İşletmelerde Stratejik Yönlülük Boyutları ile Hizmet Yenilik Yeteneği ve Pazar Performansı Arasındaki İlişki: Bir Araştırma

Amaç – Makalenin amacı Antalya ili üretim işletmelerinde stratejik yönlülük boyutları ile hizmet yenilik yeteneği ve pazar performansı arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemektir. Yöntem – Makalede, kullanılan ölçekler şu şekildedir: Müşteri yönlülük ölçeği Despande ve Farley (1998); rakip yönlülük ölçeği Narver ve Slater (1990) ile Olson vd. (2005); maliyet yönlülük ölçeği Olson vd. (2005) ile Homburg vd (1999); hizmet yenilik yeteneği ölçeği Grawe vd. (2009) ve pazar performansı da, Claycomb vd. (1999) ile Jaworski ve Kohli (1993) tarafından yapılan makaleden yararlanılarak oluşturulmuştur. Araştırmanın ana kütlesi Antalya ilinde faaliyet gösteren ve Ticaret ve Sanayi Bakanlığı’na kayıtlı 879 işletme olarak belirlenmiş; araştırma, katılmayı kabul eden 180 işletme ile görüşülerek gerçekleştirilmiştir. Elde edilen verilere kısmi en küçük kareler yöntemi ve model testi uygulanmış, elde edilen bulgular değerlendirilmiş ve yorumu yapılmıştır. Bulgular – Stratejik yönlülük boyutları (müşteri yönlülük, rakip yönlülük, maliyet yönlülük), hizmet yenilik yeteneği ve pazar performansı arasında ilişkilerin analizinde; stratejik yönlülük boyutlarının hizmet yenilik yeteneğini doğrudan ve pozitif yönde etkilediği görülmüştür. Ayrıca hizmet yenilik yeteneğinin pazar performansını doğrudan ve pozitif yönde etkilediği ve oluşturulan araştırma hipotezleri ve modeli tam olarak doğrulandığı izlenmiştir. Tartışma – Bu araştırmada stratejik yönlülük boyutları, hizmet yenilik yeteneği ve pazar performansı Türkiye ve Antalya ili özelinde ampirik olarak incelemiş ve elde edilen bulgular tartışılmıştır.

The Relationship Between Strategic Orientation Dimensions and Service Innovation Capability and Market Performance in Businesses: A Research

Purpose – The aim of the article is to determine the relationship between strategic orientation dimensions and service innovation capability and market performance in Antalya province production business. Design/methodology/approach – The scales used in the article are as follows: Customer orientation scale Despande and Farley (1998); the competitor orientation scale Narver and Slater (1990) and Olson et al. (2005); cost- orientation scale Olson et al. (2005) and Homburg et al (1999); service innovation capability scale Grawe et al. (2009) and market performance Claycomb et al. (1999) and Jaworski and Kohli (1993). The main mass of the research was determined as 879 business operating in Antalya and registered with the Ministry of Trade and Industry. The research was conducted by interviewing 180 businesses that agreed to participate. Partial least squares method and model test were applied to the obtained data, the obtained findings were evaluated and interpreted. Findings – In the analysis of the relationship between strategic orientation dimensions (customer orientation, competitor orientation, cost orientation), service innovation capability and market performance; it was observed that the strategic orientation dimensions affect service innovation capability directly and positively. Furthermore, it was determined that service innovation capability has a direct and positive effect on market performance. This result fully confirms the research hypotheses and model created. Discussion – In this study, the relationship between strategic orientation dimensions, service innovation capability and market performance empirically examined for Turkey and Antalya province in particular and the findings were discussed.

