Psikolojik Sahiplik Olgusunu Örgütsel Düzlemde Ölçmek İçin Ölçek Geliştirme Çalışması

Bu çalışmada, olumlu işgören tutum ve davranışlarını önemli düzeyde etkilediği araştırmalara sıklıkla konu olan psikolojik sahiplik olgusunu örgütsel bağlamda ölçmeyi sağlayacak bir ölçek geliştirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Amaca yönelik olarak ilgili yazın taranmış ve dört boyutu kapsayan bir yapının oluşabileceği anlaşılmıştır. Bu boyutlar örgütsel düzey psikolojik sahiplik yapısı altında kimlikleştirme, etkililik, koruyucu odak ve içsel sorumluluk olarak etiketlenmiştir. Araştırmanın ikinci kısmında yapıyı ve alt boyutlarını kuramsal bağlara dayalı olarak açıklayacağı düşünülen soru havuzu oluşturulmuş, soru havuzunun kapsam geçerliliği test edilmiş, anket haline getirilerek uygulanması sağlanmıştır. Anket sonucunda elde edilen verilerin güvenilirlik, geçerlilik ve faktör yapılarına uygunluğu ilgili analizlerle test edilmiştir. Analizler sonucunda toplam 15 madde ve dört boyuttan oluşan yapının belirlenen dört faktörlü yapıyla uyumlu olduğu görülmüştür. Bu araştırma sonuçlarına özgü olarak geliştirilen ölçme aracı sayesinde, psikolojik sahiplenme konusunda çalışacak olan araştırmacılara katkı sağlanacağı umulurken; psikolojik sahiplik olgusunun teorileşmesi yönünde ampirik çalışmalara alt yapı sağlanmış olacaktır.

Measurement Device Development Study for Measuring in Organizational Plane of Psychological Ownership Phenomenon

In this study, it was aimed to develop a scale that will measure psychological ownership, which is often the subject of investigations that affect employee attitudes and behaviors in the positive direction, in the organizational context. it has been thoroughly searched for this purpose in the related literature and it has been understood that a four dimensional structure can be formed. These dimensions are labeled as self-Identity, efficacy, protective focus and internal responsibility under the organizational level psychological ownership structure. In the second part of the research, has been establis-hed a pool of questions that are thought to explain their sub-dimensions based on theoretical links, the content validity of the question pool has been tested, surveyed and implemented and the results obtained from the questionnaire were tested for reliability, validity and suitability to factor structures. As a result of the analyzes, it is seen that the structure composed of 15 items and four dimensions is compatible with the determined four factorial structure. it is hoped that researchers who will work on psychological ownership will contribute thanks to the measurement tool developed specifically for these research results and empirical works will be provided for the theorization of psychological ownership.

