Güvenlikli Sitelerde Yönetimin İşlevleri ve Güç İlişkileri

Güvenlikli Sitelerde Yönetimin İşlevleri ve Güç İlişkileri ÖZ Bu makale, güvenlikli sitelerde ortaya çıkan yönetim sistemlerini yapı, işlev ve site içerisindeki güç ilişkileri açısından ele almaktadır. Güvenlikli siteler her geçen gün yaygınlaşmasıyla bu yeni yaşam alanlarını tercih eden kentli nüfus da her geçen gün artmaktadır. Bu durum güvenlikli siteleri kentsel yaşam açısından daha da önemli hale gelmektedir. Güvenlikli siteler üzerine yapılan araştırmalar genellikle sosyo-mekansal ayrışma, dışlanma ve cemaat arayışı gibi konulara odaklanmaktadır. Bu çalışmada ise güvenlikli siteler, site yönetimi açıdan değerlendirilmektedir. Güvenlikli sitelerde ortaya çıkan yönetimlerin ekonomik açıdan güçlü olmaları, yerel demokrasi açısından site sakinlerini temsil güçlerinin olması ve yerel yönetimlerin alt yapı, temizlik, güvenlik vb. gibi bazı işlevlerini site sınırları içinde yerine getirmesi güvenlikli siteleri kentlerin yönetimi açısından önemli bir konu haline getirmektedir. Bu çalışma ile güvenlikli site yönetimlerinin yerel yönetimlerin işlevlerini yerine getirebilecek düzeyde gelişip gelişmediğinin ortaya konulması amaçlanmaktadır. Bu amaçla çalışmada güvenlikli sitelerdeki yönetim yapıları ve site içi güç ilişkileri incelenmektedir. Güvenlikli sitlerin yönetim yapıları incelenirken site yönetiminin oluşturulması, site yönetimlerinin işlevleri, site sakinlerinin site yönetimine katılım durumları, sitede yönetim oluşturulması gibi noktalara odaklanılmaktadır. Çalışmada nitel araştırma yöntemi kullanılmaktadır. Çalışmanın verileri Türkiye’nin başkenti Ankara’nın Çankaya ve Eryaman bölgelerindeki güvenlikli sitelerde yaşayan site sakinleri ve site yöneticileriyle yapılan derinlemesine görüşmelerden elde edilmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda güvenlikli sitelerde yönetim yapısının sitenin büyüklüğüne göre değiştiği tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca güvenlikli site yönetimlerinin hem site içerisinde hem de yerel yönetimle ilişkilerde önemli işlevlerinin olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ancak güvenlikli site sakinlerinin bu işlevlerin öneminin bilincinde olmadıkları görülmüştür. Anahtar Kelimeler: Güvenlikli siteler, site yönetimi, yerel yönetim, güç ilişkileri Functions of Homeowner Associations and Power Relations in the Gated Communities ABSTRACT This article examines the management systems of gated communities in terms of structure, function and power relations within the site. With the expansion of the gated communities, the urban population living on these complexes is increasing day by day. Accordingly, gated communities are becoming more and more important in terms of urban life. Researches conducted on gated communities is often related to issues such as socio-spatial segregation, exclusion and seeking community. In this study, the gated communities are considered from the management point of view. The aim of the study is to indicate whether homeowners’ associations of gated communities have improved at a level of performing the functions of local governments. For this purpose, the management structures in the gated communities and the power relations within these communities are studied. While exploring the management structures of the gated communities, the focus is on formation of homeowner associations, the functions of homeowner associations, the participation of the residents in the community management, and formation of homeowner associations on the communities. Qualitative research method is applied in the study. The study's data have been obtained from in-depth interviews conducted with residents living in gated communities and managers in Çankaya and Eryaman regions of Ankara, Turkey's capital city. As a result of the study, it was determined that the management structure of the gated communities differs according to the size of the community. In addition, it was found out that homeowner associations have important functions both within the community and in relations with local governments. However, it was observed that the residents of the gated communities are not aware of the importance of these functions. Keywords: Gated communities, homeowner associations, local government, power relation

Structural Concepts and Change in Science Fiction The Sample of Arrival Film

Genre films have similar characteristics formally and thematically. Science fiction films have themes such as technology, space, scientific experiments and robots. They use science to form fictional reality. They’re affected by the context of the world wars and the circumstances formed before cultural and politic revolutions. There are science fiction films having cultural, political references or prepared for propaganda. They interact with other genres. The culture industry commercially decides which genres they interact more with. The social circumstances and the directors’ original style effect the production. In this study, Arrival (Denis Villeneuve, 2016) was evaluated in the context of science fiction genre’s interaction with other genres and it is aimed to find out if the genre changed in the continuum of social and cultural change. Text analysis technique was used in the genre analysis of Arrival. Derrida’s method of deconstruction was used to determine the structural change of the genre. As a result of the study, it is concluded that Arrival reflects the style of its director Denis Villeneuve in terms of content and atmosphere. It is concluded that Arrival defends the idea that the cooperation of the countries of the world is more valuable than war and conflict.