___

  • Alobaidi, M. and Kitapcı, O. (20199. Strategic Orientation, Market Orientation and Business Performance: In Searching for Integration, Evidence from Turkey. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 14 (3), 53-70.
  • Autry, C. W., Griffis, S. E., Goldsby, T. J. and Bobbitt, L. M. (2005). Warehouse Management System: Resource Commitment Capabilities and Organizational Performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 26 (2), 165- 183.
  • Bagozzi, R. and Yi, Y. (1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 16 (1), 74-94.
  • Baker, W. E. and Sinkula, J. M. (1999). The Synergistic Effect of Market Orientation and Learning Orientation on Organizational Performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27 (4), 411-427.
  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1), 99-120.
  • Benner, M. J. and Tushman, M. (2002). Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industrial. Administrative Science Quartely, 47 (4), 676-706.
  • Berry, L. L., Shankar, V., Parish, J. T., Cadwallader, S. and Dozel, T. (2006). Creating New Markets through Service Innovation. Sloan Management Review, 47 (2), 56-63.
  • Calantone, J. R., Çavusgil, S. T. and Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning Orientation Firm Innovation Capability and Firm Performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31, 515-524.
  • Chapman, R. L., Soosay, C. and Kandampully, J. (2003). Innovation in Logistics Services and the New Business Model: A Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 33 (7), 630-650.
  • Claycomb, C., Droge, C. and Germain, R. (1999). The Effect of Just in time with Customers on Organizational Design and Performance. International Journal of Logistics Management, 10 (1), 37-58
  • Closs, D. J. and Xu, K. (2000). Logistics Information Technology Practice in Manufacturing and Merchandising Firms-an International Benchmarking Study Versus World Class Logistics Firms. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 30 (10), 869-886.
  • Collis, D. J. (1994). Organizational Innovation: A Meta Analysis of Effect of Determinants and Moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34 (3), 555-590.
  • Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizatioal Innovation: A Meta Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderatos. Academy of Management Journal, 34 (3), 555-590.
  • Damanpour, F. and Evan, W. M. (1984). Organizational Innovation and Performance: The Problem of Organizational Lag. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29 (3), 392-409.
  • Daugherty, P. J., Stanj, T. P. and Ellinger, A. E. (1998). Leveraging LogisticsDistribution Capabilities: The Effect of Logistics Service on Market Share. Journal of Business Logistics, 19 (2), 35-51.
  • Day, G. S. (1994). The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58 (4), 37-52.
  • Day, G. S. (1990). Market Driven Strategy. The Free Press, New York, NY.
  • Dehpande, R. and Webster, F. E. (1989). Organizatiponal Culture and Marketing: Defining the Reseach. Journal of Marketing, 53 (1), 3-15.
  • Deshpande, R. and Farley, J. U. (1998). Measuring Market Orientation: Generalization and Synthesis. Journal of Market-Focused Management, 2 (3), 213-232.
  • Deshpande, R., Farley, U. and Webster, F. E. (1993), Corporate Culture Customer Orientation and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: a Quadrad Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 57 (1), 23-37.
  • Dickson, P. R. (1992). Toward a General theory of Competitive Rationality. Journal of Marketing, 56 (1), 69-83.
  • Eren, M. Ş., Tokgöz, E., Gül, H. ve Saylan, O. (2013). Pazar Odaklılığın Nitel Performans üzerindeki etkisinde Öğrenme Odaklılık ve Yenilikçiliğin Düzenleyici Etkisi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 28 (2), 1- 39.
  • Ferdows, K. and De Meyer, A. (1990). Lasting Improvements in Manufacturing Performance. Journal of Operations Management, 9 (2), 168-184.
  • Flint, D.,J., and Mentzer, J., T. (2000). Logisticians as Marketers: Their Role when Customers’ Desired Value Changes. Journal of Business Logistics, 21 (2), 19-45.
  • Flint, D. J., Larsson, E., Gammelgaard, B. and Mentzer, J. T. (2005). Logistics Innovation: a Customer ValueOriented Social Process. Journal of Business Logistics, 26 (1), 113-147.
  • Fornell, C., Lacker D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, (1), 39-50.
  • Gatignon, H. and Xuereb, J. (1997). Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (1), 77-90.
  • Gotteland, D., Shock, J. and Sarin, S. (2020). Strategic Orientations, Marketing Proactivity and Firm Market Performance. Industrial Marketing Management. [Basımda]
