ROLE AND IMPORTANCE OF APPLIED EURASIANISM OF THE TURKIC STATES AND MONGOLIAN EMPIRE IN THE FOUNDATION OF THE CONCEPT OF THE EURASIANISM

The article discusses the relationship of theoretical and applied Eurasianism on the example of the empire of Chinggis Khan, the Golden Horde and the Timurid state. How often do we ask questions of causation of a certain scientific and theoretical concept and historical event? Meanwhile, causation is obvious. It is connected both with the concrete application of scientific terminology and the vision of its founders of the problems of scientific knowledge. The Chinggis Khan empire, the Golden Horde, the Timurid state and the concept of Eurasianism became such closely intertwining phenomena. In a concrete historical aspect, the Eurasians tried to realize and evaluate the revolutionary ideas that triumphed in the once mighty Russian Empire. The reasons for self-examination was more than enough. Understanding the fait accompli outside the historical context was not possible and not advisable. The article is devoted to the analysis of the concept of statehood in Eurasianism, identifying the causes and consequences of the emergence of this idea on the example of the analysis of individual historical phenomena. A comparative analysis of the concept of statehood revealed a clear link between the emergence of the idea of Eurasianism and its historical prerequisites.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

eurasianism, polyculture society, statehood, person, Golden Horde, East, West, third way

ROLE AND IMPORTANCE OF APPLIED EURASIANISM OF THE TURKIC STATES AND MONGOLIAN EMPIRE IN THE FOUNDATION OF THE CONCEPT OF THE EURASIANISM

Keywords:

eurasianism, polyculture society, statehood, person, Golden Horde, East, West, third way,

PDF

___

1. Russian Eurasianism: An Ideology of Empire \\ Sarah Dixon Klump. https:// www. Wilson center.org/publication/russian-eurasianism-ideology-empire.
2. Bassin, Mark, et al., editors. ―Narrating kulikovo: Lev Gumilev, Russian Nationalists, and the Troubled Emergence of Neo-Eurasianism.‖ Between Europe and Asia: The Origins, Theories, and Legacies of Russian Eurasianism, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, Pa., 2015, pp. 165–186. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt15nmjch.13.
3. Laruelle, Marlene, et al., editors. ―Postface: The paradoxical legacy of eurasianism in contemporary Eurasia.‖ Between Europe and Asia: The Origins, Theories, and Legacies of Russian Eurasianism, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, Pa., 2015, pp. 187–194. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt15nmjch.14.
4. PålKolstø, Helge Blakkisrud \\ The New Russian Nationalism: Imperialism, Ethnicity and Authoritarianism 2000–2015\\Pages: 288\\Copyright Date: 2016\\Edinburgh University Press (p 279)
5. Williams, D.S.M. History, vol. 72, no. 234, 1987, pp. 165–166. JSTOR, www.jstor. org/ stable/24415703.
6. Halperin, Charles J. ―George Vernadsky, Eurasianism, the Mongols, and Russia.‖ Slavic Review, vol. 41, no. 3, 1982, pp. 477–493. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/2497020.
7. EVANS, CHARLES T. ―VASILII BARTHOLD: ORIENTALISM IN RUSSIA?‖ Russian History, vol. 26, no. 1, 1999, pp. 25–44. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/24659245.
8. LARUELLE, MARLÈNE. ―Conspiracy and Alternate History in Russia: A Nationalist Equation for Success?‖ Russian Review, vol. 71, no. 4, 2012, pp. 565–580., www.jstor. org/stable /23263930.
9. ―The Mongol Empire and the Golden Horde.‖ Russia and the Golden Horde: The Mongol Impact on Medieval Russian History, by CHARLES J. HALPERIN, Indiana University Press, 1985, pp. 21–32. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1c0gmrs.8.
10. ―THE PATRON OF THE TURKIC PEOPLES.‘‖ The Gumilev Mystique: Biopolitics, Eurasianism, and the Construction of Community in Modern Russia, by Mark Bassin, 1st ed., Cornell University Press, 2016, pp. 273–305. JSTOR, www.jstor. org/stable /10.7591/ j.ctt18kr 63n. 16.
11.Pritsak, Omeljan. ―Moscow, the Golden Horde, and the Kazan Khanate from a Polycultural Point of View.‖ Slavic Review, vol. 26, no. 4, 1967, pp. 577–583. JSTOR, www.jstor. org /stable/ 492610.