Lider Üye Etkileşim Kalitesinde Üyelerin Kişilik Özelliklerinin Rolü: Ankara’da Özel Bir Hastane Örneği

Amaç – Bu araştırma, çalışanların beş faktör kişilik özellikleri ile lider üye etkileşim kalitesi arasındaki ilişkiyi ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu doğrultuda yapılan araştırma, yeni geliştirilen lider üye etkileşimi ölçeğinde belirlenen alt boyular ile beş faktör kişilik özelliği alt boyutları arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Yöntem – Araştırmanın verileri 184 sağlık çalışanından yüz yüze uygulama ile toplanmış anket formlarından elde edilmiştir. Elde edilen veriler SPSS2 20 ve AMOS paket programları ile analiz edilmiş ve yorumlanmıştır. Bulgular – Yapılan analizler sonucunda, lider üye etkileşiminin tüm alt boyutları ile beş faktör kişilik özelliklerinden dışadönüklük, uyumluluk, duygusal denge ve açıklık alt boyutları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ilişkilere rastlanmıştır. Tartışma – Araştırmadan elde edilen bulgular konuya ilişkin yapılan çalışmaların kimisini destekler nitelikte olsa da kimi araştırma sonuçları ile de örtüşmemektedir. Bu noktadan hareketle, kişilik özelliklerinin lider üye etkileşim kalitesi üzerinde, sektörel anlamda da değişkenlik gösterebileceği düşünülmektedir. Ancak sağlık çalışanlarının mesleki sorumluluk hisleri ve kişilik özelliklerinin, örgütsel ortamda yaşanılan lider ve ast ilişkileri üzerinde belirleyici bir unsur olduğu da gözlemlenmiştir.

The Role of Personality Traits of Subordinates on Leader Member Exchange Quality: Example of a Private Hospital in Ankara

Purpose – This research aims to reveal the relationship between five factor personality traits of subordinates and the quality of leader member exchange. Accordingly, the study was conducted to reveal the relationship between the sub-dimensions determined in the newly developed leader member exchange scale and five factor personality trait sub-dimensions. Design/methodology/approach – The data of the study were obtained from questionnaires collected by face to face implementation from 184 healthcare workers. The obtained data were analysed and interpreted with SPSS 20 and AMOS package programs. Findings – As a result of this analysis, statistically significant relationships were found between all sub-dimensions of leader member exchange and sub-dimensions of extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism and openness among the five factor personality traits. Discussion – Although the findings obtained from the research support some of the studies on the subject, they do not coincide with some research results. From this point of view, it is thought that personality traits may vary on the quality of leader member Exchange on a sectoral basis. However, it has been observed that the sense of professional responsibility and personality traits of healthcare professionals are a determining factor on the leader and subordinate relationships experienced in the organizational environment.

