BINARY TENSE SYSTEM IN KAZAKH, RUSSIAN AND ENGLISH LANGUAGES

The article analyzes the representation of binary tense system in Kazakh, Russian and English languages. The binarity as the universal law of perception of all things is reflected in categorization of the surrounding world, in contradistinction of various phenomena of language and at the conceptual level. The peculiarities of absolute and relative time representations in grammatical category of tense are analyzed; the oppositions of connection at the level of two interrelated categories of aspect and tense in Russian, Kazakh and English languages are defined. The field approach with the analysis of semantic and metaphorical oppositions have been applied here in order to research the category of tense. The nuclear conceptual and semantic oppositions, their national linguistic peculiarities connected with polychronism and monochronism of the examined cultures are defined. In lexical and phraseological "representation of time" the metaphorical component is allocated with such models as "time – eternity"; "time – river/water"; "time – space"; "time – man"; "time – female"; "time – animal" where the binary nature of human perception of surrounding reality is also exhibited.

BINARY TENSE SYSTEM IN KAZAKH, RUSSIAN AND ENGLISH LANGUAGES

The article analyzes the representation of binary tense system in Kazakh, Russian and English languages. The binarity as the universal law of perception of all things is reflected in categorization of the surrounding world, in contradistinction of various phenomena of language and at the conceptual level. The peculiarities of absolute and relative time representations in grammatical category of tense are analyzed; the oppositions of connection at the level of two interrelated categories of aspect and tense in Russian, Kazakh and English languages are defined. The field approach with the analysis of semantic and metaphorical oppositions have been applied here in order to research the category of tense. The nuclear conceptual and semantic oppositions, their national linguistic peculiarities connected with polychronism and monochronism of the examined cultures are defined. In lexical and phraseological "representation of time" the metaphorical component is allocated with such models as "time – eternity"; "time – river/water"; "time – space"; "time – man"; "time – female"; "time – animal" where the binary nature of human perception of surrounding reality is also exhibited.

