Alexius von meinong ve nesneler teorisi

Alexius von Meinong hocası Franz Brentano'nun etkisi altında Hume'un demet teorisini nesnelerin yapısını açıklamada kullanmış ve varlığı nesne için onsuz olunamaz bir belirleyici olmaktan çıkartarak, varolmayan nesneler' kavrayışını geliştirmiştir. Meinong bu teoriyi ontolojik-semantik boyutlarıyla işlemiştir.

Alexius von meinong and his theory of objects

Alexius von Meinong, within the influence of his master Franz Brentano, had used Hume's 'bundle theory' in order to explain the structure of objects and not holding 'being' a necessary determination for 'object' he had developed the conception of 'non-existent objects'. Mainong had developed this theory with its ontological-semantical dimensions.

___

Alexius von Meinong, Hume Studies I-II, Translation and Commentary by Kenneth Barber, Iowa Üniversitesinde Profesör Gustav Bergmann yönetiminde hazırlanmış doktora tezi ve çeviriler, August, 1966.

Alexius von Meinong, Über Gegenstandstheorie. Selbstdarstellung, Leben und Streben, Erster Abschnitt, Mit Einl.,Bibliogr. u. Reg. Hrsg. von Josef M. Werle.-Hamburg: Meiner, 1988 (Philosophische Bibliothek; Bd. 361).

Anne L. Michaelis, The Conception of Possibility in Meinong 's "Gegenstandstheorie ", Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol.11, Number.3, March 1942, s.395.

Aristoteles, On the Soul, The Complete Works of Aristotle, Edited by Jonathan Barnes, Volume One, Bollingen Series LXXI.2, Princeton University Press, Sixty Printing, 1995.

Barry Smith, Pleasure and Its Modifications: Witasek, Meinong and the Aesthetics of the Grazer Schule from L. Albertazzi (ed.), The Philosophy of Alexius Meinong (.Axiomathes VII, nos. 1-2), 1996.

Barry Smith, Austrian Philosophy: The Legacy of Franz Brentano, Open Court Publishing Company, Chicago and La Salle, Illionis 1994, Paper Back Edition 1996

Bertrand Russell, "Review of Meinong's Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologies Mind ns 14 (1905).

Bertrand Russell, "Review of Meinong's Über die Stellung der Gegenstandstheorie im System der Wissenschaften." Mind ns 16 (1907).

Bertrand Russell, The Analysis of Mind, London: George Allen and Unwin LTD., Fourth Impression, 1933.

Bertrand Russell, Three Letters to Meinong, İngilizceye çeviren: Douglas Lackey: (çevrimiçi)

http://digitalcommons.mcmaster.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1727&context=russelljournal

Bertrand Russell, "On Denoting" Logic and Knowledge, Ed. Robert C. Marsh. London: Allen & Unwin, 1956.New York: Capricorn-MacMillan 1971.

Dale Jacquette, Alexius Meinong (1853-1920), The School of Franz Brentano, Ed. Liliana Albertazzi, Massimo Libardi, Roberto Poli, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherland, 1996

David Hume, İnsan Doğası Üzerine Bir İnceleme, Çeviren: Aziz Yardımlı, Kitap I, Kesim VI, İdea Yayınevi İstanbul 1997.

David Hume, İnsan Doğası Üzerine Bir İncelemenin Özeti, Çevirenler: Ece Aydoğdu-Uğur Ekren,Kutadgubilig Felsefe-Bilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, Sayı: 10, Ekim 2006.

Dennis Sweet, The Geştalt Controversy: The Development of Objects of HigherOrder in Meinong's Ontology, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 53, No. 3 (Sep., 1993).

Ernst Mach, The Analysis of Sensations and The Relation of Physical to The Psychical, Translated From The First German Edition by C. M. Williams, Dover Publications, Inc. New York, 1959.

Franz Brentano, Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt, Mit Ausfurlicher Einleitung Anmerkungen und Register Herausgegeben von Oskar Kraus, Erster Band, Der Philosophischen Bibliothek Band 192, Leipzig 1924, Verlag von Felix Meiner, Buch 2, Kapitel I.

