Çoğulcu demokrasilerde parti içi demokrasi

Çoğunluğun sınırlı egemenliği anlamına gelen çoğulcu demokrasi, gerek çoğunluğun yönetme hakkını kullanabilmesi gerekse azınlığın çoğunluğa dönüsebilmesinde, halkın yönetime katılımına dayanmaktadır. Günümüzde temsili bir biçimde isleyen demokrasilerde katılım, siyasi partiler aracılığıyla gerçeklesmektedir. Bu nedenle çoğulcu demokrasinin islemesine önemli ölçüde katkıda bulunan siyasi partilerin, kendi iç yapılanmalarında demokratik ilkelere uygun hareket etmeleri, o parti içerisinde demokrasiye olan inancı ortaya koyması ve ideal çoğulcu demokratik bir rejime yaklasılması açısından önemlidir. Ancak çoğulcu demokratik düzenin varlığı açısından zorunluluk arz eden husus; parti içi demokrasinin varlığı değil, siyasi partiler arasındaki mücadelenin demokratik esaslara uygun bir biçimde islemesidir. Bu değerlendirmenin temelinde kendisi örgüt olan siyasi parti ile bir örgüt olmayan demokrasinin birbirine karıstırılmaması gerektiği düsüncesi bulunmaktadır. Bu durumda parti içi demokrasinin doğurabileceği çesitli sorunlar da dikkate alınarak, parti içerisinde var olan talepler ile partinin düzen ve isleyisi arasında makul bir denge kurulmalıdır.

Intra-party democracy in pluralist democracies

Pluralist democracy means the limited rule of the majority. This democracy approach is based on the rule of the majority and the right of minority may be the majority. This understanding is very important for people's participation in decision making process. Today due to the current representative democracy, participation is realised via political parties. Since political parties assumed a vital role in the functioning of pluralist democracy, they themselves must have their own internal construction of a democratic order. The presence of intra-party democracy, the ideal approach is important in a pluralist democratic regime. but it is not necessary for the existence of the democratic order. At this point, the organization itself is not an organization with a political party of democracy, and this point should not be confused. Also intra-party democracy can lead to various problems. Therefore a reasonable balance must be struck between demands within the party and organization and functioning of the party.

PDF

___

ARASLI, Oya, Adaylık Kavramı ve Türkiyede Milletvekili Adaylığı, Sevinç Matbaası, Ankara 1972.
ATAR, Yavuz, Çağdas Demokrasinin Siyasal Boyutu: Türkiyede Demokratiklesme ve Anti-Demokratiklesme Göstergeleri, Yeni Türkiye, y. 3, sy. 17, 1997.
ATAR, Yavuz, Seçim Hukukunun Güncel Sorunları, Anayasa Yargısı, c. 23, Anayasa Mahkemesi Yayınları, Ankara 2006.
ATAR, Yavuz, Türk Anayasa Hukuku, Mimoza Yayınları, Konya 2009.
AYBAY, Rona, Çoğunlukçu ve Çoğulcu Demokrasi Ayrımı, Cumhuriyet, 19.06.2010.
BÄCK, Hanna, Intra-Party Politics And Coalition Formation Evidence from Swedish Local Government, Party Politics, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2008.
BAKKER Ryan, JOLLY Seth, POLK Jonathan, Patterns of Dimensionality, Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association Chicago, 31 March - 3 April 2011, http://faculty.maxwell.syr.edu/skjolly/Dim2.pdf, 25.11.2012.
BAKKER Ryan, JOLLY Seth, POLK Jonathan, Complexity in the European Party Space: Exploring Dimensionality with Experts, 2010 European Consortium for Political Research's Fifth Pan-European Conference on EU Politics in Porto Portugal. http://faculty.maxwell.syr.edu/skjolly/Dim1.pdf 25.11.2012.
BEKTAS, Arsev, Demokratiklesme Sürecinde Liderler Oligarsisi, CHP ve AP (1961- 1980), Bağlam Yayınları, İstanbul 1993.
BIELEN Ingrid v., HOPKIN Jonattan, The Presidentialization of Spanish democracy: Sources of Prime Ministerial Power in Post-Franco Spain, The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, Eds. Thomas Poguntke, Paul D. Webb, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2005.