___

  • Alver K. (2010). Siteril Hayatlar: Kentte Mekânsal Ayrışma ve Güvenlikli Siteler (2.b.). Ankara: Hece Yayınları.
  • Ayata S. (2002). The new middle class and the joys of suburbia in: D. Kandiyoti and A. Saktanber (Eds) Fragments of Culture: The Everyday of Modern Turkey, (pp. 25 – 43). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Blakely, J. E. and Snyder G. M. (1997). Fortress America: Gating Communities in the United States. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press and Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
  • Blandy, S. and Lister, D. (2005). Gated Communities: (Ne)Gating Community Development? Housing Studies. 20(2), 287-301.
  • Blandy, S., Dixon J. and Dupuis A. (2006). Theorising Power Relationships in Multi-owned Residential Developments: Unpacking the Bundle of Rights. Urban Studies, 43(13), 2365-2383.
  • Blandy, S., and Wang, F., (2013). Curbing the Power of Developers? Lav and Power in Chinese and English Gated Urban Enclaves. Geoforum, 47, pp. 199-208.
  • Caldeira, T., (2000). City of Walls: Crime, Segregation and Citizenship in Sao Paulo. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Danış, D. (2001). İstanbul’da Uydu Yerleşmelerin Yaygınlaşması: Bahçeşehir Örneği. 21. Yüzyıl Karşısında Kent ve İnsan. Gümüşoğlu, F. (Haz.), (ss. 151-160), İstanbul: Bağlam Yayınları.
  • Danış, D., Perouse, J. F. (2005). Zenginliğin Mekânda Yeni Yansımaları: İstanbul’da Güvenlikli Siteler. Toplum ve Bilim. 22(3). 92-103.
  • Frantz, K., (2006). Private gated neighbourhoods: a progressive trend in US urban development. in, Private Cities: Global and Local Perspectives, G. Blasze, C. Webster and K. Frantz, (Eds), (pp. 61-73). Londan and Newyork: Routledge.
  • Geniş Ş. (2007) Producing Elite Localities: The Rise of Gated Communities in Istanbul. Urban Studies, 44(4), 771-798.
  • Graham, S. and Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering Urbanism. Routledge, London.
  • Judd, D. (1995). The Rise of the New Walled Cities. In Spatial Practices, Ligget,H. & Perry, D. (Eds.), (pp.144-165). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Kurtuluş H. (2011) Gated Communities as a Representation of New Upper and Middle Classes in Istanbul. İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 49-65.
  • Lang R. E. and Danielsen K. A. (1997). Gated communities in America: walling out the world? Housing Policy Debate 8(4): 867–877.
  • Le Goix, R. (2006). Gated Communities As Predators Of Public Resources: The Outcomes Of 73 Fading Boundaries Between Private Management And Public Authorities in southern California, in, Private Cities: Global and Local Perspectives, G. Blasze, C. Webster and K. Frantz, (Eds), (pp. 73-86). Londan and Newyork: Routledge.
  • Le Goix, R. and Webster, C., (2006). Gated Communities, Sustainable Cities and a Tragedy of the Urban Commons. Critical Planning, v. 13. 41-62.
  • Low S. (2003) Behind the Gates: Life, Security and The Pursuit of Happiness in Fortress America. New York: Routledge.
  • McKenzie E. (2011). Beyond Privatopia: Rethinking Residential Private Government. Washington, DC.: The Urban Institute Press.
  • McKenzie E. (1994). Privatopia. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
  • McKenzie E. (2006). Construction the Pomerium in Las Vegas: A Case Study of Emerging Trends in American Gated Communities, Housing Studies, 20(2), 187-203.
  • Öncü, A. (1997). The myth of ‘ideal home’ travels across cultural borders in Istanbul, in Space, Power and Culture. A. Öncü and P. Weyland, (Eds), pp. 56–72. London: Zed Books.
  • Roitman S. (2005). Who Segregates Whom? The Analysis of a Gated Community in Mendoza, Argentina. Housing Studies. 20 (2): 303–321.
  • Roitman, S. (2010). Gated Communities: Definations, Causes and Consequences. Urban Design and Planning. 163. 31-38.
  • Vesselinow E. (2008). Members Only: Gated Communities and Residential Segregation in the Metropolitan United States. Sociological Forum. 23(3): 536-555.
  • Webster, C. (2001). Gated Cities of Tomorrow: A Pragmatic Path to Urban Reform. Town Planning Review. 72(2): 149–169.
  • Webster, C. (2002). Property rights and the public realm: Gates, green belts and Gemeinschaft, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29(3), 397–412.