Practice of the Decision of the National Question in the 20s of the XX century

Article is devoted to synthesis of practice of the solution of an ethnic question in Kazakhstan in the twenties. In the article the history and a historiography of a problem of interethnic processes in Kazakhstan in the 20th years of the XX century are considered. Giving a retrospective assessment to the published literature on a historiography of the Soviet society, including on a historiography of the international relations, it should be noted negative impact of the party and state documents for the concept of national policy that undoubtedly led to wrong concepts and ideological dogmas. Therefore everything listed led to inadequate reflection of historical reality, tendentiousness of judgments, practice of concealing and distortions In the article the main problems of a historiography of establishment of the Soviet power in the region and Sovietization of the Kazakh aul, formation of the Kazakh Autonomous SSR and the Kazakh SSR are also considered. The analysis of publications of this period showed strengthening of attention of researchers to an ethnic perspective. Changes in social-class structure of the population of Kazakhstan, social and economic transformations in the Kazakh aul and in the Russian village, the national peasantry, demographic characteristics of the population were mainly studied.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

historiography, interethnic processes, national intelligentsia, tolerance

Practice of the Decision of the National Question in the 20s of the XX century

Keywords:

historiography, interethnic processes, national intelligentsia, tolerance,

PDF

___

1. Valıhanov Ch.Ch. Sobranıe sochınenıı v pıatı tomah. – T.5. – Alma-Ata: Glavnaıa redaksıa KSE, 1985. – S. 309.
2. Altynsarın Y. Po povodý goloda v kırgızskoı stepı // Sobranıe sochınenıı v treh tomah. –T.2. – Alma-Ata: Naýka, 1976. – S. 104.
3. Abaı. Knıga slov. – Alma-Ata: El, 1992. – S.272.
4. Býkeıhanov A. Izbrannoe. – Almaty: Kazak Ensıklopedıasy, 1995. – S. 70-71.
5. Nazarbaev N.A. V potoke ıstorıı. – Almaty: Atamýra, 1999. – S. 296.
6. Dýlatov M. Shygarmalary. – Almaty: Jazýshy, 1991. – 384 b.
7. Kýdabaeva R. Gazeta «Kazah» kak ıstorıcheskıı ıstochnık // Kazahstan v nachale XX veka: metodologıa, ıstorıografıa, ıstochnıkovedenıe. Sbornık stateı. – Almaty: Instıtýt ıstorıı ı etnologıı, 1993. – S. 156.
8. Nýrpeısov K. Alash hám Alashorda. – Almaty: Atatek, 1995. – 256 b.
9. Nam I.V. Kazahskıe avtonomısty na І Sıbırskom oblastnom sezde // Ideı ı realnostı evrazııstva: Materıaly Valıhanovskıh chtenıı «Istorıcheskıe kornı ı perspektıvy evrazııstva kak sosıokýltýrnogo ı sosıopolıtıcheskogo fenomena». – Almaty: Daık- Press, 1999. – S. 160.
10. Safarov G. Kolonıalnaıa revolıýsıa (Opyt Týrkestana). – Almaty: Jalyn, 1996. – S. 272.