BİLİR, Faruk, Siyasi Partilerin Güncel Sorunları ve Demokratiklesme, Uluslararası Davraz Kongresi Küresel Diyalog, Isparta 2009.
BOUCEK, Francoise, The Structure and Dynamics of Intra-Party Politics in Europe, Perspectives on European Politics and Society, Vol. 3, Issue, 3, 2002.
CAREY, John M., POLGA-HECIMOVICH John, Primary Elections and Candidate Strength in Latin America, The Journal of Politics, Vol. 68, No. 3, August 2006.
CHRYSSOCHOOU, Dimitris, Democracy in the European Union, I.B.Tauris, London 2000.
ÇAPOĞLU, Gökhan, Türkiyede Siyasi Parti Yapılanması, Yeni Türkiye, y. 3, sy. 13, 1997.
DAALDER, Hans, The Rise of Parties In Western Democarcies, Political Parties and Democracy A Journal of Democracy Book Political Parties and Democracy, Eds. Larry Diamond and Richard Gunther, Jhons Hopkins University Press, Maryland 2001.
DAHL, Robert A., Pluralism Revisited, Comparative Politics, Vol. 10, No. 2, January 1978.
DAHL, Robert A., Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition, Yale University Press, New Haven 1971. (Polyarchy)
DALTON Russell J., FARRELL David M., MCALLISTER Ian, Political Parties and Democratic Linkage: How Parties Organize Democracy: How Parties Organize Democracy Comparative Study Of Electoral Systems, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2011.
DALTON, Russell J., Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation, Political Studies, Vol. 56, Issue 1, 2008. (Political Participation)
DALTON, Russell J., Communists and Democrats: Democratic Attitudes in the Two Germanies, British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 24, No. 4, October 1994. (Communists and Democrats)
DEPAUW, Government Party Discipline in Parliamentary Democracies: The Cases of Belgium, France and United Kingdom in the 1990s, Cohesion And Discipline in Legislatures, Ed. Reuven Y. Hazan, Routledge, Oxon 2006.
DIERMEIER Daiıel, VLAICU Razvan, Executive Control and Legislative Success, Review of Economic Studies, Vol., 78, 2011.
DİNÇKOL, Bihterin, Yönetilenlerin Öz Yönetimi - Kamuoyu, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Y. 5, Sy. 10, Güz 2006/2.
DUVERGER, Maurice, Siyasi Partiler, Çev. Ergun Özbudun, Bilgi Yayınevi, Ankara 1993.
ERDOĞAN, Mustafa, Anayasal Demokrasi, Siyasal Kitabevi Yayınları, Ankara 2004.
FAUCHER, Florence, Party organisation and democracy A comparison of Les Verts and the British Green Party, GeoJournal. Vol. 47, Issue 3, 1999.
FELD Lars P., KİRCHG¨ASSNER Gebhard, Direct Democracy, Political Culture, and the Outcome of Economic Policy: A Report on the Swiss Experience, European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 16, 2000.
FINKEL, Steven E., Can Democracy Be Taught?, Journal of Democracy, Volume 14, Number 4, October 2003.
FOWLER James H., KAM Cindy D., Beyond the Self: Social Identity, Altruism, and Political Participation, Journal of Politics, Vol. 69, Issue 3, 2007.
GAUJA, Anika, An Assessment of the Impact of Party Law on Intra-Party Democracy in Common Law Nations, 20th International Political Science Association World Congress, Fukuoka, Japan, 2006.
GIBSON, James L., The Contributions of Truth to Reconciliation: Lessons From South Africa, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 50 No. 3, June 2006.
GÖZTEPE, Ece, Çoğunlukçu Demokrasi Anlayısına Karsı Çoğulcu Demokrasi Modelleri: Normatif Düzenleme Olanakları ve Bunun Sınırlılığı Üzerine Bazı Düsünceler, Çoğulcu Demokrasi Çoğunlukçu Demokrasi İkilemi ve İnsan Hakları Toplantısı, Türkiye Barolar Birliği Yayını, Ankara 2010.
GUNTHER Richard, DIAMOND Larry, Species of Political Parties: A New Typology, Party Politics, vol. 9, no. 2, March 2003..
