The rule of law conditionality of the European union and developments in Turkish judiciary

Hukukun üstünlüğü kavramı Avrupa Birliği hukuk düzeninin temel prensiplerinden biri olup,bu kavram işleyen ,etkili,tarafsız ve bağımsız bir yargının varlığını gerektirir.Kopenhag kriterleriyle ilgili belgelerde,yargı sistemlerinin tarafsız,bağımsız,yeterli kadroya sahip,iyi eğitilmiş mesleğinde uzmanlaşmış kişilerden oluşması ve vatandaşların kolayca ulaşabilecekleri tarzda örgütlenmesi aday ülkelere tavsiye edilmiştir.Bu nedenle,birliğe katılım öncesi dönemde aday ülkelerin yargı sistemleri Avrupa Birliği standartlarına uygun olarak önemli yapısal değişiklikler geçirmiştir.Türk yargı sistemide bu dönemde kurumsal,yasal ve yapısal değişiklikler geçirmiştir.

The concept of the rule of law is one of the core principles of the European Union legal order .It requires a functioning, effective, independent and impartial judiciary. According to the Copenhagen-related documents, judicial systems of the candidate countries should be independent, impartial, well-staffed, well-trained and easily accessible to the citizens. Therefore, in the course course of pre-accession period, legal systems of candidate countries have significantly been transformed in complience with the European Union standarts. Turkish judicial system has experienced institutional, legal and structural developments during this period as well.

___

Advisory visit report on independence, impartiality and administration of judiciary,2008,http://www.avrupa.info.tr/Files/Independence,%20Imparti ality%20and%20Administration%20of%20the%20Judiciary.pdf,accessed in 15.07.2011

Albi A, Ironies in Human Rights Protection in the EU:Pre-accession conditionality and Post-accession Conundrums, European Law Journal,vol. 15 no.1,2009

Alegre S, Ivanova I and Denis- Smith D, Safeguarding the rule of law in an enlarged Europe, The case of Bulgaria and Romania,CEPS special report,2009, www.ceps.eu, accessed in 30.06.2011

Alessandri E,Democratization and Europeanization in Turkey after the September 12 referendum, Insight Turkey,vol 12, October 2010 Aydin S and Cakiroglu A, EU Conditionality and Democratic Rule of Law in Turkey, http://cddrl.stanford.edu/publications/eu_conditionality_and_democratic_ rule_of_law_in_turkey/,accessed in 28.07.2011

Banani D, Reforming History:Turkey's Legal Regime and its Potential Accession to the European Union, Boston College International and Comparative Law Review,2008

Bobek M,The fortress of Judicial Independence and the Mental Transition of the Central European Judiciary, European Public Law, vol 14, 2008

Brussels European Council, December 2004,Presidency conclusions. Case 294/83 Les Verts v. Parliament (1986)ECR Case C 131/03 P Reynolds Tobacco et al. v. Commission (2006) ECR 1- 7795

Çoban A.R, The Rule of Law in Turkey, http://wikis.fuberlin. de/download/attachments/29557481/Coban+Turkey.pdf,accessed in 17.07.2011

Communication No. 263/1987,Views of the Human Rights Committee under article 5, paragraph 4, of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, http:// www1. umn. edu/ humanrts/ undocs/html/dec263.htm,

Erdoğan B, Compliance with EU Democratic Conditionality :Turkey and Political Criteria of EU,http://www.jhubc.it/ecpr-istanbul/ virtualpaperroom/042.pdf,accessed in 17.07.2011

Erdogan Threatens freeze with the EU during Cypriot presidency, http://www.eubusiness.com/news-eu/cyprus-turkey.bex/,accessed in19.07.2011

European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice Report on efficiency and quality of justice 17, http:// www. justice. gov. tr/ news/ 2009/ overview2008_en.pdf,accessed in 12.07.2011

European Commission Strategy Paper 2001, http:// ec. europa. eu/ enlargement/archives/key_documents/reports_2001_en.htm#paper2001,

European Council in Copenhagen ,21-22 June 1993, Conclusions of the Presidency,p 13. http:// www. europarl. europa. eu/ summits/ copenhagen/co_en.pdf.,

Finkel E, Defending rights, promoting democracy: The institutions of ombudsman in Poland, Russia and Bulgaria, http:// www. ef. huji. ac. il/ publications/finkel.pdf,accessed in 17.07.2011

Goebel R.J, Joining the European Union:The accession procedure for the central European and Mediterranean states, International Law Review, volume 1, issue 1,2003-2004

Grabbe H, European Union Conditionality and Acquis Communautaire, International Political Science Review,2002, vol 23 no 3

Helfer L.R, Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a Deep Structural Principle of the European Human Rights Regime, The European Journal of International law, vol 19 no 1 2008

Helsinki European Council December 1999,presidency conclusions, para. 12,http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/hel1en.html,

