.V., Gobena, L.B. ve Verboon, P. (2019), “Make Me Want to Pay, A Three-Way Interaction Between Procedural Justice, Distributive Justice, and Power on Voluntary Tax Compliance”, Front Psychol, 10,1632.
  • Faizal, M.S. ve Palil, R.M. (2015), “Study on Fairness and Individual Tax Compliance in Malaysia: Preliminary Findings”, International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 8(1), 74-79.
  • Faizal, M.S., Palil, R.M., Maelah, R. ve Ramli R. (2017), “Perception on Justice, Trust and Tax Compliance Behavior in Malaysia”, Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38, 226-32.
  • Fjeldstad, O., Schulz-Herzenberg, C. ve Hoem Sjursen, I. (2012), “People’s Views of Taxation in Africa: A Review of Research on Determinants of Tax Compliance”, ICTD Working Paper 8.
  • Gangl, K., Muehlbacher, S., de Groot, M., Goslinga, S., Hofmann, E., Kogler, C., Antonides, G. ve Kirchler, E. (2013), “How can I Help You?” Perceived Service Orientation of Tax Authorities and Tax Compliance. FinanzArchiv, 69, 487-510.
  • Gberegbe, F.B. ve Umoren, A.O. (2017), “The Perception of Tax Fairness and Personal Income Tax Compliance of Smes in Rivers State”, Quest Journals Journal of Research in Business and Management, 5(2), 40-51.
  • George, D. ve Mallery, P. (2019), IBM SPSS Statistics 25 Step by Step (15th Edition), New York: Routledge.
  • Gobena, L.B. ve Dijke, M.V. (2016), “Power, Justice, and Trust: A Moderated Mediation Analysis of Tax Compliance among Ethiopian Business Owners”, Journal of Economic Psychology, 52, 24-37.
  • Gobena, L.B. (2021), “Do Fairness Perceptions Matter in Tax Compliance? The Effect of Procedural×Distributive Justice Interaction on Intention to Pay Taxes”, Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 12(3), 36-46.
  • Gürbüz, S. (2019), Amos ile Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi, Ankara, Seçkin Kitabevi.
  • Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. ve Anderson, R.E. (2019), Multivariate Data Analysis (Eighth Edition), New Jersey: Prentice Hall International Inc.
  • Ho, R. (2014), Handbook of Univariate and Multivariate Data Analysis with IBM SPSS (2nd Edition), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
  • Hu, L.T. ve Bentler, P.M. (1999), “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives”, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
  • Kastlunger, B., Lozza, E., Kirchler, E. ve Schabmann, A. (2013), “Powerful Authorities and Trusting Citizens: The Slippery Slope Framework and Tax Compliance in Italy”, Journal of Economic Psychology, 34, 36-45.
  • Kirchler, E. ve Wahl, I. (2010), “Tax Compliance Inventory TAX-I: Designing an Inventory for Surveys of Tax Compliance”, Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(3), 331-346.
  • Kırbaş, S. (2015), Vergi Hukuku (20.Bs.), İstanbul: Siyasal Kitabevi.
  • Kızılot, Ş. ve Kızılot, Z. (2014), Vergi İhtilafları ve Çözüm Yolları (23.Bs.), Ankara, Yaklaşım Yayıncılık.
  • Kline, R.B. (2016), Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (4rd ed), The Guilford Press.
  • Kogler, C., Muehlbacher, S. ve Kirchler, E. (2013), “Trust, Power, and Tax Compliance: Testing the 'Slippery Slope Framework' Among Self Employed Taxpayers”, WU International Taxation Research Paper Series, No.2013-05.
  • Loehlin, J.C. (2004), Latent Variable Models an Introduction to Factor, Path, and Structural Equation Analysis (4th Ed), New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Mahangila, D.N. ve Holland, K. (2015), “Analysis of Procedural and Retributive Justice in Tax Compliance”, ORSEA Journal, 5(1), 113-160.
  • Mardhiah, M., Miranti, R. ve Tanton, R. (2019), “The Slippery Slope Framework: Extending the Analysis by Investigating Factors Affecting Trust and Power”, CESifo Working Paper, No.7494, CESifo, Munich.
  • Mas’ud, A., Manaf, N.A.A. ve Saad, N. (2019), “Trust and Power as Predictors of Tax Compliance: Global Evidence”, Economics and Sociology, 12(2), 192-204.
  • Muehlbacher, S., Kirchler, E. ve Schwarzenberger, H. (2011), “Voluntary Versus Enforced Tax Compliance: Empirical Evidence for the “Slippery Slope” Framework”, European Journal of Law and Economics, 32, 89-97.
  • Mulder, L.B., Verboon, P. ve Cremer, D.D. (2009), “Sanctions and Moral Judgments: The Moderating Effect of Sanction Severity and Trust in Authorities”. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 255-269.
