Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Fen Bilimleri Dersindeki 21. Yüzyıl Becerilerine İlişkin Algıları: Çok Boyutlu Bir Yaklaşım

belirlemektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda ilk olarak Fen Öğreniminde 21.yy. Becerileri ölçeğinin ortaokul öğrencileri için geçerlik çalışması yapılmıştır. Sonrasında öğrencilerin deneyimledikleri 21. Yüzyıl becerileri; öğrenme becerileri (öz yönelimli öğrenme, bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerini kullanarak anlamlı öğrenme, iş birlikçi öğrenme), düşünme becerileri (kritik düşünme, yaratıcı düşünme, problem çözme) ve netice olarak (bilgi üretme yeterliliği) açılarından incelenmiştir. Yapılan analizlerin sonucunda, kullanılan ölçeğin Türkçe formunun öğrencilerin deneyimledikleri 21. Yüzyıl becerilerini ölçmekte kullanılmak için geçerli ve güvenilir olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, bu çalışmadan elde edilen veriler, 21. Yüzyıl becerilerinin fen bilimleri derslerindeki entegrasyonunun orta düzeyde olduğunu ortaya koymuştur

Middle School Students’ Perceptions about Twenty-First-Century Learning Practices in Science Classes: A Multidimensional Approach

The purpose of this study was to determine middle school students’ perceptions about twenty-first-century learning practices that they experience in their science classes. For the specified purpose, firstly, Students’ Perception of 21st Century Learning Practices instrument was validated for Turkish middle school students. Then, students’ perceptions were examined in terms of learning processes for 21th century learning (i.e. selfdirected learning, collaborative learning, and meaningful learning with ICT), thinking processes in 21th century learning (i.e. critical thinking, creative thinking, and authentic problem solving), and outcome in 21th century learning (i.e. self-efficacy for knowledge creation). According to the results, Turkish version of the instrument appears to provide a valid and reliable measure of middle school students’ perceptions about twenty-first-century learning practices. Findings obtained from the administration of the instrument revealed that, integration of 21th century skills to science classes tend to be at moderate levels.