Incal v. Turkey ECHR 41/1997/825/1031,Judgement 9/6/1998

Interview with Selim Kuneralp in 20 june 2011, http:// www. todayszaman.com/news,

Joined Cases C-402/05 P and C-405/05 P Kadi and Al- Barakaat (2008)

Kayasu v. Turkey application no , 64119/00, 76292/01 ,20 November 2008 ECHR

Kochenov D, The rule of law: Cutting path through confusion, Erasmus Law Review, volume 2, 2009

Kochenov D, EU Enlargement and the Failure of Conditionality. Preaccession Conditionality in the fields of democracy and the rule of law, Kluwer Law International,2008

Kubicek P, The European Union and Democratization 'From Below' in Turkey,http://aei.pitt.edu, accessed in 29.06.2011

Licht A .N, Goldschmidt, Chanan and Schwartz, Shalom H., Culture Rules: The Foundations of the Rule of Law and Other Norms of Governance, 2006, http://ssrn.com/abstract,accessed in 26.06.2011

Magalhaes P .C, The politics of Judicial Reform in Eastern Europe, Comparative Politics, vol 32,1999,p 43-62

Magen A.A, ‘EU Membership Conditionality and Democratization in Turkey: The. Abolition of the Death Penalty as a Case Study,http://iisdb. stanford.edu/evnts/3779/CDDRL-Turkey-seminar.pdf

Magnette P, Between Parliamentary Control and the Rule of Law: The Political Role of the Ombudsman in the European Union, Journal of European Public Policy 10:5 2003

Marktler T, The power of the Copenhagen Criteria, Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy,vol 2 ,2006

Monitoring the EU Accession Process, Judicial independence, EU accession monitoring program,2001,www.eumap.org,accessed in 24.06.2011

Morlino L and Magen A, EU Rule of law Promotion in Romania, Turkey and Serbia-Montenegro: Domestic elites and Responsiveness to Differentiated External Influence, http, accessed in 29.06.2011 O'Donnel G.A, Why the Rule of Law Matters?, Journal of Democracy, volume 15, 2004,

Onaran O and Karasu K, Quality and Justice in Turkey,in the Administration of Justice in Europe: Towards the development of Quality Standards, 2003

Peach L, A union founded on the rule of law: meaning and reality of the rule of law as a constitutional principle of the EU law, European Constitutional Law Review,6, 2010

Pech L , The rule of Law as a Constitutional Principle of the European Union, Jean-Monnet Working Paper 04/09,p 46 www.JeanMonnetprogram.org ,accessed in 21.07.2011

Piana D, Unpacking Policy Transfer, Discovering Actors: The French Model of Judicial Education Between Enlargement and Judicial Cooperation in the EU,French Politics,5 ,2007

Reitz J.C. Export of the rule of law, Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems,429,2003

Report of an advisory visit on the functioning of the judicial system in the Republic of Turkey, 2003, http://www.abgm.adalet.gov.tr

Report of an advisory visit on the functioning of the judicial system in the Republic of Turkey, july 2004, http://www.abgm.adalet.gov.tr

Report on independence, impartiality and administration of the judiciary, April 2009,http://www.abgm.adalet.gov.tr

Rios -Figueroa J and Staton J.K, Unpacking the Rule of Law: A review of Judicial Independence Measures, http:// papers. ssrn. com/ sol3/ papers.cfm?abstract_id=1434234, Accessed in 30.06.2011

Saatcioglu B, How Closely Does the European Union's Membership Conditionality Reflect the Copenhagen Criteria? Insights from Turkey, Turkish Studies Volume 10, Issue 4, 2009

Schimmelfenning F, EU political accession conditionality after the 2004 enlargement: consistency and effectiveness, Journal of European Public Policy, 15:6, 2008

Schimmelfenning F, Engerdt S and Knobel H,The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe, Cornell University Press, 2005

Schimmelfenning F, Entrapped again: The way to EU membership negotiations with Turkey, International Politics,2009,46

Schimmelfenning F, European Regional Organizations, Political Conditionality, and Democratic Transformation in Eastern Europe, East European Politics & Societies, February 2007 vol. 21 no. 1

Schimmelfening F, Sedelmeier U, Governance by conditionality:EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of central and eastern Europe, Journal of European Public Policy,2004

Sedelmeier U, After conditionality: Cost-accession Compliance with EU law in East Central Europe, Journal of European Public Policy,15:6, 2008

Tanja A. Borzel T. A. and Risse T, One Size Fits All! EU Policies for the Promotion of Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law, http://cddrl.stanford.edu/publications/20747/,accessed in 17.07.2011

The Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct of November 2002 The European Charter on the Statute for judges, 1998

The History of UYAP, http://www.e-justice. gov. tr/ presentation/ history. html, accessed in 11.07.2011

