___

• Almegta, N. (1997). Correlation of standardized math achievement, DISCOVER math worksheet, ability, and gender of American Indian students. Unpublished manuscript. The University of Arizona, Tucson.
• Baum, S., Owen, S., & Oreck, B. (1996). Talent beyond words: Identification of potential talent in dance and music in elementary students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 93-101.
• Baum, S., Owen, S., & Oreck, B. (1997). Transferring individual self-regulation processes from arts to academics. Arts Education Policy Review, 98, 32-39.
• Bredekamp, S., & Rosegrant, T. (1995). Reaching potentials: Appropriate curriculum and assessment for young children. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
• Caterall, J. S. (1995). Different ways of knowing 1991-1994 National Longitudinal study report. Schools, communities, and the arts: A research compendium. Morrison Institute for public policy, Arizona State University, Tempe.
• Ceci, S.J. (1990). On intelligence: A bioecological treatise on intellectual development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 33-81.
• Chi, M.T.H., Feltovich, P.J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
• Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• College Examination Board. (1993). Profile of SAT and achievement tests taken, 1987-93.
• Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
• Gardner, H. (1992). Assessment in context: The alternative to standardized testing. In B. Gifford & M. O’Connor (Eds.), Changing assessments: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement, and instruction. (pp. 77-120). Boston, MA: Kluver.
• Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st century. New York, NY: Basic Books.
• Getzels, J. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1967). Scientific creativity. Science Journal,3(9), 80-84.
• Getzels, J. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: Wiley & Sons.
• Griffiths, S. E. (1997). The comparative validity of assessments based on different theories for the purpose of identifying gifted ethnic minority students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Arizona, Tucson.
• Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.
• Larkin, J. H. (1983). The role of problem representation in phyisics. In D. Genter & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), pp. 75-98. Mental Models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Maker, C.J. (1982a). Curriculum development for the gifted. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
• Maker, C.J. (1982b). Teaching models in education of the gifted. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
• Maker, C. J. (1993). Creativity, intelligence, and problem-solving: A definition and design for cross-cultural research and measurement related to giftedness. Gifted Education International, 9, 68-77.
• Maker, C. J. (1994). Authentic assessment of problem solving and giftedness in secondary school students. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 6, 19-26.
• Maker, C. J. (1996). Identification of gifted minority students: A national problem, needed changes and a promising solution. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 41-50.
• Maker, C. J. (1997). DISCOVER Problem-Solving Assessment. Quest: the Journal of the Division of Research and Evaluation, National Association for Gifted Children, 1, 3, 5, 7, 9.
• Maker, C.J. & Nielson, A.B. (1995). Teaching/Learning models in education of the gifted. (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
• Maker, C. J. & King, M. A. (1996). Nurturing giftedness in young children. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
• Maker, C. J., Rogers, J. A., Nielson, A. B., & Bauerle, P. (1996). Multiple Intelligences, problem solving, and diversity in the general classroom. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19(4), 437- 460.
• Nielson, A. B. (1994). Traditional identification: Elitist, racist, sexist? New evidence. CAG Communicator: The Journal of the California Association for the Gifted, 3, 18-19, 26-31.
• Powers, S. V. (2003). Evaluation Report: Project LISTO. Tucson, AZ: Creative Research Associates, Inc.
• Renzulli, J. (1978). What makes giftedness: Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180-184.
• Renzulli, J.S. (1986). Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
• Sak, U., & Maker, C.J. (2003a, August). Assessing and Cultivating children’s divergent and convergent thinking using the Problem Continuum. Paper presented at the 15th World Conference for Gifted and Talented Children, Adelaide, South Australia.
• Sak, U., & Maker, C. J. (2003c, April). The predictive validity of the DISCOVER Assessment: Problem solving abilities in intellectual domains. Paper presented at the CEC 2003 Annual Convention and Expo, Seattle, WA.
• Sarouphim, K. (1999a). Discovering multiple intelligences through a performance-based assessment: Consistency with independent ratings. Exceptional Children, 2, pp.151-161.
• Sarouphim, K. (1999b). DISCOVER: A promising alternative assessment for the identification of gifted minorities. Gifted Child Quarterly, 4), 244-251.
• Sarouphim, K. (2000). Internal structure of DISCOVER: A performance-based assessment. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 3), 314-327.
• Sarouphim, K. M. (2001). DISCOVER: Concurrent validity, gender differences, and identification of minority students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 2, 130-138.
• Sarouphim, K. M. (2002). DISCOVER in high school: Identifying gifted Hispanic and Native American students. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 1, 30-38.
• Schiever, S., & Maker, C.J. (1991). Enrichment and acceleration: An overview and new directions. In N. Colangelo., & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education. (pp. 99-110). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
• Schiever, S., & Maker, C.J. (1997). Enrichment and acceleration: An overview and new directions. In N. Colangelo., & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education. (pp. 113-125). 2nd ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
• Shonebaum, J. A. (1997). Assessing multiple intelligences of children who are deaf with DISCOVER process and the use of American Sign Language. Unpublished masters thesis. The University of Arizona, Tucson.
• Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man: Their nature and measurement. New York: Macmillan.
• Sternberg, R.J. (1984). The Triarchic mind: A new theory of human intelligence. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
• Sternberg, R.J. (1986). Conceptions of giftedness. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
• Sternberg, R.J. (1997). What does it mean to be smart? Educational Leadership, 54, 20-24.
• Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Intelligence as developing expertise. Contemporary educational Psychology, 24, 259-375.
• Sternberg, R.J., & Grigorenko, E.L. (2002). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
• Sternberg, R.J., Lautrey, J., & Lubart, T.I. (2003). Models of intelligence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Stevens, B. (2000). Relationship between the DISCOVER Assessment and Wechsler Intelligence Scale as identifiers of gifted children. Unpublished master’s thesis. The University of Arizona, Tucson.
• Torrance, E. P. (1972). Predictive validity of the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking. Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 52-57.
• Vantassel-Baska, Johnson, and Avery (2002). Using performance tasks in the identification of economically disadvantaged and minority gifted learners: Findings from Project STAR. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 110-123.