GÜLSOY, Tevfik, Demokrasilerde Siyasal Parti Teskilatı ve Parti İçi Demokrasi, (Yayımlanmamıs Doktora Tezi), Konya 2000.
HABERMAS Jürgen, Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research, Communication Theory, Vol. 16, Issue 4, November 2006.
HAKYEMEZ, Yusuf Sevki, Çoğunlukçu Demokrasi Anlayısı, Rousseau ve Türk Anayasaları Üzerindeki Etkisi, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, C. 52, Sy. 4, Y. 2003.
HAZAN, Reuven Y., Does Cohesion Equal Discipline? Towards a Conceptual Delineation, Cohesion And Discipline in Legislatures, Ed. Reuven Y. Hazan, Routledge, Oxon 2006.
HEWLETT, Nick, Democracy in modern France, Continuum International Publishing Group, New York 2005.
İNCEOĞLU, Sibel, İnsan Hakları Avrupa Mahkemesi Kararlarında Çoğulculuk, Çoğulcu Demokrasi Çoğunlukçu Demokrasi İkilemi ve İnsan Hakları Toplantısı, Türkiye Barolar Birliği Yayını, Ankara 2010.
KABASAKAL, Mehmet, Factors Influencing Intra-party Democracy and Membership Rights: The Case of Turkey, Party Politics, July 2012.
KAM, Christopher J., Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2009.
KAPANİ, Münci, Politika Bilimine Giris, Bilgi Yayınevi, Ankara 2001.
KAYE Philip, FLAVELLE Luncinda, Part Discipline and Legislative Voting, Canadian Parliamentry Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, Summer 1986.
KENIG, Ofer, Democratization of Party Leadership Selection: Do Wider Selectorates Produce more Competitive Contests?, Electoral Studies, Vol. 28, 2008.
KILIÇ, Hasim, Parti İçi Demokrasi, Yeni Türkiye, y. 3, sy. 13, 1997.
KITSCHELT, Herbert, The Internal Politics of Parties: The Law of Curvilinear Disparity Revisited, Political Studies, Vol. XXXVII, 1989.
KÖKER, Levent, Seçim Sistemleri ve Siyasî Çoğulculuk, Anayasa Yargısı, c. 23, Anayasa Mahkemesi Yayınları, Ankara 2006.
LANE Jan-Erik, ERSSON Svante O., Democracy: a Comparative Approach, Routledge, New York 2003.
LAPALOMBARA, Joseph, Reflections on Political Parties and Political Development, Four Decades Later, Party Politics, Vol. 13 No. 2, March 2007.
LIN, Gang, Leadership Transition, Intra-Party Democracy, And Institution Buildıng Inchina, Asian Survey, Vol. 44, No. 2, March/April 2004.
LIPSET, Seymour Martin, Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 53, No. 1, March 1959.
LIPSON, Eslie, Demokratik Uygarlık, (Çev: Haldun Gülalp, Türker Alkan), Türkiye İs Bankası Kültür Yayınları, Ankara, 1984.
LISI Marco, FREIRE André, Political Equality And The Process Of Candidate Selection: Mps' Views In Comparative Perspective, Representation, Vol. 48, Issue 4, 2012.
LOTSHWAO, Kebapetse, The Lack of Internal Party Democracy in the African National Congress: A Threat to the Consolidation of Democracy in South Africa*, Journal of Southern African Studies, Vol. 35, No 4, December 2009.
MAINWARING Scott, SHUGART Matthew S., Concluision: Presidentialism and The Party System, Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1997.
McCARTY Nolan, POOLE Keıth T., ROSENTHAL Howard, The Hunt for Party Discipline in Congress, American Political Science Review, Vol. 95, No. 3 September 2001.
MIMPEN, Jeroen, Intra-Party Democracy and ıts Discontents Democratization in a Volatile Political Landscape, http://www.nimd.org/documents/I/intraparty_ democracy_and_its_discontents_mimpen.pdf, 27.11.2012.
MOELLENDORF, Darrel, Reconciliation as a Political Value, Journal of Social Philosophy, Volume 38, Issue 2, May 2007.
MOLTCHANOVA, Anna, Nationhood and Political Culture, Journal of Social Philosophy, Volume 38, Issue 2, May 2007.