  • Grant, R. M. (1991). The Resource-Based theory of Competitive Advantage Implications for Strategic Formation. California Management Review, 33 (3), 114-135.
  • Grant, R. M. (1996). Towards A Knowledge Based theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109- 122.
  • Grawe, S., Chen, H. and Daugherty, P. (2009). The Relationship between Strategic Orientation Service Innovation and Performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 39 (4), 282-300.
  • Gronroos, C. (2015). Service Management and Marketing: Managing the Service Profit Logic, 4th Edition, John Wiley & Sons.
  • Hair, J. F., Christian M. R., and Sarstedt M. (2011). PLS-SEM:Indeed A Silver Bullent. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practive, 19 (2),139-151.
  • Hair, J. F., Hult G. T., Ringle C. M., and Sarsted, M. (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks, California.
  • Hamşıoğlu, A. B. (2017). Girişimci Yönlülük, Stratejik Yönlülük ve Performans İlişkisi: İstanbul İli Tekstil İşletmelerinde Bir Uygulama. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9 (2), 376-403.
  • Han, J. K. and Srivastava, R. K. (1998). Market Orientation and Organizational Performance: Is Innovations A Missing Link?. Journal of Marketing, 62 (4), 30-45.
  • Hapman, R. L., Soosay, C. and Kandampully, J. (2003). Innovation in Logistic Services and the New Business Model: A Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Physical Distibution & Logistics Management, 33 (7), 630-650.
  • Harrison-Walker, J. (2001). The Measurement of a market Orientation and Its Impact on Besiness Performance. Journal of Quality Management, 6(2), 139-172.
  • He, Z. and Wong, P. (2004). Explorating vs. Exploitation: An Emprical test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis. Organization Science, 15 (4), 481-494.
  • Henseler, J., Ringle C., and Sasted M. (2016). Testing Measurement Invariance of Composites Using Partial Least Squares. International Marketing Review, 33 (3), 405-431.
  • Homburg, C., Workman, J. P. and Krohmer, H. (1999). Marketing’s Influence within the Firm. Journal of Marketing, 63 (2), 1-17.
  • Hooley, J. G., Greenley, G. E., and Cadogan, J. W. (2005). The Performance Impact of Marketing Resources. Journal of Business Research, 58 (1), 18-27.
  • Hult, G. T. M., Hurley, R. F. and Knight, G.,A. (2004). Innovativeness: Its Antecedents and Impact on Business Performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 33 (5), 429-438.
  • Hunt, S. D. and Morgan, R. M. (1996). The Resource Advantage theory of Competition: Dynamics path Dependencies and Evolutionary Dimensions. Journal of Marketing, 60 (4), 107-144.
  • Hurley, R. F. and Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation Market Orientation and Organizational Learning an Integration and Emprical Examination. Journal of Marketing, 62 (3), 42-54.
  • Jaworski, B. J. and Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market Orietation: Antecedebts and Consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57 (3), 53-70.
  • Kandampully, J. (2002). Innovation as the Core Competency of a Service Organization: The Role of Technology Knowledge and Networks. European Journal of Innovation Management, 5 (1), 18-26.
  • Keskin, H. (2006). Market Orientation Learning Orientation and Innovation Capabilities in SMEs. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9 (4), 396-417.
  • Keskin, H., Zehir, S. ve Ayar, H. (2016). Pazar Yönelimi ve Firma Performansı İlişkisi: Farklılaştırma Stratejisinin Aracı Rolü. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 17 (1), 111-127.
  • Khan, A. M. and Manopichetwattana, V. (1989). Innovation and Noninnovative Small Firms: Types and Characteristics. Management Science, 35 (5), 597-606.
  • Kindström, D., Kowalkowski, C. and Sandberg, E. (2013). Enabling Service Innovation: A Dynamic Capabilities Approach., Journal of Business Research, 66, 1063-1073.
  • Kohli, A. K. and Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market Orientation: The Construct Reseatch Propositions and Managerial Implications. Journal of Marketing, 54 (2), 1-18.
  • Ledered, P. J. and Rhee, S. (1995). Economics of Total Quality Management. Journal of Operations Management, 12 (34), 353-367.
  • Malhotra, K. N. (2007). Marketing Research An Applied Orientation. Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Menguc, B. and Auh, S. (2005). A Test of Strategic Orientation formation Versus Strategic Orientation Implementations: The Influence of TMT Functional Diversity and Inter-Functional Coordination. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 13 (2), 4-19.
  • Nada, N. and Ali, Z. (2015). Service Value Creation Capability Model to Assess the Service Innovation Capability in SMEs. 7th Indıstrial Product Service Systems Conference PSS Industry transformation for Sustainability and Business Procedia CIRP, 30, 390-395.