PDF

___

Asatryan, V. S., ve Oh, H. (2008). Psychological Ownership Theory: An Exploratory Application in The Restaurant İndustry. Journal of Hospitality& TourismResearch, 32(3), 363-386.
Atalay, C. G. ve Özler, D. E. (2013). A Research to Determine the Relationship between Organizational Justice and Psychological Ownership among Nonfamily Employees in a Family Business. 9th International Strategic Management Conference, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99, 247-256.
Avey, J. B., Avolıo, B. J., Crossley, C. D., ve Luthans, F. (2009). Psychological Ownership: Theoretical Extensions, Measurement and Relation to Work Outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(2), 173-191.
Bernhard, F., ve O'driscoll, M. P. (2011). Psychological Ownership in Small Family- Owned Businesses: Leadership Style and Non Family-Employees’ Work Attitudes and Behaviors. Group & Organization Management, 36(3), 345-384.
Brown, G., Lawrence, T. B., ve Robinson, S. L. (2005). Territoriality in Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30(3), 577-594.
Chi, N. W., ve Han, T. S. (2008). Exploring The Linkages Between Formal Ownership and Psychological Ownership for The Organization: The Mediating Role of Organizational Justice. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81(4), 691-711.
Dittmar, H. (1992). The Social Psychology of Material Possessions: To Have is to be. Harvester Wheatsheaf and St. Martin's Press.
Ergeneli, A., ve Arı, G. S. (2005). Krizde İşten Çıkarılmaların Banka Yöneticileri Üzerine Etkileri: Örgütsel Bağlılık, Güven ve Güçlendirme Algıları. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 60(01), 121-148.
Etzioni, A. (1991). The Socio-Economics of Property. In F. W. Rudmin (Ed.), To Have Possessions: A Hand Book on Ownership and Property. Special Issue, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6(6), 465-468.
Ghafoor, A., Qureshi, T. M., Khan, M. A., ve Hijazi, S. T. (2011). Transformational Leadership, Employee Engagement and Performance: Mediating Effect of Psychological Ownership. African Journal Of Business Management, 5(17), 7391-7403.
Han, T. S.,Chiang, H. H., ve Chang, A. (2010). Employee Participation in Decision Making, Psychological Ownership and Knowledge Sharing: Mediating Role of Organizational Commitment in Taiwanese High- Techorganizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(12), 2218-2233.
Kaur, D., Sambasivan, M., ve Kumar, N. (2013). Effect of Spiritual İntelligence, Emotional İntelligence, Psychological Ownership and Burnout on Caring Behaviour of Nurses: A Cross-Sectional study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 22(21-22), 3192-3202.
Kubzansky, P. E., ve Druskat, V. U. (1993). Psychological Sense Of Ownership in The Workplace: Conceptualization and Measurement. In Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario.
Liu, J.,Wang, H., Hui, C., ve Lee, C. (2012). Psychological Ownership: How Having Control Matters. Journal of Management Studies, 49(5), 869-895.
Mayhew, M. G.,Ashkanasy, N. M., Bramble, T., ve Gardner, J. (2007). A Study of The Antecedents and Consequences of Psychological Ownership in Organizational Settings. The journal of Social Psychology, 147(5), 477- 500.
Nelson-Jones, R. (1984). Personal Responsibility Counseling and Therapy An Integrative Approach. London: Herper & Row Publishers.
O’driscoll, M. P., Pierce, J. L., ve Coghlan, A. M. (2006). The Psychology of Ownership Work Environment Structure, Organizational Commitment, and Citizenship Behaviors. Group & Organization Management, 31(3), 388-416.
Olckers, C.,ve Duplessis, Y. (2012). Psychological Ownership: A Managerial Construct for Talent Retention and Organisational Effectiveness. African Journal of Business Management, 6(7), 2585-2596.
Pierce, J. L., ve Furo, C. A. (1991).Employee Ownership: Implications for Management. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 32-43.
Pierce, J. L., ve Rodgers, L. (2004). The Psychology of Ownership and Worker-Owner Productivity. Group & Organization Management, 29(5), 588-613.
Pierce, J. L.,Jussila, I., ve Cummings, A. (2009). Psychological Ownership within The Job Design Context: Revision of The Job Characteristics Model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(4), 477-496.
Pierce, J. L.,Kostova, T., ve Dirks, K. T. (2001). Toward A Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 298-310.
Pierce, J. L.,Kostova, ve T., Dirks, K. T. (2003). The State of Psychological Ownership: Integrating and Extending a Century of Research. Review of General Psychology, 7(1), 84.
Pierce, J. L.,O'driscoll, M. P., ve Coghlan, A. M. (2004). Work Environment Structure And Psychological Ownership: The Mediating Effects Of Control. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144(5), 507-534.
Pierce, J. L.,Rubenfeld, S. A., ve Morgan, S. (1991). Employee Ownership: A Conceptual Model of Process and Effects. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 121- 144.
Sieger, P.,Zellweger, T., ve Aquino, K. (2013). Turning Agentsinto Psychological Principals: Aligning Interests of Non Owners through Psychological Ownership. Journal of Management Studies, 50(3), 361-388.
Taylı, A. (2013). Sorumluluğun Bazı Değişkenler Açısından Değerlendirilmesi. Sosyal Ve Beşeri Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, (30), 68-84.
Tolay, E., Sürgevil, O., ve Topoyan, M. (2012). Akademik Çalısma Ortamında Yapısal ve Psikolojik Güçlendirmenin Duygusal Bağlılık ve İs Doyumu Üzerindeki Etkileri. Ege Akademik Bakış, 12(4), 449-465.
Türnüklü, A. (2000). Eğitimbilim araştırmalarında etkin olarak kullanılabilecek nitel biraraştırma tekniği: Görüşme. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 6(4), 543-559.
Uçar, Z. (2017). Psikolojik Sahiplenme: Örgütsel Alana İlişkin Bir Model Önerisi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(1), 167-200.
Van D., L., Ve Pıerce, J. L. (2004). Psychological Ownership and Feelings of Possession: Three Field Studies Predicting Employee Attitudes and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(4), 439-459.
Van, D. L., Cummings, L. L., ve Parks, J. M. (1995). Extra-role behaviors: In Pursuit of Construct and Definitional Clarity (A Bridge Over Muddied Waters). Research in Organizational Behavior, 17, 215-285.
Vandewalle, D., Van Dyne, L., ve Kostova, T. (1995). Psychological Ownership: An Empirical examination of Its Consequences. Group & Organization Management, 20(2), 210-226.
Wagner, S. H.,Parker, C. P., ve Christiansen, N. D. (2003). Employees That Think and Act Like Owners: Effects of Ownership Beliefs and Behaviors on Organizational Effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 56(4), 847-871.
Weiss, H. M., ve Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective Events Theory: A Theoretical Discussion of The Structure, Causes And Consequences of Affective Experiences at Work. Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays And Critical Reviews, Vol. 18.
Yeşil, Ü., Bancar, A., ve Budak, G. (2015). Psikolojik Sahiplik Kavramına İlişkin Bir Literatür İncelemesi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16(2), 59-82.
Yıldız B., Yıldız H. (2015). The Effect of Servant Leadership on Psychological Ownership: The Moderator Role of Perceived Organizational Support. Journal Of Global Strategıc Management, 9, 65-77.
Zhu, H.,Chen, C. C., Lı, X., ve Zhou, Y. (2013). From Personal Relationship to Psychological Ownership: The Importance of Manager–Owner Relationship Closeness in Family Businesses. Management and Organization Review, 9(2), 295-318.