“TÜRKİYE CUMHURİYETİ” DEVLET KURUMLARI RESMİ WEB SİTELERİNDE WEB 2.0 TEKNOLOJİLERİNİN KULLANIM ETKİNLİĞİ ANALİZİ

Bu araştırmanın amacı, günümüzde yaygın olarak kullanılan web 2.0 teknolojilerinin Türkiye Cumhuriyeti'ndeki kamu kurumları olan Bakanlık ve Valilik web sitelerinde ne ölçüde yaygınlaştığını, hangi web 2.0 teknolojilerin kullanıldığını ve bunların ne tür etkilerinin olduğunu araştırmaktır. Bu çalışmada Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Devleti'ne ait tüm bakanlık web siteleri ve 81 ilden rassal olarak seçilmiş 16 ilin valilik web siteleri içerik analizi kullanılarak test edilmiştir. Web 2.0 çerçevesinde analiz edilen web sitelerinde Really Simple Syndication (RSS), Blog, Forum, Sosyal Etiketleme Servisleri, Sosyal Ağ Servisleri, Multimedya paylaşım servislerinin yaygın olarak kullanıldığı bulguları ortaya konmuştur. Bu araştırma 22 bakanlık web sitesi ve rassal seçilen 16 valilik web sitesi ile sınırlandırılmıştır. Araştırmada devlet kurumlarının resmi domainleri (alan adları) üzerinde çalışılmıştır. Devlet kurumu web sitelerinde Web 2.0 teknolojilerinin kullanımının daha planlı ve daha etkin bir çerçevede yürütülmesi, kurum web sitelerinin içerik ve görünüm kalitesini arttıran etkenler olduğu ortaya konmuştur. Web 2.0 teknolojilerinin devlet kurumlarındaki kullanım çeşitliliği ve etkinliğinin içerik analizi yöntemi ile incelenmesi bu alandaki önceki çalışmalara farklı bir perspektif katmaktadır

USE EFFICIENCY AND ANALYSIS OF WEB 2.0 TECHNOLOGIES IN THE “REPUBLIC OF TURKEY” GOVERMENT AGENCIES OFFICIAL WEB SITES

The purpose of this research is to investigate nowadays widely used Web 2.0 Technologies extent to websites and which was used web 2.0 technologies on Institutions of the Republic of Turkey, Ministry and the governorship's websites In this study, all ministry websites of the Republic of Turkey and selected randomly from 81 cities in 16 governorship websites will be tested using content analysis method. Web 2.0 was examined by dimensions and on these web sites, "Really Simple Syndication (RSS)", "blog", "Forum", "Social Tagging Services", "Social Network Services", "Multimedia Sharing Services” is used widely. This research is limited to, 22 ministry website and random selected 16 governorship website. Research has worked on the main domain names of state institutions. State institutions websites, the use of Web 2.0 technologies should be more structured and implementation of a more effective framework. These factors are the most important that increase the content and appearance quality. Use of Web 2.0 technology diversity in state institutions and to examine the effectiveness of the content analysis method adds a different perspective to previous work in this area

