Organizational Communication: An Analysis of the Main Perspectives, Main Concepts and Future Directions of the Field

Örgütsel iletişim alanının kapsamı ve bu alanı ilgili displinlerden ayıracak içerik, teori, yöntem, ve uygulamalar üzerine akademik tartışmalar 1980li yıllardan beri devam etmektedir. Bu tartışmalar, örgütsel iletişim alanının derinlemesine anlaşılması, sınırlarının belirlenmesi ve diğer disiplinlerden ayrılan özelliklerinin anlaşılması noktasında hayati öneme sahiptir. Bu temel tartışmalardan hareketle, bu makale örgütsel iletişim alanının tarihçesini, sınırlarını, alandaki temel teorik yaklaşımları (işlevsel, yorumlayıcı, eleştirel),organizasyon, iletişim, kültür, ve kontrol gibi alanda önemli kavramların bu farklı yaklaşımlar içerisinde sunumunu incelemektedir. Ayrıca, literatürdeki boşlukları ve alanın gelecek yönelimleri de bu makale içinde tartışılmaktadır. Bu konuları tartışarak, bu makale örgütsel iletişim alanını bütünsel bir şekilde sunmayı ve bu alanda çalışan akademisyenler için temel bir referans olmayı amaçlamıştır.

There is a scholarly debate since the 1980s regarding the content, theory, methodology and applications that define the scope of organizational communication and separate it from other related disciplines. This debate is critical in the sense that it enables to identity organizational communication in a rich manner and helps us define the scope of the field and its unique characteristics. Based on this debate, this article provided the history and scope of the field, analysis of the major theoretical perspectives in the field (functional, interpretive, and critical), conceptualization of the most critical concepts (organization, communication, culture, voice/control) in these theoretical perspectives. Current gaps and future directions of the field are also discussed in this article. By discussing these topics, this article aimed to provide a holistic view of organizational communication and become a basic reference for scholars in this field.

___

  • Alvesson, Matz, (1993). Cultural Perspectives on Organizations, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Axley, Stephen, (1984). “Managerial and Organizational Communication in terms of the Conduit Metaphor”, Academy of Management Review, 9, 428–437.
  • Berlo, David, (1960). The Process of Communication: An Introduction to Theory and Practice, San Francisco: Rinehart Press.
  • Barge, J. Kevin, (2004). “Reflexivity and Managerial Practice”, Communication Monographs, 71, 70-96.
  • Barker, James, (1993). “Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Selfmanaging Teams”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 408-437.
  • Barker, C. Joan, (1999). Danger, Duty and Disillusion, Illinois: Waveland Press.
  • Berger, R. Charles, (1977). “The covering law perspective as a theoretical basis for the study of human communication”, Communication Quarterly, 25, 7-18.
  • Bryman, Alan, (1999). Leadership in Organizations, London: Sage. Bullis, Connie, (2005). “From Productivity Servant to Foundation to Connection”, Management Communication Quarterly, 18, 595-603.
  • Chan, Janet, (1996). “Changing Police Culture”, British Journal of Criminology, 36, 109-134.
  • Cheney, George, (1995). “Democracy in the Workplace: Theory and Practice from the Perspective of Communication”, Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23, 167-200.
  • Craig, T. Robert, (1983). “Galilean Rhetoric and Practical Theory”, Communication Monographs, 50, 395-412.
  • Craig, T. Robert, (1999). “Communication Theory as a Field”, Communication Theory, 9, 119-161.
  • Conrad, Charles, and Haynes, Julie, (2001). “Development of Key Constructs”, In Fredric M. Jablin and Linda Putnam (eds.), The New Handbook of Organizational Communication, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 44-77.
  • Dawson, Patrick, (2004). “Managing Change”, Dannis Tourish and Owen Hargie (eds.), Key Issues in Organizational Communication, New York: Routledge, pp. 60-73.
  • Deetz, Stanley, (1994). “Future of Discipline: The Challenges, the Research, and the Social Contribution”, Stanley Deetz (ed.), Communication Yearbook, CA: Sage, pp.565-600.
  • Deetz, Stanley, (2001). “Conceptual Foundations”, Fredric M. Jablin and Linda Putnam (eds.), The New Handbook of Organizational Communication, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 3-46.