Franz Brentano, Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint, Edited by Oskar Kraus, English Edition Edited byLinda L. Mc Alister, Translated by Antos C. Rancurello, D. B. Terrell and Linda L. Mc Alister, New York, Humanities Press, Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd. 1973.

Franz Brentano, Descriptive Psychology, Translated and edited by Benito Müller, Routledge London and New York, 1995.

Franz Brentano, Gerçek ve Kurmaca Nesneler, Çev. Uğur Ekren, Kutadgubilig Felsefe-Bilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, Sayı 7:, Mart 2005.

Franz Brentano, Tasvirci Psikoloji yada Tasvirci Fenomenoloji, Çeviren: Uğur Ekren, Kutadgubilig Felsefe Bilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, Sayı:9, Mart 2006.

Franz Brentano, Entia Irrealia ile ilgili Hatalı Öğretinin Kökeni Üzerine, Çev. Uğur Ekren, İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayın No. 4667, Feslefe Arkivi, Sayı 31, İstanbul, 2007.Jacek Pasniczek, The Logic of Intentional Objects. A Meinongian Version of Classical Logic, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht / Boston / London, 1998.

Franz Brentano, Ways of Reference to Meinongian Objects,Ontological Commitments of Meinongian Theories, Logic and Logical Philosophy, Volume 2 (1994).

John. N. Findlay, Meinong The Phenomenologist, Revue Internationale de Philosophie, Meinong özel sayısı, No. 104-105, 1973, Fasc. 2-3.

Kenneth J. Perszyk, Nonexistent Objects: Meinong and Contemporary Philosophy, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrechts, The Netherlands, 1993.

Kenneth Barber, Meinong's Hume Studies Part I: Meinong's Nominalism, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol.30, 1970.

Kenneth Barber, Meinong's Hume Studies, Part II: Meinong's Analysis of Relations, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Vol.31, 1971.

Nicholas Rescher, The Concept of Nonexistent Possibles, Essays in Philosophical Analysis, New York. University of America Press, 1982.

Ömer Naci Soykan, Bilgi ve Betimleme. Pozitivizm ve Ernst Mach Üstüne, Küyerel Yayınları, İstanbul Kasım 1998.

Reinhardt Grossmann, II. Non-Existent Objects: Recent Work on Brentano and Meinong, American Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 6, Number I, January 1969.

Richard Routley, Exploring Meinong's Jungle and Beyond, Australian National University, Cenberra, Austria, 1980.

Roberto Poli, The Brentano Puzzle, Ed. Roberto Poli, Ashagate Publishing Company, 1998.

Roderick M. Chisholm, Brentano on Descriptive Psychology and the Intentional, Essays One, Phenomenology and Existentialism, Edited by Edward N. Lee and Maurice Mandelbaum, The Johns Hopkins Press: Baltimore, 1967.

Roderick M, Homeless Objects, Revue Internationale de Philosophie, No. 104-105, Fasc. 2-3, 1973.

Roderick M, Brentano and Intrinsic Values, Cambridge University Press, 1986.

Ryan Nicholas, Reid on Fictional Objects and The Ways of Ideas, The Philosophy Quarterly, Vol.52, No. 209, October 2002.

Şafak Ural, Pozitif Bilimde Basitlik İlkesi 'nin Belirlenmesi Yolunda Bir Deneme, Doktora Tezi, İ.Ü. Edebiyat fakültesi Yayınları, Edebiyat Fakültesi Matbaası, İstanbul 1981.

Uğur Ekren, Nesneler Teorisine Giriş I, Kutadgubilig Felsefe-Bilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, Sayı:7, Mart 2005.

Uğur Ekren, Franz Brentano: Hayatı, Eserleri, Okulu ve Felsefesi /, Kutadgubilig Felsefe-Bilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, Sayı: 9, Mart 2006.

Uğur Ekren, Kant Hakkında: Franz Brentano ve Henry Sidgwick, Teoman Duralıya Armağan Bir Felsefe Bilim Çağrısı, Dergâh Yayınları, Şubat 2008.

William and Martha Kneale, The Development of Logic, Oxford At The Clarendon Press, 1968. William Kneale, Leibniz and Picture Theory of Langauge, Revue Internationale de Philosophie, No. 76-77, Fasc. 2-3, 1966.