PDF

___

Antonioni, D. (1998). Relationship between the big five personality factors and conflict management style, International Journal of Conflict Management. (9)4, 336-355.
Barbuto, John E. and Bugenhagen, Marilyn J., (2009). The emotional intelligence of leaders as antecedent to leader-member exchanges: a field study, Journal of Leadership Education, 8-2 (2009).
Barrick, M. and Mount, M.K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta analysis, Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1.
Bauer, T.N. and Green, S.G. (1996). Development of leader member exchange: a longitudinal test, Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1538- 1567.
Bauer, T.N., Erdoğan, B., Liden R.C. and Wayne, S.J. (2006), “A longitudinal study of the moderating role of extraversion: leader-member exchange, performance and turnover during new executive development, Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 298-310.
Bernerth, J.B., Armenakis, A.A., Feild, H.S., Giles, W.F. ve Walker, H.J. (2007). Is personality associated with perceptions of lmx? an emprical study, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 28(7), 613-631.
Bono, J.E., Boles, T.L., Judge, T.A. and Lauver, K.J. (2002). The role of personality in task and relationship conflict. Journal of Personality, (70)3, 1311-1344.
Bone, P. F., Sharma, S., and Shimp, T. A. (1989). A bootstrap procedure for evaluating goodness-of-fit indices of structural equation and confirmatory factor models, Journal of Marketing Research, 26(1), 105-111.
Bouchard, G., Guillemette, A. and Landry-Leger, N. (2004). Situational and dispositional coping: an examination of their relation to personality. cognitive appraisals and psychological distress. European Journal of Personality. 18(3), 221-238.
Burger Jerry, M. (2006). Kişilik (1.Baskı). İstanbul: Kaktüs Yayınları.
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
Campbell, L., Simpson, J.A. , Stewart, J. and Manning, M. (2003). Putting personality in social context extraversion, emergant leadership and the availability of rewards, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(12), 1547-1559.
Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2007). Personality and Individual Differences. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
Costa, P.T. and McCrae, R.R. (1995). Domains and facets: hiyerarchical personality assessment using the revised neo personality inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment. (64)1, 21-50.
Delongis, A. and Holtzman, S. (2005). Coping in context: the role of stres, social support and personality in coping. Journal of Personality, 73(6), 1633-1656.
Deluga, R. J., and Perry, J. T. (1994). The role of subordinate performance and ingratiation in leader-member exchanges, Group & Organization Management, 19(1), 67-86.
Dienesch, Richard M and Liden, Robert C. (1986). Leader member exchange model of leadership: a critique and further development, Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 618-634.
Erdoğan, İ. (1994). İşletmelerde Davranış. 4. Baskı ,Beta Basım Yayın Dağıtım, İstanbul.
Fink, A. (2017). How to Conduct Surweys: A Step-By-Step Guide. 6 Edition. Thousand Oaks, California Sage Publications.
Gerstner, Charlotte R. and Day, David V., (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader – member exchange theory: correlates and construct issues, Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827-844.
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative ‘‘description of personality’’: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–1229.
Graen, G.B., Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: development of leader-member exchange (lmx) theory of leadership over 25 years: applying a multi-level multidomain perspective, Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.
Graen, George and Cashman, James F. (1975). A role making model of leadership in formal organizations: a developmental approach. J.Hunt ve L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership Frontiers, 143-165.
Graziano, W.G., Jensen-Campbell, A.L. and Hair, C.E. (1996). Perceiving interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: the case for agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 820- 835.
Jing-zhou, Pan and Wen-xia, Zhou, (2011). Under dual perspective of work exchange and social exchange: the study of impact of lmx on affective commitment, Nankai Business Review International, 2(4), 402-417.
John, O. P., and Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Berkeley: University of California.
Judge, T.A., Locke, E.A. and Durham, C.C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: a core evaluations approach, Research in Organizational Behavior, 19,151-88.
Kaptangil, İ. (2017). Y kuşağı çalışanların lider üye etkileşimi ve örgütsel sinizm tutumlarının incelenmesi. abant izzet baysal üniversitesi sosyal bilimler enstitüsü. Yayınlanmış Doktora Tezi. 2017,Bolu.
Köknel,Ö.(1985), Kaygıdan Mutluluğa Kişilik, Altın Kitap Yayınevi, İstanbul.
Liden, Robert C. and Graen, George. (1980). Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership, Academy of Management Journal, No:23(3), 451-465.
Liden, Robert C., Maslyn, John M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader member exchange: an empirical assessment through scale development, Journal of Management, 24(1), 43-72.
Martin Robin, Thomas,Geoff, Charles, Kao K., Epitropaki, Olga ve McNamara, Rachel, (2005). “The Role of Leader Member Exchange in Mediating The Relationship Between Locus of Control and Work Reactions”. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol:78, 141-147.
McCrae, R. R. ve Costa, P. T. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 182–207). New York: Guilford Press.
Mount, M.K., Barrick, M.R., Scullen, S.M. ve Rounds, J. (2005). Higher-order dimensions of the big five personality traits and the big six vocational interest types. Personal Psychology, 58(2), 447-478.
Northouse, P.G. (2001). Leadership Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
Peterson, M. F., and Hunt, J. G. (1997). International perspectives on international leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 8(3), 203 – 231.
Philips, A.S. and Bedeian, A.G. (1994). Leader-follower exchange quality: the role of personal and interpersonal attributes, Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 990-1001.
Raja, U., Johns, G. and Ntalianis, F. (2004). The impact of personality on psychological contracts, Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 350-367.
Schmidt, F. and Hunter, J.E. (1998). “The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings, Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262- 274.
Schyns, B., Meindl, J.R. and Croon, M.A. (2007). The romance of leadership scale- cross cultural testing and refinement, Leadership, 3(1), 29-46.
Scroggins, J. (2016). Combined influence of personality and leader member exchange on task and citizenship performance” The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Department of Psychology, May.
Servidio, R. (2014). Exploring the effects of demographic factors, internet usage and personality traits on Internet addiction in a sample of Italian university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 85–92.
Snyder, Robert A., Williams, Ronald R., and Cashman, James F., (1984). Age, tenure and work perceptions as predictors of reactions to performance feedback, Joural of Psychology, 116(1), 11-21.
Sümer, N., Lajunen, T., & Özkan, T. (2005). Big five personality traits as the distal predictors of road accident. Traffic and Transport Psychology: Theory and Application, 215, 215-227.
Tett, R.P. and Murphy, P.J. (2002), “Personality and situations in co-worker preference: similarity and complementarity in work compatibility”, Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(2), 223-243.
Thoms, P., Moore, K. S., & Scott, K. S. (1996). The relationship between self-efficacy for participating in selfmanaged work groups and the big five personality dimensions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17(4), 349-362.
Turban, D. B., & Dougherty, T. W. (1994). Role of protégé personality in receipt of mentoring and career success. Academy of Management journal, 37(3), 688-702.
Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in Organizations, New Jersey: Pearson – Prentice Hall Inc.
Zel, U. (2001). Yönetimde Kişilik ve Kişilik Teorileri. Yönetim ve Organizasyon, Ed. Salih Güney, Nobel Yayın, Ankara.