  • Narver, J. C. and Slater, S. F. (1990). The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54 (4), 20-35.
  • Olson, E. M., Slater, S. F. and Hult, G. T. M. (2005). The Performance Implications of fit among Business Strategy Marketing Organization Structure and Strategic Behavior. Journal of Marketing, 69 (3), 49-65.
  • Papatya, G., Papatya N. ve Hamşıoğlu, A.B. (2014). Yenilik Üretme Yeteneğinin İşletme Performansına Etkisi ve Bir Uygulama. 8-10 Mayıs 2014 Antalya 13. Ulusal İşletmecilik kongresi Bildiri Kitabı, C. 2, Marmara Ünv. Yayınevi, 1067-1074.
  • Papatya, N. (2002). Gelecek Rekabetinin Yeni Konsepti: Kaynak Tabanlılık Görüşü. İnfomag İletişim ve Bilişim Dergisi, 22 (Ağustos), 59-61.
  • Papatya, N. (2003). Kaynak Tabanlı Görüş. Ankara: Nobel Ya.
  • Papatya, N. (2006a). İşletmelerde Sıradışı Rekabet için Yenilikçi Pazarlama Yaklaşımı. Pazarlama Dünyası Dergisi, 20, 4 (Temmuz-Ağustos), 42-46.
  • Papatya, N. (2006b). İşletmelerde Rekabetçi Zekânın Değişen Yüzü: Girişimci Pazarlama. Pİ-Pazarlama iletişim Kültür Dergisi-Medicat, 5, 16 (Nisan-Mayıs-Haziran 2006/2), 45-59.
  • Papatya, N. ve Papatya, G. (2007). İşletmelerde Rekabetçi Zekâ Nasıl Yaratılabilir?: Türkiye Tekstil Sektörüne İlişkin Değerlendirme ve Bir Model Önerisi. 25-27 Mayıs 2007 Sakarya Ünv. 15. Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongre Bildiri Kitabı, 368-379.
  • Persson, G. (1991). Achieving Competitiveness through Logistics. International Journal of Logistics Management, 2 (1), 1-11.
  • Peters, T. J. (1984). Strategy follows Structure: Developing Distinctive Skills. California Management Review, 26 (3), 111-125.
  • Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Avdantage, The Free Press, New York, NY.
  • Porter, M. E. (1998). Competitive Advantage, Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press, London
  • Rajapathirana, R. P. and Hui, Y. (2018). Relationship between Innovation Capability, Innovation type and Firm Performance., Journal of Innovation Knowledge, 3, 44-55.
  • Richey, R. G., Daugherty, P. J., Genchev, S. E. and Autry, C.,W. (2004). Reverse Logistics: The Impact of Timing and Resources. Journal of Business Logistics, 25 (2), 229-270.
  • Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations. Third Edition, The Free Press, New York.
  • Sinkovics, R. R. and Roath, A. S. (2004). Strategic Orientatiion Capabilities and Performance in Manufacturer3PL Relatiponship. Journal of Business Logistics, 25 (2), 43-64.
  • Sinkula, J. M. (1994). Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning. Journal of Marketing, 58 (1), 35-45.
  • Ta-Wei, T., Wang M., Hung, C. and Ya-Yun, T. (2015). Developing Service Innovation Capability in the Hotel Industry. Service Business, 9, 97-113.
  • Teece, D. J. (1998). Capturing Value from Knowledge Assests: The New Economy Markets for Know-how and Intangible Assets. California Management Review, 40 (3), 55-79.
  • Theodosiou, M., Kehagias J. and Katsikea, E. (2012). Strategic Orientation, Marketing Capabilities and Firm Performance: An Emprical Investigation in the Context of frontline Managers in Service Organizations. Industrial Marketing Management, 41, 1058-1070.
  • Turner, K. L. and Makhija, M. K., (2006). The role of Organizational Control in Managing Knowledge. The Academy of Management Review, 31 (1), 197-217.
  • Venkatraman, N. and Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11 (4), 801-814.
  • Wong K. K. K. (2013). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Techniques Using SmartPLS. Technical Note 1, Marketing Bulletin, 24, 1-32.
  • Woodruff, R. B. (1997). Customer Value: The Next Source for Competitive Advantage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25 (2), 139-153.
  • Yasin, M. M., Bayes, P. E., and Czurchry, A. J. (2005). The Changing role of Accounting in Supporting the Quality and Customer Goals of Organizations: An Open System Perspective. International Journal of Management, 22 (3), 323-331.
  • Zander, U. and Kogut, B. (1995). Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Emprical Test. Organization Science, 6 (1), 76-92.
  • Zhou, K. Z. and Li, C. B. (2010). How Strategic Orientations Influence the Building of Dynamic Capability in Emerging Economies. Journal of Business Research, 63, 224-231.
İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1309-0712
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2009
  • Yayıncı: Melih Topaloğlu
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Sürdürülebilir ve Sosyal Sorumlu Bankacılığa Katkı Sağlayan İnovasyon Uygulamalarının 4P İnovasyon Modeli Çerçevesinde Analizi

