Dışa Dönük Kişilik Özelliğinin Grup Uyumu Üzerine Etkisi: Hakkâri’deki Özel Güvenlik Personeli Üzerinde Bir Araştırma

Amaç – Bu çalışma, örgüt çalışanlarında bulunan dışadönük kişilik özelliğinin grup uyumuna etkisinin olup olmadığının belirlenmesi amacıyla yapılmıştır. Yöntem – Bu çalışma, özel güvenlik personelinin örgütsel kimlik algılarının örgütsel bağlılık düzeylerine olan etkisinin test edilmesi amacıyla ilişkisel tarama modeliyle yapılmıştır. Çalışmada alan olarak belirlenen Hakkâri’de görevli 351 Özel Güvenlik personeli üzerinde anket tekniği uygulanmıştır. Dışadönük kişilik özelliğinin belirlenmesi amacıyla John ve Srivastava’nın (1999) kişilik ölçeği, grup uyumunun ortaya çıkarılması amacıyla da Carron vd.’nin (1985) grup uyumu ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde SPSS 25 nicel veri analiz programı kullanılmıştır. Bulgular – Analizler sonucunda özel güvenlik personelinin iş tecrübesi arttıkça dışa dönük kişilik özelliği düzeyinin azaldığı saptanmıştır. Lise ve üniversite mezunu özel güvenlik personelinin grup sosyal çekicilik algılarının fazla olduğu anlaşılmaktadır. Özel güvenlik personelinin grup uyumunun her iki boyutu ile iş tecrübesi değişkeni arasında anlamlı bir farklılık saptanmıştır. Dışa dönük kişilik özelliğinin grup uyumu üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisi olduğu araştırmanın bir diğer sonucudur. Tartışma – Geçmişe dönük uzun bir süreci olan grup çalışmalarında önemli bir yeri olan grup uyumu kavramının tam olarak tanımının ortaya konamamış olması onun sadece belirli kavramlarla ilişkilendirilmesine neden olmuştur. Bu nedenle grup içerisinde yer alan bireyi ve onun kişilik yapısını ön plana çıkaran bu çalışma grup çalışmalarında bireysel özelliklere daha fazla önem verilmesi gerektiğine dair bakış açısı kazandırabilecektir.

Effect of Extroversionist Personality Trait on Group Cohesion: A Study on Private Security Staff in Hakkâri

Purpose – This study was conducted with the aim of establishing whether there is an effect of extroversionist personality trait on group cohesion. Design/methodology/approach – This study was conducted with a correlational screening model to test the effect of organizational identity perceptions of private security personnel on organizational commitment. Survey technique was applied on 351 Private Security personnel employed in Hakkâri, which was determined as the field in the study. John and Srivastava's (1999) personality questionnaire was used in order to establish the extroverted personality trait, and the group cohesion questionnaire of Carron et al. (1985) was used in order to establish the group cohesion. SPSS 25 quantitative data analysis program was used to analyze the data. Results – According to the results which were obtained at the end of the study it was established that there is a positive relation between extroverted personality trait and the group coherence. It is understood that the group social attraction perceptions of high school and university graduates are high. A significant difference was found between both dimensions of group compliance of private security personnel and the work experience variable. Another result of the study is that extroverted personality trait has a significant effect on group cohesion. Discussion – Not revealing of the definition of the concept of group cohesion which has an important place in group studies which have a long retroactive process caused it to be connected only with certain concepts. So, this study which brings the individual in the group and his/her personality to the forefront will be able to bring a point of view of putting emphasis on personality traits in group studies.

___

  • Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.J. and Sanford, R. N. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality, New York,Harper & Brothers.
  • Ahronson, A. and Cameron, J.E. (2007). The Nature and Consequences of Group Cohesion in a Military Sample. Military Psychology, 19 (1), 9-25.
  • Allport G.W. and Odbert, H.S. (1936). Trait Names: A Psycho-Lexical Study, USA, Psychological Review Company.
  • Andrade, N.C.L., Pedrosa, F.G., Lobo, I.L.B. and Bicalho, C.C.F. (2017). The Effects of Work Routine and Professional Satisfaction on Burnout among High-School Teachers, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 6 (4), 50-55.