  • Delia, Jesse, (1987). “Communication Research: A History”, Charles R. Berger and Steven H. Chaffee (eds.), Handbook of Communication Science, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, p. 20-98.
  • Eisenberg, Eric, (1984). “Ambiguity as Strategy in Organizational Communication”, Communication Monographs, 51, 227-242.
  • Eisenberg, E. and Goodall, H. L., (1993). Organizational Communication: Balancing Creativity and Constraint, Bedford: St Martin’s.
  • Fulk, J. and Collins, L., (2001). “Wired Meetings: Technological Mediation of Organizational Gatherings”, Fredric M. Jablin and Linda Putnam (eds.), The New Handbook of Organizational Communication, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 624-663.
  • Geertz, Clifford, (2000). The Interpretation of Cultures, New York: Basic Books. Gregory, L. Kathleen, (1983). “Native-view Paradigms: Multiple Cultures and Culture Conflicts in Organizations”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 359-376.
  • Goldhaber, Gerald, (1978). “Organizational Communication”, Human Communication Research, 5, 76-96.
  • Hardy, C. and Clegg, R. S., (1996). “Some Dare Call it Power”, In Clegg R. Stewart et al. (eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies, London: Sage Publications, pp.622-641.
  • Hylmo, A. and Buzzanell, M. P., (2002). “Telecommuting as Viewed Through Cultural Lenses: An Empirical Investigation of the Discourses of Utopia, Identity, and Mystery”, Communication Monographs, 69, 329-356.
  • Jones, Elizabeth, (2004). “Organizational Communication: Challenges for the New Century”, Journal of Communication, 54, 722-750.
  • Kuhn, Timothy, (2005). “The Institutionalization of Alta in Organizational Communication Studies”, Management Communication Quarterly, 18, 618-627.
  • Kunda, Gideon, (1992). Engineering Culture, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Lewis, K. Laurie, (2006). “Advice on Communicating During Organizational Change: The Content of Popular Press Books”, Journal of Business Communication, 43, 113–137.
  • Martin, Joanne, (1992). Cultures in Organizations, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Martin, Joanne, (2002). Culture Wars, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • McDonald, Peggy, (1991). “The Los Angeles Olympic Organizing Committee: Developing Organizational Culture in the Short Run”. Peter Frost (ed.), Reframing Organizational Culture, Newbury Park: Sage, pp. 26-38.
  • Mcphee, R. D. and Zaug, P., (2001). “Organizational Theory, Organizational Communication, Organizational Knowledge and Problematic Integration”, Journal of Communication, 12, 574-591.
  • McPhee, D. R. and Poole, S., (2001). “Organizational Structures and Configurations”, Frederick M. Jablin and Linda Putnam (eds.), The New Handbook of Organizational Communication, CA: Sage Publications. pp. 503-543.
  • Miller, Vernon, (1994). “Antecedents to Willingness to Participate in a Planned Organizational Change”, Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22, 59-80
  • Motley, T. Michael, (1990). “On Whether One Can (not) Communicate: An Examination Via Traditional Communication Postulates”, Western Journal of Speech Communication, 54, 1-20.
  • Mumby, K. D. and Stohl, C., (1996). “Disciplining Organizational Communication Studies”, Management Communication Quarterly, 10, 50-72.
  • Mumby, K. Dennis, (1993). “Critical Organizational Communication Studies: The Next 10 Years”, Communication Monographs, 60, 18-25.
  • Mumby, K. Dennis, (2001). “Power and Politics”, Frederick M. Jablin and Linda Putnam (eds.), The New Handbook of Organizational Communication, CA: Sage, pp.585- 623.
  • Pacanowsky, M. and O’Donnell-Trujillo, N., (1983). “Organizational Communication as Cultural Performance”, Communication Monographs, 50, 127-147.
  • Papa, J. Michael, (1997). “Organizing for Social Change within Concertive Control Systems: Member Identification, Empowerment, and the Masking of Discipline”, Communication Monographs, 64, 219-249.
  • Peters, J. Durham, (1999). The Problem of Communication, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Peters, J. T. and Waterman, H. R., (1982). In Search of Excellence: Lessons From America’s Best-run Companies, New York: Harper & Row.
