Pet Holding Örnek Olay İncelemesi: Türkiye’de Bir Petrol Arama ve Madencilik Aile Şirketinin Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Gündemi

Bu örnek olay analizi petrol arama, madencilik, turizm ve inşaat sektöründe faaliyet gösteren bir aile holdingi olan Pet Holding'in kimlik inşa sürecini ve kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk faaliyetlerini incelemektedir. Çalışmanın amacı, yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler ve ikincil verilerin niteliksel incelemesi aracılığıyla, şirketlerin kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk faaliyetlerinin kapsam ve içeriğini belirlemek ve kurumsal sosyal sorumluluğun kurum kimliği inşasındaki rolünü anlayabilmektir. İncelenen örnek olay kapsamında çalışma sonuçları kurumsal sosyal sorumluluğun kurumsal kimlik inşasında önemli bir rolü olduğunu ve kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk faaliyetlerinin seçiminde şirket kurucusunun geçmişinden ve değerlerinden etkilendiğini göstermiştir. Buna ilaveten kurucunun kişiliğinin ve önceliklerinin özellikle aile holdingleri için kurumsal kimlik inşasında kritik bir rolü olduğunu ortaya koymuştur

The CSR Agenda of a Family Holding in Oil Extraction and Mining: An analysis of Turkey’s Pet Holding

This case study focuses on the identity construction process and corporate social responsibility (CSR) efforts of Pet Holding, a Turkish family holding company working in petroleum and gas exploration and extraction as well as in mining, tourism and construction. This study aims to understand how companies determine context and content of their CSR initiatives, the role of CSR in organizational identity construction through qualitative semistructured interviews with the firm’s managers and a quantitative analysis of secondary data. The findings revealed that CSR contributes deeply to organizational identity construction and tends to be influenced by the founder’s personal history and values. The founder’s personality and priorities were found to be critical for any organization’s identity construction, but especially important for family holdings

