Destinasyon Pazarlamasında Yere Bağlılık: Tekrar Ziyaret Niyeti Üzerindeki Etkileri

Amaç – Bu çalışmanın amacı, destinasyon (yer) bağlılığı ile tekrar ziyaret niyeti arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektir. Bu kapsamda, destinasyon bağlılığını oluşturan üç boyutun (yer bağımlılığı, yer kimliği ve duygusal bağlanma) tekrar ziyaret niyeti üzerindeki etkileri test edilmiştir. Yöntem – Çalışma kapsamında, alan araştırması yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma evreni, İstanbul’u ziyaret eden kişilerden oluşmaktadır. Kolayda örnekleme yöntemi kullanılarak, Temmuz ve Ağustos 2019 aylarında İstanbul’u ziyaret eden yerli ve yabancı turistlerden toplam 412 kullanılabilir anket formu toplanmıştır. Veriler çoklu normallik ön koşulunu sağlamadığından dolayı, verilerin analizi için kısmi en küçük kareler yapısal eşitlik modellemesi (PLS-SEM) yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular – Araştırma bulguları, destinasyona bağlılığın, tekrar ziyaret niyetini anlamlı olarak etkilediğini göstermektedir. Destinasyon bağlılığını oluşturan her üç boyutun da (yer bağımlılığı, yer kimliği ve duygusal bağlanma) tekrar ziyaret niyeti üzerinde olumlu etkileri tespit edilmiştir. Tartışma – Araştırma sonuçları, yer bağlılığı teorisini turizm destinasyonları bağlamında destekler niteliktedir. Bu araştırmanın sonuçları, bir destinasyona bağlılık ne kadar fazlaysa, turistin o destinasyonu tekrar ziyaret etme olasılığının o kadar yüksek olduğunu göstermektedir.

Place Attachment in Destination Marketing: Effects on Revisit Intention

Purpose – This study aims to investigate the relationship between destination (place) attachment and revisit intention. Within this context, the study examines the effects of the dimensions of destination attachment (i.e., place dependence, place identity, and affective attachment) on revisit intention. Design/methodology/approach – A survey research design was employed in this study. The target population comprised visitors to Istanbul. Using a convenience sampling method, a total of 412 useable questionnaires were collected from both domestic and international tourists visiting Istanbul in the months of July and August 2019. To analyze the data, partial least squares structural equation modeling was employed since the data violate the multivariate normality assumption. Findings – The study indicates that tourists’ attachment to the destination positively and significantly influences revisit intention. All three dimensions of destination attachment (i.e., place dependence, place identity, and affective attachment) were found to have positive effects on revisit intention. Discussion – The study supports the place attachment theory in the context of tourism destinations. Results show that the greater the attachment to a destination, the more likely a tourist is to revisit that destination.