  • Murphy, K. (2002), “Procedural Justice and the Australian Taxation Office: A Study of Scheme Investors”, Centre for Tax System Integrity Working Paper No.35, Canberra: Australian National University.
  • Murphy, K. (2003), “The Importance of Procedural Justice in Securing Compliance: A Study of Tax Scheme Investors”, Australian Journal of Social Issues, 38(3), 365-390.
  • Murphy, K. (2004a), “Procedural Justice and Tax Compliance”, Working Paper No.56, Centre for Tax System Integrity, The Australian National University, Canberra.
  • Murphy, K. (2004b), “The Role of Trust in Nurturing Compliance: A Study of Accused Tax Avoiders”, Law and Human Behavior, 28,187-209.
  • Murphy, K. (2005), “Regulating More Effectively: The Relationship between Procedural Justice, Legitimacy and Tax Non-Compliance”, Journal of Law and Society, 32, 562-589.
  • Murphy, K. (2009), “Procedural Justice and Affect Intensity: Understanding Reactions to Regulatory Authorities”, Soc Just Res, 22, 1-30.
  • Murphy, K. (2011), “Procedural Justice, Emotions and Resistance to Authority”, In S. Karstedt, I. Loader & H. Strang (Eds.), Emotions, Crime and Justice, Hart Publishing 211-232.
  • Murphy, T., Bradford, B. ve Jackson, J. (2015), “Motivating Compliance behavior Among Tax Offenders: Procedural Justice or Deterrence?”, Criminal Justice and Behavior, ISSN 0093-8548.
  • Öncel, M., Kumrulu, A. ve Çağan, N. (2017), Vergi Hukuku (26.Bs.), Ankara, Turhan Kitabevi Yayınları.
  • Öner, E. (2019), Vergi Hukuku (11.Bs.), Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi.
  • Potter, P.W. (2005), “Procedural Justice and Voice Effects”, Proceedings of the Academy of Organizational Culture”, Communications and Conflict, 10(1), 51-54.
  • Rachmawan, R., Subekti, I. ve Adib, N. (2020), “The Effect of Tax Knowledge on Relationship of Procedural Justice Perception Towards Voluntary Tax Compliance Mediated by Trust”, Internatıonal Journal of Research in Busıness and Socıal Scıence. 9(4), 207-213.
  • Saban, N. (2009), Vergi Hukuku (5.Bs.), İstanbul, Beta Basım. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. ve Müller, H. (2003), “Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures”, Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
  • Serim, N. (2015), “Gönüllü Vergi Uyumunu Arttırmada Kamu Otoritesinin Düzenleyici Rolünün ve Mükellef Çevresinin Önemi: Sıralı Probit Model Yaklaşımı”. AKÜ İİBF Dergisi, XVII(1), 141-156.
  • Siahaan, F.O.P. (2012), “The Influence of Tax Fairness and Communication on Voluntary Compliance: Trust as an Intervening Variable”, International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(21), 191-198.
  • Sigle, M., Goslinga, S., Spekle, R., Hel, L. ve Veldhuizen, R. (2018), “Corporate Tax Compliance: Is a change Towards Trust-Based Tax Strategies Justified?”, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 32, 3-16.
  • Sobhkhiz, M.R., Ashrafi, A.M., Mojibi, T. ve Otadi, M. (2019), “Accountability, Legitimacy, and Voluntary Tax Compliance: A Case Study in Tax Offices in Mazandaran Province of Iran”, Int. Journal of Organizational Leadership, 8, 38-55.
  • Thibaut, J.W. ve Walker, L. (1975), Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis, Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Torgler, B. (2007), Tax Compliance and Tax Morale: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar.
  • Topal, M.H. (2016), “Vergi Adaleti Algısı: Gelir Vergisi Mükellefleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Muhasebe ve Vergi Uygulamaları Dergisi, 9(2), 149-172.
  • TÜRMOB (2020), Üye İstatistikleri, https://www.turmob.org.tr/istatistikler/ 9ce9f5a8-3697-48a0-b4ef-946ca9558f32/calisanlarin-kutuge-kayitli olanlar---olmayanlar-tablosu (Erişim Tarihi: 10.09.20)
  • Tyler, T.R. ve Smith, H.J. (1995), “Social Justice and Social Movements”, IRLE Working Paper No.61-95, https://irle.berkeley.edu/files/1995/ Social-Justice-and-Social-Movements.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 13.05.22)
  • Tyler, T.R. (1997), “Procedural Fairness and Compliance with the Law”, Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 133(2/2), 219-240.
  • Tyler, T.R. (2006), “Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation”, Annual Review of Psychology, (57), 375-400.
  • Tyler, T.R. (2008), “Procedural Justice and the Courts”, Court Review, (44), 26-31.
  • Verboon, P. ve Dijke, M.V. (2007), “A Self-Interest Analysis of Justice and Tax Compliance: How Distributive Justice Moderates the E ect of Outcome Favorability”, Journal of Economic Psychology, (28), 704-727.