___

  • Berkman, Ü., and Özen, Ş., (2007). “Turkish Business System and Managerial Culture: State Dependency and Paternalism in Transition”, Davel, E., Dupuis, J.P., & Chanlat, J.F. (Eds.), Gestion en contexte interculturel: approches, problématiques, pratiques et plongées. (Chapter VI.4) Québec, Presse de l’Université Laval et TÉLUQ/ UQAM.
  • Chua, J.H., Chrisman, J.J., and Bergiel, E.B., (2009). “An agency theoretic analysis of the professionalizated family firm”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, (2), p.355-372
  • Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, California: Sage Publications.
  • Deephouse, D.L., (1996). “Does isomorphism legitimate?”, Academy of Management Journal, 39, (4), p.1024-1039.
  • DiMaggio, P., and Powell, W., (1983). “The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields”, American Sociological Review, 48, (2), p.345-363.
  • Donaldson, T., and Preston, L., (1995). “The stakeholder theory of corporation: concepts, evidence and implications”, Academy of Management Review, 20 (1), p.65-91.
  • Du, S., and Vieira, E.T., (2012). “Striving for Legitimacy Through Corporate Social Responsibility: Insights from Oil Companies”, Journal of Business Ethics, 110, (4), p.413-427.
  • Du, S., Bhattacharya, C.B., and Sen, S., (2007). “Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24, (3), p.224-241.
  • Dyer, G., and Whetten, D.A., (2006). “Family firms and social responsibility: Preliminary evidence from the S & P 500”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, (6), p.785-802.
  • Egri, C.P., and Ralston, D.A., (2008). ”Corporate responsibility: A review of international management research from 1998 to 2007”, Journal of International Management, 14, p.319-339.
  • Gifford, B., Kestler, A., and Anand, S., (2010). “Building local legitimacy into corporate social responsibility: Gold mining firms in developing nations”, Journal of World Business, 45, p.304-311.
  • Gilberthorpe, E., and Banks, G., (2012). “Development on whose terms?: CSR discourse and social realities in Papua New Guinea’s extractive industries sector”, Resources Policy, 37, p.185-193.
  • Gomez-Mejia, L.R., Hynes, K.T., Nunez-Nickel, M., and Moyano-Fuentes, H.,
  • (2007). “Socioemotional wealth and business risk in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, p.106-137.
  • Guille´n, M., (2000). “Business Groups in Emerging Economies: A Resource-Based View”, Academy of Management Journal, 43, (3), p.362-380.
  • Handelman, J.M., and Arnold, S.J., (1999). “The role of marketing actions with a social dimension: Appeals to the institutional environment”, Journal of Marketing, 63, (3), p.33-48.
  • Hilson, G., (2012). “Corporate Social Responsibility in the extractive industries: Experiences from developing countries”, Resources Policy, 37, p.131-137.
  • Kaynak, H. 2003. ‘The relationship between total quality management practices and their effects of firm performance’. Journal of Operations Management, 21(4), 405–435.
  • Klein, S.B., and Kellermanns, F.W., (2008). ”Editor’s Note: Understanding the noneconomic motivated behavior in family firms: An introduction”, Family Business Review, 21, (2), p.121-125.
  • Kvale, S., (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Lok, J., (2010). “Institutional logics as identity projects”, Academy of Management Journal, 53, (6), p.1305-1335.
  • Maignan, I., and Ferrell, O.C., (2004). “Corporate social responsibility and marketing: An integrative framework”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32, (1), p.3-19.
  • McWilliams, A., Siegel, D.S., and Wright, P.M., (2006). “Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications”, Journal of Management Studies, 43, (1), p.1-18.
  • Özen, Ş., and Küskü, F., (2009). “Corporate environmental citizenship variation in developing countries: An institutional framework”, Journal of Business Ethics, 89, p.297- 313.
  • Özen, Ş., and Yeloğlu, H.O., (2006). “Bir örgüt kimliği olarak ‘Holding’ adının inşası ve aşınması: Eşanlı kurumsallaşma ve çözülme üzerine bir model önerisi”, Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6, (1-2), p.45-84.
  • Palazzo, G., and Scherer, A.G., (2006). “Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework”, Journal of Business Ethics, 66, p.71-88.
  • Patton, M.Q., (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, (3rd Edition) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Pfeffer, J., and Salancik, G., (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective, New York: Harper & Row.
  • Powell, W.W., (1991). “Expanding the scope of institutional analysis”, Powell, W.W. and DiMaggio, P.J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, p.183-203.
  • Powell, W.W., and DiMaggio, P.J., (1981). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Rao, H., Monin, P., and Durand, R., (2003). “Institutional change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy”, American Journal of Sociology, 108, p.795-843.
  • Rubin, H.J., and Rubin, I.S., (1995). Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Ryan, G.W., and Bernard, H.R., (2003). “Techniques to identify themes”, Field Methods, 15, (1), p.85-109.
  • Scott, W.R., (1987). “The adolescence of institutional theory”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, (December), p.493-511.
  • Scott, W.R., (1995). Institutions and organizations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Slack, K., (2012). “Mission impossible?: Adopting a CSR-based business model for extractive industries in developing countries”, Resources Policy, 37, p.179-184.
  • Spangler, I.S., and Pompper, D., (2011). “Corporate social responsibility and the oil industry: Theory and perspective fuel a longitudinal view”, Public Relations Review, 37, p.217-225.
  • Stinchcombe, A.L., (1965). “Social structures and organizations”, J. G. March (Eds.), Handbook of organizations, Chicago: Rand McNally, p.142-192.
  • Suchman, M.C., (1995). “Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches”, Academy of Management Review, 20, (3), p.571-610.
  • Suddaby, R., and Greenwood, R., (2005). “Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, p.35-67.
  • Waddock, S., (2004). “Parallel universes: Companies, academics, and the progress of corporate citizenship”, Business and Society Review, 109, (1), p.5-42.
  • Wert-Gray, S., Center, C., Brashers, D.E., and Meyers, R.A., (1991). “Research topics and methodological orientations in organizational communication: A decade in review”, Communication Studies, 42, p.141-154.
  • Westphal, J.D., Gulati, R., and Shortell, S.M., (1997). “Customization or conformity? An institutional perspective on the content and consequences of TQM adoption”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, (2), p.366-394.
  • Whetten D.A., and Makey, A., (2002). “A social actor conception of organizational identity and its implications for the study of organizational reputation”, Business & Society, 41, p.393-414.
  • Whetten, D.A., (2006). “Albert and Whetten revisited: Strengthening the concept of organizational identity”, Journal of Management Inquiry, 15, p.219-234.
  • Wilson, D.D., and Collier, D.A., (2000). “An empirical investigation of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality award casual model”, Decision Sciences, 31, (2), p.361-390.
  • Wimmer, R.D., and Dominick, J.R., (2003). Mass Media Research, USA: Thomson Wadsworth, p.107-138.
  • Yin, R., (1989). Case study research: Design and methods, London: Sage. Yıldırım-Oktem, O., and Üsdiken, B., (2010). “Contingencies versus external pressure: Professionalization in boards of firms affiliated to family business groups in late-industrializing countries”, British Journal of Management, 21, (1), p.115-130.
  • Young, G.J., Charns, M.P., and Shortell, S.M., (2001). “Top manager and network effect on the adoption of innovative management practices: a study of TQM in a public hospital system”, Strategic Management Journal, 22, (10), p.935-951.
  • Zellweger, T.M., and Astrachan, J.H., (2008). “On the Emotional Value of Owning a Firm”, Family Business Review, 21, (4), p.347-363.
  • Zellweger, T.M., and Nason, R.S., (2008). “A stakeholder perspective on family firm performance”, Family Business Review, 21, (3), p.203-216.
  • Zellweger, T.M., Nason, R.S., Nordqvist, M., and Brush, C.G., (2013). “Why do family firms strive for nonfinancial goals? An organizational identity perspective”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, (2), p.229-248.