GLOBAL TAX COMPETITION AND ITS REFLECTIONS ON FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENTS: TURKEY-EU ANALYSIS1

Bu çalışmada, 2000-2013 döneminde Türkiye ve 6 Avrupa Birliği ülkesinde vergi rekabetinin yansımaları analiz edilmiştir. Bu bağlamda, kurumlar vergisi oranı ile doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımları arasında ilişki olup olmadığı panel veri yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda, kurumlar vergisi oranı ile doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımları arasında negatif ilişki olduğu tespit edilmiştir

KÜRESEL VERGİ REKABETİ VE YANSIMALARI: TÜRKİYE AB ANALİZİ

The reflections of tax competition in Turkey and six Eurepean Union countries covering the years of 2000-2013 is analysed in this paper. In this context, whether the relationship between corporation income tax and foreign direct investment is analysed with panel data methods. As a result of analysis, the negative relationship between the corporation income tax and foreign direct investment is determined

___

  • Baltagi, H. Badi and Chihwa K. (2000). “Nonstationary Panels, Cointegration in Panels and Dynamic Panels: A Survey”, Advances in Econometrics, 15, pp. 7-51.
  • Buettner, T. (2002). “The Impact of Taxes and Public Spending on the Location of FDI: Evidence from FDI Flows within Europe”, ZEW Discussion Paper, No:02.
  • Cassou, Steven P. (1997). “The Link Between Tax Rates and Foreign Direct Investment”, Applied Economics, Vol:29, 1295-1301.
  • Cummins, J. G ve Hubbard, R.G. (1994). The Tax Sensitivity of Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from FirmLevel Panel Data, University of Chicago Press.
  • Çukurçayır, S. (2015). Küresel Vergi Rekabeti ve Yansımaları, Birinci Baskı, Gazi Kitabevi.
  • Devereux, M. P. ve Freeman H.(1995). “The Impact of Tax on Foreign Direct Investment: Empirical Evidence and the Implications for Tax Integration”, International Tax and Public Finance, Vol:2(1),85-106.
  • Devereux, M.P, Lockwood, B. ve Redoano, M. (2004). “Do Countries Compete over Corporate Tax Rates?”, CEPR Discussion Paper
  • Hadri, K. (2000). “Testing for Stationarity in Heterogeneous Panel Data”, Econometric Journal, Volume 3 (2), 148–161.
  • Harris, R. ve Sollis R. (2003). “Applied Time Series Modelling and Forecasting”, First Edition, England: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
  • Hubert, F. ve Pain, N. (2002). “Fiscal Incentives, European Integration and the Location of Foreign Direct Investment”, The Manchester School, Vol. 70, 2002, s.336-363.
  • Krogstrup, S. (2004). “A Synthesis of Recent Development in the Theory of Capital Tax Competition”, EPRU Working Paper.
  • Kwaitkowski, D., Phillips P. C.B., Schmidt, P. ve Shin, Y. (1992). “Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity against the Alternative of a Unit Root: How Sure are We that Economic Time Series have a Unit Root?”, Journal of Econometrics, 54, 159–178.
  • Levin, A., Lin, C.F. ve Chu, C.S.J. (1992). “Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties”, Journal of Econometrics, .1-24.
  • Pedroni, P. (1999). “Critical Values For Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors”, Oxford Bulletin of Economic and Statistics, Special Issue, 0305-9049.
  • Pedroni, P. (2000). “Fully Modified OLS for Heterogeneous Cointegrated Panels”, Advances in Econometrics, 15, pp. 93–130.
  • Philips, P.C.B., Bruce ve Hansen, B. (1990). “Statistical Inference in Instrumental Variables Regressions with I(1) Processes”, Review of Economic Studies, Vol:57, 99-125.
  • Rodrik, D. (1997). “Trade, Social Insurance and the Limits to Globalization”, NBER Working Paper, No.5905.
  • Stock, J.H. ve Watson, M.W. (1993). “A Simple Estimator of Cointegrating Vectors in Higher Order Integrated Systems”, Econometrica, Vol:61(4), 783-820.
  • Swenson, D.L. (1994). “The Impact of U.S. Tax Reform on Foreign Direct Investment in the United States”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol:54, 89-112.
  • Wheeler, David and Ashoka, M. (1992). “International Investment Location Decisions: The Case of U.S. Firms”, Journal of International Economics, Vol:33(2), 57-76.