  • Balch, R.W. (1972). The Police Personality: Fact or Fiction?, The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 63 (1), 106-119.
  • Barrick, M.R., Steward, G.L., Neubert, N.J., and Mount, M.K. (1998). Relating Member Ability and Personality to Work-Team Processes and Team Effectiveness, Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 377-391.
  • Beauchaine, T. P., Gatzke-Kop, L. M., and Hinshaw, S. P. (2008). Genetic and environmental influences on Behavior, Beauchaine, T. P. and Hinshaw, S. P., (Eds.), Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, New Jersey, Wiley, 58-90.
  • Beal, D.J., Cohen, R.R. and McLendon, C.L. (2003). Cohesion and Performance in Groups: A Meta-analytic Clarification of Construct Relations, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (6), 989-1004.
  • Bettenhausen, K.L. (1991). Five Yeras of Groups Research: What We Have Learned and What Needs to Be Addressed, Journal of Management, 17 (2), 345-381.
  • Billings, P. R., Backwith, J. and Alper, J. S. (1992). The Genetic Analysis of Human Behavior: A New Era? Social Science & Medicine, 35(3), 227-238.
  • Brett, J.M. (1980). The Effect of Job Transfer on Employees and Their Families,Cooper, C.L, and Payne, O., (Eds.), Current Concerns in Occupational Stress, New York, John Wiley and Sons, 99-136.
  • Broudy, M.S. (2019). WWII And Its Impact On Psychology, https://www.online-psychologydegrees.org/study/wwii-psychology-impact/, (Erişim Tarihi:31.05.2020)
  • Clark, J.P. (1965). Isolation of the Police: A Comparison of the British and American Situations, The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 56 (3), 307-319.
  • Carron, A. V. (1982). Cohesiveness in sport groups: Interpretations and considerations, Journal of Sport Psychology, 4(2), 123–138
  • Carron, A.V., Widmeyer, W.N. and Brawley, L.R. (1985). The Development of an Instrument to Assess Cohesion in Sport Teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire, Journal of Sport Psychology, 7 (3), 244-266.
  • Carron, A.V. and Spink, K.S. (1995). The Group Size-Cohesion Relationship in Minimal Groups, Small Group Research, 26 (1), 86-105.
  • Carron, A.V. and Brawley, L.R. (2000). Cohesion: Conceptual and Measurement Issues, Small Group Research, 31 (1), 89-106.
  • Carron, A.V., Bray, S.R. and Eys, M.A.(2002). Team Cohesion and Team Success in Sport, Journal of Sports Sciences, 20 (2), 119-126.
  • Carron, A. V., Colman, M. M., Wheeler, J. and Stevens, D. (2002). Cohesion and Performance in Sport: A meta analysis, Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 24(2), 168-188.
  • Carron, A. V., Burke, S.M. and Prapavessis, H. (2004). Self-Presentation and Group Influence, Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 16:1, 41-58.
  • Carless, S.A. and De Paola, C. (2000). The Measurement of Cohesion in Work Units, Small Group Research, 31 (1), 71-88.
  • Cattell, R. B. (1943). The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, 476-506.
  • Cattell, R.B. (1957). Personality and Motivation: Structure and Measurement, USA, World Book Company.
  • Cattell, H.E.P. and Schuerger, J.M. (2003). Essentials of 16PF Assessment, Canada, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  • Charney, E. (2016). Genes, behavior, and behavior genetics, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 8(1-2).
  • Conklin, E.S. (1927). The Determination of Normal Extravert-Introvert Interest Differences, The Pedagogical Seminary and Journal of Genetic Psychology, 34(1), 28-37.
  • Dion, K.L. (2000). Group Cohesion: From “Field of Forces” to Multidimensional Construct, Group Dynamics, 4(1), 7-26.
  • Dobbins, G.H., and Zaccaro, S.J. (1986). The Effects of Group Cohesion and Leader Behavior in Subordinate Satisfaction, Group and Organization Studies, 11 (3), 203-29.
  • Dumont, F. (2010). A History of Personality Psychology, New York, Cambridge University Press.