The History of Turkey-EU Relations, http:// www. abgs. gov. tr/ index. php?p=111&l=2, accessed in 07.08.2011

The Law on State Security Courts

Towards to Enlarged Union Strategy Paper and Report of the European Commission on the Progress towards accession by each of the candidate countries, 09.10.2002, http:// eurlex. europa. eu/ LexUriServ/ LexUriServ.do?uri=COM

Trauner T, From membership conditionality to policy conditionality: EU external governance in South Eastern Europe, Journal of European Public Policy,16:5,2009

The Council of the European Union Decision of 3 March 2001 on the principles, priorities, intermediate objectives and conditions contained in the accession partnership with the Republic of Turkey http://www.abgm.adalet.gov.tr/katilim_ortakligi.html,accessed in 12.07.2011

The Council of the European Union Decision of 19 May 2003 on the principles, priorities, intermediate objectives and conditions contained in the accession partnership with the Republic of Turkey http://www.abgm.adalet.gov.tr/katilim_ortakligi.html,accessed in 12.07.2011

The Council of the European Union Decision of 23 January 2006 on the principles, priorities, intermediate objectives and conditions contained in the accession partnership with the Republic of Turkey http://www.abgm.adalet.gov.tr/katilim_ortakligi.html,accessed in 12.07.2011

The Council of the European Union Decision on 18 February 2008,on the principles, priorities, intermediate objectives and conditions contained in the accession partnership with the Republic of Turkey, http://www.abgm.adalet.gov.tr/katilim_ortakligi.html, accessed in 12.07.2011

The infrastructure of UYAP, http://www.e-justice. gov.tr/ presentation/ infrastructure.html

The National Program of Turkey for the Adoption of the Acquis, www.adalet.gov.tr

The principle 20 of the UN Basic Principles on the Independence of Judiciary

Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Vashakmadze M, National Security Courts: A European Perspective, Pace International

Law Review online, April 2010 volume 26, 2003

Yazıcı S, 'A Short Review of the Proposed Constitutional Amendments, ' in A judicial conundrum: opinions and recommendations on constitutional reform in Turkey, http, accessed in 17.07.2011

Yazıcı S, 'Judicial Reform Project :High Council of Judges and Prosecutors' in A judicial conundrum: opinions and recommendations on constitutional reform in Turkey, http, accessed in 21.07.2011

1998 Regular Report From the Commission on Slovakia's Progress Towards Accession, http enlargement/ archives/ key documents/ reports_en.htm#1. Progress Reports

1998 Regular Report From the Commission on Turkey's Progress Towards Accession, http://ec.europa.eu/ enlargement/ archives/ key documents/ reports_en.htm#1. Progress Reports

1999 Regular Report From the Commission on Romania's Progress Towards Accession, http://ec.europa.eu/ enlargement/archives / key documents/reports_en.htm#1. Progress Reports

2000 Regular Report From the Commission on Romania's Progress Towards Accession, http://ec.europa.eu/ enlargement / archives / key documents/reports_en.htm#1.Progress Reports

2000 Regular Report From the Commission on Latvia's Progress TowardsAccession,http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/key_docume nts/reports_en.htm#1. Progress Reports

2000 Regular Report From the Commission on Lithuanian's Progress Towards Accession, http://ec.europa.eu/ enlargement/ archives/ key documents/reports_en.htm#1. Progress Reports

2001 Regular Report From Commission on Bulgaria’s Progress Towards accession,http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/key_documents/report s_en.htm#1. Progress Reports

2001 Regular Report From the Commission on Romania's Progress Towards Accession, http://ec.europa.eu/ enlargement/ archives/key documents/reports_en.htm#1. Progress Reports

2002 Regular Report From the Commission on Bulgaria's Progress Towards Accession, http/ enlargement/ archives/ key documents/ reports_en.htm#1. Progress Reports

2002 Regular Report From the Commission on Estonia's Progress Towards Accession, http://ec.europa.eu/ enlargement/archives/ key documents/reports_en.htm#1. Progress Reports

2002 Regular Report From the Commission on Romania's Progress Towards Accession, http://ec.europa.eu/ enlargement/ archives/ key documents/reports_en.htm#1. Progress Reports

2002 Regular Report From the Commission on Turkey's Progress Towards Accession ,http://ec.europa.eu/ enlargement/ archives/ key documents/ reports_en.htm#1. Progress Reports

2005 Regular Report From the Commission on Turkey's Progress Towards Accession http://ec.europa.eu/ enlargement/ archives/ key documents/ reports_en.htm#1. Progress Reports

2006 Regular Report From the Commission on Turkey's Progress Towards Accession http://ec.europa.eu/ enlargement/ archives/ key documents/ reports_en.htm#1. Progress Reports

2010 Regular Report From the Commission on Turkey's Progress Towards Accession, http://ec.europa.eu/ enlargement/ archives/ key documents/reports_en.htm#1. Progress Reports