___

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin,103(3), 411-423.
  • Adamson, F., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2014). Policy Pathways for Twenty-First Century Skills. Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills,293-310.
  • Alismail, H. A., & McGuire, P. (2015). 21st Century Standards and Curriculum: Current Research and Practice. Journal of Education and Practice,6(6).
  • Arsad, N. M., Osman, K., & Soh, T. M. (2011). Instrument development for 21st century skills in Biology. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,15, 1470-1474.
  • Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., &
  • Rumble, M. (2012). Defining Twenty-First Century Skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach (pp. 17- 66). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Boholano, H. B. (2017). Smart Social Networking: 21st Century Teaching and Learning Skills. Research in Pedagogy,7(1), 21-29. doi: 10.17810/2015.45
  • Castle, A. (2006). Assessment of the critical thinking skills of student radiographers. Radiography, 12(2), 88–95.
  • Chai, C. S., Deng, F., Tsai, P., Koh, J. H., & Tsai, C. (2015). Assessing multidimensional students’ perceptions of twenty-firstcentury learning practices. Asia Pacific Education Review,16(3), 389-398.
  • Cho, Y. H., Caleon, I. S., & Kapur, M. (2015). Authentic Problem Solving and Learning for Twenty-First Century Learners. Education Innovation Series Authentic Problem Solving and Learning in the 21st Century,3-16.
  • Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2015). Active Learning Approaches to Integrating Technology into a Middle School Science Curriculum Based on 21st Century Skills. Emerging Technologies for STEAM Education,17-37.
  • Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity,12, 43-52.
  • Ersoy, E., & Başer, N. (2013). The effects of problem-based learning method in higher education on creative thinking. 5th World Conference on Educational Sciences.
  • Fahnoe, C., & Mishra, P. (2013). Do 21st Century Learning Environments Support Self-Directed Learning? Middle School Students’ Response to an Intentionally Designed Learning.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.
  • Holbrook, J. (2017). 21st Century Skills and Science Learning Environments. Science Education,385-401. Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (2007). LISREL 8 user's guide. Chicago: Scientific Software.
  • Laar, E. V., Deursen, A. J. V., Dijk, J. A. V., & Haan, J. D. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010
  • Lee, K., Tsai, P., Chai, C., & Koh, J. (2014). Students perceptions of self-directed learning and collaborative learning with and without technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,30(5), 425-437.
  • Lee, K., Tsai, P., Chai, C., & Koh, J. (2014). Students perceptions of self-directed learning and collaborative learning with and without technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,30(5), 425-437.
  • Lombardi, M. M. (2007). Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview. Educause learning initiative, 1(2007), 1‐12.
  • Long, B., & Huey, B. (2009). Skills for self-directed learning [Electronic version] (pp. 1-5).
  • MoNE a. (2018). Elementary science and technology course curriculum (3rd-8th grades). Ankara, Turkey: Board of Education.
  • MoNE b. (2018). Elementary social sciences course curriculum (4th-7th grades). Ankara, Turkey: Board of Education.
  • MoNE c. (2018). Elementary mathematics course curriculum (1st-8th grades). Ankara,Turkey: Board of Education
  • Moylan, W. A. (2008). Learning by project: Developing essential 21st century skills using student team projects. The International Journal of Learning, 15(9), 287-292.
  • Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Uluyol, Ç, & Şahin, S. (2014). Elementary school teachers ICT use in the classroom and their motivators for using ICT. British Journal of Educational Technology,47(1), 65-75.
  • Partnership for 21st century skills. (2008). 21st Century skills, education & competitiveness: A resource and policy guide. Washington.
  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1999). Schools as knowledge building organizations. In D. Keating & C. Hertzman (Eds.), Today’s children, tomorrow’s society: The developmental health and wealth of nations (pp. 274–289). New York: Guilford.
  • Saeid, N., & Eslaminejad, T. (2016). Relationship between Student’s Self-Directed-Learning Readiness and Academic SelfEfficacy and Achievement Motivation in Students. International Education Studies, 10(1), 225.
  • Skryabin, M., Zhang, J., Liu, L., & Zhang, D. (2015). How the ICT development level and usage influence student achievement in reading, mathematics, and science. Computers & Education, 85, 49-58
  • Soh, T. M., Arsad, N. M., & Osman, K. (2010). The Relationship of 21st Century Skills on Students’ Attitude and Perception towards Physics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 546-554.
  • Sukor, N. S., Osman, K., & Abdullah, M. (2010). Students’ achievement of Malaysian 21st century skills in chemistry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1256-1260.
  • Tan, S. C., & Tan, Y. H. (2014). Perspectives of Knowledge Creation and Implications for Education. Education Innovation Series Knowledge Creation in Education, 11-34.
  • Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2012). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21stcentury competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321. doi: 10.1080/00220272.2012.668938
  • Welch, D., & McDowall, J. J. (2010). A comparison of creative strategies in teaching undergraduate students in the visual arts and design. In Paper presented at the ACUADS 2010 conference.
Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • Başlangıç: 1986
  • Yayıncı: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dekanlığı
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Okul Öncesi Çocuklarının Yüzme Batma Kavramı ile İlgili Düşünceleri ve Sınıf İçi Etkileşimin Düşüncelerine Etkisi

Şule ELMALI, Canan LAÇİN ŞİMŞEK

Çalışan Belleğin Farklı Bileşenlerinin 3. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Çarpma Becerisine Etkisi

Selma BOZ, Münire ERDEN

Öz-duyarlığın Vücut Algısı, Beden Kitle İndeksi, Yaş ve Ebeveyn Tutumları ile İlişkisi

Melisa Sevi KOÇ, Fidan KORKUT OWEN

Okul Öncesi Dönem Çocuklarında Zihin Kuramı ve Akran İlişkileri Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi

Sevim GÜRLEYİK, Özlem GÖZÜN KAHRAMAN

Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Fen Bilimleri Dersindeki 21. Yüzyıl Becerilerine İlişkin Algıları: Çok Boyutlu Bir Yaklaşım

Ünzile Elif UĞUR, Semra SUNGUR

Kaynaştırma Sınıflarındaki Normal Gelişim Gösteren Öğrencilerin Prososyal Davranışlarının İncelenmes

Ayşe Hicret GÜDÜK, Dilara YILMAZ

Çevrimiçi Ders Materyallerinin Değerlendirilmesi: EBA Ders Örneği

Çetin GÜLER, Elif ERENSAYIN

Okulların Finansman Yönetimi Açısından Okul Yöneticilerinin Politik Becerileri

Esen ALTUNAY

Paylaşımlı Kitap Okuma Sırasında Tipik Gelişim Gösteren, Otizm Spektrum Bozukluğu ve Zihinsel Yetersizliği Olan Çocukların Annelerinin Kullandıkları Etkileşim ve Dili Destekleme Stratejilerinin İncelenmesi

Ayşenur ÇELİK ŞAHİN, Emine Rüya ÖZMEN

Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Araştırma-Sorgulamaya Yönelik Öz Yeterlik Algılarının Yordanmasında Epistemolojik İnançların Rolü

Munise SEÇKİN KAPUCU, Afra BIYIK