  • Evans, C.R. and Dion K.L. (2012). Group Coesion and Performance: A Meta-Analysis, Small Group Research, 43 (6), 690-701.
  • Festinger, L., Schachter, S. and Back, K. (1950a). Social Pressures in Informal Groups, California, Stanford University Press.
  • Festinger, L. (1950b). Informal Social Communication, Psychological Review, 57 (5), 271-282.
  • Fine, G.A. and Holyfield, L. (1996). Secrecy, Trust, and Dangerous Leisure: Generating Group Cohesion in Voluntary Organizations, Social Psychology Quarterly, 59 (1), 22-28.
  • Fiorillo, S.(2019). Great Depression: Causes, Effects and Timeline, https://www.thestreet.com/politics/greatdepression-causes-14663720 (Erişim Tarihi: 31.05.2020)
  • Forsyth, D.R. (1983). An Introduction to Group Dynamics, California, Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
  • Goldberg, L.R. (1990). An Alternative Description of Personality: The Big Five Factor Structure, Journal Of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216-1229.
  • Goyal, N. (2010). Industrial Psychology, India,Krishna Prakashan Media (P) Ltd.
  • Greene, C.N. (1989). Cohesion and Productivity in Work Groups. Small Group Research, 20 (1), 70-86.
  • Griffith, J. (1988). Measurement of Group Cohesion in U. S. Army Units, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 9 (2), 149-171.
  • Gross, N. and Martin W.E. (1952). On Group Cohesiveness, American Journal of Sociology, 57 (6), 546-564.
  • Gully, S.M., Devine, D.J. and Whitney, D.J. (2012). A Meta-Analysis of Cohesion and Performance: Effects of Level of Analysis and Task Interdependence, Small Group Research, 43 (6), 702-725.
  • Gürbüz, S. ve Şahin, F. (2015). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri, Ankara, Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Hogg, M.A. and Hardie, E.A. (1991). Social Attraction, Personal Attraction, and Self-Categorization: A Field Study, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17 (2), 175-180.
  • Hogg, M.A. and Hardie, E.A. (1992). Prototypicality, Conformity and Depersonalized Attraction: A Selfcategorization Analysis of Group Cohesiveness, British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 41-56.
  • Hogg, M.A. (1993). Group Cohesivenes: A Critical Review and Some New Directions, European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 85-111.
  • Horne, C (201). The Enforcements of Norms: Group Cohesion and Meta-Norms, Social Psychology Quarterly, 64 (3), 253-266.
  • Jackson, S.E., Stone, V.K. and Alvarez, E.B.(1993). Socialization Amidst Diversity: The Impact of Demographics on Work Team Oldtimers and Newcomers, Research in Organisational Behavior, 15, 45- 109.
  • John, O.P. and Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five Trait Taxonomy: History, Measurement and Perspectives, Lawrence, A. P., and Oliver, P. J., (Eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, New York, The Guilford Press ,102-138.
  • Jung, C. G. (1926). The Psychological Types, (Çeviren: H.Godwin Baynes), Great Britain, Edinburg Press.
  • Kiesler, C.A. (1963). Attraction to the group and conformity to group norms, Journal of Peronality, 31, 559-569.
  • Lewin, K. (1935). A Dynamic Theory of Personality, New York, McGraw-Hill Book Company.
  • Lewin, K. (1939). Field Theory and Experiment in Social Psychology: Concepts and Methods, American Journal of Sociology, 44(6), 868-896.
  • Lott, K.L. (1961). Group Cohesiveness: A Learning Phenomenon, The Journal of Social Psychology, 55, 275-286.
  • Lott, A.J. and Lott, B.E. (1965). Group Cohesiveness as Interpersonal Attraction: A Review of Relationships With Antecedent and Consequent Variables, Psychological Bulletin, 64 (4), 259-309
  • Marrow, A.J. (1969). The Practical Theorist: The Life and Work of Kurt Lewin, USA, Basic Books, Inc., Publishers.
  • Mayo, E. (1945). The Social Poblems of An Industrial Civilization, Boston, Harvard University Press.
