FATMA KORKMAZ, İSMAİL GÖKDENİZ, KÜRŞAD ZORLU

Paternalist Liderlik Davranışının Örgütsel Özdeşleşme Üzerindeki Etkisinde Çalışanların İşe Tutkunluk Düzeylerinin Aracılık Rolü

Bu çalışmada, algılanan paternalist liderlik davranışının yardımsever, ahlâki ve otoriter liderlik alt boyutları ile çalışanların örgütsel özdeşleşme düzeyleri arasındaki etki ve bu etkide çalışanların işe tutkunluk düzeylerinin aracılık rolü incelenmektedir. Bu kapsamda; öncelikle paternalist liderlik, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve işe tutkunluk konusunda oluşturulan kavramsal çerçeve sunulmaktadır. Ardından, araştırma kapsamında gerçekleştirilen anket uygulamasına ilişkin bulgu ve sonuçlara yer verilmektedir. Araştırmanın örneklemi, yüz yüze anket yöntemi ile ulaşılan, Kırşehir ilinde faaliyet gösteren kamu kurumları ve özel sektör kuruluşları bünyesinde çalışan toplam 1032 çalışandan oluşmaktadır. Anket formunda likert tipi ölçek kullanılmış, araştırma modeli olarak ise yapısal eşitlik modeli (YEM) tercih edilmiştir. Verilerin analizi için SPSS 22.0 paket programı ve AMOS 24 YEM programı birlikte kullanılmıştır. Araştırmadan elde edilen bulgu sonuçlarına göre, paternalist liderliğin otoriter liderlik alt boyutunun örgütsel özdeşleşme üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisinin bulunmadığı ve dolayısıyla işe tutkunluğun aracılık rolünün incelenemeyeceği, bunun yanı sıra paternalist liderliğin yardımsever liderlik alt boyutunun örgütsel özdeşleşme üzerinde pozitif yönlü ve anlamlı bir etkisinin bulunduğu, işe tutkunluğun bu etkide tam aracılık rolünün olduğu, aynı zamanda paternalist liderliğin ahlaki liderlik alt boyutunun da örgütsel özdeşleşme üzerinde pozitif yönlü ve anlamlı bir etkisinin bulunduğu, fakat işe tutkunluğun bu etkide kısmi aracılık rolünün olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

The Mediating Role of Employee’s Work Engagement in the Effect on Organizational Identification of Paternalistic Leadership Behaviour

This study examines the influence of perceived paternalist leadership behavior on the level of organizational identification of employees with benevolent, ethical and authoritarian leadership subdivisions, and in this effect the mediator role of employees' levels of work engagement. In this scope; the conceptual framework established primarily for paternalist leadership, organizational identification and work engagement is presented. Then, findings and conclusions related to the survey implemented within the scope of the research are included. The sample of the study consists of a total of 1032 employees working in the public sector and private sector organizations operating in the province of Kırşehir, which is reached through the face-to-face survey method. Likert type scale was used in the questionnaire form and structural equality model (SEM) was chosen as the research model. For the analysis of the data, the SPSS 22.0 package program and AMOS 24 SEM program were used together. The findings of the research show that the paternalist leadership’s authoritarian leadership subdimension does not have a meaningful effect on the organizational identification and therefore the role of mediation of work engagement can not be examined as well as that the paternalist leadership’s the benevolent leadership subdimension has a positive and meaningful effect on the organizational identification and the work engagement has a fully mediator role in this effect. It is also found that the moral leadership subdimension of the paternalist leadership has a positive and meaningful effect on organizational identification, but that work engagement has partly mediator role in this effect.

PDF

___

Akhtar, R., Boustani, L., Tsivrikos, D., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., (2015). ‘‘The Engageable Personality: Personality and Trait El as Predictors of Work Engagement’’, Personality and Individual Differences, 73, 44–49.
Anwar, H., (2013). “Impact of Paternalistic Leadership on Employees' Outcome: A study on the Banking Sector of Pakistan”, IOSR J. Bus. Manage, http://dx.doi:10.9790/487X-076109115, 7(6), 109-115.
Ardıç K. ve Polatçı S., (2009). “Tükenmişlik Sendromu ve Madalyonun Öbür Yüzü: İşle Bütünleşme”, Erciyes Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 32(1), 21-46.