  • Pugh, S. D. and Hickson, J. D., (1997). Writers on Organization: An Invaluable Introduction to the Ideas of Leading Authorities of Management, London: Penguin Books.
  • Putnam, Linda, (1983). “The Interpretive Perspective: An Alternative to Functionalism”, Linda Putnam and Michael. E. Pacanowsky (eds.), Communication and Organizations: An Interpretive Approach, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 31- 54.
  • Putnam, Linda, (1986). “Contradictions and Paradoxes in Organizations”, Lee Thayer (ed.), Organizational Communication: Emerging Perspectives, Norwood, NJ: Ablex. pp. 151-167.        
  • Putnam, L. and Krone, J. K., (2006). “Editors’ Introduction”, Linda Putnam and Kathleen J. Krone (eds.), Organizational Communication, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. pp. xxiii – xxiii.
  • Redding, W. C. and Tompkins, K. P., (1988). “Organizational communication: Past and Present Tenses”, Gerald. M. Goldhaber and George. A. Barnett (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Communication Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 5-33.
  • Richetto, M. Gary, (1977). “Organizational Communication Theory and Research: An Overview”, Brent D. Ruben (ed.), Communication Yearbook 1, Transaction Publishers, pp. 331-346.
  • Ruben, D. Brent, (2000). “Systems Theory and the Quality Approach to Organizations”, Linda C. Lederman and David W. Gibson (eds.), Communication Theory: A Casebook Approach, Dubuque, IA: Kendell Hunt, pp. 173-201.
  • Ruben, D. Brent, (2005). “Linking Communication Scholarship and Professional Practice in Colleges and Universities”, Journal of Applied Communication Research, 33, 294-304.
  • Ruben, D. B. and Stewart, P. L., (2006). Communication and Human Behavior (5th edition), Allyn: Bacon.
  • Schein, H. Edgar, (1985). Organizational Culture and Leadership, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Schön, A. Donald, (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, London: Temple Smith
  • Smircich, Linda, (1983). “Concepts of Culture and Organizational Analysis”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 339-358
  • Smircich, L. and Calas, M., (1987). “Organizational Culture: A Critical Assessment”, Frederick Jablin et al. (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Communication, Beverley Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 228-263.
  • Smith, C. R. and Eisenberg, M. E,, (1987). “Conflict at Disneyland: A Rootmetaphor Analysis”, Communication Monographs, 54, 367-380.
  • O’Kane, Paula, et al., (2004). “Communication Without Frontiers: The Impact of Technology Upon Organization”, Dennis Tourish and Owen Hargie (eds.), Key Issues in Organizational Communication, New York: Rutledge, pp. 74-95.
  • Orlikowski, J. Wanda, (1992). “The Duality of Ttechnology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations”, Organization Science, 3, 398-427.
  • Taylor, James, et al., (2001). “Organizational Communication Research: Key Moments, Central Concerns, and Future Challenges”, Communication Yearbook, 24, 99- 137.
  • Taylor, James, (1993). Rethinking the Theory of Organizational Communication: How to Read an Organization, Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing.
  • Thayer, Lee, (1986). Communication and Communication Systems: In Organization, Management, and Interpersonal Relations, Lanham: University Press of America.
  • Tompkins, Philip, and Cheney, George, (1985). “Communication and Unobtrusive Control in Contemporary Organizations”, Robert McPhee and Philip K. Tompkins (eds.), Organizational Communication: Traditional Themes and New Directions, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. pp. 179-210.
  • Van Maanen, Joan, (1991). “The Smile Factory: Work at Disneyland”, Peter Frost et al. (eds.), Reframing Organizational Culture, Newbury Park: Sage, pp. 58-76.
  • Wood, Jennifer, (2004). “Cultural Change in the Governance of Security”, Policing & Society, 14, 31-48.
  • Zorn, E. Theodore, (2000). “Nuts about Change: Multiple Perspectives on Changeoriented Communication in a Public Sector Organization”, Management Communication Quarterly, 13, 515-566.
  • Zorn, E. Theodore, (2002). “The Emotionality of Information and Communication Technology Implementation”, Journal of Communication Management, 7, 160-171.