  • McCrae, R.R. and Costa, P.T., (2004). A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory, Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 587-596.
  • McDougall, W. (1933). The Energies of Men, Great Britain, Methuen & Co. Ltd.
  • Moreno, J.L. and Jennings H.H. (1938). Statistics of Social Configurations, Sociometry, 1(3/4), 342-374.
  • Mudrack, P.E. (1989). Defining Group Cohesiveness: A Legacy of Confusion? Small Group Behavior, 20(1), 37- 49.
  • Mullen, B. and Copper, C. (1994). The Relation Between Group Cohesiveness and Performance, An Integration Psychological Bulletin, 115 (2), 210-227.
  • Niederhoffer, A. (1967). Behind the Shield. Garden City.Anchor Books.
  • Organ, D.W. and Bateman, T. (1986). Organizational Behavior, Texas,Business Publications , Inc.
  • Plomin, R., Owen, M. J., and McGuffin, P. (1994). The Genetic Basis of Complex Human Behaviors, Science, 264(5166),1733-1739.
  • Roseborough, M.A. (1953). Experimental Studies of Small Groups, Psychological Bulletin, 50(4), 275-303.
  • Rosenman, R.H. (1978). The Role of the Type A Behavior Pattern in Ischaemic Heart Disease: Modification of Its Effects By Beta-blocking Agents, British Journal of Clinical Practice, 32 (1), 58-65.
  • Schneider, D. and Harknett, K. (2019). Consequences of Routine Work-Schedule Instability for Worker Health and Well-Being, American Sociological Review, 84(1), 82–114
  • Severt, J.B. and Estrada, A.X. (2015). On the Function of Group Cohesion, Team Cohesion: Advances in Psychological Theory, Methods and Practice, 17, 3-24.
  • Shephard, B. (2015). Psychology and the Great War, 1914-1918, The Psychologist,28(11), 944-946.
  • Singh, A.K. (2019). Social Psychology, Delhi, Asoke K. Ghosh, PHI Learning Private Limited.
  • Skolnick, J.H (2010). A Sketch of the Policeman’s Working Personality, K. R, Stephen, and D. W., Michael (Eds.), Race, Ethnicity, and Policing: New and Essential Readings, USA. New York Uniersity Press , 15-31.
  • Stokes, J.P. (1983). Components of Group Cohesion: Intermember Attraction, Instrumental Value, and Risk Taking, Small Group Behavior, 14 (2), 163-173.
  • Şimşek, S. (2015). Polislik Kurumunun İnşası ve Polislerin Meslek Örgütlenmesi: Türkiye, İngiltere Ve Fransa Örnekleri, (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi), Ankara, Türkiye ve Ortadoğu Amme İdaresi Enstitüsü (TODAİE).
  • Turner, M., Pratkanis, A.R., Probasco, P. and Leve, C. (1992). Threat, Cohesion, and Group Effectiveness: Testing a Social, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63 (5), 781-796.
  • Tziner, A. (1982). Differenial Effects of Group Cohesiveness Types: A Clarifying Overview, Social Behavior and Personality, 10 (2), 227-240.
  • Ulusal Eğitim İstatistikleri Veri Tabanı, https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=130&locale=tr, (Erişim tarihi: 23.08.2020)
  • Van Bergen, A. and Koekebakker, J. (1959). “Group Cohesiveness” in Laboratory Experiments, Acta Psychologica, 16, 81-98.
  • Van Vianen, A.E.M. and De Dreu, C.K.W. (2001) Personality in teams: Its relationship to social cohesion, task cohesion, and team performance, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(2), 97-120.
  • Wagner, G.W, Pfeffer, J. and O'Reilly, C.A. (1984). “Organizational Demography and Turnover in TopManagement Group”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 29 (1), 74-92.
  • Wright, T. L. and Duncan, D. (1986). Attraction To Group, Group Cohesiveness, and Individual Outcome. Small Group Behavior, 17(4), 487-492.
  • Zander, A. (1979). Psychology of the Group Processes, Annual Review of Psychology, 30, 417-451.
İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1309-0712
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2009
  • Yayıncı: Melih Topaloğlu