___

  • Ağbaba, D. (2020). Yer bağlılığının sosyo-mekânsal farklar bakımından incelenmesi: Niğde örneği. IBAD Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Milli Mücadele'nin 100. Yılı Özel Sayısı, 133-147.
  • Altanlar, A. (2021). Turizm stratejilerinin yere bağlılık üzerindeki etkisi: Amasya örneği. Kent Akademisi, 14(1), 199-213.
  • Altman, I., & Low, S. M. (1992). Place attachment. Boston, MA: Springer.
  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
  • Aydın, M., ve Ünüvar, Ş. (2021). Yaşam tarzının destinasyon aidiyetine etkisi: Olympos örneği. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 47, 189-207.
  • Baloglu, S. (2002). Dimensions of customer loyalty: Separating friends from well wishers. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 43(1), 47-59.
  • Baloglu, S., & Usakli, A. (2017). Summarizing data. Sirakaya, E., Uysal, M., Hammit, W. E. & Vaske, J. J. (Eds.), Research Methods for Leisure, Recreation and Tourism (2nd edition). UK: CABI Publishing.
  • Bezirgan, M. (2014). Destinasyon imajı, algılanan değer, aidiyet ve davranışsal niyetler arasındaki ilişkilerin belirlenmesi: Bir araştırma. Doktora tezi. Balıkesir: Balıkesir Üniversitesi.
  • Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss, Volume 1: Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss, Vol. 2: Separation – Anxiety and anger. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss, Vol. 3: Loss – Sadness and depression. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Brocato, E. D. (2006). Place attachment: An investigation of environments and outcomes in service context. Doctoral dissertation. USA: The University of Texas at Arlington.
  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.
  • Chen, N. C., Dwyer, L., & Firth, T. (2014). Effect of dimensions of place attachment on residents’ word-ofmouth behavior. Tourism Geographies, 16(5), 826–843.
  • Chew, E. Y. T., & Jahari, S. A. (2014). Destination image as a mediator between perceived risks and revisit intention: A case of post-disaster Japan. Tourism Management, 40, 382-393.
  • Devine‐Wright, P. (2009). Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place‐protective action. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 19(6), 426-441.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  • Göregenli, M., Karakuş, P., Özgen Köstem, E. Y. ve Umuroğlu, İ. (2014). Mahalleye bağlılık düzeyinin kent kimliği ile ilişkisi içinde incelenmesi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 29(73), 73-85.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2013). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  • Hair, J. F., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101–110.
  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLSSEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24.
  • Hammitt, W. E., Kyle, G. T., & Oh, C.-O. (2009). Comparison of place bonding models in recreation resource management. Journal of Leisure Research, 41(1), 57–72.
  • Han, J. H., Kim, J. S., Lee, C. K., & Kim, N. (2019). Role of place attachment dimensions in tourists’ decisionmaking process in Cittaslow. Journal of Destination Marketing and Management, 11, 108–119.
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. R. R. Sinkovics, & P. N. Ghauri (Eds.), New challenges to international marketing (Vol. 20, pp. 277–319). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variancebased structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.
  • Huang, S., & Hsu, C. H. (2009). Effects of travel motivation, past experience, perceived constraint, and attitude on revisit intention. Journal of Travel Research, 48(1), 29-44.
  • Isa, S. M., Ariyanto, H. H., & Kiumarsi, S. (2019). The effect of place attachment on visitors’ revisit intentions: evidence from Batam. Tourism Geographies, 22(1), 51-82
  • Japutra, A. (2020). The relations among attachment styles, destination attachment and destination satisfaction. Current Issues in Tourism, 23(3), 270-275.
  • Karakaş, S. (2017). Prof. Dr. Sirel Karakaş Psikoloji Sözlüğü: Bilgisayar Programı ve Veritabanı - www.psikolojisozlugu.com. Erişim Tarihi: 01.12.2021
  • Kozak, M., & Baloglu, S. (2011), Managing and marketing tourist destinations: Strategies to gain a competitive edge. United Kingdom: Routledge.
  • Kozak, M., & Rimmington, M. (2000). Tourist satisfaction with Mallorca, Spain, as an off-season holiday destination. Journal of Travel Research, 38(3), 260-269.
  • Kucukergin, K. G., Kucukergin, F. N., & Dedeoglu, B. B. (2020). An overview of the destination physical servicescape with SOR paradigm: the importance of prestige sensitivity. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 25(5), 473-488.
  • Kyle, G. T., Mowen, A. J., & Tarrant, M. (2004). Linking place preferences with place meaning: An examination of the relationship between place motivation and place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 439–454.
  • Lam, T., & Hsu, C. H. (2006). Predicting behavioral intention of choosing a travel destination. Tourism Management, 27(4), 589-599.