PDF

___

ACAR, Ertan. (2015). Türkiye Sosyal Medya Lideri. http://www.radikal.com.tr/yazarlar/ertanacar/turkiye-sosyal-medyada-dunya-lideri-1354432/
AGHAEI, Sareh, Mohammad Ali NEMATBAKHSH - Hadi Khosravi FARSANI. (2012). "Evolution of the world wide web: From WEB 1.0 TO WEB 4.0". International Journal of Web & Semantic Technology, 3(1), ss. 1.
BEKKERS, Victor. (2003). "E-government and the emergence of virtual organizations in the public sector". Information polity, 8(3), ss. 89-101.
BLOG. ((n.d.)). In Wikipedia. http://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blog
BRANDAO JR, F. - C. M. BATISTA. (2009). "E-participation in electoral campaigns: The Brazilian experience". International Journal of Electronic Governance, 2(4), ss. 328-343. doi:10.1504/IJEG.2009.030525
CHAN, Calvin M. L., YiMeng LAU - Shan L. PAN. (2008). "E-government implementation: A macro analysis of Singapore's e-government initiatives". Government Information Quarterly, 25(2), ss. 239-255.
CHUA, Alton YK, Dion H GOH - Rebecca P ANG. (2012). "Web 2.0 applications in government web sites: Prevalence, use and correlations with perceived web site quality". Online Information Review, 36(2), ss. 175-195.
CORMODE, Graham - Balachander KRISHNAMURTHY. (2008). "Key differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0". First Monday, 13(6).
DANIS, Catalina, Mark BAILEY, Jim CHRISTENSEN, Jason ELLIS, Thomas ERICKSON, Robert FARRELL - Wendy A Kellogg IBM TJ WATSON. (2009). "Mobile applications for the next billions: A social computing application and a perspective on sustainability". Strengthening the Role of ICT in Development, 309.
DEČMAN, Mitja. (2009). "Web 2.0 in e-government: the challenges and opportunities of wiki in legal matters". Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Government, ss. 229.
ERKUL, Erdem. (2009). "Sosyal Medya Araçlarının ( Web 2.0 ) Kamu Hizmetleri ve Uygulamalarında Kullanılabilirliği". Türkiye Bilişim Derneği, 116, ss. 96-101.
GEORGESCU, Mircea - Daniela POPESCUL. (2014). "The Uncertainty of Using Web 2.0 Technologies in E-Government Development. Romania's Case". Procedia Economics and Finance, 15, ss. 769-776. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00485-7
KAPLAN, Andreas M - Michael HAENLEIN. (2010). "Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media". Business horizons, 53(1), ss. 59-68.
KOOP, Royce - Harold J. JANSEN. (2009). "Political Blogs and Blogrolls in Canada: Forums for Democratic Deliberation?". Social Science Computer Review. doi:10.1177/0894439308326297
LAI, LindaS L. - Efraim TURBAN. (2008). "Groups Formation and Operations in the Web 2.0 Environment and Social Networks". Group Decision and Negotiation, 17(5), ss. 387-402. doi:10.1007/s10726-008-9113-2
LAWSON, George. (1998). NetState: Creating electronic government. http://www.demos.co.uk/files/netstate.pdf
LAYNE, Karen - Jungwoo LEE. (2001). "Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model". Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), ss. 122.
MANDELSON, P. (1999). "The digital government". In A. C. Leer (Ed.), Masters of the Wired World: Cyberspace Speaks Out (pp. 318–323): Financial Times/Pitman.
MCDERMOTT, Irene E. (2007). All a-twitter about Web 2.0: what does it offer libraries?, 34.
MEIJER, Albert - Marcel THAENS. (2010). "Alignment 2.0: Strategic use of new internet technologies in government". Government Information Quarterly, 27(2), ss. 113-121.
MERGEL, Ines, Charlies M SCHWEIK - Jane E FOUNTAIN. (2009). "The transformational effect of Web 2.0 technologies on government". Available at SSRN 1412796.
MEXT. (2016). "The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology". Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCL2DLwqqYxa0Q5DcGoQGbrw
O'REILLY, Tim. (2005). Web 2.0: Compact Definition? http://radar.oreilly.com/2005/10/web-20- compact-definition.html
O'REILLY, Tim. (2007). "What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software". Communications & strategies(1), ss. 17.
O’REILLY, Tim. (2005). "September 30". What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software.
OSIMO, David. (2008). Web 2.0 in Government: Why and How? ftp://ftp.jrc.es/pub/EURdoc/EURdoc/JRC45269.pdf
PARAMESWARAN, Manoj - Andrew B WHINSTON. (2007). "Research Issues in Social Computing*". Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(6), ss. 336.
PELED, Alon. (2001). "Centralization or Diffusion?: Two Tales of Online Government". Administration & Society, 32(6), ss. 686-709. Retrieved from http://aas.sagepub.com/content/32/6/686.abstract
TALMAÇ, Mehmet Ali. (2013). Bakanlıklar sosyal medyada ne kadar temsil ediliyor? http://rss.emlak27.net/web-haberler/bakanl-305-klar-sosyal-medyada-ne-kadar-temsilediliyor-304-nfografik__30732.html#.VUMabyGqiko
WIKI. ((n.d.)). In Wikipedia. http://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki