“Ulus”un Makbul Kadınları: Rövanşist Kent Politikaları Bağlamında Bir Değerlendirme**

Bu çalışma “rövanşist kent” kavramını analitik bir lens olarak kullanarak Ulus bölgesindeki neoliberal kentsel yenileme sürecinin“makbul” kadın kurgusuna etkilerini tartışmaktadır. Ulus bölgesinde bulunan Bentderesi genelevinin yıkılması sonrasında seks işçileribu bölgeden çeşitli şekillerde uzaklaştırıldı. Ulus bölgesi Ankara’nın manevi merkezi olarak pazarlanmaya başlandı ve muhafazakâraile odaklı bir mekân haline geldi. Radikal modernite ve neoliberal rövanşist dönem olarak tanımladığım iki dönemde seks işçilerineyönelik uygulamaları ve “makbul” kadının tanımının değişimine etkisini tartışacağım. “Üçlü ikilik” kavramını kullanarak “makbul”kadının tanımı değişirken seks işçilerinin her daim bir “öteki” olarak kurgulandığına değinecek ve dolayısıyla ataerkilliğin süreklilikve kopuşlarını analiz edeceğim.

In Search for Femina Grata: Revanchist UrbanPolicies in a Historical District of Turkey

This study uses the analytical lens of the “revanchist city” to examine the neoliberal urban renewal processes in Ulus, a historicaldistrict in Ankara, Turkey’s capital city, in which prostitutes work. This study takes a comparative approach to examine theconstruction of femina grata by analyzing the law, practices, and political projects in relation to women in the radical modernityperiod of Turkey. It also analyzes current neoliberal revanchist interventions that have taken place in Ulus and looks at their gendered meanings in accordance with implemented urban renewal strategies. I mainly argue that neoliberal revanchist policiescarried out in Ulus aim to cultivate city spaces for capital and attract families who engage in pious activities, and thus do not includethose women and families who remain secular through the creation of a moment of “triple dualism.”

___

  • Aalbers, M. B. (2011). The revanchist renewal of yesterday’s city of tomorrow. Antipode, 43(5), 1696-1724.
  • Alemdaroğlu, A. (2005). Politics of the body and eugenic discourse in Early Republican Turkey. Body & Society, 11(3), 61-76.
  • Ankara’nın göbeğinde fuhuş rezaleti! (2014, 19 May). Yeni Akit. Retrieved from https://www.yeniakit.com.tr/haber/ ankaranin-gobeginde-fuhus-rezaleti-18377.html
  • Atkinson, R. (2003). Domestication by cappuccino or a revenge on urban space? Control and empowerment in the management of public spaces. Urban Studies, 40(9), 1829- 1843.
  • Bacchi, C. and Eveline, J. (2010). Mainstreaming politics: Gendering practices and feminist theory. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press.
  • Batuman, B. (2005). Identity, monumentality, security: building a monument in early Republican Ankara. Journal of Architectural Education, 59(1), 34-45.
  • Batuman, B. (2015). “Everywhere is Taksim”: The politics of public space from nation-building to neoliberal Islamism and beyond. Journal of Urban History, 41(5), 881–907.
  • Belge, B. (2011). Yargıtay üyesinin namus gerekçesi 21 yıl öncesinden kalma. Bianet. Retrieved from https://bianet. org/kurdi/kadin/127733-yargitay-uyesinin-namusgerekcesi-21-yil-oncesinden-kalma
  • Bondi, L. (1994). Gentrification, work and gender identity. In A. L. Kobayashi, (Ed.), Women, Work and Place (p. 182– 200). Quebec: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
  • Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2002). Cities and the geographies of “actually existing neoliberalism.” Antipode, 34(3), 349–379.
  • Brenner, N. and Theodore, N. (2005). Neoliberalism and the urban condition. City, 9(1), 101–107.
  • Butler, J. (2012). Can one lead a good life in a bad life? Adorno Prize Lecture. Radical Philosophy, 176, 9.
  • Card, C. (2010). Confronting evils: Terrorism, torture, genocide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Caslin, S. (2010). Flappers, amateurs, and professionals: The spectrum of promiscuity in 1920s Britain. In K. Hardy, and S. Kingston (Eds). New sociologies of sex work (p. 11-22). Farnham: Ashgate.
  • Cixous, H. (1988). Writing differences: Readings from the seminar of Hélène Cixous. Open University Press.
  • Cockburn, C. (1977). The local state: management of cities and people. Race & Class, 18(4), 363-376.
  • Colomb, C. (2012). Pushing the urban frontier: temporary uses of space, city marketing, and the creative city discourse in 2000s Berlin. Journal of Urban Affairs, 34(2), 131–152.
  • Coşar, S. and Yeğenoğlu, M. (2011). New grounds for patriarchy in Turkey? Gender policy in the age of AKP. South European Society and Politics, 16(4), 555-573.
  • Cresswell, T. (2010). Towards a politics of mobility. Environment and planning D: society and space, 28(1), 17-31.
  • Degen, M. M. and Rose, G. (2012). The sensory experiencing of urban design: the role of walking and perceptual memory. Urban Studies, 49(15), 3271-3287.
  • Ditmore, M. H. (Ed.). (2006). Encyclopedia of prostitution and sex work (Vol. 1). Greenwood Publishing Group.
  • Doğan, A. E. (2005). Gökçek’in Ankara’yı neo-liberal rövanşçılıkla yeniden kuruşu. Planlama, 4, 130-138.
  • Douglas, M. (2003). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. Routledge.
  • Durakbasa, A. and Ilyasoğlu, A. (2001). Formation of gender identities in republican Turkey and women’s narratives as transmitters of’herstory’of modernization. Journal of Social History, 35(1), 195-203.
  • Edensor, T. (2010). Walking in rhythms: place, regulation, style and the flow of experience. Visual Studies, 25(1), 69-79.
  • Eşsiz, V. (2012). Devletin eli beli sopası: Anlatılmamış sürgünden kabahatlere Türkiye’de trans bedenin denetimi. In C. Çakırlar, and S. Delice (Eds.), Cinsellik muamması: Türkiye’de queer kültür ve muhalefet (s. 185-220). Istanbul: Metis Yayınları.
  • Evered, E. Ö. and Evered, K. T. (2013). Sex and the capital city: the political framing of syphilis and prostitution in early republican Ankara. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 68(2), 266–299.
  • Evered, E. Ö. and Evered, K. T. (2013). Protecting the national body: regulating the practice and the place of prostitution in early republican Turkey. Gender, Place & Culture, 20(7), 839-857.
  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punishment: The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Random.
  • Frug, M. J. (1992). A postmodern feminist legal manifesto (an unfinished draft). Harvard Law Review, 1045-1075.
  • Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L. (1966). Awareness of dying. (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351327923
  • Henderson, L. (1991). Law’s patriarchy. Law & Society Review, 25(2), 411-444.
  • Hobsbawm, E. and Ranger, T. (Eds.). (2012). The invention of tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hubbard, P. (2004). Revenge and injustice in the neoliberal city: uncovering masculinist agendas. Antipode, 36(4), 665–686.
  • Hubbard, P. and Sanders, T. (2003). Making space for sex work: Female street prostitution and the production of urban space. International Journal of Urban and regional research, 27(1), 75-89.
  • Türk Dil Kurumu (TDK). İffet. Güncel Türkçe Sözlük. Retrieved from https://sozluk.gov.tr/
  • Kalish, R. A. (1968). Life and death: dividing the indivisible. Social Science and Medicine, 2, 249–259.
  • Kandiyoti, D. (1996). Gendering the Middle East: Emerging perspectives. New York: Syracuse University Press.
  • Kandiyoti, D., Bora, A., Sayılan, F., Tekeli, Ş., Tapınç, H. and Özbay, F. (2013). Cariyeler, bacılar, yurttaşlar: kimlikler ve toplumsal dönüşümler. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
  • Kandiyoti, D., and Saktanber, A. (Eds.). (2002). Fragments of culture: The everyday of modern Turkey (1st edition). New Brunswick, N.J: Rutgers University Press.
  • Králová, J. (2015). What is social death? Contemporary Social Science, 10(3), 235–248.
  • Kristeva, J. (1986). The kristeva reader. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Kurtoğlu, A. (2009). Erkek egemenliği, kültürel şiddet ve hukuk. Toplum ve Bilim, 114, 74–97.
  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Lefebvre, H. (2004). Rhythmanalysis: Space, time and everyday life. (S. Elden and G. Moore, Trans.). London; New York: Continuum.
  • Lupton, D. (1995). The imperative of health: Public health and the regulated body. SAGE. https://www.doi. org/10.4135/9781446221976
  • MacKinnon, C. A. (1982). Feminism, Marxism, method, and the state: An agenda for theory. Signs, 7(3), 515–544.
  • MacKinnon, C. A. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Massey, D. (1994). Space, place, and gender. Durham: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Parla, A. (2001). The “honor” of the state: Virginity examinations in Turkey. Feminist Studies, 27(1), 65–88.
  • Pateman, C. (1983). Defending prostitution: charges against ericsson. Ethics, 93(3), 561-565.
  • Patterson, H. O. (1982). Slavery and social death: A comparative study. London: Harvard University Press.
  • Pratt, A. C. (1997). The Cultural industries production system: A case study of employment change in Britain, 1984–91. Sage Journals, 29(11), 1953-1974.
  • Pink, S. (2007). Walking with video. Visual studies, 22(3), 240- 252.
  • Rubin, G. S. (1984). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In E. C. S. Vance (Ed.), Pleasure and danger: Exploring female sexuality. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Schinkel, W., Suvarierol, S. and Van Houdt, F. (2011). Neoliberal communitarian citizenship: Current trends towards earned citizenship in the United Kingdom, France and the Netherlands. International Sociology, 26(3), 408– 432.
  • Sibley, D. (1988). Survey 13: Purification of space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 6(4), 409–421.
  • Smart, C. (1989). Feminism and the power of law. London; New York: Routledge.
  • Smith, N. (1996). The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the revanchist city. London; New York: Routledge.
  • Smith, N. (2002). New globalism, new urbanism: gentrification as global urban strategy. Antipode, 34(3), 427-450.
  • Sorkin, M. (Ed.). (1992). Variations on a Theme Park: the new American city and the end of public space. New York: Hill and Wang.
  • Sudnow, D. (1967). Passing on. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Swanson, K. (2007). Revanchist urbanism heads south: The regulation of indigenous beggars and street vendors in Ecuador. Antipode, 39(4), 708–728.
  • Şahin, U. (2017, 25 June). AKP’nin amacı mimariyi de muhafazakârlaştırmak! Birgün. Retrieved from https://www.birgun.net/haber/akp-nin-amacimimariyi-de-muhafazakarlastirmak-166609
  • Şengül, T. (2010, 4 August). Geneleve özel yaklaşımlar: Kirlilik ve tehdit algısı. Birgün. Retrieved from https://www.birgun. net/haber/geneleve-ozel-yaklasimlar-kirlilik-ve-tehditalgisi-11989
  • Tekeli, İ. (2010). The story of Istanbul’s modernisation. Architectural Design, 80(1), 32–39.
  • Uitermark, J. and Duyvendak, J. W. (2008). Civilising the city: Populism and revanchist urbanism in Rotterdam. Urban Studies, 45(7), 1485–1503.
  • Uluğ, H. N. (1997). Hemşehrimiz Atatürk. Ankara: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
  • Wright, M. W. (2006). Public women, profit, and femicide in northern Mexico. South Atlantic Quarterly, 105(4), 681- 698.
  • Wyers, M. D. (2012). The wicked Istanbul: The regulation of prostitution in Early Turkish Republic. Istanbul: Libra Book.
  • Yalım, İ. (2002). Toplumsal belleğin ulus meydanı üzerinden kurgulanma çabası. In G. A. Sargın (Ed.), Ankara’nın kamusal yüzleri. Başkent üzerine mekân-politik tezler (p. 157-214). İstanbul: İletişim.