Arsezen-Otamis, P., Arikan-Saltik, I., Babacan, S., (2015). “The Relationship Between Paternalistic Leadership and Business Performance in Small Tourism Businesses: The Moderating Role of Affective Organizational Commitment”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207, 90-97.
Ashforth, B. E. ve Mael, F., (1989). “Social Identity Theory and the Organization’’, Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H. Corley, K. G., (2008). “Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamantal Questions”, Journal of Management, 34(3), 325-374.
Aycan, Z., Kanungo, R., Mendonca, M., Yu, K., Deller, J., Stahl, G., Kurshid, A., (2000). “Impact of Culture on Human Resource Management Practices: A 10-‐ Country Comparison”, Applied Psychology, 49(1), 192-221.
Aycan, Z., (2001). ‘‘Paternalizm: Yönetim ve Liderlik Anlayışına İlişkin Üç Görgül Çalışma’’, Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 11-31.
Aydın, Y., (2015). ''Liderlik Tarzları ile Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı Arasındaki İlişkide Örgüt Kültürünün Rolü: Bursa Serbest Bölgesinde Faaliyet Gösteren Firmalar Üzerine Bir Araştırma'', Çukurova Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, Adana.
Bakker, A. B., Bal, P. M., (2010). ‘‘Weekly Work Engagement and Performance A Study Among Starting Teachers’’, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 189-206.
Bal, E., (2010). ‘‘İnsan Kaynakları Alanında Yeni Bir Kavram: İşe Gönülden Adanma (Engagement) ve Türkiye’de Durum’’, 12. Lojistik Yönetimi Zirvesi.
Baron, R. M. ve Kenny, D. A., (1986). “The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Blomme, R. J., Kodden, B., Beasley-Suffolk, A., (2015). ‘‘Leadership Theories and the Concept Of Work Engagement: Creating A Conceptual Framework For Management İmplications and Research, Journal of Management & Organization, 1-20.
Cenkci, A. T. ve Özçelik, G., (2015). ‘‘Leadership Styles and Subordinate Work Engagement: The Moderating Impact of Leader Gender’’, Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 7(4), 8-20.
Cerit, Y., (2012). “Paternalistik Liderlik İle Yöneticiden Ve İşin Doğasından Doyum Arasındaki İlişki”, Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(2), 35-56.
Chen, H. Y. ve Kao, H. S., (2009). ‘‘Chinese Paternalistic Leadership and Non-Chinese Subordinates Psychological Health’’, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(12), 2533–2546.
Chen, X. P., Eberly, M. B., Chiang, T. J., Farh, J. L., Cheng, B. S., (2011). “Affective Trust in Chinese Leader: Linking Paternalistic Leadership to Employee Performance”, Journal of Management, http://dx.doi:10.1177/0149206311410604, 1-24.
Chen, S., (2017). “Paternalistic Leadership and Cabin Crews’ Upward Safety Communication: The Motivation of Voice Behavior”, Journal of Air Transport Management, 62, 44-53.
Cheney, G. ve Tompkins, I. K., (1987). ‘‘Coming to Terms with Organizational Identification’’, Central States Speech Journal, 38, 1-15.
Cheng, M. Y. ve Wang, L., (2015). ‘‘The Mediating Effect of Ethical Climate on the Relationship Between Paternalistic Leadership and Team Identification: A Team- Level Analysis in the Chinese Context’’, Journal of Business Ethics, 129(3), 639- 654.
Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., Wu, T. Y., Huang, M. P., Farh, J. L., (2004). ‘‘Paternalistic Leadership and Subordinate Responses: Establishing A Leadership Model in Chinese Organizations’’, Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7(1), 89–117.
Chien, Y. M., (2013). ‘‘Tourism Involvement, Work Engagement And Job Satisfaction among Frontline Hotel Employees. Annals of Tourism Research’’, 42, 214–239.
Chou, H., (2012). ‘‘Effects of Paternalistic Leadership On Job Satisfaction-Regulatory Focus as The Mediator’’, International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 4(4), 62–85.
Costa, P. L., Passos, A. M., Bakker, A. B., (2014). ‘‘Team Work Engagement: A Model of Emergence’’, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 414- 436.