___

  • 1. Litvin F.A. About semantic categories of syntax//Semantic categories of language and methods of their analysis. – Ufa, 1985.
  • 2. Bondarko A.V. Principles of functional grammar and issues of aspectology. / Editor-in-chief V.N. Yartseva. 2nd publishing. – М.: ―Editorial‖ of URSS, 2001. – 208 p.
  • 3. Vasilyev L.M. Modern linguistic semantics. – M.: ―The higher school‖, 1990. – 176 p.
  • 4. Boldyrev N.N. Language categories as knowledge format//Issues of cognitive linguistics. – 2006. – No. 2. – P. 5 – 22.
  • 5. Linguistic encyclopedic dictionary. / Editor-in-chief V.N. Yartseva – M.: ―Soviet encyclopedia‖, 1990. – 685 p.
  • 6. Rosenthal D. E., Telenkova M.A. Dictionary- reference of linguistic terms. – M., 1976//http:www.textologia.ru/slovari/lingvisticheskie-terminy/kategoriya-yazikovaya/? q=486&n=2195
  • 7. Philosophy. Encyclopedic dictionary. / Edited by A.A. Ivin. – M.: ―Gardariki‖, 2004.//https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_philosophy
  • 8. Efremova T.F. New dictionary of Russian language. Lexicon and word-formation//http:efremova-online.ru/about/
  • 9. Newton I. Mathematical beginnings of natural philosophy. – M., 1989.
  • 10. Arutyunova N.D. Time: models and metaphors.//Logical analysis of language: Language and time. – M., 1997. – P. 51-61.
  • 11. Akhmanova O.S. Dictionary of linguistic terms. – M.: Publishing house ―Soviet Encyclopedia‖, 1966. – 486 p.
  • 12. Gyuyo M. Origin of the idea of time. – St. Petersburg, 1899.
  • 13. Uspensky B.A. History and semiotics (perception of time as semiotic problem)//Selected works. – Vol.1. – M, 1996. – P. 9-70.
  • 14. Arutyunova N.D. Language and world of the person. – M.: ―Languages of the Russian culture‖, 1999. – 896 p.
  • 15. Hall Ch.J. Morphology and mind: A unified approach to explanation in linguistics. – L.; N.Y., 1992. – 224 p.
  • 16. Abdigaliyeva G.K. Valuable identification of the Kazakh culture //https://articlekz.com/ article/8268
  • 17. Valuable parameters of nomadic ethnos//http:www.kazportal.kz/tsennostnyie-parametryi-kochevogo-etnosa/
  • 18. Orynbekov M.S. Pre philosophy of proto Kazakhs. – Almaty: Publishing house ―Olke‖, 1994. – 207 p.
  • 19. The Kazakh traditions of anniversary - mushelzhas//https:// kvent.kz/ eventopedia/ birthday/ mushel-zhas.html
  • 20. Paducheva E.V. About compatibility of an adverbial modifier of time with an aspect and tense of a verb: reference point//National Technical Initiative. – 1992. – Series 2. – No. 3. – P. 34 – 40.
  • 21. Sokolova E.E., Gridina N.V. Aspectuality as a pragmatical category//Philological sciences. Issues of the theory and practice. – Tambov: ―Diploma‖, 2008. – No. 2 (2). – P. 120 – 121.
  • 22. Russian. Encyclopedia. / Editor-in-chief Yu.N. Karaulov. 2nd edition, processed and added – M.: Big Russian encyclopedia; ―Drofa‖, 1997. – 721 p.
  • 23. Mustayoki A. Concept of aspectuality of the New World//Russian: historical destinies and present time: II International congress of researchers of Russian language//http: www.helsinki. fi/mustajok/ pdf/ponjatie_aspektualnosti.pdf.
  • 24. Russian grammar of Academy of Sciences of the USSR//http://rusgram.narod.ru/1490-1515.html
  • 25. Bondarko A.V. Aspect and tense of the Russian verb (meaning and use). – M.: ―Education‖, 1971. – 239 p.
  • 26. Bondarko A.V. Temporality: Temporal deixis and issues of the meaning of a form of the present//Theory of functional grammar. Temporality. Modality. – L.: ―Science‖, 1990. – P. 21 – 32.
  • 27. Myrkin V.Ya. An aspect and tense of a verb in the Russian and German languages: (comparative analysis). – L., 1989. – 125 p.
  • 28. Petrukhina E.V. Russian verb: categories of an aspect and tense (in the context of modern linguistic research). – M.: ―MAX‖. Press, 2009. – 208 p.
  • 29. Jacobson R.O. About structure of the Russian verb // Jacobson R.O. Selected works. – M.: ―Progress‖, 1985. – P. 210 – 221.
  • 30. Kazhbulatova L. S. Fundamentals of grammar of Kazakh language. – Almaty: Publishing house ―LEM‖, 2009. – 492 p.
  • 31. Vorontsova G.N. The meaning of a perfect (Present Perfect in modern English): abstract of a thesis of Doctor of Philosophical Science. – M., 1953. – 32 p.
  • 32. Smirnitsky A.I. Morphology of modern English. – M.: ―Publishing of literature in foreign languages‖, 1959. – 440 p.
  • 33. Bondarko A.V. Functional grammar. – L.: ―Science‖, 1984. – 136 p.
  • 34. Tolstoy N.I. A magic circle of time (representations of Slavs).//Logical analysis of language: Language and time. – M., 1997. – P. 17 – 27.
  • 35. Mineralov Yu.I. Slavic pagan mythology http://fanread.ru/book/9266027/?page=1
  • 36. Tolstoy N.I. Language and national culture: Sketches on Slavic mythology and ethno linguistics. – M.: Publishing house ―Indrik‖, 1995. – 512 p.
  • 37. Logical analysis of language: language and time. / Editor-in-chief N.D. Arutyunov, T.E.Janko. -M.: ―Indrik‖, 1997. -352 p.