  • Lee, S. J., Busser, J., & Yang, J. (2015). Exploring the dimensional relationships among image formation agents, destination image, and place attachment from the perspectives of pop star fans. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 32(6), 730–746.
  • Lee, J., Kyle, G., & Scott, D. (2012). The Mediating Effect of Place Attachment on the Relationship between Festival Satisfaction and Loyalty to the Festival Hosting Destination. Journal of Travel Research, 51(6), 754–767.
  • Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519– 530.
  • Moore, R. L., & Graefe, A. R. (1994). Attachments to recreation settings: The case of rail-trail users. Leisure Sciences, 16(1), 17–31.
  • Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 63(4), 33–44.
  • Oliver, R. L. (2014). Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the consumer: A behavioral perspective on the consumer. NY, USA: Routledge.
  • Prayag, G., & Ryan, C. (2012). Antecedents of tourists’ loyalty to Mauritius: The role and influence of destination image, place attachment, personal involvement, and satisfaction. Journal of Travel Research, 51(3), 342-356.
  • Proshansky, H. M. (1978). The city and self-identity. Environment and Behavior, 10(2), 147–169.
  • Ryu, K., & Han, H. (2011). New or repeat customers: How does physical environment influence their restaurant experience? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(3), 599–611.
  • Selçuk, F. ve Türkseven Doğrusoy, İ. (2021). Kamusal açık mekânlarda “yer bağlılığı”: İzmir-Bostanlı kıyı düzenlemesi örneği. Tasarım Kuram, 17(33), 1-17.
  • Smith, J. W., Siderelis, C., & Moore, R. L. (2010). The effects of place attachment, hypothetical site modifications and use levels on recreation behavior. Journal of Leisure Research, 42(4), 621–640.
  • Stylos, N., Bellou, V., Andronikidis, A., & Vassiliadis, C. A. (2017). Linking the dots among destination images, place attachment, and revisit intentions: A study among British and Russian tourists. Tourism Management, 60, 15–29.
  • Tasci, A. D., Uslu, A., Stylidis, D., & Woosnam, K. M. (2022). Place-oriented or people-oriented concepts for destination loyalty: Destination image and place attachment versus perceived distances and emotional solidarity. Journal of Travel Research, 61(2), 430-453.
  • Tosun, C., Dedeoglu, B. B., & Fyall, A. (2015). Destination service quality, affective image and revisit intention: The moderating role of past experience. Journal of Destination Marketing and Management, 4(4), 222–234.
  • Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Türkeri, İ. (2020). Destinasyon deneyimi ve sadakati arasındaki ilişkide destinasyon aidiyetinin aracı rolü. Seyahat ve Otel İşletmeciliği Dergisi, 17(2), 270-282.
  • Um, S., Chon, K., & Ro, Y. (2006). Antecedents of revisit intention. Annals of Tourism Research, 33(4), 1141-1158.
  • Usakli, A., & Baloglu, S. (2011). Brand personality of tourist destinations: An application of self-congruity theory. Tourism Management, 32(1), 114–127.
  • Usakli, A., & Kucukergin, K. G. (2018). Using partial least squares structural equation modeling in hospitality and tourism: Do researchers follow practical guidelines? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(11), 3462–3512.
  • Usakli, A., Kucukergin, K. G., Shi, D., & Okumus, F. (2022). Does self-congruity or functional congruity better predict destination attachment? A higher-order structural model. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 23, 100686.
  • Vardal, E. ve Durak Batıgün, A. (2017). Bağlanma stilleri ve yeme tutumu arasındaki ilişkide geştalt temas biçimlerinin aracı rolü. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 20(39), 14-23.
  • Veasna, S., Wu, W. Y., & Huang, C. H. (2013). The impact of destination source credibility on destination satisfaction: The mediating effects of destination attachment and destination image. Tourism Management, 36, 511–526.
  • Williams, D. R., Patterson, M. E., Roggenbuck, J. W., & Watson, A. E. (1992). Beyond the commodity metaphor: Examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place. Leisure Sciences, 14(1), 29–46.
  • Yıldızhan, E. (2017). Bağlanma teorisi ve bağlanma bozukluklarına genel bir bakış. Anadolu Kliniği, 22(1), 66- 72.
  • Yılmazdoğan, O. C. (2017). Destinasyon aidiyeti ve öncüllerinin destinasyon sadakati üzerindeki etkisi. Doktora tezi. Eskişehir: Eskişehir: Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi.
  • Yuksel, A., Yuksel, F., & Bilim, Y. (2010). Destination attachment: Effects on customer satisfaction and cognitive, affective and conative loyalty. Tourism Management, 31 (2), 274–284.
  • Zabkar, V., Brencic, M. M., & Dmitrovic, T. (2010). Modelling perceived quality, visitor satisfaction and behavioural intentions at the destination level. Tourism Management, 31(4), 537–546.
  • Zhang, H., Wu, Y., & Buhalis, D. (2018). A model of perceived image, memorable tourism experiences and revisit intention. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 8, 326-336.