Çakınberk, A., Derin, N., Demirel, E. T., (2011). ‘‘Örgütsel Özdeşleşmenin Örgütsel Bağlılıkla Biçimlenmesi: Malatya ve Tunceli Özel Eğitim Kurumları Örneği’’, İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(1), 89-121.
Çıraklar, N. H., Uçar, Z., Sezgin, O. B., (2016). ‘‘Effects Of Paternalistic Leadership on Organizational Identification: Mediating Role of Trust in Leader’’, Research Journal of Business and Management -(RJBM) ISSN: 2148-6689, 73-87.
Doğan, E., (2002). ‘‘Çalışanların İşine Cezbolması: Dönüştürücü Liderlik Tarzının Lidere Olan Güvenin Güçlenmesine ve Negatif / Pozitif Duygulanımın Etkileri’’, Marmara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul.
Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., Harquail, C. V., (1994). “Organizational Images and Member Identification”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239-263.
Dworkin, G. (1972). ''Paternalism'', In R. A. Wasserstrom (ed.), Morality and the Law. Belmont CA: Wadsworth, 64-84.
Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P., Ouwerkerk, J. W., (1999). ''Self- Categorization, Commitment to the Group and Group Self- Esteem as Related But Distinct Aspects of Social Identity'', European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 371–389.
Erben, G. S. ve Güneşer, A. B., (2008). “The Relationship Between Paternalistic Leadership and Organizational Commitment: Investigating the Role of Climate Regarding Ethics”, Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 955–968.
Erkuş, A., Tabak, A., Yaman, T., (2010). ''Paternalist (Babacan) Liderlik Çalışanların Örgütsel Özdeşleşmelerini ve İşten Ayrılma Niyetlerini Etkiler mi? Bir Özel Hastane Uygulaması'', 9. Ulusal İşletmecilik Kongresi, 6-8 Mayıs 2010, Zonguldak.
Esen E., (2011). “Çalışanların Örgüte Cezbolması”, Marmara Üniversitesi, İİBF Dergisi, 30(1), 377-390.
Farh, J. L. ve Cheng, B. S., (2000). ''A Cultural Analysis of Paternalistic Leadership in Chinese Organizations'', İçinde: J. T. Li, A. S. Tsui, E. Weldon, (Ed.), Management and Organizations in the Chinese Context, London: Macmillan; 85– 127.
Farh, J. L., Liang, J., Chou, L. F., Chu, X. P., (2006). "Authority and Benevolence: Employees' Responses to Paternalistic Leadership in China", A. S. Tsui, Y. Bian, L. Cheng (Ed.), China's Domestic Private Firms: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Management and Performance, New York, Sharpe, 230-260.
Gautam, T, Van Dick, R. ve Wagner, U., (2004), “Organizational Identification and Organizational Commitment: Distinct Aspects of Two Related Concepts”, Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7(3), 301-315.
Gelfand, M. J., Erez, M., Aycan, Z., (2007). “Cross-Cultural Organizational Behavior”, Annu. Rev. Psychol., 58, 479-514.
Göncü, A., Aycan, Z., Johnson, R. E., (2014). “Effects of Paternalistic and Transformational Leadership on Follower Outcomes”, International Journal of Management and Business, 5(1), 36-58.
Kahn, W. A., (1990). ''Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work'', Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692-724.
Karatepe, O. M. ve Olugbade, O. A., (2009). ''The Effects of Job and Personal Resources on Hotel Employees’ Work Engagement'', International Journal of Hospitality Management, 28, 504–512.
Karatepe, O. M., (2013). ''High-performance Work Practices and Hotel Employee Performance: The Mediation of Work Engagement'', International Journal of Hospitality Management, 32, 132–140.
Karatepe, O. M., Beirami, E., Bouzari, M., Safavi, H. P., (2014). ''Does Work Engagement Mediate the Effects of Challenge Stressors on Job Outcomes? Evidence from the Hotel Industry'', International Journal of Hospitality Management, 36, 14–22.
Köksal, O., (2011). ''Bir Kültürel Liderlik Paradoksu: Paternalizm'', Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(15),101-122.
Kurtpınar, M., (2011). ''Birey-örgüt Uyumunun Bireysel Performans Üzerindeki Etkisinde Kişilik Özellikleri ve İşe Adanmışlığın Rolü'', İstanbul: Genelkurmay Başkanlığı Harp Akademileri Komutanlığı Stratejik Araştırmalar Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü.