Arzum Erken ÇELİK

Online Purchase Behavior of Somali Consumers

Abdikarim FARAH

The Effects of Using Internet-Based Export Marketing Information Sources on Export Market Growth Capability

Murat ARSLANDERE, Serkan ADA, İlhami TUNCER

Algılanan Örgütsel Desteğin Duygusal Emek Davranışları Üzerine Etkisi: Afyonkarahisar’daki Beş Yıldızlı Otel İşletmeleri Örneği

Mustafa GÜLAYDIN, Gonca AYTAŞ

Banka Tercihini Belirleyen Kriterlerin ENTROPİ Yöntemi İle Ağırlıklandırılması: Giresun İli Örneği

Alper KARAVARDAR, Arif ÇİLEK

Dağıtım Adaleti ile İşten Ayrılma Niyeti Arasındaki İlişkide Duyarsızlaşmanın Aracılık Rolü: Bir Telekomünikasyon Firmasında Çalışan Mühendisler Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Cansu CEVİZ DOĞRAR, Barış BOSTANCI, Evrim MAYATÜRK AKYOL

Sanal Kaytarma Davranışının İş Performansına Etkisinde İşe Bağlılığın Aracı Rolüne Yönelik Bilişim Sektöründe Bir Araştırma

Ahmet Tuncay ERDEM

Örgüt Kültürünün Personel Güçlendirme ve İşten Ayrılma Niyeti Üzerine Etkisi

RAHMAN TEMİZKAN, Mustafa YILDIRIM

Dindarlık, Tutum ve Davranışsal Niyetler Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi: Almanya’daki Müslüman Tüketicilerin Helal Gıda Etiketli Ürünlere Yönelik Algılarının VAB Modeli İle İncelenmesi

Bülent DEMİRAĞ, Sinan ÇAVUŞOĞLU, Kazım DAĞ

Psikolojik Sahiplenme Ölçeğinin Türkçe Uyarlaması, Güvenilirlik ve Geçerlilik Çalışmaları

Mustafa ASLAN, Hülya ATEŞOĞLU