MOONEY Annabelle, EVANS Betsy, Globalization The Key Concepts, Taylor & Francis, Oxon 2007.
OWENS, Jhon E., Explaining Party Cohesion and Discipline in democratic Legislatures: Purposiveness and Contexts, Cohesion And Discipline in Legislatures, Ed. Reuven Y. Hazan, Routledge, Oxon 2006.
ÖZBUDUN, Ergun, Batı Demokrasilerinde ve Türkiyede Parti Disiplini, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Yayınları, Ankara 1968.
ÖZBUDUN, Ergun, Siyasal Partiler, Sevinç Matbaası, Ankara 1979.
ÖZBUDUN, Ergun, Siyasi Partilerin Hukukça Düzenlenmesi İhtiyacı ve Örgütlenme Sorunları, Siyasi Partiler ve Demokrasi, TESAV yayınları, 1999, http://www.ekitapyayin.com/id/070/siyasi1-1sunus.htm 22.11.2012.
PETAUX, Jean, Democracy and Human Rights for Europe: the Council of Europe's Contribution, Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg, 2009.
PETTITT, Robin T., Electoral Reform, New Polıtıcs And Intra‐Party Democracy In Post‐Devolutıon Scotland, Representation, Vol. 44, No. 4, 2008.
PLATTNER, Marc, Democracy Without Borders?: Global Challenges to Liberal Democracy, Rowman & Littlefield, Maryland 2008.
RAHAT Gideon, HAZAN Reuven, Democracy within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and their Political Consequences, Oxford University Press, Oxford New York 2010.
ROKKAN, Stein, Citizens, Elections, Parties: Approaches To The Comparative Study Of The Processes Of Development, McKay, Oslo 1970.
SARTORI, Giovanni, Demokrasi Teorisine Geri Dönüs, Çev. Tuncer Karamustafaoğlu- Mehmet Turan, Yetkin Yayınları, Ankara 1993.
SCHUMPETER, Joseph A., Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Routledge, London New York, 2012.
SELÇUK, Sami, Zorba Devletten Hukukun Üstülüğüne, Yeni Türkiye Yayınları, Ankara 1999.
SHUGART, Matthew Søberg, Semi-Presidential Systems: Dual Executive And Mixed Authority Patterns, French Politics, Vol. 3, 2005.
SUNAY, Reyhan, İfade Hürriyetinin Muhtevası ve Sınırları, Liberal Düsünce Topluluğu, Ankara 2001.
TEORELL Jan, HADENIUS Axel, Democracy without Democratic Values: A Rejoinder to Welzel and Inglehart, Studies in Comparative International Development, Vol. 41, Issue 3, Fall 2006.
TEORELL, Jan, Political participation and three theories of democracy: A research inventory and agenda, European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 45, Issue 5, 2006.
TEZİÇ, Erdoğan, Anayasa Hukuku, Beta Yayınları, İstanbul 2003.
TUNCAY, Suavi, Parti İçi Demokrasi ve Türkiye, Gündoğan Yayınları, Ankara 1996. (Parti İçi Demokrasi)
TUNCAY, Suavi, Parti İçi Demokrasi ve Türkiye, Yeni Türkiye, y. 3, sy. 17, 1997.
UYGUN, Oktay, Demokrasinin Çoğunlukçu ve Çoğulcu Modelleri İki Bin Besyüz Yıllık Bir Tartısmanın Analizi, Çoğulcu Demokrasi Çoğunlukçu Demokrasi İkilemi ve İnsan Hakları Toplantısı, Türkiye Barolar Birliği Yayını, Ankara 2010.
WAUTERS, Bram, Explaining Participation in Intra-Party Elections: Evidence from Belgian Political Parties, Party Politics, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2010.
YANIK, Murat, Parti İçi Demokrasi Açısından Aday Belirleme Yöntemleri, Erzincan Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, C. XI, Sy. 34, 2007.
YANIK, Murat, Parti İçi Demokrasi, Beta Yayınları, İstanbul 2002.
YAYLA, Atilla, Parti İçi Demokrasi" ve Demokrasi, http://www.liberaldt. org.tr/guncel/Yayla/ay_demokrasi1.htm, 13.10.2004.
YAYLA, Atilla, Siyaset Teorisine Giris, Siyasal Kitabevi, Ankara 2004.