Kim, J., Jin, Y., (2013). “The Effect of Paternalistic Leadership on Employees, Organizational Identification and Organization-based Self- esteem in Hotel Restaurant”, Tourism Research, 6, 103-122.
Liao, S., Widowati, R., Hu, D., Tasman, L., (2017). “The Mediating Effect of Psychological Contract in the Relationships Between Paternalistic Leadership and Turnover Intention for Foreign Workers in Taiwan”, Asia Pacific Management Review, 22, 80-87.
Liu, Y., Zhang, J., Huang, G., (2010). “Paternalistic Leadership and Its Impact on Organizational Effectiveness”, 260-266, IFERA 2010 Family Business Forum, Zhuhai, China.
Macey, W. S., (2008). ''The Meaning of Employee Engagement'', Industrial and Organizational Psychology, (1), 3-30.
Mael, F., Ashforth, B. E., (1992). “Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of the Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103-123.
Mardanow, I. T., Heischmidt, K., Henson, A., (2008). “Leader-Member Exchange and Job Satisfaction: Bond and Predicted Employee Turnover”, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15(2), 159-175.
Maslach, C. S., (2001). ''Job Burnout'', Annual Reviews Psychology, 52, 397-422.
Nal, M. ve Tarım, M., (2017). “Sağlık Yöneticilerinin Paternalist (Babacan) Liderlik Davranışlarının Çalışanların İş Doyumu Üzerine Etkisi”, AÇÜ Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(2), 117-141.
Niu, C. P., Wang, A. C., Cheng, B. S., (2009). “Effectiveness of A Moral and Benevolent Leader: Probing the Interactions of the Dimensions of Paternalistic Leadership”, Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12(1), 32-39.
Öge, E., Çetin, M., Top, S., (2017). “The Effects of Paternalistic Leadership on Workplace Loneliness, Work Family Conflict and Work Engagement among Air Traffic Controllers in Turkey”, Journal of Air Transport Management, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2017.10.003, 66, 25-35.
Özkalp, E. ve Meydan, B., (2015). '' Schaufeli ve Bakker Tarafından Geliştirilmiş Olan İşe Angaje Olma Ölçeğinin Türkçe'de Güvenilirlik ve Geçerliliğinin Analizi'', ''İşGüç'' Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, DOI: 10.4026/1303- 2860.2015.0285.x, 4-19.
Paşa, F. S., Kabasakal, H., Bodur, M., (2001). “Society, Organisations and Leadership in Turkey”, Applied Psychology, 50(4), 559- 589.
Pellegrini, E. K. ve Scandura, T. A., (2008). “Paternalistic Leadership: A Review and Agenda for Future Research”, Journal of Management, 34(3), 566–593.
Pellegrini, E. K. ve Scandura, T. A., (2006). “Leader-member Exchange (LMX), Paternalism, and Delegation in the Turkish Business Culture: an Empirical Investigation”, Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 264-79.
Poaching, C. ve Chichun, H., (2009). ''The Relationship of Paternalistic Leadership and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Mediating Effect of Upward Communication'', The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 5(2), 66- 74.
Rehman, M. ve Afsar, B., (2012). ''The Impact of Paternalistic Leadership on Organization Commitment and Organization Citizenship Behaviour'', Journal of Business Management and Applied Economics, 5, 148-159.
Robbins, P. S. (1996). Organizational Behaviour, New Jersey, Prentice Hall. Saher, N., Naz, S., Tasleem, I., Naz, R., Kausar, S., (2013). “Does Paternalistic Leadership Lead to Commitment? Trust in Leader as Moderator in Pakistani Context”, Inter-disciplinary J. Contemp. Res. Bus. 5(1), 443-455.
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., Bakker, A. B., (2002). “The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach”, Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.
Schaufeli, W. B. Salanova, M., (2008). ''Efficacy or Inefficacy, that's the Question: Burnout and Work Engagement, and Their Relationships with Efficacy Beliefs Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 20(2), 177-196.
Shamir, B., (1990). “Calculations, Values and Identities: The Sources of Collectivist Work Motivation”, Human Relations, 43, 313-332.
Sonnentag, S., (2003). ''Recovery, Work Engagement, and Proactive Behavior: A New Look at the Interface Between Nonwork and Work'', Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 518-528.
