New Paradigm of the Multicultural Educational Environment

The purpose of the article is to study the educational and educational environment in the modern world, which became the objects of globalization. This was facilitated by the development of multi-ethnic society, which leads to profound changes in the structure and content of all public institutions of all states that affect the issues of culture, philosophy, and education. It is interesting that in the second half of the XX century multiculturalism officially recognized Canada, USA, Australia, UK, Germany, France, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland and other countries. The United States, Canada, and Australia have common educational and training settings, especially in the concept of multicultural education. They combine the expectations of interethnic and intercultural dialogue. Modern higher educational institutions of the USA, Canada and Australia change strategies and programs to meet the needs of students from different ethnic and cultural groups carried out training of specialists who are able to respond effectively to the realities of a multicultural society. The crisis of multiculturalism in Europe was named a state in which the state and society are presented as disparate communities living side at the side, but those that do not cooperate, do not identify themselves as unified state. But despite the declarations of failure to try to create a multicultural society, leading European countries continue to support immigration. Today, the transformation of Ukraine into an open society is the democratization of society, the construction of a rule of law through the recognition of basic human rights and freedoms, and the expansion of opportunities for the development of the spiritual and material needs of the individual. These development trends are quite controversial in Ukraine, requiring a rethinking of the goals and results of education. If people do not know their history and are not responsible for this responsibility, anyone can take advantage of this weakness and to highlight historical facts in his own way, for their own interests, which often happens today.

New Paradigm of the Multicultural Educational Environment

The purpose of the article is to study the educational and educational environment in the modern world, which became the objects of globalization. This was facilitated by the development of multi-ethnic society, which leads to profound changes in the structure and content of all public institutions of all states that affect the issues of culture, philosophy, and education. It is interesting that in the second half of the XX century multiculturalism officially recognized Canada, USA, Australia, UK, Germany, France, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland and other countries. The United States, Canada, and Australia have common educational and training settings, especially in the concept of multicultural education. They combine the expectations of interethnic and intercultural dialogue. Modern higher educational institutions of the USA, Canada and Australia change strategies and programs to meet the needs of students from different ethnic and cultural groups carried out training of specialists who are able to respond effectively to the realities of a multicultural society. The crisis of multiculturalism in Europe was named a state in which the state and society are presented as disparate communities living side at the side, but those that do not cooperate, do not identify themselves as unified state. But despite the declarations of failure to try to create a multicultural society, leading European countries continue to support immigration. Today, the transformation of Ukraine into an open society is the democratization of society, the construction of a rule of law through the recognition of basic human rights and freedoms, and the expansion of opportunities for the development of the spiritual and material needs of the individual. These development trends are quite controversial in Ukraine, requiring a rethinking of the goals and results of education. If people do not know their history and are not responsible for this responsibility, anyone can take advantage of this weakness and to highlight historical facts in his own way, for their own interests, which often happens today.

___

  • Scott P. (2000) Globalisation and the University // Alma Mater of the VEA., No. 4., 3 – 8
  • Milward A. S. (1984) The reconstruction of Western Europe, 1945-51. – London: Routledge.
  • Sale Benhabib. (2005) The claims of culture. Equality and diversity in the global era // TRANS. engl.; under the editorship of V. L. Inozemtsev. – M.: Logos.
  • Mamonova V. Multiculturalism: diversity and the multiple [Electronic resource]. – Mode of access : http: // credonew.ru / content/view /606/32/.
  • Multiculturalism. The history [Electronic resource]. – Mode of access: http://traditio.ru/wiki/ Multiculturalism
  • Malakhov V. (2001) The discreet charm of racism and other articles. – M.: Modest Kolerov and the House of intellectual books. Ronan de Kodak. Multiculturalism / www. Immigranty.qxd
  • The big sociological dictionary: collins eng.-eng. - eng.-Rus. /comp. John. Geri., Jerry D. – M.: Veche, AST, 2001. – Vol. 1.
  • Berghe P. (2002) Multicultural Democracy: Can it work? / P. Berghe // Nations and Nationalism., № 8(4), 33–63.
  • Kymlicka W. (2002) Opalski M. Can Liberal Pluralism Be Exported? Western Political Theory and Ethnie Relations in Eastern Europe. - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kymlicka W. (2006) Immigration, Multiculturalism, and the Welfare State / W. Kymlicka // Ethics & International Affairs. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 43–47.
  • Huntington S. (2004) Who are we?: Challenges to American national identity. – M.: OOO AST: Tranzitkniga.
  • Banks J. (1981) Multiethnic Education: Theory and Practice – Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Nieto S. (2012) Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education [Text] – London: Pearson.
  • Sliter K. (2012) Multicultural Education in Your Classroom – New York.
  • Balitskaya I. (2009) Multicultural education in the United States, Canada and Australia: author. dis. d-RA Sciences.
  • Grzega Joachim Reflections on conсepts of English for Europe British English, American English, Euro-English, Global English. – P. 44–64. – http://www1.ku-eichstaett.de/SLF/EngluVglSW/ELiX /index.htm.
  • Wallerstein I. (2006) World-system analysis: Introduction. – M.: Publishing house territory of the future. Wallerstein I. (2003)The end of the familiar world: Sociology of XXI century – M.: Logos.
  • Tumuhairwe G. (2013) Analysis of Library and Information Science/Studies (LIS) education today: th e inclusion of indigenous knowledge and multicultural issues in LIS Curriculum / G. K. Tumuhairwe // IFLA World Library and Information Congress, Singapore. American Memory from the Library of Congress. Retrieved from http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/index.html [іn English]. World Digital Library. Retrieved from http://www.wdl.org [іn English].
  • As Germany has become a country of migrants. Cooperation without borders. The crisis of multiculturalism and issues of national policy / edited by M. B. Pogrebinsky and A. K. Tolpygo. – M.: Whole World, 2013.
  • Götz I. (2011) Deutsche Identitäten: Die Wiederentdeckung des Nationalen nach 1989 / I. Götz. – Köln, Wien. Merkel demanded that immigrants learn German // http://webground.su/topic/2010/10/17/t21
  • Roth A.-L. (2013) Neuer Bundestag: Wer kommt, wer bleibt, wer geht. / A.-L. Roth // Der Spiegel. 22 October, 9-11.
  • Germany 2050: the old, sick, road [Electronic source]. – Mode of access: http://zgroup.com.ua/article.php?articleid=2930
  • Dyachenko L. (2016) Trends in professional development of teachers in countries of the European Union and the United States of America: monograph / L. M. Dyachenko, N. M. Marusinec, N. V. Pazura, N. A. Postriga, J. M. Pilinski – Kyiv: Institute of pedagogical and adult education of NAPS of Ukraine.
  • What is the consequence of the refusal of the Europeans of the multicultural tolerance? // http://bankomet.com.ua/2011/02/tchem-tchevat-otkaz-evropeytsev-o...; Sarkozy: an Attempt to build a multicultural society in France failed // http://korrespondent.net/world/1184999/print 14. The split to a multicultural integration? European criticism and the Russian way // http://uralistica.com/profiles/blogs/ot-multikulturnogo-raskola-k-1
  • Rymarenko Y. (1996) Small encyclopedia of political science. – K.: Genesis.