Ülke Risk Primi ile Değişkenliği Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi: Türkiye Örneği

Bu çalışma, kredi temerrüt takası (CDS) prim değişkenliği ile CDS primi arasındaki ilişkiyi EGARCH-M modeli ile Türkiye ekonomisi için incelemektedir. Çalışmanın temel bulguları; (i) CDS prim değişkenliğindeki artış CDS primini artırmaktadır; (ii) borsadaki artış ve TL’deki değerlenme CDS primini azaltmaktadır; (iii) Türkiye CDS prim değişkenliği uzun dönem hafıza etkisine sahiptir; (iv) asimetrik etki istatistiksel olarak anlamsız bulunmuştur; (v) CDS prim değişkenliği, VIX ile pozitif ve petrol fiyatları ile negatif ilişkilidir.

The Relationship Between Country Risk Premium and its Volatility: Turkish Case

This study investigates the relationship between credit default swap (CDS) premium and its volatility using the EGARCH-M model for the Turkish economy. Empirical findings robustly suggest that (i) the CDS premium volatility significantly increases the CDS premium; (ii) an increase in Stock Exchange and appreciation in Turkish lira decreases the CDS premium; (iii) Turkish CDS premium volatility has a strong long memory effect; (iv) the asymmetric effect has been found statistically insignificant; and (v) CDS premium volatility is positively associated with VIX and negatively associated with oil price.

___

  • Akdoğan, K. ve Chadwick, M.G. (2013), Nonlinearities in CDS-bond Basis, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 49(3), 6-19.
  • Alexander, C. ve Kaeck, A. (2008), Regime Dependent Determinants of Credit Default Swap Spreads, Journal of Banking & Finance, 32, 1008- 1021.
  • Balı, S. ve Yılmaz, Z. (2012), Kredi Temerrüt Takası Marjları ile İMKB Endeksi Arasındaki Ilişki, 16. Finans Sempozyumu Bildiri Kitapçığı, 83, 104.
  • Benkert, C. (2004), Explaining Credit Default Swap Premia, the Journal of Futures Markets, 24, 71-92.
  • Bollerslev, T. (1986), Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity, Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307-327.
  • Collin-Dufresne, P., Goldstein, R.S. ve Martin, J.S. (2001), The Determinants of Credit Spread Changes, The Journal of Finance, 61, 2177-2207.
  • Çevik, M. ve Karaca, S.S. (2021), Kredi Temerrüt Takası Primlerinin Oynaklığında Uzun Hafıza ve Etkin Piyasa Hipotezi-Fraktal Piyasa Hipotezi Sınaması: Türkiye Örneği, Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 20(3), 1375-1400.
  • Da Fonseca, J. ve Gottschalk, K. (2020), The Co-Movement of Credit Default Swap Spreads, Equity Returns and Volatility: Evidence From Asia-Pacific Markets. International Review of Finance, 20(3), 551-579.
  • Da Silva, P.P., Vieira, C. ve Vieira, I. (2015), The Determinants of CDS Open Interest Dynamics, Journal of Financial Stability, 21, 95-109.
  • De Boyrie, M.E. ve Pavlova, I. (2016), Dynamic Interdependence of Sovereign Credit Default Swaps in BRICS and MIST Countries, Applied Economics, 48(7), 563-575.
  • Ekinci, İ. (2013), Bütçe Açığı, Kredi Temerrüt Takası (CDS) ve Kredi Derecelendirme Notları Arasındaki İlişki: AB Ülkeleri ve Türkiye Örneği, Hazine ve Maliye Bakanlığı, Uzmanlık Tezi, Ankara.
  • Engle, R.F. (1982), Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 987-1007.
  • Ericsson, J., Jacobs, K. ve Oviedo, R. (2009), The Determinants of Credit Default Swap Premia, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 44, 109-132.
  • Fender, I., Hayo, B. ve Neuenkirch, M. (2012), Daily Pricing of Emerging Market Sovereign CDS Before and During the Global Financial Crisis, Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(10), 2786-2794.
  • Fettahoğlu, S. (2019), Relationship Between Credit Default Swap Premium and Risk Appetite According to Types of Investors: Evidence From Turkish Stock Exchange, Journal of Accounting & Finance, (84).
  • Fontana, A. ve Scheicher, M. (2016), An Analysis of Euro Area Sovereign CDS and their Relation with Government Bonds, Journal of Banking & Finance, 62, 126-140.
  • Günay, S. ve Shi, Y. (2016), Long-Memory in Volatilities of CDS Spreads: Evidences From the Emerging Markets, Journal for Economic Forecasting, XIX (1), 122-137.
  • Ho, S.H. (2016), Long and Short-Runs Determinants of the Sovereign CDS Spread in Emerging Countries, Research in International Business and Finance, 36, 579-590.
  • Kılıç, Ç. (2009), “Kredi Temerrüt Swap Primini Etkileyen Faktörler ve Türkiye Üzerine Uygulamalar”, Doktora Tezi, Kocaeli Üniversitesi.
  • Kim, G.H., Li, H. ve Zhang, W. (2017), The CDS-bond Basis Arbitrage and the Cross Section of Corporate Bond Returns, Journal of Futures Markets, 37(8), 836-861.
  • Köseoğlu, S.D. (2013), The Transmission of Volatility Between the CDS Spreads and Equity Returns Before, During and After the Global Financial Crisis: Evidence From Turkey, In Proceedings of 8th Asian Business Research Conference, 1-2.
  • Kunt, A.S. ve Taş, O. (2008), Kredi Temerrüt Swapları ve Türkiye'nin CDS Priminin Tahmin Edilmesine Yönelik Bir Uygulama, İTÜDERGİSİ/b, 5(1).
  • Nelson, D. (1991), “Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach”, Econometrica 59, 2, 347-70.
  • Oliveira, M.A. ve Santos, C. (2014), Sovereign CDS Contagion in the European Union: A Multivariate GARCH-in-Variables Analysis of Volatility Spill-Overs, in 27th International Business Research Conference.
  • Sarıgül, H. ve Şengelen, H.E. (2020), Ülke Kredi Temerrüt Takas Primleri ile Hisse Senedi Fiyatları Arasındaki İlişki: Borsa İstanbulda Banka Hisse Senetleri Üzerine Ampirik Bir Araştırma, Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, (86), 205-222.
  • Tokat, H.A. (2013), Understanding Volatility Transmission Mechanism Among the CDS Markets: Europe & North America Versus Brazil & Turkey, Economia Aplicada, 17(1), 5-19.
  • Ural, M. ve Demireli, E. (2015), APGARCH Modeling of CDS Returns, International Journal of Economic & Social Research, 11(2).
  • Varlık, S. ve Varlık, N. (2017), Türkiye’nin CDS Priminin Oynaklığı, Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar, (632), 9-17.