Suber, P., (1999). "Paternalism", Christopher Berry Gray (Ed.), Philosophy of Law: An Encyclopedia, Garland Pub.II, 632-635.
Tabak, A., Sığrı, Ü., Arlı, Ö., Coşar, S., (2010). “Otantik Liderlik Ölçeğinin Uyarlama Çalışması”, 18. Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Kongre Bildiriler Kitabı, Adana, 699-706.
Tokgöz, E. ve Aytemiz Seymen, O., (2013). “Örgütsel Güven, Örgütsel Özdeşleşme ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı Arasındaki İlişki: Bir Devlet Hastanesinde Araştırma”, Öneri Dergisi, 10(9), 61-76.
Tompkins, P. K. ve Cheney, G., (1985). “Communication and Unobtrusive Control in Contemporary Organizations”, In R. D. McPhee and P. K. Tompkins (Eds.), Organizational Communication: Traditional Themes and New Directions, Beverly Hill, CA: Sage, 179-210.
Top, S., Öge, E., Atan, Ö., Gümüş, S., (2015). “Investigation Relational Levels of Intensity between Paternalistic and Servant Leadership Styles and National Culture, Organizational Commitment and Subordinate Responses or Reactions to the Leaders Style”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.861, 12-22.
Turunç, Ö. ve Çelik, M., (2010). “Algılanan Örgütsel Desteğin Çalışanların İş-Aile, Aile-İş Çatışması, Örgütsel Özdeşleşme ve İşten Ayrılma Niyetine Etkisi: Savunma Sektöründe Bir Araştırma”, Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14(1), 209-232.
Turgut, T., (2011). ‘‘Çalışmaya Tutkunluk: İş Yükü, Esnek Çalışma Saatleri, Yönetici Desteği ve İş-Aile Çatışması İle İlişkileri’’, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 25(3-4), 155-179.
Van Dick, R., (2001), “Identification in Organization Contexts: Linking Theory and Research from Social and Organizational Psychology”, International Journal of Management Reviews, (3-4), 265-283.
Van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Stellmacher, J., ve Christ, O., (2004). “The Utility of A Broader Conceptualization of Organizational Identification: Which Aspects Really Matter?”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 171-191.
Vassos, M., Nankervis, K., Skerry, T., Lante, K., (2013). ''Work Engagement and Job Burnout Within the Disability Support Worker Population'', Research in Developmental Disabilitiess, 34, 3884–3895.
Vogelgesang, G. R., Leroy, H., Avolio, B. J., (2013). ''The Mediating Effects of Leader Integrity with Transparency In Communication and Work Engagement/Performance'', The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 405–413.
Yeh, H. R., Chi, H. K., Chiou, C. Y., (2008). “The Influences of Paternalistic Leadership, Job Stress, and Organizational Commitment on Organizational Performance: An Empirical Study of Policemen in Taiwan”, The Journal of International Management Studies, 3(2), 85-91.
Xanthopoulou, D., Baker, A. B., Heuven, E., Demerouti, W., Schaufeli, W. B., (2008). ''Working in the Sky: A Diary Study on Work Engagement among Flight Attendants'', Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13(4), 345–356.
Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., Schaufeli, W. B., (2009). ''Work Engagement and Financial Returns: A Diary Study on the Role of Job and Personal Resources'', Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 183–200.
Walker, W. C., (2013). ''Work Readiness of Graduate Nurses and the Impact on Job Satisfaction, Work Engagement and Intention to Remain'', Nurse Education Today, 33, 1490–1495.
Wiesenfeld, B. M., Raghuram, S., Garud, R., (1999). ''Communication Patterns as Determinants of Organizational İdentification in A Virtual Organization”, Organization Science, 10(6), 777-790.
Wiesenfeld, B. M., Raghuram, S., Garud, R., (2001). “Organizational Identification among Virtual Workers: The Role of Need for Affiliation and Perceived Work- Based Social Support”, Journal of Management, 27(2), 213-229.
Zhu, W., He, H., Treviño, L. K., Chao, M. M., Wang, W., (2015). “Ethical Leadership and Follower Voice and Performance: The Role of Follower Identifications and Entity Morality Beliefs”, The Leadership Quarterly, 26(5), 702-718.